- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

SB 5395
Washington Senate•Passed
Summary
SB 5395, “Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorization determination process”, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 21, 2025 by Sen. Tina Orwall (D) with 5 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Mar 23, 2026: Effective date 6/11/2026*.
Record
Text
SB 5395 has 5 co-sponsors and 7 roll calls.
sb5395/chaptered.txtCERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENTENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395Chapter 157, Laws of 202669th Legislature2026 Regular SessionHEALTH CARRIERS—PRIOR AUTHORIZATION DETERMINATIONSEFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2026—Except for sections 3 and 7, whichtake effect January 1, 2027.Passed by the Senate March 9, 2026 CERTIFICATEYeas 49 Nays 0I, Sarah Bannister, Secretary ofthe Senate of the State ofDENNY HECK Washington, do hereby certify thatPresident of the Senate the attached is ENGROSSED SECONDSUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395 aspassed by the Senate and the Houseof Representatives on the datesPassed by the House March 4, 2026 hereon set forth.Yeas 94 Nays 0SARAH BANNISTERLAURIE JINKINSSecretarySpeaker of the House ofRepresentativesApproved March 23, 2026 3:32 PM FILEDMarch 24, 2026Secretary of StateBOB FERGUSON State of WashingtonGovernor of the State of WashingtonENGROSSED SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5395AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSEPassed Legislature - 2026 Regular SessionState of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular SessionBy Senate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Orwall,Muzzall, Hasegawa, Lovelett, Nobles, and Slatter)READ FIRST TIME 01/29/26.1 AN ACT Relating to making improvements to transparency and2 accountability in the prior authorization determination process;3 amending RCW 48.43.830, 41.05.845, 48.43.525, 48.43.535, 48.43.535,4 and 48.43.0161; reenacting and amending RCW 48.43.830; creating a new5 section; providing an effective date; and providing an expiration6 date.7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:8 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that health9 carriers are the decision makers for the type and level of care10 covered for an enrollee's health care benefits and are not11 responsible for determining or altering an enrollee's diagnosis or12 treatment plan. It is not always transparent who the decision maker13 is or how decisions are made in determining enrollee coverage for14 treatment, prescription drugs, or services. Artificial intelligence15 is being increasingly utilized by health carriers to make or aid in16 decisions about medical necessity and coverage of provider-17 recommended treatment.18 (2) It is the intent of the legislature to increase transparency19 in the prior authorization process for health care coverage decisions20 and to ensure licensed physicians and licensed health professionals21 remain responsible for making determinations regarding treatments,p. 1 E2SSB 5395.SL1 prescription drugs, and other health care services. If artificial2 intelligence is used to aid in the decision-making process, standards3 must be put in place to ensure artificial intelligence is not used to4 make inappropriate determinations that could impact the health of an5 enrollee.6 (3) It is the intent of the legislature to update the protections7 of this act for enrollees to include managed care organizations as8 soon as feasible, recognizing that low-income, publicly insured9 Washingtonians deserve the same patient protections as higher-income,10 commercially insured Washingtonians.11 Sec. 2. RCW 48.43.830 and 2025 c 25 s 1 are each amended to read12 as follows:13 (1) Each carrier offering a health plan issued or renewed on or14 after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards15 related to prior authorization for health care services and16 prescription drugs:17 (a) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior18 authorization determinations and notifications to a participating19 provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request20 through an electronic prior authorization process, as designated by21 each carrier:22 (i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the23 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of24 the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding25 holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request26 by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information27 to make a determination. If insufficient information has been28 provided to the carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request29 any additional information from the provider or facility within one30 calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization31 request.32 (ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the33 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of34 the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of35 an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility36 that contains the necessary information to make a determination. If37 insufficient information has been provided to the carrier to make a38 decision, the carrier shall request any additional information fromp. 2 E2SSB 5395.SL1 the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the2 electronic prior authorization request.3 (b) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior4 authorization determinations and notifications to a participating5 provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request6 through a process other than an electronic prior authorization7 process:8 (i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the9 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of10 the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission11 of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or12 facility that contains the necessary information to make a13 determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the14 carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional15 information from the provider or facility within five calendar days16 of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.17 (ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,18 the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility19 of the results of the decision within two calendar days of submission20 of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or21 facility that contains the necessary information to make a22 determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the23 carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional24 information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of25 submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.26 (c) In any instance in which a carrier has determined that a27 provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for28 making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a29 carrier may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission30 of the additional information. This time frame must be communicated31 to the provider and enrollee with a carrier's request for additional32 information.33 (d) The carrier's prior authorization requirements must be34 described in detail and written in easily understandable language.35 The carrier shall make its most current prior authorization36 requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review37 criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic38 format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be39 based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review40 criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new andp. 3 E2SSB 5395.SL1 emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical2 criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of3 color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review4 criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least5 annually.6 (((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the7 carrier shall include the credentials, board certifications, and8 areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight over9 the determination in any notification sent to the health plan10 enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.11 (2) Carriers must post any adjustments to policies and procedures12 that impact the applicability of their prior authorization13 requirements for health care services or prescription drugs,14 including new applications of prior authorization, in a single15 location on the carrier's website. After December 30, 2030, any new16 application of prior authorization for health care services must be17 available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system18 or application programming interface system referenced in subsection19 (4) of this