Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 5395

Washington SenatePassed

Summary

SB 5395, “Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorization determination process”, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 21, 2025 by Sen. Tina Orwall (D) with 5 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Mar 23, 2026: Effective date 6/11/2026*.


Record

Text

SB 5395 has 5 co-sponsors and 7 roll calls.

sb5395/chaptered.txt
CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT
ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395
Chapter 157, Laws of 2026
69th Legislature
2026 Regular Session
HEALTH CARRIERS—PRIOR AUTHORIZATION DETERMINATIONS
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2026—Except for sections 3 and 7, which
take effect January 1, 2027.
Passed by the Senate March 9, 2026 CERTIFICATE
Yeas 49 Nays 0
I, Sarah Bannister, Secretary of
the Senate of the State of
DENNY HECK Washington, do hereby certify that
President of the Senate the attached is ENGROSSED SECOND
SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395 as
passed by the Senate and the House
of Representatives on the dates
Passed by the House March 4, 2026 hereon set forth.
Yeas 94 Nays 0
SARAH BANNISTER
LAURIE JINKINS
Secretary
Speaker of the House of
Representatives
Approved March 23, 2026 3:32 PM FILED
March 24, 2026
Secretary of State
BOB FERGUSON State of Washington
Governor of the State of Washington
ENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395
AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE
Passed Legislature - 2026 Regular Session
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session
By Senate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Orwall,
Muzzall, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, and Slatter)
READ FIRST TIME 01/29/26.
AN ACT Relating to making improvements to transparency and
accountability in the prior authorization determination process;
amending RCW 48.43.830, 41.05.845, 48.43.525, 48.43.535, 48.43.535,
and 48.43.0161; reenacting and amending RCW 48.43.830; creating a new
section; providing an effective date; and providing an expiration
date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that health
carriers are the decision makers for the type and level of care
covered for an enrollee's health care benefits and are not
responsible for determining or altering an enrollee's diagnosis or
treatment plan. It is not always transparent who the decision maker
is or how decisions are made in determining enrollee coverage for
treatment, prescription drugs, or services. Artificial intelligence
is being increasingly utilized by health carriers to make or aid in
decisions about medical necessity and coverage of provider-
recommended treatment.
(2) It is the intent of the legislature to increase transparency
in the prior authorization process for health care coverage decisions
and to ensure licensed physicians and licensed health professionals
remain responsible for making determinations regarding treatments,
p. 1 E2SSB 5395.SL
prescription drugs, and other health care services. If artificial
intelligence is used to aid in the decision-making process, standards
must be put in place to ensure artificial intelligence is not used to
make inappropriate determinations that could impact the health of an
enrollee.
(3) It is the intent of the legislature to update the protections
of this act for enrollees to include managed care organizations as
soon as feasible, recognizing that low-income, publicly insured
Washingtonians deserve the same patient protections as higher-income,
commercially insured Washingtonians.
Sec. 2. RCW 48.43.830 and 2025 c 25 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Each carrier offering a health plan issued or renewed on or
after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards
related to prior authorization for health care services and
prescription drugs:
(a) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior
authorization determinations and notifications to a participating
provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request
through an electronic prior authorization process, as designated by
each carrier:
(i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding
holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request
by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information
to make a determination. If insufficient information has been
provided to the carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request
any additional information from the provider or facility within one
calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization
request.
(ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of
an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility
that contains the necessary information to make a determination. If
insufficient information has been provided to the carrier to make a
decision, the carrier shall request any additional information from
p. 2 E2SSB 5395.SL
the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the
electronic prior authorization request.
(b) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior
authorization determinations and notifications to a participating
provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request
through a process other than an electronic prior authorization
process:
(i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission
of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or
facility that contains the necessary information to make a
determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional
information from the provider or facility within five calendar days
of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.
(ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,
the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility
of the results of the decision within two calendar days of submission
of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or
facility that contains the necessary information to make a
determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional
information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of
submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.
(c) In any instance in which a carrier has determined that a
provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for
making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a
carrier may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission
of the additional information. This time frame must be communicated
to the provider and enrollee with a carrier's request for additional
information.
(d) The carrier's prior authorization requirements must be
described in detail and written in easily understandable language.
The carrier shall make its most current prior authorization
requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review
criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic
format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be
based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review
criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and
p. 3 E2SSB 5395.SL
emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical
criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of
color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review
criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least
annually.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the
carrier shall include the credentials, board certifications, and
areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight over
the determination in any notification sent to the health plan
enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(2) Carriers must post any adjustments to policies and procedures
that impact the applicability of their prior authorization
requirements for health care services or prescription drugs,
including new applications of prior authorization, in a single
location on the carrier's website. After December 30, 2030, any new
application of prior authorization for health care services must be
available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system
or application programming interface system referenced in subsection
(4) of this section.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health
professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior
authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed
physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific
clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the
requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting
provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical
history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,
delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to
process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used
