Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 780

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 780, the Alexandra’s Law Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Jan 28, 2025 by Rep. Darrell Issa (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 28, 2025: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 780 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb780/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 780 IH: Alexandra’s Law Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-28
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 780 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 28, 2025 Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Kiley of California , and Mr. Obernolte ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To authorize the court to make an advisory statement under certain circumstances, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Alexandra’s Law Act of 2025 .
2.
Controlled substances advisory statement
Section 401 of the Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.S.C. 841 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(i)
Advisory statement
(1)
Conviction
Any person who is convicted of, or enters a plea of guilty or no contest, to an offense under this section with respect to which death occurred, may be charged with homicide.
(2)
Court advising
A court shall advise any person who is convicted of, or enters a plea of guilty or no contest to, an offense under this section involving N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide, or an analogue thereof, exchanged for anything of value, with respect to which death occurred, of the following:
You are hereby advised that all illicit drugs and counterfeit pills are dangerous to human life and become even deadlier when they are, sometimes unknowingly, mixed with substances such as fentanyl and analogues of fentanyl. People can and have died from these substances, even in very small doses. It is extremely dangerous and deadly to human life to sell or administer drugs, in any form, when not lawfully authorized to do so. If you do so in the future and a person dies as a result of that action, and you knew or should have known that the substance you provided contained fentanyl or a fentanyl analogue, you may be charged with an offense under section 1111 or 1112 of title 18, United States Code. This conviction will be considered by a judge or jury as to whether you knew or should have known that the substance you provided to the decedent contained fentanyl. .
(3)
Evidence
(A)
In general
Except as provided in paragraph (4), in the case of a defendant who is charged with an offense under section 1111 of 1112 of title 18, United States Code, with respect to a death involving N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or an analogue thereof, exchanged for anything of value, a previous conviction for, or a plea of guilty or no contest to, an offense under this section involving N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide, or an analogue thereof, in exchange for anything of value, with respect to which death occurred, may be used as evidence that the defendant had knowledge that the substance provided to the decedent contained N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or an analogue thereof.
(B)
Admission of State court acknowledgment
Any sworn statement used in State court that is substantially similar to the statement in paragraph (2) shall be admissible in a Federal court.
(C)
Admission of Federal court acknowledgment
Any sworn statement in paragraph (2) may be admissible in a State court.
(4)
Exception
Paragraph (3) shall not apply to the prosecution of an individual who was a minor at the time at which the individual committed the offense.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-28
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To authorize the court to make an advisory statement under certain circumstances, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Darrell Issa (R) sponsors H.R. 780, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 780 went before 2 committees: Energy and Commerce and Judiciary.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Jan 28, 2025 · 1,636 Bills
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jan 28, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 780 has taken 2 actions since Jan 28, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 28, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 28, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 780 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 780 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Alexandra’s Law Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Alexandra’s Law Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To authorize the court to make an advisory statement under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

2 clients hired 2 firms and 18 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 780 in 2 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Agriculture, Banking, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Education, Family issues/Abortion/Adoption, Health Issues.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONDistrict of Columbia11
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION CTW-CLCDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 fourth_quarter$520K4th Quarter - Report
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION CTW-CLCSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION CTW-CLC2026 second_quarter$300K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 780 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 780’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr780/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com