section.20 (3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health21 professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior22 authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed23 physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific24 clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the25 requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting26 provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical27 history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.28 Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,29 delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to30 process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used31 without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical32 necessity.33 (b) A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose34 of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in35 whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or36 otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence37 for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization38 functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall39 ensure all of the following:p. 4 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the2 following information, as applicable:3 (A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including4 demographic data; and5 (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the6 requesting provider;7 (ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination8 solely on a group data set;9 (iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines10 comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;11 (iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not12 discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in13 violation of state or federal law;14 (v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,15 including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance16 issued by the federal department of health and human services;17 (vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial18 intelligence are open to audit by the office of the insurance19 commissioner under chapter 48.37 RCW;20 (vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and21 outcomes are periodically reviewed by the carrier to maximize22 accuracy and reliability; and23 (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated24 purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health25 insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. Sec.26 1320d et al., as applicable.27 (4)(a) Each carrier shall establish and maintain a prior28 authorization application programming interface that is consistent29 with final rules issued by the federal centers for medicare and30 medicaid services and published in the federal register, and that31 indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a32 service less intensive than that included in the original request is33 an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's34 grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.35 (b) Each carrier shall establish and maintain an interoperable36 electronic process or application programming interface that37 automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a38 prior authorization is required for a covered prescription drug. The39 interoperable electronic process or application programming interface40 must support the exchange of prior authorization requests andp. 5 E2SSB 5395.SL1 determinations for prescription drugs, including information on2 covered alternative prescription drugs, beginning January 1, 2027,3 and must:4 (i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information5 and documentation requirements;6 (ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and7 determinations from its electronic health records or practice8 management system; and9 (iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization10 of a drug other than the one included in the original prior11 authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is12 subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW13 48.43.535.14 (c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for15 using an application programming interface to communicate prior16 authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or17 not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid18 services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this19 subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.20 (d) By September 13, 2023, and at least every six months21 thereafter until September 13, 2026, the commissioner shall provide22 an update to the health care policy committees of the legislature on23 the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal24 centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards25 for development of application programming interfaces and26 interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization27 functions. The updates should include recommendations, as28 appropriate, on whether the status of the federal rule development29 aligns with the provisions of chapter 382, Laws of 2023. The30 commissioner also shall report on any actions by the federal centers31 for medicare and medicaid services to exercise enforcement discretion32 related to the implementation and maintenance of an application33 programming interface for prior authorization functions. The34 commissioner shall consult with the health care authority, carriers,35 providers, and consumers on the development of these updates and any36 recommendations.37 (((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior38 authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 48.43.761.p. 6 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions2 carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW3 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.4 (7) The commissioner may adopt any rules necessary to implement5 this section.6 (8) For the purposes of this section:7 (a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning8 and related technologies that use data to train statistical models9 for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks10 normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as11 computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content12 generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial13 intelligence.14 (b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a15 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or16 prescription drug where:17 (i) The passage of time:18 (A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the19 enrollee;20 (B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain21 maximum function; or22 (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of23 the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to24 severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care25 service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or26 (ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment27 using a nonformulary drug.28 (((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an29 artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content30 based on a foundation model.31 (d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial32 intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw33 inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy34 without explicit programming.35 (e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a36 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or37 prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the38 enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is39 not required to be expedited.p. 7 E2SSB 5395.SL1 Sec. 3. RCW 48.43.830 and 2025 c 227 s 8 and 2025 c 25 s 1 are2 each reenacted and amended to read as follows:3 (1) Each carrier offering a health plan issued or renewed on or4 after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards5 related to prior authorization for health care services and6 prescription drugs:7 (a) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior8 authorization determinations and notifications to a participating9 provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request10 through an electronic prior authorization process, as designated by11 each carrier:12 (i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the13 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of14 the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding15 holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request16 by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information17 to make a determination. If insufficient information has been18 provided to the carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request19 any additional information from the provider or facility within one20 calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization21 request.22 (ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the23 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of24 the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission of25 an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or facility26 that contains the necessary information to make a determination. If27 insufficient information has been provided to the carrier to make a28 decision, the carrier shall request any additional information from29 the provider or facility within one calendar day of submission of the30 electronic prior authorization request.31 (b) The carrier shall meet the following time frames for prior32 authorization determinations and notifications to a participating33 provider or facility that submits the prior authorization request34 through a process other than an electronic prior authorization35 process:36 (i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the37 carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility of38 the results of the decision within five calendar days of submission39 of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or40 facility that contains the necessary information to make ap. 8 E2SSB 5395.SL1 determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the2 carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional3 information from the provider or facility within five calendar days4 of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.5 (ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,6 the carrier shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility7 of the results of the decision within two calendar days of submission8 of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the provider or9 facility that contains the necessary information to make a10 determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the11 carrier to make a decision, the carrier shall request any additional12 information from the provider or facility within one calendar day of13 submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization request.14 (c) In any instance in which a carrier has determined that a15 provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for16 making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, a17 carrier may establish a specific reasonable time frame for submission18 of the additional information. This time frame must be communicated19 to the provider and enrollee with a carrier's request for additional20 information.21 (d) The carrier's prior authorization requirements must be22 described in detail and written in easily understandable language.23 The carrier shall make its most current prior authorization24 requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review25 criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic26 format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be27 based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review28 criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and29 emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical30 criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of31 color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review32 criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least33 annually. Clinical review criteria used for purposes of reviewing and34 decided upon prior authorization requests related to mental health35 and substance use disorder services, as defined in RCW 48.43.766,36 must meet the requirements of RCW 48.43.766.37 (((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the38 carrier shall include the credentials, board certifications, and39 areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight overp. 9 E2SSB 5395.SL1 the determination in any notification sent to the health plan2 enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.3 (2) Carriers must post any adjustments to policies and procedures4 that impact the applicability of their prior authorization5 requirements for health care services or prescription drugs,6 including new applications of prior authorization, in a single7 location on the carrier's website. After December 30, 2030, any new8 application of prior authorization for health care services must be9 available to providers on the electronic prior authorization system10 or application programming interface system.11 (3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health12 professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior13 authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed14 physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific15 clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the16 requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting17 provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical18 history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.19 Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,20 delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to21 process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used22 without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical23 necessity.24 (b) A carrier that uses artificial intelligence for the purpose25 of prior authorization or prior authorization functions, based in26 whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts with or27 otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial intelligence28 for the purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization29 functions, based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall30 ensure all of the following:31 (i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the32 following information, as applicable:33 (A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including34 demographic data; and35 (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the36 requesting provider;37 (ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination38 solely on a group data set;39 (iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines40 comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;p. 10 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not2 discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in3 violation of state or federal law;4 (v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,5 including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance6 issued by the federal department of health and human services;7 (vi) The policies and procedures for using artificial8 intelligence are open to audit by the office of the insurance9 commissioner under chapter 48.37 RCW;10 (vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and11 outcomes are periodically reviewed by the carrier to maximize12 accuracy and reliability; and13 (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated14 purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health15 insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. Sec.16 1320d et al., as applicable.17 (4)(a) Each carrier shall establish and maintain a prior18 authorization application programming interface that is consistent19 with final rules issued by the federal centers for medicare and20 medicaid services and published in the federal register, and that21 indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization of a22 service less intensive than that included in the original request is23 an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the carrier's24 grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.25 (b) Each carrier shall establish and maintain an interoperable26 electronic process or application programming interface that27 automates the process for in-network providers to determine whether a28 prior authorization is required for a covered prescription drug. The29 interoperable electronic process or application programming interface30 must support the exchange of prior authorization requests and31 determinations for prescription drugs, including information on32 covered alternative prescription drugs, beginning January 1, 2027,33 and must:34 (i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information35 and documentation requirements;36 (ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and37 determinations from its electronic health records or practice38 management system; and39 (iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization40 of a drug other than the one included in the original priorp. 