Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 1891

Washington HouseIntroduced

Summary

HB 1891, “Concerning the establishment of liability standards for criminal defense counsel”, was introduced in the House on Feb 7, 2025 by Rep. Jenny Graham (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 12, 2026: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.


Record

Text

HB 1891 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb1891/introduced.txt
H-1031.2
HOUSE BILL 1891
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2025 Regular Session
By Representatives Graham, Chase, Walsh, and Schmidt
Read first time 02/07/25. Referred to Committee on Civil Rights &
Judiciary.
AN ACT Relating to the establishment of liability standards for
criminal defense counsel; amending RCW 4.92.070, 4.92.075, and
4.96.041; adding a new chapter to Title 7 RCW; and providing an
effective date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) Any person injured by an individual
who was previously arrested for a violent offense, and subsequently
released from custody before trial for such offense as a result of
the advocacy of their criminal defense counsel, has a cause of action
against such criminal defense counsel if: (a) The individual caused
the injury after being released from custody; and (b) the criminal
defense counsel failed to adequately consider the risk of public harm
that could result from the individual being released from custody.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "criminal defense counsel"
means any attorney who is licensed to practice law in this state and
who represents an individual who is or has been previously accused
of, arrested for, charged with, or incarcerated for committing a
violent offense.
(3) For the purposes of this section, "violent offense" has the
same meaning as defined in RCW 9.94A.030.
p. 1 HB 1891
(4) For the purposes of this section, adequate consideration
requires:
(a) A written and published assessment that analyzes:
(i) All known evidence about the individual's alleged violent
offense, criminal record, and risk of engaging in further violence;
(ii) The vulnerability of anyone the individual has previously
victimized or is likely to victimize in the future; and
(iii) The adequacy of alternatives to custody for mitigating the
risk the individual may cause harm to others if he or she is not held
in custody; and
(b) Consideration of all relevant and reasonably available
evidence, including public records, and the testimony of law
enforcement officials and experts and crime victims and crime victim
advocates.
(5) No form of legal immunity may be raised as an immunity or
defense to any action brought under this section, including without
limitation any immunity or defense premised on the argument that
criminal defense counsel has absolute immunity from liability when
acting within the scope of their duties in defending or advocating on
behalf of the criminally accused, or that immunity is warranted or
necessary to protect defense counsel's role as an advocate or the
administration of justice.
(6) In an action brought under this section, the court shall
award to a prevailing plaintiff actual damages as determined by the
trier of fact, and shall make an award of at least nominal damages.
The court may also award to a prevailing plaintiff costs and
reasonable attorneys' fees. The court may grant declaratory and
injunctive relief as it deems appropriate.
(7)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, nothing in
this section is intended to limit the right of an elected or
appointed official to have a legal defense provided at the expense of
the state or a political subdivision of the state, or to have any
judgment under this section satisfied by the state or a political
subdivision of the state under chapter 4.92 or 4.96 RCW.
(b) Whenever a claim is brought under this section, if the trier
of fact finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly disregarded the risk of
public harm when the defendant advocated for their client's release
from custody, then:
p. 2 HB 1891
(i) The defendant shall be personally liable for all costs of
defense and judgment;
(ii) The state and any political subdivision of the state must
not pay any of the defendant's subsequent costs of defense or
judgment; and
(iii) Any costs of defense the state or any political subdivision
of the state has previously paid must be repaid by the defendant
within one year of entry of judgment.
(8) A cause of action under this section must be commenced within
three years after the cause of action accrues. For the purpose of
this section, a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff discovers,
or in the reasonable exercise of diligence should discover, the
elements of the cause of action.
(9) This section must be liberally construed to effect its
beneficial and remedial purposes.
(10) Nothing in this section affects any other common law or
statutory right of action available to a plaintiff.
(11) This section applies only to causes of action arising on or
after the effective date of this section.
Sec. 2. RCW 4.92.070 and 1999 c 163 s 5 are each amended to read
as follows:
((If)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, if the
attorney general shall find that said officer, employee, or
volunteer's acts or omissions were, or were purported to be in good
faith, within the scope of that person's official duties, or, in the
case of a foster parent, that the occurrence arose from the good
faith provision of foster care services, said request shall be