without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical
necessity.
(b) A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose
of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in
whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or
otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence
for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization
functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall
ensure all of the following:
p. 4 E2SSB 5395.SL
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the
following information, as applicable:
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including
demographic data; and
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the
requesting provider;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination
solely on a group data set;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines
comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not
discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in
violation of state or federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,
including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance
issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial
intelligence are open to audit by the office of the insurance
commissioner under chapter 48.37 RCW;
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and
outcomes are periodically reviewed by the carrier to maximize
accuracy and reliability; and
(viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated
purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health
insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. Sec.
1320d et al., as applicable.
(4)(a) Each carrier shall establish and maintain a prior
authorization application programming interface that is consistent
with final rules issued by the federal centers for medicare and
medicaid services and published in the federal register, and that
indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a
service less intensive than that included in the original request is
an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's
grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
(b) Each carrier shall establish and maintain an interoperable
electronic process or application programming interface that
automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a
prior authorization is required for a covered prescription drug. The
interoperable electronic process or application programming interface
must support the exchange of prior authorization requests and
p. 5 E2SSB 5395.SL
determinations for prescription drugs, including information on
covered alternative prescription drugs, beginning January 1, 2027,
and must:
(i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information
and documentation requirements;
(ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and
determinations from its electronic health records or practice
management system; and
(iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization
of a drug other than the one included in the original prior
authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is
subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW
48.43.535.
(c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for
using an application programming interface to communicate prior
authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or
not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid
services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this
subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.
(d) By September 13, 2023, and at least every six months
thereafter until September 13, 2026, the commissioner shall provide
an update to the health care policy committees of the legislature on
the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal
centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards
for development of application programming interfaces and
interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization
functions. The updates should include recommendations, as
appropriate, on whether the status of the federal rule development
aligns with the provisions of chapter 382, Laws of 2023. The
commissioner also shall report on any actions by the federal centers
for medicare and medicaid services to exercise enforcement discretion
related to the implementation and maintenance of an application
programming interface for prior authorization functions. The
commissioner shall consult with the health care authority, carriers,
providers, and consumers on the development of these updates and any
recommendations.
(((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior
authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 48.43.761.
p. 6 E2SSB 5395.SL
(((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions
carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW
48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(7) The commissioner may adopt any rules necessary to implement
this section.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning
and related technologies that use data to train statistical models
for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks
normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as
computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content
generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial
intelligence.
(b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where:
(i) The passage of time:
(A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the
enrollee;
(B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain
maximum function; or
(C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of
the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to
severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care
service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or
(ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment
using a nonformulary drug.
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an
artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content
based on a foundation model.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial
intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw
inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy
without explicit programming.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the
enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is
not required to be expedited.
p. 7 E2SSB 5395.SL
Sec. 3. RCW 48.43.830 and 2025 c 227 s 8 and 2025 c 25 s 1 are
each reenacted and amended to read as follows:
(1) Each carrier offering a health plan issued or renewed on or
after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards
related to prior authorization for health care services and
prescription drugs:
(a) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior
authorization determinations and notifications to a participating
provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request
through an electronic prior authorization process, as designated by
each carrier:
(i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding
holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request
by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information
to make a determination. If insufficient information has been
provided to the carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request
any additional information from the provider or facility within one
calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization
request.
(ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of
an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility
that contains the necessary information to make a determination. If
insufficient information has been provided to the carrier to make a
decision, the carrier shall request any additional information from
the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the
electronic prior authorization request.
(b) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior
authorization determinations and notifications to a participating
provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request
through a process other than an electronic prior authorization
process:
(i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the
carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of
the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission
of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or
facility that contains the necessary information to make a
p. 8 E2SSB 5395.SL
determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional
information from the provider or facility within five calendar days
of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.
(ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,
the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility
of the results of the decision within two calendar days of submission