11 E2SSB 5395.SL1 authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is2 subject to the carrier's grievance and appeal process under RCW3 48.43.535.4 (c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for5 using an application programming interface to communicate prior6 authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or7 not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid8 services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this9 subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.10 (d) By September 13, 2023, and at least every six months11 thereafter until September 13, 2026, the commissioner shall provide12 an update to the health care policy committees of the legislature on13 the development of rules and implementation guidance from the federal14 centers for medicare and medicaid services regarding the standards15 for development of application programming interfaces and16 interoperable electronic processes related to prior authorization17 functions. The updates should include recommendations, as18 appropriate, on whether the status of the federal rule development19 aligns with the provisions of chapter 382, Laws of 2023. The20 commissioner also shall report on any actions by the federal centers21 for medicare and medicaid services to exercise enforcement discretion22 related to the implementation and maintenance of an application23 programming interface for prior authorization functions. The24 commissioner shall consult with the health care authority, carriers,25 providers, and consumers on the development of these updates and any26 recommendations.27 (((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior28 authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 48.43.761.29 (((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions30 carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW31 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.32 (7) The commissioner may adopt any rules necessary to implement33 this section.34 (8) For the purposes of this section:35 (a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning36 and related technologies that use data to train statistical models37 for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks38 normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as39 computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and contentp. 12 E2SSB 5395.SL1 generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial2 intelligence.3 (b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a4 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or5 prescription drug where:6 (i) The passage of time:7 (A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the8 enrollee;9 (B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain10 maximum function; or11 (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of12 the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to13 severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care14 service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or15 (ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment16 using a nonformulary drug.17 (((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an18 artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content19 based on a foundation model.20 (d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial21 intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to draw22 inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy23 without explicit programming.24 (e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a25 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or26 prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the27 enrollee obtaining a health care service or prescription drug that is28 not required to be expedited.29 Sec. 4. RCW 41.05.845 and 2025 c 25 s 2 are each amended to read30 as follows:31 (1) A health plan offered to public employees, retirees, and32 their covered dependents under this chapter issued or renewed on or33 after January 1, 2024, shall comply with the following standards34 related to prior authorization for health care services and35 prescription drugs:36 (a) The health plan shall meet the following time frames for37 prior authorization determinations and notifications to a38 participating provider or facility that submits the priorp. 13 E2SSB 5395.SL1 authorization request through an electronic prior authorization2 process:3 (i) For electronic standard prior authorization requests, the4 health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility5 of the results of the decision within three calendar days, excluding6 holidays, of submission of an electronic prior authorization request7 by the provider or facility that contains the necessary information8 to make a determination. If insufficient information has been9 provided to the health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall10 request any additional information from the provider or facility11 within one calendar day of submission of the electronic prior12 authorization request.13 (ii) For electronic expedited prior authorization requests, the14 health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility15 of the results of the decision within one calendar day of submission16 of an electronic prior authorization request by the provider or17 facility that contains the necessary information to make a18 determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the19 health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any20 additional information from the provider or facility within one21 calendar day of submission of the electronic prior authorization22 request.23 (b) The health plan shall meet the following time frames for24 prior authorization determinations and notifications to a25 participating provider or facility that submits the prior26 authorization request through a process other than an electronic27 prior authorization process described in subsection (2) of this28 section:29 (i) For nonelectronic standard prior authorization requests, the30 health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider or facility31 of the results of the decision within five calendar days of32 submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the33 provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make34 a determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the35 health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any36 additional information from the provider or facility within five37 calendar days of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization38 request.39 (ii) For nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests,40 the health plan shall make a decision and notify the provider orp. 14 E2SSB 5395.SL1 facility of the results of the decision within two calendar days of2 submission of a nonelectronic prior authorization request by the3 provider or facility that contains the necessary information to make4 a determination. If insufficient information has been provided to the5 health plan to make a decision, the health plan shall request any6 additional information from the provider or facility within one7 calendar day of submission of the nonelectronic prior authorization8 request.9 (c) In any instance in which the health plan has determined that10 a provider or facility has not provided sufficient information for11 making a determination under (a) and (b) of this subsection, the12 health plan may establish a specific reasonable time frame for13 submission of the additional information. This time frame must be14 communicated to the provider and enrollee with the health plan's15 request for additional information.16 (d) The prior authorization requirements of the health plan must17 be described in detail and written in easily understandable language.18 The health plan shall make its most current prior authorization19 requirements and restrictions, including the written clinical review20 criteria, available to providers and facilities in an electronic21 format upon request. The prior authorization requirements must be22 based on peer-reviewed clinical review criteria. The clinical review23 criteria must be evidence-based criteria and must accommodate new and24 emerging information related to the appropriateness of clinical25 criteria with respect to black and indigenous people, other people of26 color, gender, and underserved populations. The clinical review27 criteria must be evaluated and updated, if necessary, at least28 annually.29 (((2))) (e) When denying a prior authorization determination, the30 health plan shall include the credentials, board certifications, and31 areas of specialty of the provider who had clinical oversight over32 the determination in any notification sent to the health plan33 enrollee and provider requesting or referring the service.34 (2) Health plans must post, and maintain the ability to make35 adjustments to policies and procedures that impact the applicability36 of their prior authorization requirements for health care services or37 prescription drugs, including new applications of prior38 authorization, in a single location on the health plan's website.39 After December 30, 2030, any new application of prior authorization40 for health care services must be available to providers on thep. 15 E2SSB 5395.SL1 electronic prior authorization system or application programming2 interface system.3 (3)(a) Only a licensed physician or a licensed health4 professional