granted, in which event the necessary expenses of the defense of said
action or proceeding relating to a state officer, employee, or
volunteer shall be paid as provided in RCW 4.92.130. In the case of a
foster parent, necessary expenses of the defense shall be paid from
the appropriations made for the support of the department to which
such foster parent is attached. In such cases the attorney general
shall appear and defend such officer, employee, volunteer, or foster
parent, who shall assist and cooperate in the defense of such suit.
However, the attorney general may not represent or provide private
representation for a foster parent in an action or proceeding brought
by the department of social and health services against that foster
parent.
p. 3 HB 1891
Sec. 3. RCW 4.92.075 and 1989 c 413 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
((When)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, when a
state officer, employee, or volunteer has been represented by the
attorney general pursuant to RCW 4.92.070, and the body presiding
over the action or proceeding has found that the officer, employee,
or volunteer was acting within the scope of his or her official
duties, and a judgment has been entered against the officer,
employee, or volunteer pursuant to chapter 4.92 RCW or 42 U.S.C. Sec.
1981 et seq., thereafter the judgment creditor shall seek
satisfaction only from the state, and the judgment shall not become a
lien upon any property of such officer, employee, or volunteer.
Sec. 4. RCW 4.96.041 and 1993 c 449 s 4 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Whenever an action or proceeding for damages is brought
against any past or present officer, employee, or volunteer of a
local governmental entity of this state, arising from acts or
omissions while performing or in good faith purporting to perform his
or her official duties, such officer, employee, or volunteer may
request the local governmental entity to authorize the defense of the
action or proceeding at the expense of the local governmental entity.
(2) If the legislative authority of the local governmental
entity, or the local governmental entity using a procedure created by
ordinance or resolution, finds that the acts or omissions of the
officer, employee, or volunteer were, or in good faith purported to
be, within the scope of his or her official duties, the request shall
be granted. ((If)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, if
the request is granted, the necessary expenses of defending the
action or proceeding shall be paid by the local governmental entity.
((Any)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, any monetary
judgment against the officer, employee, or volunteer shall be paid on
approval of the legislative authority of the local governmental
entity or by a procedure for approval created by ordinance or
resolution.
(3) The necessary expenses of defending an elective officer of
the local governmental entity in a judicial hearing to determine the
sufficiency of a recall charge as provided in RCW ((29.82.023))
29A.56.140 shall be paid by the local governmental entity if the
officer requests such defense and approval is granted by both the
p. 4 HB 1891
legislative authority of the local governmental entity and the
attorney representing the local governmental entity. The expenses
paid by the local governmental entity may include costs associated
with an appeal of the decision rendered by the superior court
concerning the sufficiency of the recall charge.
(4) ((When)) Except as provided in section 1(7) of this act, when
an officer, employee, or volunteer of the local governmental entity
has been represented at the expense of the local governmental entity
under subsection (1) of this section and the court hearing the action
has found that the officer, employee, or volunteer was acting within
the scope of his or her official duties, and a judgment has been
entered against the officer, employee, or volunteer under chapter
4.96 RCW or 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 et seq., thereafter the judgment
creditor shall seek satisfaction for nonpunitive damages only from
the local governmental entity, and judgment for nonpunitive damages
shall not become a lien upon any property of such officer, employee,
or volunteer. The legislative authority of a local governmental
entity may, pursuant to a procedure created by ordinance or
resolution, agree to pay an award for punitive damages.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. Section 1 of this act constitutes a new
chapter in Title 7 RCW.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. This act takes effect January 1, 2026.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. If any provision of this act or its
application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other
persons or circumstances is not affected.
--- END ---
p. 5 HB 1891

Concerning the establishment of liability standards for criminal defense counsel.

Sponsors

Rep. Jenny Graham (R) sponsors HB 1891, and 3 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

HB 1891 went before 1 committee: Civil Rights & Judiciary.

Civil Rights & Judiciary
Civil Rights & Judiciary
Referred to · Feb 7, 2025 · 61 Bills

History

HB 1891 has taken 2 actions since Feb 7, 2025, the latest on Jan 12, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jan 12, 2026
House
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
Feb 7, 2025
House
First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.

Votes

HB 1891 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com