Recent Bills
- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
Committees
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

HB 1891
Washington House•Introduced
Summary
HB 1891, “Concerning the establishment of liability standards for criminal defense counsel”, was introduced in the House on Feb 7, 2025 by Rep. Jenny Graham (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 12, 2026: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
Record
Text
HB 1891 has 3 co-sponsors.
hb1891/introduced.txtH-1031.2HOUSE BILL 1891State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular SessionBy Representatives Graham, Chase, Walsh, and SchmidtRead first time 02/07/25. Referred to Committee on Civil Rights &Judiciary.1 AN ACT Relating to the establishment of liability standards for2 criminal defense counsel; amending RCW 4.92.070, 4.92.075, and3 4.96.041; adding a new chapter to Title 7 RCW; and providing an4 effective date.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:6 NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) Any person injured by an individual7 who was previously arrested for a violent offense, and subsequently8 released from custody before trial for such offense as a result of9 the advocacy of their criminal defense counsel, has a cause of action10 against such criminal defense counsel if: (a) The individual caused11 the injury after being released from custody; and (b) the criminal12 defense counsel failed to adequately consider the risk of public harm13 that could result from the individual being released from custody.14 (2) For the purposes of this section, "criminal defense counsel"15 means any attorney who is licensed to practice law in this state and16 who represents an individual who is or has been previously accused17 of, arrested for, charged with, or incarcerated for committing a18 violent offense.19 (3) For the purposes of this section, "violent offense" has the20 same meaning as defined in RCW 9.94A.030.p. 1 HB 18911 (4) For the purposes of this section, adequate consideration2 requires:3 (a) A written and published assessment that analyzes:4 (i) All known evidence about the individual's alleged violent5 offense, criminal record, and risk of engaging in further violence;6 (ii) The vulnerability of anyone the individual has previously7 victimized or is likely to victimize in the future; and8 (iii) The adequacy of alternatives to custody for mitigating the9 risk the individual may cause harm to others if he or she is not held10 in custody; and11 (b) Consideration of all relevant and reasonably available12 evidence, including public records, and the testimony of law13 enforcement officials and experts and crime victims and crime victim14 advocates.15 (5) No form of legal immunity may be raised as an immunity or16 defense to any action brought under this section, including without17 limitation any immunity or defense premised on the argument that18 criminal defense counsel has absolute immunity from liability when19 acting within the scope of their duties in defending or advocating on20 behalf of the criminally accused, or that immunity is warranted or21 necessary to protect defense counsel's role as an advocate or the22 administration of justice.23 (6) In an action brought under this section, the court shall24 award to a prevailing plaintiff actual damages as determined by the25 trier of fact, and shall make an award of at least nominal damages.26 The court may also award to a prevailing plaintiff costs and27 reasonable attorneys' fees. The court may grant declaratory and28 injunctive relief as it deems appropriate.29 (7)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, nothing in30 this section is intended to limit the right of an elected or31 appointed official to have a legal defense provided at the expense of32 the state or a political subdivision of the state, or to have any33 judgment under this section satisfied by the state or a political34 subdivision of the state under chapter 4.92 or 4.96 RCW.35 (b) Whenever a claim is brought under this section, if the trier36 of fact finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant37 intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly disregarded the risk of38 public harm when the defendant advocated for their client's release39 from custody, then:p. 2 HB 18911 (i) The defendant shall be personally liable for all costs of2 defense and judgment;3 (ii) The state and any political subdivision of the state must4 not pay any of the defendant's subsequent costs of defense or5 judgment; and6 (iii) Any costs of defense the state or any political subdivision7 of the state has previously paid must be repaid by the defendant8 within one year of entry of judgment.9 (8) A cause of action under this section must be commenced within10 three years after the cause of action accrues. For the purpose of11 this section, a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff discovers,12 or in the reasonable exercise of diligence should discover, the13 elements of the cause of action.14 (9) This section must be liberally construed to effect its15 beneficial and remedial purposes.16 (10) Nothing in this section affects any other common law or17 statutory right of action available to a plaintiff.18 (11) This section applies only to causes of action arising on or19 after the effective date of this section.20 Sec. 2. RCW 4.92.070 and 1999 c 163 s 5 are each amended to read21 as follows:22 ((If)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, if the23 attorney general shall find that said officer, employee, or24 volunteer's acts or omissions were, or were purported to be in good25 faith, within the scope of that person's official duties, or, in the26 case of a foster parent, that the occurrence arose from the