- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 65
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 65, the Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Andy Biggs (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Natural Resources, and last saw action on Jan 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Record
Text
H.R. 65 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb65/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 65 IH: Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-01-03text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 65 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Gosar ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILLTo amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to further restrict the Secretary of the Interior from designating certain lands used for national defense-related purposes as critical habitat for any species under that Act and to broaden exclusions and exemptions from that Act for such defense-related purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act .2.Exclusion of military institutions as critical habitatSection 4(a)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(3)(B) ) is amended to read as follows:(i)The Secretary shall not designate as critical habitat—(I)any military installation or a State-owned National Guard installation, or any portion thereof, as such terms are defined in section 100 of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670 ); or(II)any other lands, waters, or geographical area not described in clause (i) that is otherwise designated for use by the Secretary of Defense including by any contractor of the Department of Defense, if the Secretary of Defense determines in writing and submitted to the Secretary of the Interior that such area is necessary for military training, weapons testing, or any other reason determined appropriate by such Secretary of Defense.(ii)The Secretary of Defense shall not be required to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, under section 7(a)(2) of this Act with respect to agency action, regardless of whether the area described in clause (i) is subject to an integrated natural resources management plan prepared under section 101 of the Sikes Act ( 16 U.S.C. 670a )..3.Additional exclusions and exemptions from Endangered Species Act of 1973 for defense-related operationsSection 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1539 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:(k)Exclusion for national defense-Related operations(1)ExclusionsThe prohibitions under section 9 shall not apply with respect to—(A)the taking of any endangered species or threatened species, or the importation or exportation of any such species taken as prohibited by such section, by military personnel engaged in a national defense-related operation;(B)damaging or destroying any threatened or endangered species, or removing, cutting, digging up, damaging, or destroying any such species, by military personnel engaged in a national defense-related operation; or(C)an injury to or mortality of a threatened or endangered species that results from, but is not the purpose of, a national defense-related operation,regardless of whether the operation is conducted on a military installation or other area described in section 4(a)(3)(B)(i).(2)DefinitionsFor the purposes of this subsection—(A)the term national defense-related operation means—(i)research, development, testing, and evaluation of military munitions, other ordnance, and weapons systems;(ii)the training of members of the Armed Forces in the use and handling of military munitions, other ordnance, and weapons systems;(iii)general training and military preparedness; or(iv)any action or duty that the Secretary of Defense deems necessary to support the Department of Defense in its mission; and(B)the term military personnel means—(i)a member of the Armed Forces; and(ii)a civilian employee or contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier) of the—(I)Department of Defense (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department); or(II)any other Federal agency, or any provisional authority, to the extent such employment relates to supporting the mission of the Department of Defense overseas..
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-01-03
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025
hb65/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)
Sponsors
Rep. Andy Biggs (R) sponsors H.R. 65, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 65 went before 1 committee: Natural Resources.
Actions
H.R. 65 has taken 2 actions since Jan 3, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 3, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Jan 3, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.Natural Resources Committee |
Votes
H.R. 65 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 65 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act — Display Title
- Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to further restrict the Secretary of the Interior from designating certain lands used for national defense-related purposes as critical habitat for any species under that Act and to broaden exclusions and exemptions from that Act for such defense-related purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 12 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 65 in 2 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Animals, Budget/Appropriations, Natural Resources, Energy/Nuclear, Homeland Security, Immigration.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | — | Arizona | 1 | 1 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | 1 | 1 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASHLEY NUNES | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BRETT HARTL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CAMDEN WEBER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CASSIE FERRI | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRISTOPHER WESTFALL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANIEL MOSS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JOHN GLASS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARY BEETHAM | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RACHEL RILEE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ROBERT DEWEY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| STEPHANIE KUROSE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TAYLOR RUSH | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 2025 first_quarter | $80K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | 2025 first_quarter | $64.6K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 65 under Environmental Protection, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 65’s is Environmental Protection.
hr65/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com