Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

Sign In

H.R. 1001

U.S. House•In Senate Committee

Summary

H.R. 1001, to provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund, was introduced in the House on Feb 5, 2025 by Rep. Harriet Hageman (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Energy And Natural Resources, and last saw action on May 14, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Record

Text

H.R. 1001 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb1001/engrossed-in-house.txt
119 HR 1001 EH: To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 IB
 119th CONGRESS  1st Session
 H. R. 1001
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 AN ACT
To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
1.
Memorandum of understanding to address potential impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund
(a)
In general
As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the record of decision entitled the  Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision  and dated July 2024 (referred to in this section as the  record of decision ) has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund (referred to in this section as the  Fund ).
(b)
Required plan
The memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) shall, using information derived from existing hydropower contracts, include the establishment of a plan to—
(1)
address the effects that the record of decision may have on Fund obligations including routine operations, maintenance, and replacement of critical infrastructure;
(2)
address the impact that the record of decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, including costs to replace hydropower resources and grid reliability; and
(3)
identify impacts that the record of decision has had on species listed as a threatened species or an endangered species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533 ).
(c)
Savings clauses
Nothing in this Act shall preempt rights or obligations under subchapter II of  chapter 5  of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the  Administrative Procedure Act ).
    Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2025.  Kevin F. McCumber,  Clerk.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-05
  2. Passed House2025-05-13
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Feb 5, 2025

hb1001/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (02/05/2025)

This bill directs the Bureau of Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, to enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the 2024 record of decision entitled Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. The memorandum of understanding must include a plan to (1) address the effects that the decision may have on the fund's obligations, (2) address the impact that the decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, and (3) identify impacts that the decision has had on species listed as threatened or endangered species.

By way of background, Reclamation published a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for the Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) in 2024. The SEIS revises the 2016 LTEMP Record of Decision to address two issues: (1) responding to the threat of the invasive smallmouth bass below Glen Canyon Dam, and (2) incorporating the latest sediment science to assess when high-flow experiments should be conducted in order to protect the endangered humpback chub.

Sponsors

Rep. Harriet Hageman (R) sponsors H.R. 1001, and 2 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 1001 went before 2 committees: Energy and Natural Resources and Natural Resources.

Energy and Natural Resources
Energy and Natural Resources
Referred To · May 14, 2025 · 314 Bills
Natural Resources
Natural Resources
Reported By · Apr 17, 2025 · 395 Bills

Reports

1 committee report has been filed on H.R. 1001, the latest H. Rept. 119-61.

  • H. Rept. 119-61 — TO PROVIDE FOR A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO ADDRESS THE IMPACTS OF A CERTAIN RECORD OF DECISION ON THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN FUND

Actions

H.R. 1001 has taken 13 actions since Feb 5, 2025, the latest on May 14, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 14, 2025
Senate
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.Energy and Natural Resources Committee
May 13, 202516:29
House
Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
May 13, 202516:29
House
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1972-1973)
May 13, 202516:29
House
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1001.
May 13, 202516:37
House
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1972)

Votes

H.R. 1001 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 1001.

Titles

H.R. 1001 goes by 3 titles.

  • To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. — Display Title
  • To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. — Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text
  • To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 1001, the latest on May 27, 2025.

Lobbying

4 clients hired 3 firms and 25 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 1001 in 15 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear, Environment/Superfund, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Clean Air and Water (quality), Disaster Planning/Emergencies, Natural Resources, Utilities.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONPublic power non-profitArizona16$120K
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)—Virginia16—
UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMSPublic power firmUtah12$40K
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION—Virginia11—

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
MEGUIRE WHITNEY28$160K
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)16—
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION11—

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 25.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
ELIZABETH WHITNEY128
JOY GREWATZ128
RYAN SEROTE128
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN116
HILL THOMAS116
JASON COOKE116
KATIE CULLETON116
LOUIS FINKEL116
MARY KIRLIN116
MICHAEL HORDER116
MONTEE WYNN116
PAUL GUTIERREZ116
WILL MITCHELL116
JOSEPH CIRRINCIONE115
EMILY PETERSON114
HANNAH SCOTT114
GRANT CUMMINGS113
HANNAH HARDIN112
ROBERT HAMILL112
AMY THOMAS111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 second_quarter$1.2M2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2026 second_quarter$980K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 first_quarter$881.7K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2026 first_quarter$850K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 third_quarter$840K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 fourth_quarter$770K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$290K3rd Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMSMEGUIRE WHITNEY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMSMEGUIRE WHITNEY2026 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2025 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONMEGUIRE WHITNEY2025 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1001 under Water Resources Development, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 9 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1001’s is Water Resources Development.

hr1001/policy-areas.txt
Water Resources DevelopmentAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public Works

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 1001 carries 9 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Arizona to Wildlife conservation and habitat protection.

hr1001/subjects.txt
ArizonaCaliforniaDams and canalsEnvironmental assessment, monitoring, researchFishesGovernment trust fundsLakes and riversNevadaWildlife conservation and habitat protection

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1001, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. HAGEMAN:H.R. 1001.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article IV, Section 3, clause 2 (Property Clause)[Page H505]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com