working within their scope of practice may deny a prior5 authorization request based on medical necessity. The licensed6 physician or licensed health professional shall evaluate the specific7 clinical issues involved in the health care services requested by the8 requesting provider by reviewing and considering the requesting9 provider's recommendation, the enrollee's medical or other clinical10 history, as applicable, and individual clinical circumstances.11 Artificial intelligence shall not be the sole means used to deny,12 delay, or modify health care services. Algorithms may be used to13 process and approve prior authorization requests, but may not be used14 without human review to deny care based on a determination of medical15 necessity.16 (b) A health plan that uses artificial intelligence for the17 purpose of prior authorization or prior authorization functions,18 based in whole or in part on medical necessity, or that contracts19 with or otherwise works through an entity that uses artificial20 intelligence for the purpose of prior authorization or prior21 authorization functions, based in whole or in part on medical22 necessity, shall ensure all of the following:23 (i) The artificial intelligence bases its determination on the24 following information, as applicable:25 (A) An enrollee's medical or other clinical history, including26 demographic data; and27 (B) Individual clinical circumstances as presented by the28 requesting provider;29 (ii) The artificial intelligence does not base its determination30 solely on a group data set;31 (iii) The artificial intelligence's criteria and guidelines32 comply with this chapter and applicable state and federal law;33 (iv) The use of the artificial intelligence does not34 discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an enrollee in35 violation of state or federal law;36 (v) The artificial intelligence is fairly and equitably applied,37 including in accordance with any applicable regulations and guidance38 issued by the federal department of health and human services;p. 16 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (vi) The policies and procedures for using the artificial2 intelligence is open to audit by the office of the insurance3 commissioner;4 (vii) The artificial intelligence's performance, use, and5 outcomes are periodically reviewed by the health plan to maximize6 accuracy and reliability; and7 (viii) Patient data is not used beyond its intended and stated8 purpose, consistent with chapter 70.02 RCW and the federal health9 insurance portability and accountability act of 1996, U.S.C. Sec.10 1320d et al., as applicable.11 (4)(a) Each health plan offered to public employees, retirees,12 and their covered dependents under this chapter shall establish and13 maintain a prior authorization application programming interface that14 is consistent with final rules issued by the federal centers for15 medicare and medicaid services and published in the federal register,16 and that indicates that a prior authorization denial or authorization17 of a service less intensive than that included in the original18 request is an adverse benefit determination and is subject to the19 health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW 48.43.535.20 (b) Each health plan offered to public employees, retirees, and21 their covered dependents under this chapter shall establish and22 maintain an interoperable electronic process or application23 programming interface that automates the process for in-network24 providers to determine whether a prior authorization is required for25 a covered prescription drug. The interoperable electronic process or26 application programming interface must support the exchange of prior27 authorization requests and determinations for prescription drugs,28 including information on covered alternative prescription drugs,29 beginning January 1, 2027, and must:30 (i) Allow providers to identify prior authorization information31 and documentation requirements;32 (ii) Facilitate the exchange of prior authorization requests and33 determinations from its electronic health records or practice34 management system; and35 (iii) Indicate that a prior authorization denial or authorization36 of a drug other than the one included in the original prior37 authorization request is an adverse benefit determination and is38 subject to the health plan's grievance and appeal process under RCW39 48.43.535.p. 17 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (c) Regardless of whether federal rules related to standards for2 using an application programming interface to communicate prior3 authorization status to providers are revoked, delayed, suspended, or4 not finalized by the federal centers for medicare and medicaid5 services after February 8, 2024, the requirements of (a) of this6 subsection shall be enforced beginning January 1, 2027.7 (((3))) (5) Nothing in this section applies to prior8 authorization determinations made pursuant to RCW 41.05.526.9 (((4))) (6) This section applies to prior authorization functions10 carried out by health care benefit managers, as defined in RCW11 48.200.020, under direct or indirect contract with a carrier.12 (7) The authority may adopt any rules necessary to implement this13 section.14 (8) For the purposes of this section:15 (a) "Artificial intelligence" means the use of machine learning16 and related technologies that use data to train statistical models17 for the purpose of enabling computer systems to perform tasks18 normally associated with human intelligence or perception, such as19 computer vision, speech or natural language processing, and content20 generation. "Artificial intelligence" includes generative artificial21 intelligence.22 (b) "Expedited prior authorization request" means a request by a23 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or24 prescription drug where:25 (i) The passage of time:26 (A) Could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the27 enrollee;28 (B) Could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain29 maximum function; or30 (C) In the opinion of a provider or facility with knowledge of31 the enrollee's medical condition, would subject the enrollee to32 severe pain that cannot be adequately managed without the health care33 service or prescription drug that is the subject of the request; or34 (ii) The enrollee is undergoing a current course of treatment35 using a nonformulary drug.36 (((b))) (c) "Generative artificial intelligence" means an37 artificial intelligence system that generates novel data or content38 based on a foundation model.39 (d) "Machine learning" means the process by which artificial40 intelligence is developed using data and algorithms to drawp. 18 E2SSB 5395.SL1 inferences therefrom to automatically adapt or improve its accuracy2 without explicit programming.3 (e) "Standard prior authorization request" means a request by a4 provider or facility for approval of a health care service or5 prescription drug where the request is made in advance of the6 enrollee obtaining a health care service that is not required to be7 expedited.8 (((5))) (9) This section shall not apply to coverage provided9 under the medicare part C or part D programs set forth in Title XVIII10 of the social security act of 1965, as amended.11 Sec. 5. RCW 48.43.525 and 2000 c 5 s 9 are each amended to read12 as follows:13 (1) A health carrier that offers a health plan shall not14 retrospectively deny coverage or retrospectively modify to a service15 less intensive than that included in an approved request for16 emergency and nonemergency care that had prior authorization,17 including for medical necessity, under the plan's written policies at18 the time the care was rendered, unless:19 (a) The approved prior authorization was based upon a material20 misrepresentation by the provider, facility, or covered person; or21 (b) The underlying health plan coverage is lawfully rescinded,22 canceled, or terminated retrospectively through the date of service.23 (2) Retrospective denials of services with an approved prior24 authorization or retrospective modification of an approved prior25 authorization to less intensive services due to a change in the26 carrier's determination of medical necessity are prohibited, shall27 not be considered adverse benefit determinations, and will not be28 required to follow the standard appeals processes in RCW 48.43.530 or29 any carrier policies related to their own grievance and appeals30 process. If an enrollee, or the provider requesting the authorization31 demonstrates the authorization was valid per the plan's written32 policies, then the carrier will deem the authorization approved and33 payable. Interest will be assessed on the associated claim submitted34 by the provider at the rate of one percent per month, retroactive to35 the date of submission. An enrollee, or provider on behalf of the36 enrollee, may seek review by an independent