Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H 407

Vermont HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H 407, an act relating to protection from nuisance suits for agricultural activities, was introduced in the House on Feb 27, 2025 by Rep. Richard Nelson (R) with 36 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Feb 27, 2025: Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.


Record

Text

H 407 has 36 co-sponsors.

h407/introduced.txt
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 1 of 8
H.407
Introduced by Representatives Nelson of Derby, Boutin of Barre City, Boyden
of Cambridge, Branagan of Georgia, Burtt of Cabot, Casey of
Hubbardton, Charlton of Chester, Cooper of Pownal, Dobrovich
of Williamstown, Feltus of Lyndon, Goslant of Northfield,
Greer of Bennington, Gregoire of Fairfield, Harvey of
Castleton, Higley of Lowell, Hooper of Randolph, Labor of
Morgan, Laroche of Franklin, Lipsky of Stowe, Maguire of
Rutland City, Morgan, L. of Milton, Morgan, M. of Milton,
Morris of Springfield, Morrissey of Bennington, Nielsen of
Brandon, North of Ferrisburgh, Parsons of Newbury, Pinsonault
of Dorset, Powers of Waterford, Sibilia of Dover, Southworth
of Walden, Steady of Milton, Sweeney of Shelburne, Tagliavia
of Corinth, Walker of Swanton, Wells of Brownington, and
Winter of Ludlow
Referred to Committee on
Date:
Subject: Court procedure; agriculture; nuisance suits; agricultural activities;
right-to-farm
Statement of purpose of bill as introduced: This bill proposes to amend the
protection against nuisance suits for agricultural activities under the Vermont
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 2 of 8
right-to-farm law by providing that an agricultural activity shall not be a
nuisance or trespass when the activity complies with generally accepted
agricultural practices. The nuisance and trespass protection for an agricultural
activity would not apply whenever a nuisance or trespass violation results from
the negligent operation of an agricultural activity or from a violation of the
State agricultural water quality requirements. The bill would also provide that
an agricultural activity shall not lose nuisance or trespass protection due to a
change of ownership or a cessation of operation of not more than ten years; a
change of crops produced; or a change of a farming method or conversion of a
farming practice or agricultural activity to another farming method, practice, or
agricultural activity on a farm. The act would also provide that a person shall
not bring a court action based on a claim of nuisance or trespass arising from
an agricultural activity unless the person and the operator of the agricultural
activity, at least once, attempt to resolve through mediation the issue or dispute
that the person has concerning operation of the agricultural activity.
An act relating to protection from nuisance suits for agricultural activities
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 3 of 8
It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
Sec. 1. 12 V.S.A. chapter 195 is amended to read:
CHAPTER 195. NUISANCE SUITS AGAINST AGRICULTURAL
ACTIVITIES
§ 5751. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND PURPOSE
The General Assembly finds that agricultural production is a major
contributor to the State’s economy; that agricultural lands constitute unique
and irreplaceable resources of statewide importance; that the continuation of
existing and the initiation of new agricultural activities preserve the landscape
and environmental resources of the State, contribute to the increase of tourism,
and further the economic welfare and self-sufficiency of the people of the
State; and that the encouragement, development, improvement, and
preservation of agriculture will result in a general benefit to the health and
welfare of the people of the State. In order for the agricultural industry to
survive in this State, farms will likely change, adopt new technologies, and
diversify into new products, which for some farms will mean increasing in
size. The General Assembly finds that agricultural activities are potentially
subject to lawsuits based on the theory of nuisance, and that these suits
encourage and could force the premature removal of the farmlands and other
farm resources from agricultural use. It is the purpose of this chapter to protect
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 4 of 8
reasonable agricultural activities conducted on the farm from nuisance
lawsuits.
§ 5752. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of As used in this chapter,:
(1) “agricultural activity” means, but is not limited to:
(1)(A) the cultivation or other use of land for producing food, fiber,
Christmas trees, maple sap, or horticultural and orchard crops; the raising,
feeding, or management of domestic animals as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 1151 or
bees; the operation of greenhouses; the production of maple syrup; the on-site
storage, preparation, and sale of agricultural products principally produced on
the farm; and the on-site production of fuel or power from agricultural
products or wastes principally produced on the farm;
(2)(B) the preparation, tilling, fertilization, planting, protection,
irrigation, and harvesting of crops; the composting of material principally
produced by the farm or to be used at least in part on the farm; the ditching and
