Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 59

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 59, the Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Andy Biggs (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jun 10, 2025: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 13.


Record

Text

H.R. 59 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb59/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 59 IH: Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-03
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 59 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Mr. Biggs of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Ogles ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To specify the state of mind required for conviction for criminal offenses that lack an expressly identified state of mind, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025 .
2.
State of mind element for criminal offenses
(a)
In general
Chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
28.
State of mind when not otherwise specifically provided
(a)
Definitions
In this section—
(1)
the term covered offense —
(A)
means an offense—
(i)
specified in—
(I)
this title or any other Act of Congress;
(II)
any regulation; or
(III)
any law (including regulations) of any State or foreign government incorporated by reference into this title or any other Act of Congress; and
(ii)
that is punishable by imprisonment, a maximum criminal fine of at least $2,500, or both; and
(B)
does not include—
(i)
any offense set forth in chapter 47 or chapter 47A of title 10; or
(ii)
any offense incorporated by section 13(a) of this title;
(2)
the term knowingly , as related to an element of an offense, means—
(A)
if the element involves the nature of the conduct of a person or the attendant circumstances, that the person is aware that the conduct of the person is of that nature or that such circumstances exist; and
(B)
if the element involves a result of the conduct of a person, that the person is aware that it is practically certain that the conduct of the person will cause such a result;
(3)
the term state of mind means willfully, intentionally, maliciously, knowingly, recklessly, wantonly, negligently, with reason to believe, or any other word or phrase that is synonymous with or substantially similar to any such term; and
(4)
the term willfully , as related to an element of an offense, means—
(A)
that the person acted with knowledge that the person’s conduct was unlawful; and
(B)
if the element involves the nature, attendant circumstances, object, or result of the conduct of a person, that—
(i)
the person had knowledge of the nature, attendant circumstances, object, or result of the conduct of the person; and
(ii)
it was the conscious object of the person to engage in conduct—
(I)
of that nature;
(II)
with that attendant circumstance;
(III)
with that object; or
(IV)
to cause such a result.
(b)
Default requirement
Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), a covered offense shall be construed to require the Government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted—
(1)
with the state of mind specified in the text of the covered offense for each element of the offense for which the text specifies a state of mind; and
(2)
knowingly, with respect to any element of the offense for which the text of the covered offense does not specify a state of mind.
(c)
Failure To distinguish among elements
Except as provided in subsection (d), if the text of a covered offense specifies the state of mind required for commission of the covered offense without specifying the elements of the covered offense to which the state of mind applies, the state of mind specified shall apply to all elements of the covered offense, unless a contrary purpose plainly appears.
(d)
Exceptions
(1)
In general
Subsections (b)(2) and (c) shall not apply with respect to—
(A)
any element for which the text of the covered offense makes clear that Congress affirmatively intended not to require the Government to prove any state of mind with respect to such element;
(B)
any element of a covered offense, to the extent that the element establishes—
(i)
subject matter jurisdiction over the covered offense; or
(ii)
venue with respect to trial of the covered offense; or
(C)
any element of a covered offense, to the extent that applying subsections (b)(2) and (c) to such element would lessen the degree of mental culpability that the Government is required to prove with respect to that element under—
(i)
precedent of the Supreme Court of the United States; or
(ii)
any other provision of this title, any other Act of Congress, or any regulation.
(2)
Mere absence insufficient
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the mere absence of a specified state of mind for an element of a covered offense in the text of the covered offense shall not be construed to mean that Congress affirmatively intended not to require the Government to prove any state of mind with respect to that element.
(e)
Applicability
This section shall apply with respect to a covered offense—
(1)
without regard to whether the provision or provisions specifying the covered offense are enacted, promulgated, or finalized before, on, or after the date of enactment of this section; and
(2)
that was committed—
(A)
on or after the date of enactment of this section; or
(B)
before the date of enactment of this section, unless—
(i)
applying this section to such covered offense would—
(I)
punish as a crime conduct that was innocent when done;
(II)
increase the punishment for the covered offense; or
(III)
deprive a person charged with the covered offense of any defense available according to law at the time the covered offense occurred;
(ii)
a jury has been empaneled and sworn in a prosecution for the covered offense before the date of enactment of this section;
(iii)
the first witness has been sworn in a prosecution for the covered offense tried without a jury before the date of enactment of this section; or
(iv)
a sentence has been imposed following a plea of guilty or nolo contendere in a prosecution for the covered offense before the date of enactment of this section.
(f)
Subsequently enacted laws
No provision of law enacted after the date of enactment of this section shall be construed to repeal, modify the text or effect of, or supersede in whole or in part this section, unless such law specifically refers to this section and explicitly repeals, modifies the text or effect of, or supersedes in whole or in part this section.
.
(b)
Technical and conforming amendment
The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
28. State of mind when not otherwise specifically provided.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-03
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025

hb59/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)

Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025

This bill establishes a default mens rea standard (i.e., state of mind requirement) for federal criminal offenses—statutory and regulatory—that lack an explicit standard.

The government must generally prove that a defendant acted knowingly with respect to each element of an offense for which the text does not specify a state of mind.

Sponsors

Rep. Andy Biggs (R) sponsors H.R. 59, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 59 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Markup By · Jun 10, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 59 has taken 4 actions since Jan 3, 2025, the latest on Jun 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jun 10, 2025
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldJudiciary Committee
Jun 10, 2025
House
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 13.Judiciary Committee
Jan 3, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 59 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 59 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • To specify the state of mind required for conviction for criminal offenses that lack an expressly identified state of mind, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 59, the latest on May 27, 2026.


Lobbying

4 clients hired 5 firms and 18 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 59 in 23 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Constitution, Intelligence.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESChristian non-profit dedicated to serving those impacted by crime and incarceration.Virginia210$146K
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTEDistrict of Columbia15
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)District of Columbia15
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONDistrict of Columbia13

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2026 first_quarter$720K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 fourth_quarter$520K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 third_quarter$400K3rd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES2026 second_quarter$120K2nd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES2025 fourth_quarter$50K4th Quarter - Report
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTEDUE PROCESS INSTITUTE2025 third_quarter$40K3rd Quarter - Report
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTEDUE PROCESS INSTITUTE2025 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESTHE HAZEN COUNSEL, LLC2026 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESTHE HAZEN COUNSEL, LLC2026 first_quarter$30K1st Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES2026 first_quarter$30K1st Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESTHE HAZEN COUNSEL, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$30K4th Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES2025 third_quarter$30K3rd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES2025 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESTHE HAZEN COUNSEL, LLC2025 third_quarter$29K3rd Quarter - Report
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIESTHE HAZEN COUNSEL, LLC2025 second_quarter$27K2nd Quarter - Report
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTEDUE PROCESS INSTITUTE2026 second_quarter$15K2nd Quarter - Report
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTEDUE PROCESS INSTITUTE2026 first_quarter$15K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)2026 first_quarter$15K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)2025 fourth_quarter$15K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (NACDL)2025 third_quarter$15K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 59 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 2 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 59’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr59/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 59 carries 2 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation to Criminal procedure and sentencing.

hr59/subjects.txt
Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationCriminal procedure and sentencing

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 59, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 1 (Friday, January 3, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BIGGS of Arizona:H.R. 59.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Artcile 1, Section 8The single subject of this legislation is:The single subject of this bill is to specify the state ofmind required for conviction for criminal offenses that lackan expressly identified state of mind.[Page H37]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com