of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or
facility that contains the necessary information to make a
determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional
information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of
submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.
(c) In any instance in which a carrier has determined that a
provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for
making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a
carrier may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission
of the additional information. This time frame must be communicated
to the provider and enrollee with a carrier's request for additional
information.
(d) The carrier's prior authorization requirements must be
described in detail and written in easily understandable language.
The carrier shall make its most current prior authorization
requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review
criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic
format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be
based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review
criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and
emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical
criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of
color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review
criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least
annually. Clinical review criteria used for purposes of reviewing and
decided upon prior authorization requests related to mental health
and substance use disorder services, as defined in RCW 48.43.766,
must meet the requirements of RCW 48.43.766.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the
carrier shall include the credentials, board certifications, and
areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight over
p. 9 E2SSB 5395.SL
the determination in any notification sent to the health plan
enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(2) Carriers must post any adjustments to policies and procedures
that impact the applicability of their prior authorization
requirements for health care services or prescription drugs,
including new applications of prior authorization, in a single
location on the carrier's website. After December 30, 2030, any new
application of prior authorization for health care services must be
available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system
or application programming interface system.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health
professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior
authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed
physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific
clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the
requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting
provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical
history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,
delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to
process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used
without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical
necessity.
(b) A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose
of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in
whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or
otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence
for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization
functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall
ensure all of the following:
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the
following information, as applicable:
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including
demographic data; and
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the
requesting provider;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination
solely on a group data set;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines
comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
p. 10 E2SSB 5395.SL
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not
discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in
violation of state or federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,
including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance
issued by the federal department of health and human services;
(vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial
intelligence are open to audit by the office of the insurance
commissioner under chapter 48.37 RCW;
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and
outcomes are periodically reviewed by the carrier to maximize
accuracy and reliability; and
(viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated
purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health
insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. Sec.
1320d et al., as applicable.
(4)(a) Each carrier shall establish and maintain a prior
authorization application programming interface that is consistent
with final rules issued by the federal centers for medicare and
medicaid services and published in the federal register, and that
indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a
service less intensive than that included in the original request is
an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's
grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
(b) Each carrier shall establish and maintain an interoperable
electronic process or application programming interface that
automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a
prior authorization is required for a covered prescription drug. The
interoperable electronic process or application programming interface
must support the exchange of prior authorization requests and
determinations for prescription drugs, including information on
covered alternative prescription drugs, beginning January 1, 2027,
and must:
(i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information
and documentation requirements;
(ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and
determinations from its electronic health records or practice
management system; and
(iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization
of a drug other than the one included in the original prior
p. 11 E2SSB 5395.SL
authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is
subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW
48.43.535.
(c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for
using an application programming interface to communicate prior
authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or
not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid
services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this
subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.
(d) By September 13, 2023, and at least every six months
thereafter until September 13, 2026, the commissioner shall provide
an update to the health care policy committees of the legislature on
the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal
centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards
for development of application programming interfaces and
interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization
functions. The updates should include recommendations, as
appropriate, on whether the status of the federal rule development
aligns with the provisions of chapter 382, Laws of 2023. The
commissioner also shall report on any actions by the federal centers
for medicare and medicaid services to exercise enforcement discretion
related to the implementation and maintenance of an application
programming interface for prior authorization functions. The
commissioner shall consult with the health care authority, carriers,
providers, and consumers on the development of these updates and any
recommendations.
(((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior
authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 48.43.761.
(((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions
carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW
48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(7) The commissioner may adopt any rules necessary to implement
this section.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning
and related technologies that use data to train statistical models
for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks
normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as
computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content
p. 12 E2SSB 5395.SL
generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial
intelligence.
(b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where:
(i) The passage of time:
(A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the
enrollee;
(B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain
maximum function; or
(C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of
