Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 676

California SenateSigned by Governor

Summary

SB 676, the California Environmental Quality Act: judicial streamlining: state of emergency: wildfire, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 21, 2025 by Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D) with 16 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Oct 10, 2025: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 550, Statutes of 2025.


Record

Text

SB 676 has 16 co-sponsors and 10 roll calls.

sb676/chaptered-v94.txt
Introduced by Senators Limón and Blakespear
(Principal coauthors: Senators Cervantes, Cortese, Richardson, and Stern)
(Coauthors: Senators Archuleta, Caballero, Grayson, Pérez, Reyes, and Umberg)
(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bryan, Macedo, Pacheco, Sanchez, and Zbur)
An act to add Section 21168.6.2 to the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality.
environmental quality
California Environmental Quality Act: judicial streamlining: state of emergency: wildfire.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.
This bill would require, on
and after January 1, 2027, for a project, located in a geographic area for which the Governor declared a state of emergency on or after January 1, 2023, that is to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed by wildfire, and the project is not otherwise exempt from CEQA, as specified, the lead agency to prepare the record of proceeding concurrently with the administrative process. The bill would also require an action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of an environmental impact report, or the adoption of a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration, for the project to be resolved, to the extent feasible, within 270 calendar days of the filing of the certified record of
proceedings. The bill would require an applicant to agree to pay the costs of the trial court and court of appeal in hearing and deciding any action or proceeding brought under these provisions, as provided. The bill would require the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court to implement these requirements. The bill would require the project to be consistent with the applicable zoning and land use ordinances. By requiring a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings concurrently with the administrative process, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide
that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 21168.6.2 is added to the
Public Resources Code
, to read:
21168.6.2.
(a) On and after January 1, 2027, and subject to subdivisions (b) and (c), for a project, located in a geographic area for which the Governor declared a state of emergency pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, that is to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed by wildfire, and the project is not otherwise exempt from this division by paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 21080 or by a Governor’s executive order,
all of the following shall apply:
(1) The record of proceedings shall be prepared in accordance with the manner specified in subdivision (a) of Section 21167.6.2.
(2) (A) An action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of an environmental impact report, or the adoption of a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration, for the project or the granting of any project approval, including any potential appeals to the court of appeal or the Supreme Court, shall, to the extent feasible, be resolved within 270 calendar days of the filing of the certified record of proceedings with the court.
(B) The Judicial Council
shall adopt rules of court to implement subparagraph (A).
(3) The applicant shall agree to pay the costs of the trial court and the court of appeal in hearing and deciding any action or proceeding brought under this section in a form and manner as provided in a rule of court, that the Judicial Council shall adopt, which shall include, but not be limited to, the costs for the appointment of a special master if deemed appropriate by the court.
(b) (1) Subdivision (a) only applies to a project that is consistent with the applicable zoning and land use ordinances.
(2) Subdivision (a) does not apply to a project that is proposed after the Governor
rescinds the declaration of the state of emergency for that geographic area.
(c) This section applies to projects in a geographic area that was damaged by fire for which the Governor has declared a state of emergency on or after January 1, 2023.
SEC. 2.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.

An act to add Section 21168.6.2 to the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality.

Sponsors

Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D) sponsors SB 676, and 16 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 676 went before 5 committees: Rules, Environmental Quality, Judiciary, Appropriations and Natural Resources.

Rules
Rules
Referred to · Feb 21, 2025
Environmental Quality
Environmental Quality
Referred to · Mar 5, 2025
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred to · Apr 9, 2025
Appropriations
Appropriations
Referred to · Apr 23, 2025
Natural Resources
Natural Resources
Referred to · Jun 9, 2025 · 14 Bills

History

SB 676 has taken 35 actions since Feb 21, 2025, the latest on Oct 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Oct 10, 2025
Approved by the Governor.
Oct 10, 2025
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 550, Statutes of 2025.
Sep 17, 2025
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
Sep 9, 2025
Senate
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2717.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Sep 8, 2025
Assembly
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3008.) Ordered to the Senate.

Votes

SB 676 went to 10 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Sep 9, 2025 at 400.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Sep 9, 2025
Senate
Unfinished Business SB676 Limón et al. Concurrence
40
0
Sep 8, 2025
Assembly
SB 676 Limón Senate Third Reading By Bennett
79
0
Aug 29, 2025
Assembly
Do pass as amended
11
0
Jul 15, 2025
Assembly
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
12
0
Jul 7, 2025
Assembly
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
12
0

Source: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · legiscan.com