Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 386

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 386, the Critical Water Resources Prioritization Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 4, 2025 by Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Environment And Public Works, and last saw action on Feb 4, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


Record

Text

S. 386 has 2 co-sponsors.

sb386/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S386 IS: Critical Water Resources Prioritization Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-02-04
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 386 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 4, 2025 Ms. Lummis (for herself, Mr. Barrasso , and Mr. Sheehy ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works A BILL
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide exemptions from the consultation requirements required under that Act for agency actions that fulfill critical human water needs, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Critical Water Resources Prioritization Act of 2025 .
2.
Critical water resources exemptions under the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(a)
In general
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1536 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(q)
Human needs exemptions for water resources
(1)
Definitions
In this subsection:
(A)
Critical human water need
The term critical human water need means water required—
(i)
for a municipal drinking water supply;
(ii)
for emergency services, including firefighting;
(iii)
to maintain public health and safety, as determined by the Secretary or a relevant water management agency; or
(iv)
for food security, as determined by the Secretary.
(B)
Water management agency
The term water management agency means any Federal, State, or local agency with authority to manage or allocate water resources.
(2)
Exemptions for critical human water needs
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary may grant an exemption from the requirements of subsection (a)(2) for any agency action carried out by a water management agency to fulfill a critical human water need if—
(A)
those requirements would directly conflict with the fulfillment of the critical human water need;
(B)
the water management agency has—
(i)
implemented all reasonable water conservation measures;
(ii)
explored all feasible alternative water sources; and
(iii)
determined no other reasonable alternatives exist to meet the critical human water need; and
(C)
the water management agency submits to the Secretary—
(i)
documentation of the conditions described in subparagraphs (A) and (B);
(ii)
a plan to minimize adverse impacts on affected species; and
(iii)
a timeline for reinstating those requirements.
(3)
Duration and renewal
(A)
Initial period
An exemption granted by the Secretary under paragraph (2) shall be valid for a period of not more than 180 days.
(B)
Renewal
The Secretary may renew an exemption under paragraph (2) for additional 180-day periods if the conditions described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) continue to exist and the applicable water management agency resubmits the information described in subparagraph (C) of that paragraph.
(4)
Reports
(A)
Water management agency reports
A water management agency operating under an exemption granted under paragraph (2) shall submit to the Secretary monthly reports describing—
(i)
the ongoing critical human water need for which the exemption was made;
(ii)
efforts to develop alternative water sources; and
(iii)
(I)
impacts on affected species; and
(II)
measures taken to minimize those impacts.
(B)
Secretary reports
The Secretary shall submit to Congress an annual report describing—
(i)
all exemption made under this subsection;
(ii)
the cumulative impact of those exemptions on affected species; and
(iii)
recommendations for improving the balance between critical human water needs and species protection.
(5)
Judicial review
Any action taken under this subsection shall be subject to judicial review only for arbitrary and capricious agency action under section 706 of title 5, United States Code.
.
(b)
Regulations
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary (as defined in section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1532 )) shall promulgate regulations to implement the amendments made by this section.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-04
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide exemptions from the consultation requirements required under that Act for agency actions that fulfill critical human water needs, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R) sponsors S. 386, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 386 went before 1 committee: Environment and Public Works.

Environment and Public Works
Environment and Public Works
Referred To · Feb 4, 2025 · 257 Bills

Actions

S. 386 has taken 2 actions since Feb 4, 2025.

ChamberAction
Feb 4, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.Environment and Public Works Committee
Feb 4, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 386 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 386 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Critical Water Resources Prioritization Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Critical Water Resources Prioritization Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide exemptions from the consultation requirements required under that Act for agency actions that fulfill critical human water needs, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named S. 386 in 1 quarterly filing, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Natural Resources.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYconservation organizationDistrict of Columbia11$20K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
E2 STRATEGIES, LLC11$20K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
PETER UMHOFER111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYE2 STRATEGIES, LLC2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 386 under Environmental Protection, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 386’s is Environmental Protection.

s386/policy-areas.txt
Environmental ProtectionAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com