H 3085

South Carolina General Assembly
126th Session, 2025-2026
Bill 3085
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)
A bill
TO AMEND THE SOUTH
CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 63-15-220, RELATING TO PARENTING
PLANS, SO AS TO CREATE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST
OF THE CHILD TO SPEND APPROXIMATELY AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF TIME WITH EACH PARENT
WHEN BOTH PARENTS ARE WILLING, ABLE, AND FIT; AND BY AMENDING SECTION
63-15-240, RELATING TO CHILD CUSTODY ORDERS, SO AS TO REQUIRE THE COURT TO TAKE
INTO CONSIDERATION CERTAIN FACTORS WHEN DETERMINING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST
OF A CHILD, TO REQUIRE THAT A CHILD CUSTODY ORDER INCLUDE FINDINGS OF FACT IF
THE TIME-SHARING SCHEDULE DOES NOT ALLOCATE APPROXIMATELY EQUAL PARENTING TIME
TO EACH PARENT, AND TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS TO MODIFY CHILD CUSTODY ORDERS.
Be it enacted by the
General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1.  Section 63-15-220 of the S.C. Code is amended to read:
    Section
63-15-220. (A)(1)
At all temporary hearings where custody is contested, each parent must prepare,
file, and submit to the court a parenting plan, which reflects parental
preferences, the allocation of parenting time to be spent with each parent, and
major decisions, including, but not limited to, the child's education, medical
and dental care, extracurricular activities and religious training. However,
the parties may elect to prepare, file, and submit a joint parenting plan.
       (2) There is a rebuttable presumption
that a time-sharing schedule of approximately equal allocation of parenting
time to each parent is in the best interest of the child when both parents are
willing, able, and fit. In determining whether the presumption is rebutted, the
court shall evaluate the evidence taking into consideration the best interest
of the child pursuant to Section 63-15-240(B).
       (3) The court shall issue
temporary and final custody orders only after considering these parenting
plans; however, the failure by a party to submit a parenting plan to the court
does not preclude the court from issuing a temporary or final custody order.
    (B)
At the final hearing, either party may file and submit an updated parenting
plan for the court's consideration.
    (C)
The South Carolina Supreme Court shall develop rules and forms for the
implementation of the parenting plan.
SECTION 2.  Section 63-15-240 of the S.C. Code is amended to read:
    Section
63-15-240. (A) In issuing or
modifying an order for custody affecting the rights and responsibilities of the
parents, the order may include, but is not limited to:
       (1)
the approval of a parenting plan;
       (2)
the award of sole custody to one parent with appropriate parenting time for the
noncustodial parent;
       (3)
the award of joint custody, in which case the order must include:
  (a)
residential arrangements with each parent in accordance with the needs of each
child;  and
  (b)
how consultations and communications between the parents will take place,
generally and specifically, with regard to major decisions concerning the child's
health, medical and dental care, education, extracurricular activities, and
religious training;
       (4)
other custody arrangements as the court may determine to be in the best
interest of the child.
    (B)
In issuing or modifying a custody order, the court must consider the best
interest of the child, which may include, but is not limited to:
       (1)
the temperament and developmental needs of the child;
       (2)
the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the
needs of the child;
       (3)
the preferences of each child;
       (4)
the wishes of the parents as to custody;
       (5)
the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each
parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent,
who may significantly affect the best interest of the child;
       (6)
the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent-child
relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate,
including compliance with court orders;
       (7)
the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve
the child in the parents' dispute;
       (8)
any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child;
       (9)
the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child;
       (10)
the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments;
       (11)
the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences;
       (12)
the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a
disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself,
must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement
is not in the best interest of the child;
       (13)
the child's cultural and spiritual background;
       (14)
whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected;
       (15)
whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the
effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has
occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or
between the parent and the child;
       (16) whether one parent
has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in
the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons;  and
       (17) other factors as
the court considers necessary.
       (16) whether one parent has relocated
more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past
year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons;
       (17) the frequency with which a
parent would be likely to leave the child in the care of a nonrelative on
evenings and weekends when the other parent would be available and willing to
provide care; and
       (18) other factors as the court
considers necessary.
    (C) A custody order issued or modified
by the court must be supported by written findings of fact if the order
establishes a time-sharing schedule that does not allocate approximately equal
parenting time to each parent, which must address why it is not in the best
interest of the child for each parent to have approximately equal parenting
time.
    (D) A determination of custody, a
parenting plan, or a time-sharing schedule may not be modified without a
determination that modification is in the best interest of the child and a
showing of a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstance.
SECTION 3.  This act takes effect upon approval
by the Governor.
----XX----
This web page was last updated on December 06, 2024 at 10:36 AM