review organization under37 RCW 48.43.535 without the need to engage in, exhaust, or wait for any38 timelines related to the carrier's grievance process.p. 19 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (3) This section does not prevent carriers from reimbursing only2 for services billed and rendered.3 (4) The commissioner shall adopt, in rule, standards for this4 section after considering relevant standards adopted by national5 managed care accreditation organizations and state agencies that6 purchase managed health care services.7 Sec. 6. RCW 48.43.535 and 2022 c 263 s 4 are each amended to8 read as follows:9 (1) There is a need for a process for the fair consideration of10 disputes relating to decisions by carriers that offer a health plan11 to deny, modify, reduce, or terminate coverage of or payment for12 health care services for an enrollee. For purposes of this section,13 "carrier" also applies to a health plan if the health plan14 administers the appeal process directly or through a third party.15 (2) An enrollee may seek review by a certified independent review16 organization of a carrier's decision to deny, modify, reduce, or17 terminate coverage of or payment for a health care service or of any18 adverse determination made by a carrier under RCW 48.49.020,19 48.49.030, or sections 2799A-1 or 2799A-2 of the public health20 service act (42 U.S.C. Secs. 300gg-111 or 300gg-112) and implementing21 federal regulations in effect as of March 31, 2022, after exhausting22 the carrier's grievance process and receiving a decision that is23 unfavorable to the enrollee, or after the carrier has exceeded the24 timelines for grievances provided in RCW 48.43.530, without good25 cause and without reaching a decision. Any requirements that the26 enrollee must first engage in, exhaust, or wait for any timelines27 related to the carrier's grievance process do not apply to review28 sought pursuant to RCW 48.43.525.29 (3) The commissioner must establish and use a rotational registry30 system for the assignment of a certified independent review31 organization to each dispute. The system should be flexible enough to32 ensure that an independent review organization has the expertise33 necessary to review the particular medical condition or service at34 issue in the dispute, and that any approved independent review35 organization does not have a conflict of interest that will influence36 its independence.37 (4) Carriers must provide to the appropriate certified38 independent review organization, not later than the third businessp. 20 E2SSB 5395.SL1 day after the date the carrier receives a request for review, a copy2 of:3 (a) Any medical records of the enrollee that are relevant to the4 review;5 (b) Any documents used by the carrier in making the determination6 to be reviewed by the certified independent review organization;7 (c) Any documentation and written information submitted to the8 carrier in support of the appeal; and9 (d) A list of each physician or health care provider who has10 provided care to the enrollee and who may have medical records11 relevant to the appeal. Health information or other confidential or12 proprietary information in the custody of a carrier may be provided13 to an independent review organization, subject to rules adopted by14 the commissioner.15 (5) Enrollees must be provided with at least five business days16 to submit to the independent review organization in writing17 additional information that the independent review organization must18 consider when conducting the external review. The independent review19 organization must forward any additional information submitted by an20 enrollee to the plan or carrier within one business day of receipt by21 the independent review organization.22 (6) The medical reviewers from a certified independent review23 organization will make determinations regarding the medical necessity24 or appropriateness of, and the application of health plan coverage25 provisions to, health care services for an enrollee. The medical26 reviewers' determinations must be based upon their expert medical27 judgment, after consideration of relevant medical, scientific, and28 cost-effectiveness evidence, and medical standards of practice in the29 state of Washington. Except as provided in this subsection, the30 certified independent review organization must ensure that31 determinations are consistent with the scope of covered benefits as32 outlined in the medical coverage agreement. Medical reviewers may33 override the health plan's medical necessity or appropriateness34 standards if the standards are determined upon review to be35 unreasonable or inconsistent with sound, evidence-based medical36 practice.37 (7) Once a request for an independent review determination has38 been made, the independent review organization must proceed to a39 final determination, unless requested otherwise by both the carrier40 and the enrollee or the enrollee's representative.p. 21 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (a) An enrollee or carrier may request an expedited external2 review if the adverse benefit determination or internal adverse3 benefit determination concerns an admission, availability of care,4 continued stay, or health care service for which the claimant5 received emergency services but has not been discharged from a6 facility; or involves a medical condition for which the standard7 external review time frame would seriously jeopardize the life or8 health of the enrollee or jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain9 maximum function. The independent review organization must make its10 decision to uphold or reverse the adverse benefit determination or11 final internal adverse benefit determination and notify the enrollee12 and the carrier or health plan of the determination as expeditiously13 as possible but within not more than seventy-two hours after the14 receipt of the request for expedited external review. If the notice15 is not in writing, the independent review organization must provide16 written confirmation of the decision within forty-eight hours after17 the date of the notice of the decision.18 (b) For claims involving experimental or investigational19 treatments, the independent review organization must ensure that20 adequate clinical and scientific experience and protocols are taken21 into account as part of the external review process.22 (8) Carriers must timely implement the certified independent23 review organization's determination, and must pay the certified24 independent review organization's charges.25 (9) When an enrollee requests independent review of a dispute26 under this section, and the dispute involves a carrier's decision to27 modify, reduce, or terminate an otherwise covered health service that28 an enrollee is receiving at the time the request for review is29 submitted and the carrier's decision is based upon a finding that the30 health service, or level of health service, is no longer medically31 necessary or appropriate, the carrier must continue to provide the32 health service if requested by the enrollee until a determination is33 made under this section. If the determination affirms the carrier's34 decision, the enrollee may be responsible for the cost of the35 continued health service.36 (10) Each certified independent review organization must maintain37 written records and make them available upon request to the38 commissioner.39 (11) A certified independent review organization may notify the40 office of the insurance commissioner if, based upon its review ofp. 22 E2SSB 5395.SL1 disputes under this section, it finds a pattern of substandard or2 egregious conduct by a carrier.3 (12)(a) The commissioner shall adopt rules to implement this4 section after considering relevant standards adopted by national5 managed care accreditation organizations and the national association6 of insurance commissioners.7 (b) This section is not intended to supplant any existing8 authority of the office of the insurance commissioner under this9 title to oversee and enforce carrier compliance with applicable10 statutes and rules.11 Sec. 7. RCW 48.43.535 and 2025 c 227 s 6 are each amended to12 read as follows:13 (1) There is a need for a process for the fair consideration of14 disputes relating to decisions by carriers that offer a health plan15 to deny, modify, reduce, or terminate coverage of or payment for16 health care services for an enrollee. For purposes of this section,17 "carrier" also applies to a health plan if the health plan18 administers the appeal process directly or through a third party.19 (2) An enrollee may seek review by a certified independent review20 organization of a carrier's decision to deny, modify, reduce, or21 terminate coverage of or payment for a health care service or of any22 adverse determination made by a carrier under RCW 48.49.020,23 48.49.030, or sections 2799A-1 or 2799A-2 of the public health24 service act (42 U.S.C. Secs. 300gg-111 or 300gg-112) and implementing25 federal regulations in effect as of March 31, 2022, after exhausting26 the carrier's grievance process and receiving a decision that is27 unfavorable to the enrollee, or after the carrier has exceeded the28 timelines for grievances provided in RCW 48.43.530, without good29 cause and without reaching a decision. Any requirements that the30 enrollee must first engage in, exhaust, or wait for any timelines31 related to the carrier's grievance process do not apply to review32 sought pursuant to RCW 48.43.525.33 (3) The commissioner must establish and use a rotational registry34 system for the assignment of a certified independent review35 organization to each dispute. The system should be flexible enough to36 ensure that an independent review organization has the expertise37 necessary to review the particular medical condition or service at38 issue in the dispute, and that any approved independent reviewp. 