the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to
severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care
service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or
(ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment
using a nonformulary drug.
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an
artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content
based on a foundation model.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial
intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw
inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy
without explicit programming.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the
enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is
not required to be expedited.
Sec. 4. RCW 41.05.845 and 2025 c 25 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A health plan offered to public employees, retirees, and
their covered dependents under this chapter issued or renewed on or
after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards
related to prior authorization for health care services and
prescription drugs:
(a) The health plan shall meet the following time frames for
prior authorization determinations and notifications to a
participating provider or facility that submits the prior
p. 13 E2SSB 5395.SL
authorization request through an electronic prior authorization
process:
(i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the
health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility
of the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding
holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request
by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information
to make a determination. If insufficient information has been
provided to the health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall
request any additional information from the provider or facility
within one calendar day of submission of the electronic prior
authorization request.
(ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the
health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility
of the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission
of an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or
facility that contains the necessary information to make a
determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any
additional information from the provider or facility within one
calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization
request.
(b) The health plan shall meet the following time frames for
prior authorization determinations and notifications to a
participating provider or facility that submits the prior
authorization request through a process other than an electronic
prior authorization process described in subsection (2) of this
section:
(i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the
health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility
of the results of the decision within five calendar days of
submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the
provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make
a determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any
additional information from the provider or facility within five
calendar days of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization
request.
(ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,
the health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or
p. 14 E2SSB 5395.SL
facility of the results of the decision within two calendar days of
submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the
provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make
a determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the
health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any
additional information from the provider or facility within one
calendar day of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization
request.
(c) In any instance in which the health plan has determined that
a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for
making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, the
health plan may establish a specific reasonable time frame for
submission of the additional information. This time frame must be
communicated to the provider and enrollee with the health plan's
request for additional information.
(d) The prior authorization requirements of the health plan must
be described in detail and written in easily understandable language.
The health plan shall make its most current prior authorization
requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review
criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic
format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be
based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review
criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and
emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical
criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of
color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review
criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least
annually.
(((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the
health plan shall include the credentials, board certifications, and
areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight over
the determination in any notification sent to the health plan
enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.
(2) Health plans must post, and maintain the ability to make
adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability
of their prior authorization requirements for health care services or
prescription drugs, including new applications of prior
authorization, in a single location on the health plan's website.
After December 30, 2030, any new application of prior authorization
for health care services must be available to providers on the
p. 15 E2SSB 5395.SL
electronic prior authorization system or application programming
interface system.
(3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health
professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior
authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed
physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific
clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the
requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting
provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical
history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.
Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,
delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to
process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used
without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical
necessity.
(b) A health plan that uses artificial intelligence for the
purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions,
based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts
with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial
intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior
authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical
necessity, shall ensure all of the following:
(i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the
following information, as applicable:
(A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including
demographic data; and
(B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the
requesting provider;
(ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination
solely on a group data set;
(iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines
comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;
(iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not
discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in
violation of state or federal law;
(v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,
including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance
issued by the federal department of health and human services;
p. 16 E2SSB 5395.SL
(vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial
intelligence is open to audit by the office of the insurance
commissioner;
(vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and
outcomes are periodically reviewed by the health plan to maximize
accuracy and reliability; and
(viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated
purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health
insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, U.S.C. Sec.
1320d et al., as applicable.
(4)(a) Each health plan offered to public employees, retirees,
and their covered dependents under this chapter shall establish and
maintain a prior authorization application programming interface that
is consistent with final rules issued by the federal centers for
medicare and medicaid services and published in the federal register,
and that indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization
