Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 3175

Illinois HousePassed

Summary

HB 3175, “VEH CD-PASSING SCHOOL BUS”, was introduced in the House on Feb 6, 2025 by Rep. Ann Williams (D) with 11 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jul 24, 2026: Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0587.


Record

Text

HB 3175 has 11 co-sponsors and 4 roll calls.

hb3175/enrolled.txt
Select Language
×
The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.
Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.
The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.
NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.
Choose Language
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Interlingua
Interlingue
Inuktitut
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Khmer
Korean
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Myanmar
Nepali
Norwegian
Odia
Pashto
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Sango
Sanskrit
Sardinian
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Southern Sotho
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Powered by Translate
Close
Illinois General Assembly
Top Navigation Bar
Translate
Learn
Select General Assembly
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.
ILGA.GOV
Mobile Top Bar
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.
Full Text of HB3175
Home
Legislation
Full Text
HB3175 - 104th General Assembly
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Select Menu
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Engrossed
Enrolled
Senate Amendment 001
Public Act
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Engrossed
Enrolled
Senate Amendment 001
Public Act
Open PDF
HB3175 Enrolled LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
AN ACT concerning transportation.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 5. The Illinois Vehicle Code is amended by
changing Section 11-208.9 as follows:
(625 ILCS 5/11-208.9)
Sec. 11-208.9. Automated traffic law enforcement system;
approaching, overtaking, and passing a school bus.
(a) As used in this Section, "automated traffic law
enforcement system" means a device with one or more motor
vehicle sensors working in conjunction with the visual signals
on a school bus, as specified in Sections 12-803 and 12-805 of
this Code, to produce recorded images of motor vehicles that
fail to stop before meeting or overtaking, from either
direction, any school bus stopped at any location for the
purpose of receiving or discharging pupils in violation of
Section 11-1414 of this Code or a similar provision of a local
ordinance.
An automated traffic law enforcement system is a system,
in a municipality or county operated by a governmental agency,
that produces a recorded image of a motor vehicle's violation
of a provision of this Code or a local ordinance and is
designed to obtain a clear recorded image of the vehicle and
HB3175 Enrolled - 2 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
the vehicle's license plate. The recorded image must also
display the time, date, and location of the violation.
(b) As used in this Section, "recorded images" means
images recorded by an automated traffic law enforcement system
on:
(1) 2 or more photographs;
(2) 2 or more microphotographs;
(3) 2 or more electronic images; or
(4) a video recording showing the motor vehicle and,
on at least one image or portion of the recording, clearly
identifying the registration plate or digital registration
plate number of the motor vehicle.
(c) A municipality or county that produces a recorded
image of a motor vehicle's violation of a provision of this
Code or a local ordinance must make the recorded images of a
violation accessible to the alleged violator by providing the
alleged violator with a website address, accessible through
the Internet.
(d) For each violation of a provision of this Code or a
local ordinance recorded by an automated traffic law
enforcement system, the county or municipality having
jurisdiction shall issue a written notice of the violation to
the registered owner of the vehicle, who shall be liable for
the violation unless otherwise provided in this Section [as the ]
[alleged violator]. The notice shall be delivered to the
registered owner of the vehicle, by mail, within 30 days after
HB3175 Enrolled - 3 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
[the Secretary of State notifies] the municipality or county
confirms [of] the identity of the owner of the vehicle, but in no
event later than 90 days after the violation.
(e) The notice required under subsection (d) shall
include:
(1) the name and address of the registered owner of
the vehicle;
(2) the registration number of the motor vehicle
involved in the violation;
(3) the violation charged;
(4) the location where the violation occurred;
(5) the date and time of the violation;
(6) a copy of the recorded images;
(7) the amount of the civil penalty imposed and the
date by which the civil penalty should be paid;
(8) a statement that recorded images are evidence of a
violation of overtaking or passing a school bus stopped
for the purpose of receiving or discharging pupils;
(9) a warning that failure to pay the civil penalty or
to contest liability in a timely manner is an admission of
liability;
(10) a statement that the person may elect to proceed
by:
(A) paying the fine; or
(B) challenging the charge in court, by mail, or
by administrative hearing; and
HB3175 Enrolled - 4 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
(11) a website address, accessible through the
Internet, where the person may view the recorded images of
the violation.
(e-5) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a
school bus was stopped for the purpose of receiving or
discharging pupils and that the visual signals as specified in
Sections 12-803 and 12-805 were in operation on the school bus
when recorded images produced by an automated traffic law
enforcement system show:
(1) an activated stop signal arm; and
(2) an electronic indicator indicating activation of
school bus visual signals.
(f) (Blank).
(g) Based on inspection of recorded images produced by an
automated traffic law enforcement system, a notice alleging
that the violation occurred shall be evidence of the facts
contained in the notice and admissible in any proceeding
alleging a violation under this Section.
(h) Recorded images made by an automated traffic law
enforcement system are confidential and shall be made
available only to the alleged violator and governmental and
law enforcement agencies for purposes of adjudicating a
violation of this Section, for statistical purposes, or for
other governmental purposes. Any recorded image evidencing a
violation of this Section, however, may be admissible in any
proceeding resulting from the issuance of the citation.
HB3175 Enrolled - 5 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
(i) The court or hearing officer may consider in defense
of a violation:
(1) that the motor vehicle or registration plates or
digital registration plates of the motor vehicle were
stolen before the violation occurred and not under the
control of or in the possession of the owner or lessee at
the time of the violation;
(1.5) that the motor vehicle was hijacked before the
violation occurred and not under the control of or in the
possession of the owner or lessee at the time of the
violation;
(2) that the driver of the motor vehicle received a
Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer for a
violation of Section 11-1414 of this Code within
one-eighth of a mile and 15 minutes of the violation that
was recorded by the system;
(3) that the visual signals required by Sections
12-803 and 12-805 of this Code were damaged, not
activated, not present in violation of Sections 12-803 and
12-805, or inoperable; and
(4) any other evidence or issues provided by municipal
or county ordinance.
(j) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle was hijacked or
the motor vehicle or registration plates or digital
registration plates were stolen before the violation occurred
and were not under the control or possession of the owner or
HB3175 Enrolled - 6 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
lessee at the time of the violation, the owner or lessee must
submit proof that a report concerning the motor vehicle or
registration plates was filed with a law enforcement agency in
a timely manner.
(k) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle received a
Uniform Traffic Citation from a police officer at the time of