23 E2SSB 5395.SL1 organization does not have a conflict of interest that will influence2 its independence.3 (4) Carriers must provide to the appropriate certified4 independent review organization, not later than the third business5 day after the date the carrier receives a request for review, a copy6 of:7 (a) Any medical records of the enrollee that are relevant to the8 review;9 (b) Any documents used by the carrier in making the determination10 to be reviewed by the certified independent review organization;11 (c) Any documentation and written information submitted to the12 carrier in support of the appeal; and13 (d) A list of each physician or health care provider who has14 provided care to the enrollee and who may have medical records15 relevant to the appeal. Health information or other confidential or16 proprietary information in the custody of a carrier may be provided17 to an independent review organization, subject to rules adopted by18 the commissioner.19 (5) Enrollees must be provided with at least five business days20 to submit to the independent review organization in writing21 additional information that the independent review organization must22 consider when conducting the external review. The independent review23 organization must forward any additional information submitted by an24 enrollee to the plan or carrier within one business day of receipt by25 the independent review organization.26 (6) The medical reviewers from a certified independent review27 organization will make determinations regarding the medical necessity28 or appropriateness of, and the application of health plan coverage29 provisions to, health care services for an enrollee. The medical30 reviewers' determinations must be based upon their expert medical31 judgment, after consideration of relevant medical, scientific, and32 cost-effectiveness evidence, and medical standards of practice in the33 state of Washington. Except as provided in this subsection, the34 certified independent review organization must ensure that35 determinations are consistent with the scope of covered benefits as36 outlined in the medical coverage agreement. Medical reviewers may37 override the health plan's medical necessity or appropriateness38 standards if the standards are determined upon review to be39 unreasonable or inconsistent with sound, evidence-based medical40 practice. For reviews of mental health and substance use disorderp. 24 E2SSB 5395.SL1 services, as defined in RCW 48.43.766, the medical reviewers must2 conduct reviews and make determinations in a manner consistent with3 the requirements of RCW 48.43.766.4 (7) Once a request for an independent review determination has5 been made, the independent review organization must proceed to a6 final determination, unless requested otherwise by both the carrier7 and the enrollee or the enrollee's representative.8 (a) An enrollee or carrier may request an expedited external9 review if the adverse benefit determination or internal adverse10 benefit determination concerns an admission, availability of care,11 continued stay, or health care service for which the claimant12 received emergency services but has not been discharged from a13 facility; or involves a medical condition for which the standard14 external review time frame would seriously jeopardize the life or15 health of the enrollee or jeopardize the enrollee's ability to regain16 maximum function. The independent review organization must make its17 decision to uphold or reverse the adverse benefit determination or18 final internal adverse benefit determination and notify the enrollee19 and the carrier or health plan of the determination as expeditiously20 as possible but within not more than seventy-two hours after the21 receipt of the request for expedited external review. If the notice22 is not in writing, the independent review organization must provide23 written confirmation of the decision within forty-eight hours after24 the date of the notice of the decision.25 (b) For claims involving experimental or investigational26 treatments, the independent review organization must ensure that27 adequate clinical and scientific experience and protocols are taken28 into account as part of the external review process.29 (8) Carriers must timely implement the certified independent30 review organization's determination, and must pay the certified31 independent review organization's charges.32 (9) When an enrollee requests independent review of a dispute33 under this section, and the dispute involves a carrier's decision to34 modify, reduce, or terminate an otherwise covered health service that35 an enrollee is receiving at the time the request for review is36 submitted and the carrier's decision is based upon a finding that the37 health service, or level of health service, is no longer medically38 necessary or appropriate, the carrier must continue to provide the39 health service if requested by the enrollee until a determination is40 made under this section. If the determination affirms the carrier'sp. 25 E2SSB 5395.SL1 decision, the enrollee may be responsible for the cost of the2 continued health service.3 (10) Each certified independent review organization must maintain4 written records and make them available upon request to the5 commissioner.6 (11) A certified independent review organization may notify the7 office of the insurance commissioner if, based upon its review of8 disputes under this section, it finds a pattern of substandard or9 egregious conduct by a carrier.10 (12)(a) The commissioner shall adopt rules to implement this11 section after considering relevant standards adopted by national12 managed care accreditation organizations and the national association13 of insurance commissioners.14 (b) This section is not intended to supplant any existing15 authority of the office of the insurance commissioner under this16 title to oversee and enforce carrier compliance with applicable17 statutes and rules.18 Sec. 8. RCW 48.43.0161 and 2023 c 382 s 4 are each amended to19 read as follows:20 (1) By October 1, ((2020)) 2026, and annually thereafter, for21 individual and group health plans issued by a carrier that has22 written at least one percent of the total accident and health23 insurance premiums written by all companies authorized to offer24 accident and health insurance in Washington in the most recently25 available year, the carrier shall report to the commissioner the26 following aggregated and deidentified data related to the carrier's27 prior authorization practices and experience for the prior plan year:28 (a) The total number of prior authorization requests, approvals,29 and denials. The carrier must report these totals separately for30 approvals or denials made by the carrier directly and for approvals31 or denials made by a health care benefit manager as defined in RCW32 48.200.020 that is delegated to make prior authorization33 determinations either directly or indirectly on behalf of the34 carrier. In the report, carriers must also indicate:35 (i) The percentage of total denials that were aided by artificial36 intelligence;37 (ii) The percent of prior authorization determinations made after38 the standard and expedited authorization request turnaround times39 stated in RCW 48.43.830; andp. 26 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (iii) The total number of nonelectronic standard and2 nonelectronic expedited prior authorization requests;3 (b) Lists of the 10 inpatient medical or surgical codes:4 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests5 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior6 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved7 requests for each code;8 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization9 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of10 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of11 approved requests for each code; and12 