of a service less intensive than that included in the original
request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the
health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.
(b) Each health plan offered to public employees, retirees, and
their covered dependents under this chapter shall establish and
maintain an interoperable electronic process or application
programming interface that automates the process for in-network
providers to determine whether a prior authorization is required for
a covered prescription drug. The interoperable electronic process or
application programming interface must support the exchange of prior
authorization requests and determinations for prescription drugs,
including information on covered alternative prescription drugs,
beginning January 1, 2027, and must:
(i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information
and documentation requirements;
(ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and
determinations from its electronic health records or practice
management system; and
(iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization
of a drug other than the one included in the original prior
authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is
subject to the health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW
48.43.535.
p. 17 E2SSB 5395.SL
(c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for
using an application programming interface to communicate prior
authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or
not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid
services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this
subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.
(((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior
authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 41.05.526.
(((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions
carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW
48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.
(7) The authority may adopt any rules necessary to implement this
section.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning
and related technologies that use data to train statistical models
for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks
normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as
computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content
generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial
intelligence.
(b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where:
(i) The passage of time:
(A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the
enrollee;
(B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain
maximum function; or
(C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of
the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to
severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care
service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or
(ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment
using a nonformulary drug.
(((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an
artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content
based on a foundation model.
(d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial
intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw
p. 18 E2SSB 5395.SL
inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy
without explicit programming.
(e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a
provider or facility for approval of a health care service or
prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the
enrollee obtaining a health care service that is not required to be
expedited.
(((5))) (9) This section shall not apply to coverage provided
under the medicare part C or part D programs set forth in Title XVIII
of the social security act of 1965, as amended.
Sec. 5. RCW 48.43.525 and 2000 c 5 s 9 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) A health carrier that offers a health plan shall not
retrospectively deny coverage or retrospectively modify to a service
less intensive than that included in an approved request for
emergency and nonemergency care that had prior authorization,
including for medical necessity, under the plan's written policies at
the time the care was rendered, unless:
(a) The approved prior authorization was based upon a material
misrepresentation by the provider, facility, or covered person; or
(b) The underlying health plan coverage is lawfully rescinded,
canceled, or terminated retrospectively through the date of service.
(2) Retrospective denials of services with an approved prior
authorization or retrospective modification of an approved prior
authorization to less intensive services due to a change in the
carrier's determination of medical necessity are prohibited, shall
not be considered adverse benefit determinations, and will not be
required to follow the standard appeals processes in RCW 48.43.530 or
any carrier policies related to their own grievance and appeals
process. If an enrollee, or the provider requesting the authorization
demonstrates the authorization was valid per the plan's written
policies, then the carrier will deem the authorization approved and
payable. Interest will be assessed on the associated claim submitted
by the provider at the rate of one percent per month, retroactive to
the date of submission. An enrollee, or provider on behalf of the
enrollee, may seek review by an independent review organization under
RCW 48.43.535 without the need to engage in, exhaust, or wait for any
timelines related to the carrier's grievance process.
p. 19 E2SSB 5395.SL
(3) This section does not prevent carriers from reimbursing only
for services billed and rendered.
(4) The commissioner shall adopt, in rule, standards for this
section after considering relevant standards adopted by national
managed care accreditation organizations and state agencies that
purchase managed health care services.
Sec. 6. RCW 48.43.535 and 2022 c 263 s 4 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) There is a need for a process for the fair consideration of
disputes relating to decisions by carriers that offer a health plan
to deny, modify, reduce, or terminate coverage of or payment for
health care services for an enrollee. For purposes of this section,
"carrier" also applies to a health plan if the health plan
administers the appeal process directly or through a third party.
(2) An enrollee may seek review by a certified independent review
organization of a carrier's decision to deny, modify, reduce, or
terminate coverage of or payment for a health care service or of any
adverse determination made by a carrier under RCW 48.49.020,
48.49.030, or sections 2799A-1 or 2799A-2 of the public health
service act (42 U.S.C. Secs. 300gg-111 or 300gg-112) and implementing
federal regulations in effect as of March 31, 2022, after exhausting
the carrier's grievance process and receiving a decision that is
unfavorable to the enrollee, or after the carrier has exceeded the
timelines for grievances provided in RCW 48.43.530, without good
cause and without reaching a decision. Any requirements that the
enrollee must first engage in, exhaust, or wait for any timelines
related to the carrier's grievance process do not apply to review
sought pursuant to RCW 48.43.525.
(3) The commissioner must establish and use a rotational registry
system for the assignment of a certified independent review
organization to each dispute. The system should be flexible enough to
ensure that an independent review organization has the expertise
necessary to review the particular medical condition or service at
issue in the dispute, and that any approved independent review
organization does not have a conflict of interest that will influence
its independence.
(4) Carriers must provide to the appropriate certified
independent review organization, not later than the third business
p. 20 E2SSB 5395.SL
day after the date the carrier receives a request for review, a copy
of:
(a) Any medical records of the enrollee that are relevant to the
review;
(b) Any documents used by the carrier in making the determination
to be reviewed by the certified independent review organization;
(c) Any documentation and written information submitted to the
carrier in support of the appeal; and
(d) A list of each physician or health care provider who has
provided care to the enrollee and who may have medical records
relevant to the appeal. Health information or other confidential or
proprietary information in the custody of a carrier may be provided
to an independent review organization, subject to rules adopted by
the commissioner.
(5) Enrollees must be provided with at least five business days
to submit to the independent review organization in writing
additional information that the independent review organization must
consider when conducting the external review. The independent review