the violation, the motor vehicle owner is subject to a
mandatory civil penalty of $300 [not exceeding $150] for a first
time violation or $1,000 [$500] for a second or subsequent
violation, plus an additional penalty of not more than $100
for failure to pay the original penalty in a timely manner, if
the motor vehicle is recorded by an automated traffic law
enforcement system. A violation for which a civil penalty is
imposed under this Section is not a violation of a traffic
regulation governing the movement of vehicles and may not be
recorded on the driving record of the owner of the vehicle, but
may be recorded by the municipality or county for the purpose
of determining if a person is subject to the higher fine for a
second or subsequent offense.
(l) A school bus equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system must be posted with a sign indicating that
the school bus is being monitored by an automated traffic law
enforcement system.
(m) A municipality or county that has one or more school
buses equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement
system must provide notice to drivers by posting a list of
HB3175 Enrolled - 7 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
school districts using school buses equipped with an automated
traffic law enforcement system on the municipality or county
website. School districts that have one or more school buses
equipped with an automated traffic law enforcement system must
provide notice to drivers by posting that information on their
websites.
(n) A municipality or county operating an automated
traffic law enforcement system shall conduct a statistical
analysis to assess the safety impact in each school district
using school buses equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system following installation of the system and
every 2 years thereafter. A municipality or county operating
an automated speed enforcement system before the effective
date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General Assembly
shall conduct a statistical analysis to assess the safety
impact of the system by no later than one year after the
effective date of this amendatory Act of the 103rd General
Assembly and every 2 years thereafter. Each statistical
analysis shall be based upon the best available crash,
traffic, and other data, and shall cover a period of time
before and after installation of the system sufficient to
provide a statistically valid comparison of safety impact.
Each statistical analysis shall be consistent with
professional judgment and acceptable industry practice. Each
statistical analysis also shall be consistent with the data
required for valid comparisons of before and after conditions
HB3175 Enrolled - 8 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
and shall be conducted within a reasonable period following
the installation of the automated traffic law enforcement
system. Each statistical analysis required by this subsection
shall be made available to the public and shall be published on
the website of the municipality or county. If a statistical
analysis indicates that there has been an increase in the rate
of crashes at the approach to school buses monitored by the
system, the municipality or county shall undertake additional
studies to determine the cause and severity of the crashes,
and may take any action that it determines is necessary or
appropriate to reduce the number or severity of the crashes
involving school buses equipped with an automated traffic law
enforcement system.
(o) The compensation paid for an automated traffic law
enforcement system must be based on the value of the equipment
or the services provided and may not be based on the number of
traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by the
system.
(o-1) No member of the General Assembly and no officer or
employee of a municipality or county shall knowingly accept
employment or receive compensation or fees for services from a
vendor that provides automated traffic law enforcement system
equipment or services to municipalities or counties. No former
member of the General Assembly shall, within a period of 2
years immediately after the termination of service as a member
of the General Assembly, knowingly accept employment or
HB3175 Enrolled - 9 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
receive compensation or fees for services from a vendor that
provides automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or
services to municipalities or counties. No former officer or
employee of a municipality or county shall, within a period of
2 years immediately after the termination of municipal or
county employment, knowingly accept employment or receive
compensation or fees for services from a vendor that provides
automated traffic law enforcement system equipment or services
to municipalities or counties.
(p) No person who is the lessor of a motor vehicle pursuant
to a written lease agreement shall be liable for an automated
speed or traffic law enforcement system violation involving
such motor vehicle during the period of the lease; provided
that upon the request of the appropriate authority received
within 120 days after the violation occurred, the lessor
provides within 60 days after such receipt the name and
address of the lessee.
Upon the provision of information by the lessor pursuant
to this subsection, the county or municipality may issue the
violation to the lessee of the vehicle in the same manner as it
would issue a violation to a registered owner of a vehicle
pursuant to this Section, and the lessee may be held liable for
the violation.
(q) (Blank).
(r) After a municipality or county enacts an ordinance
providing for automated traffic law enforcement systems under
HB3175 Enrolled - 10 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
this Section, each school district within that municipality or
county's jurisdiction may implement an automated traffic law
enforcement system under this Section. The elected school
board for that district must approve the implementation of an
automated traffic law enforcement system. The school district
shall be responsible for entering into a contract, approved by
the elected school board of that district, with vendors for
the installation, maintenance, and operation of the automated
traffic law enforcement system. The school district must enter
into an intergovernmental agreement, approved by the elected
school board of that district, with the municipality or county
with jurisdiction over that school district for the
administration of the automated traffic law enforcement
system. The proceeds from a school district's automated
traffic law enforcement system's fines shall be divided
equally between the school district and the municipality or
county administering the automated traffic law enforcement
system.
(s) If a county or municipality changes the vendor it uses
for its automated traffic law enforcement system and must, as
a consequence, apply for a permit, approval, or other
authorization from the Department for reinstallation of one or
more malfunctioning components of that system and if, at the
time of the application, the new vendor operates an automated
traffic law enforcement system for any other county or
municipality in the State, then the Department shall approve
HB3175 Enrolled - 11 - LRB104 09887 LNS 19956 b
or deny the county or municipality's application for that
permit, approval, or other authorization within 90 days after
its receipt.
(t) The Department may revoke any permit, approval, or
other authorization granted to a county or municipality for
the placement, installation, or operation of an automated
traffic law enforcement system if any official or employee who
serves that county or municipality is charged with bribery,
official misconduct, or a similar crime related to the
placement, installation, or operation of the automated traffic
law enforcement system in the county or municipality.
The Department shall adopt any rules necessary to
implement and administer this subsection. The rules adopted by
the Department shall describe the revocation process, shall
ensure that notice of the revocation is provided, and shall
provide an opportunity to appeal the revocation. Any county or
municipality that has a permit, approval, or other
authorization revoked under this subsection may not reapply
for such a permit, approval, or other authorization for a
period of 1 year after the revocation.
(Source: P.A. 102-905, eff. 1-1-23; 102-982, eff. 7-1-23;
103-154, eff. 6-30-23; 103-364, eff. 7-28-23.)

Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Provides that, for each violation of a provision of the Code or a local ordinance recorded by an automated traffic law enforcement system, the county or municipality having jurisdiction shall issue a written notice of the violation to the registered owner of the vehicle who shall be liable for the violation unless otherwise provided. Provides that the notice shall be delivered to the registered vehicle owner within 30 days after the municipality or county confirms the identity of the owner of the vehicle (rather than 30 days after the Secretary of State notifies the municipality or county of the identity of the owner of the vehicle), but in no event later than 90 days after the violation. Provides that there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a school bus was stopped for the purpose of receiving or discharging pupils and the visual signals were in operation on the school bus when recorded images produced by an automated traffic law enforcement system show: (1) an activated stop signal arm; and (2) an electronic indicator indicating activation of school bus visual signals. Provides that the motor vehicle owner is subject to a mandatory civil penalty of $300 (rather than a penalty not exceeding $150) for a first time violation or $1,000 (rather than a penalty not exceeding $500) for a second or subsequent violation.

Sponsors

Rep. Ann Williams (D) sponsors HB 3175, and 11 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

HB 3175 went before 4 committees: Rules, Transportation: Vehicles & Safety, Assignments and Executive.

Rules
Rules
Referred to · Feb 18, 2025 · 5,290 Bills
Transportation: Vehicles & Safety
Transportation: Vehicles & Safety
Referred to · Mar 11, 2025
Assignments
Assignments
Referred to · Apr 14, 2025
Executive
Executive
Referred to · Apr 22, 2026

History

HB 3175 has taken 41 actions since Feb 6, 2025, the latest on Jul 24, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jul 24, 2026
House
Governor Approved
Jul 24, 2026
House
Effective Date January 1, 2027
Jul 24, 2026
House
Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0587
Jun 18, 2026
House
Sent to the Governor
May 20, 2026
Senate
Third Reading - Passed; 057-000-000

Votes

HB 3175 went to 4 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on May 20, 2026 at 570.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
May 20, 2026
Senate
Senate Third Reading
57
0
Apr 29, 2026
Senate
Senate Executive Committee
11
2
Apr 10, 2025
House
Third Reading in House
107
0
Mar 19, 2025
House
House Transportation: Vehicles & Safety Committee
6
0

Source: ilga.gov · legiscan.com