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests13 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,14 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each15 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then16 subsequently approved for each code;17 (((b))) (c) Lists of the 10 outpatient medical or surgical codes:18 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests19 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior20 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved21 requests for each code;22 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization23 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of24 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of25 approved requests for each code; and26 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests27 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,28 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each29 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then30 subsequently approved for each code;31 (((c))) (d) Lists of the 10 inpatient mental health and substance32 use disorder service codes:33 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests34 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior35 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved36 requests for each code;37 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization38 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of39 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of40 approved requests for each code; andp. 27 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests2 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,3 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each4 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then5 subsequently approved for each code;6 (((d))) (e) Lists of the 10 outpatient mental health and7 substance use disorder service codes:8 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests9 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior10 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved11 requests for each code;12 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization13 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of14 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of15 approved requests for each code; and16 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests17 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,18 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each19 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then20 subsequently approved;21 (((e))) (f) Lists of the 10 durable medical equipment codes:22 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests23 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior24 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved25 requests for each code;26 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization27 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of28 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of29 approved requests for each code; and30 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests31 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,32 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each33 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then34 subsequently approved for each code;35 (((f))) (g) Lists of the 10 diabetes supplies and equipment36 codes:37 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests38 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior39 authorization requests for each code and the percent of approved40 requests for each code;p. 28 E2SSB 5395.SL1 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization2 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of3 prior authorization requests for each code and the percent of4 approved requests for each code; and5 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests6 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,7 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each8 code and the percent of requests that were initially denied and then9 subsequently approved for each code;10 (((g))) (h) Lists of the 10 prescription drugs:11 (i) With the highest total number of prior authorization requests12 during the previous plan year, including the total number of prior13 authorization requests for each prescription drug and the percent of14 approved requests for each prescription drug;15 (ii) With the highest percentage of approved prior authorization16 requests during the previous plan year, including the total number of17 prior authorization requests for each prescription drug and the18 percent of approved requests for each prescription drug; and19 (iii) With the highest percentage of prior authorization requests20 that were initially denied and then subsequently approved on appeal,21 including the total number of prior authorization requests for each22 prescription drug and the percent of requests that were initially23 denied and then subsequently approved for each prescription drug; and24 (((h))) (i) The average determination response time in hours for25 prior authorization requests to the carrier in total reported under26 (a) of this subsection and with respect to each code reported under27 (((a))) (b) through (((f))) (h) of this subsection for each of the28 following categories of prior authorization:29 (i) Expedited decisions;30 (ii) Standard decisions; and31 (iii) Extenuating circumstances decisions.32 (2)(a) By January 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, the33 commissioner shall aggregate and deidentify the data collected under34 subsection (1)(b) through (h) of this section into a standard report35 and may not identify the name of the carrier that submitted the data.36 The commissioner must make the report available to interested37 parties.38 (b) The report must contain trend data for total authorization39 requests, approvals, and denials submitted under subsection (1)(a) of40 this section separately for each carrier directly and for each healthp. 29 E2SSB 5395.SL1 care benefit manager, as defined in RCW 48.200.020, that is delegated2 to make prior authorization determinations either directly or3 indirectly on behalf of the carrier.4 (3) The commissioner may request additional information from5 carriers reporting data under this section.6 (4) The commissioner may adopt rules to implement this section.7 In adopting rules, the commissioner must consult stakeholders8 including carriers, health care practitioners, health care9 facilities, and patients.10 (5) For the purpose of this section, "prior authorization" means11 a mandatory process that a carrier or its designated or contracted12 representative requires a provider or facility to follow before a13 service is delivered, to determine if a service is a benefit and14 meets the requirements for medical necessity, clinical15 appropriateness, level of care, or effectiveness in relation to the16 applicable plan, including any term used by a carrier or its17 designated or contracted representative to describe this process.18 NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. Sections 2 and 6 of this act expire19 January 1, 2027.20 NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. Sections 3 and 7 of this act take effect21 January 1, 2027.Passed by the Senate March 9, 2026.Passed by the House March 4, 2026.Approved by the Governor March 23, 2026.Filed in Office of Secretary of State March 24, 2026.--- END ---p. 30 E2SSB 5395.SL
Making improvements to transparency and accountability in the prior authorization determination process.
Sponsors
Sen. Tina Orwall (D) sponsors SB 5395, and 5 members have co-sponsored it.
Committees
SB 5395 went before 5 committees: Health & Long-term Care, Ways & Means, Rules, Health Care and Wellness and Appropriations.
History
SB 5395 has taken 41 actions since Jan 21, 2025, the latest on Mar 23, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 23, 2026 | Senate | Governor signed. | ||
Mar 23, 2026 | Senate | Chapter 157, 2026 Laws. | ||
Mar 23, 2026 | Senate | Effective date 6/11/2026*. | ||
Mar 12, 2026 | Senate | Delivered to Governor. | ||
Mar 11, 2026 | House | Speaker signed. |
Votes
SB 5395 went to 7 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Mar 9, 2026 at 49–0.
| Chamber | Question | Yea | Nay | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 9, 2026 | Senate | Senate Final Passage as Amended by the House | 49 | 0 | ||
Mar 4, 2026 | House | House Final Passage as Amended by the House | 94 | 0 | ||
Mar 2, 2026 | House | House Committee on Appropriations: do pass with amendment(s) but without amendment(s) by Health Care & Wellness | 29 | 0 | ||
Feb 25, 2026 | House | House Committee on Health Care & Wellness: do pass with amendment(s) | 16 | 0 | ||
Feb 11, 2026 | Senate | Senate 3rd Reading & Final Passage | 48 | 1 |
Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com