organization must forward any additional information submitted by an
enrollee to the plan or carrier within one business day of receipt by
the independent review organization.
(6) The medical reviewers from a certified independent review
organization will make determinations regarding the medical necessity
or appropriateness of, and the application of health plan coverage
provisions to, health care services for an enrollee. The medical
reviewers' determinations must be based upon their expert medical
judgment, after consideration of relevant medical, scientific, and
cost-effectiveness evidence, and medical standards of practice in the
state of Washington. Except as provided in this subsection, the
certified independent review organization must ensure that
determinations are consistent with the scope of covered benefits as
outlined in the medical coverage agreement. Medical reviewers may
override the health plan's medical necessity or appropriateness
standards if the standards are determined upon review to be
unreasonable or inconsistent with sound, evidence-based medical
practice.
(7) Once a request for an independent review determination has
been made, the independent review organization must proceed to a
final determination, unless requested otherwise by both the carrier
and the enrollee or the enrollee's representative.
p. 21 E2SSB 5395.SL
(a) An enrollee or carrier may request an expedited external
review if the adverse benefit determination or internal adverse
benefit determination concerns an admission, availability of care,
continued stay, or health care service for which the claimant
received emergency services but has not been discharged from a
facility; or involves a medical condition for which the standard
external review time frame would seriously jeopardize the life or
health of the enrollee or jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain
maximum function. The independent review organization must make its
decision to uphold or reverse the adverse benefit determination or
final internal adverse benefit determination and notify the enrollee
and the carrier or health plan of the determination as expeditiously
as possible but within not more than seventy-two hours after the
receipt of the request for expedited external review. If the notice
is not in writing, the independent review organization must provide
written confirmation of the decision within forty-eight hours after
the date of the notice of the decision.
(b) For claims involving experimental or investigational
treatments, the independent review organization must ensure that
adequate clinical and scientific experience and protocols are taken
into account as part of the external review process.
(8) Carriers must timely implement the certified independent
review organization's determination, and must pay the certified
independent review organization's charges.
(9) When an enrollee requests independent review of a dispute
under this section, and the dispute involves a carrier's decision to
modify, reduce, or terminate an otherwise covered health service that
an enrollee is receiving at the time the request for review is
submitted and the carrier's decision is based upon a finding that the
health service, or level of health service, is no longer medically
necessary or appropriate, the carrier must continue to provide the
health service if requested by the enrollee until a determination is
made under this section. If the determination affirms the carrier's
decision, the enrollee may be responsible for the cost of the
continued health service.
(10) Each certified independent review organization must maintain
written records and make them available upon request to the
commissioner.
(11) A certified independent review organization may notify the
office of the insurance commissioner if, based upon its review of
p. 22 E2SSB 5395.SL
disputes under this section, it finds a pattern of substandard or
egregious conduct by a carrier.
(12)(a) The commissioner shall adopt rules to implement this
section after considering relevant standards adopted by national
managed care accreditation organizations and the national association
of insurance commissioners.
(b) This section is not intended to supplant any existing
authority of the office of the insurance commissioner under this
title to oversee and enforce carrier compliance with applicable
statutes and rules.
Sec. 7. RCW 48.43.535 and 2025 c 227 s 6 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) There is a need for a process for the fair consideration of
disputes relating to decisions by carriers that offer a health plan
to deny, modify, reduce, or terminate coverage of or payment for
health care services for an enrollee. For purposes of this section,
"carrier" also applies to a health plan if the health plan
administers the appeal process directly or through a third party.
(2) An enrollee may seek review by a certified independent review
organization of a carrier's decision to deny, modify, reduce, or
terminate coverage of or payment for a health care service or of any
adverse determination made by a carrier under RCW 48.49.020,
48.49.030, or sections 2799A-1 or 2799A-2 of the public health
service act (42 U.S.C. Secs. 300gg-111 or 300gg-112) and implementing
federal regulations in effect as of March 31, 2022, after exhausting
the carrier's grievance process and receiving a decision that is
unfavorable to the enrollee, or after the carrier has exceeded the
timelines for grievances provided in RCW 48.43.530, without good
cause and without reaching a decision. Any requirements that the
enrollee must first engage in, exhaust, or wait for any timelines
related to the carrier's grievance process do not apply to review
sought pursuant to RCW 48.43.525.
(3) The commissioner must establish and use a rotational registry
system for the assignment of a certified independent review
organization to each dispute. The system should be flexible enough to
ensure that an independent review organization has the expertise
necessary to review the particular medical condition or service at
issue in the dispute, and that any approved independent review
p. 23 E2SSB 5395.SL
organization does not have a conflict of interest that will influence
its independence.
(4) Carriers must provide to the appropriate certified
independent review organization, not later than the third business
day after the date the carrier receives a request for review, a copy
of:
(a) Any medical records of the enrollee that are relevant to the
review;
(b) Any documents used by the carrier in making the determination
to be reviewed by the certified independent review organization;
(c) Any documentation and written information submitted to the
carrier in support of the appeal; and
(d) A list of each physician or health care provider who has
provided care to the enrollee and who may have medical records
relevant to the appeal. Health information or other confidential or
proprietary information in the custody of a carrier may be provided
to an independent review organization, subject to rules adopted by
the commissioner.
(5) Enrollees must be provided with at least five business days
to submit to the independent review organization in writing
additional information that the independent review organization must
consider when conducting the external review. The independent review
organization must forward any additional information submitted by an
enrollee to the plan or carrier within one business day of receipt by
the independent review organization.
(6) The medical reviewers from a certified independent review
organization will make determinations regarding the medical necessity
or appropriateness of, and the application of health plan coverage
provisions to, health care services for an enrollee. The medical
reviewers' determinations must be based upon their expert medical
judgment, after consideration of relevant medical, scientific, and
cost-effectiveness evidence, and medical standards of practice in the
state of Washington. Except as provided in this subsection, the
certified independent review organization must ensure that
determinations are consistent with the scope of covered benefits as
outlined in the medical coverage agreement. Medical reviewers may
override the health plan's medical necessity or appropriateness
standards if the standards are determined upon review to be
unreasonable or inconsistent with sound, evidence-based medical
practice. For reviews of mental health and substance use disorder
p. 24 E2SSB 5395.SL
services, as defined in RCW 48.43.766, the medical reviewers must
conduct reviews and make determinations in a manner consistent with
the requirements of RCW 48.43.766.
(7) Once a request for an independent review determination has
been made, the independent review organization must proceed to a
final determination, unless requested otherwise by both the carrier