subsurface drainage of farm fields and the construction of farm ponds; the
handling of livestock wastes and by-products; and the on-site storage and
application of agricultural inputs, including lime, fertilizer, and pesticides;
(3)(C) “farming” as defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001; and
(4)(D) “agricultural activities” as defined in 6 V.S.A. § 4802.
(2) “Generally accepted agricultural practices” mean:
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 5 of 8
(A) the requirements of 6 V.S.A. chapter 215, including permit
requirements or requirements of the Required Agricultural Practices;
(B) the requirements of the Agency of Agriculture, Food and
Markets’ Vermont Rule for Control of Pesticides; and
(C) practices conducted in a manner consistent with proper and
accepted customs and standards followed by similar operators of agricultural
activities in the State.
§ 5753. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES; PROTECTION FROM
NUISANCE LAWSUITS
(a)(1) Agricultural activities shall be entitled to a rebuttable presumption
that the activity does not constitute a nuisance if the agricultural activity meets
all of the following conditions:
(A) it is conducted in conformity with federal, State, and local laws
and regulations (including required agricultural practices);
(B) it is consistent with good agricultural practices;
(C) it is established prior to surrounding nonagricultural activities;
and
(D) it has not significantly changed since the commencement of the
prior surrounding nonagricultural activity.
(2) The presumption that the agricultural activity does not constitute a
nuisance may be rebutted by a showing that the activity has a substantial
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 6 of 8
adverse effect on health, safety, or welfare, or has a noxious and significant
interference with the use and enjoyment of the neighboring property. No
agricultural activity shall be or become a nuisance or trespass when the activity
is conducted in accordance with generally accepted agricultural practices.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of State
or local boards of health to abate nuisances affecting the public health. A
plaintiff alleging that an agricultural activity is a nuisance or trespass shall
have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the
agricultural activity is not conducted in accordance with generally accepted
agricultural practice.
(c) The nuisance and trespass protection for an agricultural activity
provided for under subsection (a) of this section shall not apply whenever a
nuisance or trespass violation results from the negligent operation of an
agricultural activity.
§ 5754. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION; SEVERABILITY
(a) This chapter is remedial in nature and shall be liberally construed to
effectuate its purposes.
(b) An agricultural activity shall not lose the nuisance or trespass protection
under section 5753 of this title due to:
(1) a change of ownership or a cessation of operation, in whole or in
part, of not more than ten years;
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 7 of 8
(2) a change of crops produced; or
(3) a change of a farming method or conversion of farming practices or
agricultural activities to other farming methods, practices, or agricultural
activities on a farm.
(c) If any provision of this chapter is held invalid, the invalidity does not
affect other provisions of this chapter that can be given effect without the
invalid provision, and for this purpose, the provisions of this chapter are
severable.
§ 5755. REQUIRED MEDIATION PRIOR TO SUIT
(a) A person shall not bring a court action based on a claim of nuisance or
trespass arising from an agricultural activity unless the person and the operator
of the agricultural activity, at least once, attempt to resolve through mediation
the issue or dispute that the person has concerning operation of the agricultural
activity. The mediation shall be conducted according to the provisions of the
Uniform Mediation Act set forth in 12 V.S.A. chapter 194.
(b) The parties to the mediation may agree upon the use of a mediator to
assist in the resolution of the agreed upon issue or dispute, and the parties shall
share the cost of the mediator. If the parties to the mediation are unable to
resolve the relevant issue or dispute through mediation, the parties may agree
to submit the issue or dispute to binding arbitration pursuant to 12 V.S.A.
chapter 192 and shall share the cost of the arbitration.
VT LEG #379747 v.1
BILL AS INTRODUCED H.407
2025 Page 8 of 8
(c) A person bringing a court action based on a claim of nuisance or
trespass arising from an agricultural activity shall provide the court with a
sworn statement of an attempt to resolve the issue or dispute through
mediation.
Sec. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE
This act shall take effect on July 1, 2025.
VT LEG #379747 v.1

An act relating to protection from nuisance suits for agricultural activities

Sponsors

Rep. Richard Nelson (R) sponsors H 407, and 36 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H 407 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred to · Feb 27, 2025 · 165 Bills

History

H 407 has taken 1 action since Feb 27, 2025.

ChamberAction
Feb 27, 2025
House
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Votes

H 407 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: legislature.vermont.gov · legiscan.com