good27 faith provision of foster care services, said request shall be28 granted, in which event the necessary expenses of the defense of said29 action or proceeding relating to a state officer, employee, or30 volunteer shall be paid as provided in RCW 4.92.130. In the case of a31 foster parent, necessary expenses of the defense shall be paid from32 the appropriations made for the support of the department to which33 such foster parent is attached. In such cases the attorney general34 shall appear and defend such officer, employee, volunteer, or foster35 parent, who shall assist and cooperate in the defense of such suit.36 However, the attorney general may not represent or provide private37 representation for a foster parent in an action or proceeding brought38 by the department of social and health services against that foster39 parent.p. 3 HB 18911 Sec. 3. RCW 4.92.075 and 1989 c 413 s 2 are each amended to read2 as follows:3 ((When)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, when a4 state officer, employee, or volunteer has been represented by the5 attorney general pursuant to RCW 4.92.070, and the body presiding6 over the action or proceeding has found that the officer, employee,7 or volunteer was acting within the scope of his or her official8 duties, and a judgment has been entered against the officer,9 employee, or volunteer pursuant to chapter 4.92 RCW or 42 U.S.C. Sec.10 1981 et seq., thereafter the judgment creditor shall seek11 satisfaction only from the state, and the judgment shall not become a12 lien upon any property of such officer, employee, or volunteer.13 Sec. 4. RCW 4.96.041 and 1993 c 449 s 4 are each amended to read14 as follows:15 (1) Whenever an action or proceeding for damages is brought16 against any past or present officer, employee, or volunteer of a17 local governmental entity of this state, arising from acts or18 omissions while performing or in good faith purporting to perform his19 or her official duties, such officer, employee, or volunteer may20 request the local governmental entity to authorize the defense of the21 action or proceeding at the expense of the local governmental entity.22 (2) If the legislative authority of the local governmental23 entity, or the local governmental entity using a procedure created by24 ordinance or resolution, finds that the acts or omissions of the25 officer, employee, or volunteer were, or in good faith purported to26 be, within the scope of his or her official duties, the request shall27 be granted. ((If)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, if28 the request is granted, the necessary expenses of defending the29 action or proceeding shall be paid by the local governmental entity.30 ((Any)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, any monetary31 judgment against the officer, employee, or volunteer shall be paid on32 approval of the legislative authority of the local governmental33 entity or by a procedure for approval created by ordinance or34 resolution.35 (3) The necessary expenses of defending an elective officer of36 the local governmental entity in a judicial hearing to determine the37 sufficiency of a recall charge as provided in RCW ((29.82.023))38 29A.56.140 shall be paid by the local governmental entity if the39 officer requests such defense and approval is granted by both thep. 4 HB 18911 legislative authority of the local governmental entity and the2 attorney representing the local governmental entity. The expenses3 paid by the local governmental entity may include costs associated4 with an appeal of the decision rendered by the superior court5 concerning the sufficiency of the recall charge.6 (4) ((When)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, when7 an officer, employee, or volunteer of the local governmental entity8 has been represented at the expense of the local governmental entity9 under subsection (1) of this section and the court hearing the action10 has found that the officer, employee, or volunteer was acting within11 the scope of his or her official duties, and a judgment has been12 entered against the officer, employee, or volunteer under chapter13 4.96 RCW or 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 et seq., thereafter the judgment14 creditor shall seek satisfaction for nonpunitive damages only from15 the local governmental entity, and judgment for nonpunitive damages16 shall not become a lien upon any property of such officer, employee,17 or volunteer. The legislative authority of a local governmental18 entity may, pursuant to a procedure created by ordinance or19 resolution, agree to pay an award for punitive damages.20 NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. Section 1 of this act constitutes a new21 chapter in Title 7 RCW.22 NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. This act takes effect January 1, 2026.23 NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. If any provision of this act or its24 application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the25 remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other26 persons or circumstances is not affected.--- END ---p. 5 HB 1891
Concerning the establishment of liability standards for criminal defense counsel.
Sponsors
Rep. Jenny Graham (R) sponsors HB 1891, and 3 members have co-sponsored it.
Committees
HB 1891 went before 1 committee: Civil Rights & Judiciary.
History
HB 1891 has taken 2 actions since Feb 7, 2025, the latest on Jan 12, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 12, 2026 | House | By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status. | ||
Feb 7, 2025 | House | First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary. |
Votes
HB 1891 has not gone to a roll call.
Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com