and the enrollee or the enrollee's representative.
(a) An enrollee or carrier may request an expedited external
review if the adverse benefit determination or internal adverse
benefit determination concerns an admission, availability of care,
continued stay, or health care service for which the claimant
received emergency services but has not been discharged from a
facility; or involves a medical condition for which the standard
external review time frame would seriously jeopardize the life or
health of the enrollee or jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain
maximum function. The independent review organization must make its
decision to uphold or reverse the adverse benefit determination or
final internal adverse benefit determination and notify the enrollee
and the carrier or health plan of the determination as expeditiously
as possible but within not more than seventy-two hours after the
receipt of the request for expedited external review. If the notice
is not in writing, the independent review organization must provide
written confirmation of the decision within forty-eight hours after
the date of the notice of the decision.
(b) For claims involving experimental or investigational
treatments, the independent review organization must ensure that
adequate clinical and scientific experience and protocols are taken
into account as part of the external review process.
(8) Carriers must timely implement the certified independent
review organization's determination, and must pay the certified
independent review organization's charges.
(9) When an enrollee requests independent review of a dispute
under this section, and the dispute involves a carrier's decision to
modify, reduce, or terminate an otherwise covered health service that
an enrollee is receiving at the time the request for review is
submitted and the carrier's decision is based upon a finding that the
health service, or level of health service, is no longer medically
necessary or appropriate, the carrier must continue to provide the
health service if requested by the enrollee until a determination is
made under this section. If the determination affirms the carrier's
p. 25 E2SSB 5395.SL
decision, the enrollee may be responsible for the cost of the
continued health service.
(10) Each certified independent review organization must maintain
written records and make them available upon request to the
commissioner.
(11) A certified independent review organization may notify the
office of the insurance commissioner if, based upon its review of
disputes under this section, it finds a pattern of substandard or
egregious conduct by a carrier.
(12)(a) The commissioner shall adopt rules to implement this
section after considering relevant standards adopted by national
managed care accreditation organizations and the national association
of insurance commissioners.
(b) This section is not intended to supplant any existing
authority of the office of the insurance commissioner under this
title to oversee and enforce carrier compliance with applicable
statutes and rules.
Sec. 8. RCW 48.43.0161 and 2023 c 382 s 4 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) By October 1, ((2020)) 2026, and annually thereafter, for
individual and group health plans issued by a carrier that has
written at least one percent of the total accident and health
insurance premiums written by all companies authorized to offer
accident and health insurance in Washington in the most recently
available year, the carrier shall report to the commissioner the
following aggregated and deidentified data related to the carrier's
prior authorization practices and experience for the prior plan year:
(a) The total number of prior authorization requests, approvals,
and denials. The carrier must report these totals separately for
approvals or denials made by the carrier directly and for approvals
or denials made by a health care benefit manager as defined in RCW
48.200.020 that is delegated to make prior authorization
determinations either directly or indirectly on behalf of the
carrier. In the report, carriers must also indicate:
(i) The percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial
intelligence;
(ii) The percent of prior authorization determinations made after
the standard and expedited authorization request turnaround times
stated in RCW 48.43.830; and
p. 26 E2SSB 5395.SL
(iii) The total number of nonelectronic standard and
nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests;
(b) Lists of the 10 inpatient medical or surgical codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved for each code;
(((b))) (c) Lists of the 10 outpatient medical or surgical codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved for each code;
(((c))) (d) Lists of the 10 inpatient mental health and substance
use disorder service codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
p. 27 E2SSB 5395.SL
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved for each code;
(((d))) (e) Lists of the 10 outpatient mental health and
substance use disorder service codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved;
(((e))) (f) Lists of the 10 durable medical equipment codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved for each code;
(((f))) (g) Lists of the 10 diabetes supplies and equipment
codes:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved
requests for each code;
p. 28 E2SSB 5395.SL
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of
approved requests for each code; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then
subsequently approved for each code;
(((g))) (h) Lists of the 10 prescription drugs:
(i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests
during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior
authorization requests for each prescription drug and the percent of
approved requests for each prescription drug;
(ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization
requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of
prior authorization requests for each prescription drug and the
percent of approved requests for each prescription drug; and
(iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests
that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,
including the total number of prior authorization requests for each
prescription drug and the percent of requests that were initially
denied and then subsequently approved for each prescription drug; and
(((h))) (i) The average determination response time in hours for
prior authorization requests to the carrier in total reported under
(a) of this subsection and with respect to each code reported under
(((a))) (b) through (((f))) (h) of this subsection for each of the
following categories of prior authorization:
(i) Expedited decisions;
(ii) Standard decisions; and
(iii) Extenuating circumstances decisions.
(2)(a) By January 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, the
commissioner shall aggregate and deidentify the data collected under
subsection (1)(b) through (h) of this section into a standard report
and may not identify the name of the carrier that submitted the data.
The commissioner must make the report available to interested
parties.
(b) The report must contain trend data for total authorization
requests, approvals, and denials submitted under subsection (1)(a) of
this section separately for each carrier directly and for each health
p. 29 E2SSB 5395.SL
care benefit manager, as defined in RCW 48.200.020, that is delegated
to make prior authorization determinations either directly or
indirectly on behalf of the carrier.
(3) The commissioner may request additional information from
carriers reporting data under this section.
(4) The commissioner may adopt rules to implement this section.
In adopting rules, the commissioner must consult stakeholders
including carriers, health care practitioners, health care
facilities, and patients.
(5) For the purpose of this section, "prior authorization" means
a mandatory process that a carrier or its designated or contracted
representative requires a provider or facility to follow before a
service is delivered, to determine if a service is a benefit and
meets the requirements for medical necessity, clinical
appropriateness, level of care, or effectiveness in relation to the
applicable plan, including any term used by a carrier or its
designated or contracted representative to describe this process.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. Sections 2 and 6 of this act expire
January 1, 2027.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. Sections 3 and 7 of this act take effect
January 1, 2027.
Passed by the Senate March 9, 2026.
Passed by the House March 4, 2026.
Approved by the Governor March 23, 2026.
Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 24, 2026.
--- END ---
p. 30 E2SSB 5395.SL

Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorization determination process.

Sponsors

Sen. Tina Orwall (D) sponsors SB 5395, and 5 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 5395 went before 5 committees: Health & Long-term Care, Ways & Means, Rules, Health Care and Wellness and Appropriations.

Health & Long-term Care
Health & Long-term Care
Referred to · Jan 21, 2025 · 51 Bills
Ways & Means
Ways & Means
Referred to · Feb 21, 2025 · 257 Bills
Rules
Rules
Referred to · Jan 29, 2026
Health Care and Wellness
Health Care and Wellness
Referred to · Feb 14, 2026 · 84 Bills
Appropriations
Appropriations
Referred to · Feb 25, 2026 · 231 Bills

History

SB 5395 has taken 41 actions since Jan 21, 2025, the latest on Mar 23, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 23, 2026
Senate
Governor signed.
Mar 23, 2026
Senate
Chapter 157, 2026 Laws.
Mar 23, 2026
Senate
Effective date 6/11/2026*.
Mar 12, 2026
Senate
Delivered to Governor.
Mar 11, 2026
House
Speaker signed.

Votes

SB 5395 went to 7 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Mar 9, 2026 at 490.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Mar 9, 2026
Senate
Senate Final Passage as Amended by the House
49
0
Mar 4, 2026
House
House Final Passage as Amended by the House
94
0
Mar 2, 2026
House
House Committee on Appropriations: do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Health Care & Wellness
29
0
Feb 25, 2026
House
House Committee on Health Care & Wellness: do pass with amendment(s)
16
0
Feb 11, 2026
Senate
Senate 3rd Reading & Final Passage
48
1

Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com