- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 1638
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 1638, the CROWN Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Feb 26, 2025 by Rep. Bonnie Coleman (D) with 84 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Feb 26, 2025: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Record
Text
H.R. 1638 has 84 co-sponsors.
hb1638/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 1638 IH: Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair Act of 2025U.S. House of Representatives2025-02-26text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1638 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 26, 2025 Mrs. Watson Coleman (for herself, Ms. Williams of Georgia , Ms. McClellan , Mr. Smith of Washington , Mr. Johnson of Georgia , Mrs. Ramirez , Mr. Cleaver , Mr. Doggett , Ms. Adams , Ms. Brown , Mr. Cohen , Ms. Tlaib , Ms. Sewell , Ms. Norton , Mr. Green of Texas , Ms. Jacobs , Ms. Underwood , Mr. Kennedy of New York , Mr. Fields , Mr. Mullin , Ms. Wilson of Florida , Ms. Kamlager-Dove , Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick , Mr. Krishnamoorthi , Mr. McGarvey , Mrs. McIver , Mrs. Beatty , Mr. Pocan , Ms. Kelly of Illinois , Ms. Sherrill , Mrs. Sykes , Mr. Thompson of Mississippi , Ms. Strickland , Mr. Meeks , Mr. Foster , Mr. Grijalva , Mr. Carson , Mr. Espaillat , Ms. Clarke of New York , Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania , Mr. Quigley , Mr. Horsford , Mr. Turner of Texas , Ms. Brownley , Ms. Stevens , Mr. Tonko , Mr. Takano , Mr. Torres of New York , Mr. Davis of Illinois , Mr. Vargas , Mrs. Foushee , Mr. Conaway , Mr. Davis of North Carolina , Mr. Amo , Mr. Ivey , Mr. Jackson of Illinois , Ms. Plaskett , Mrs. Hayes , Ms. Jayapal , Mr. Menendez , Mr. Carter of Louisiana , Ms. Bynum , Ms. Ocasio-Cortez , Mrs. McBath , Mr. Bell , Ms. Waters , Mr. Veasey , Mr. Mfume , Ms. Velázquez , Ms. Pressley , Ms. Moore of Wisconsin , Ms. Omar , Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania , Mr. Frost , and Mr. Jeffries ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILLTo prohibit discrimination based on an individual’s texture or style of hair.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair Act of 2025 or the CROWN Act of 2025 .2.Findings; sense of Congress; purpose(a)FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)Throughout United States history, society has used (in conjunction with skin color) hair texture and hairstyle to classify individuals on the basis of race.(2)Like one’s skin color, one’s hair has served as a basis of race and national origin discrimination.(3)Racial and national origin discrimination can and do occur because of longstanding racial and national origin biases and stereotypes associated with hair texture and style.(4)For example, people of African descent have been deprived of educational and employment opportunities because they are adorned with natural or protective hairstyles in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, or worn in locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, or Afros.(5)Racial and national origin discrimination is reflected in school and workplace policies and practices that bar natural or protective hairstyles commonly worn by people of African descent.(6)For example, as recently as 2018, the United States Armed Forces had grooming policies that barred natural or protective hairstyles that servicewomen of African descent commonly wear and that described these hairstyles as unkempt .(7)In 2018, the United States Armed Forces rescinded these policies and recognized that this description perpetuated derogatory racial stereotypes.(8)The United States Armed Forces also recognized that prohibitions against natural or protective hairstyles that African-American servicewomen are commonly adorned with are racially discriminatory and bear no relationship to African-American servicewomen’s occupational qualifications and their ability to serve and protect the Nation.(9)Some Federal courts have narrowly interpreted the protections against discrimination on the basis of race or national origin found in existing Federal civil rights laws, including provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq. ), section 1977 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1981 ), and the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. ), thereby permitting, for example, employers to discriminate against people of African descent who wear natural or protective hairstyles, even though the employment policies involved are not related to workers’ ability to perform their jobs.(10)Applying these narrow interpretations has resulted in a lack of Federal civil rights protection for individuals who are discriminated against on the basis of characteristics that are commonly associated with race and national origin.(11)Starting in 2019, State legislatures and municipal bodies throughout the United States have introduced and passed legislation that rejects certain Federal courts’ restrictive interpretation of race and national origin, and expressly classifies race and national origin discrimination as inclusive of discrimination on the basis of natural or protective hairstyles commonly associated with race and national origin.(b)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)the Federal Government should acknowledge that individuals who have hair texture or wear a hairstyle that is historically and contemporarily associated with African Americans or persons of African descent have suffered harmful discrimination in schools, workplaces, and other contexts based upon longstanding race and national origin stereotypes and biases;(2)a clear and comprehensive law should address the deprivation of educational, employment, and other opportunities on the basis of hair texture and hairstyle that are commonly associated with race or national origin;(3)clear, consistent, and enforceable legal standards must be provided to redress the widespread incidences of race and national origin discrimination based upon hair texture and hairstyle in schools, workplaces, housing, federally funded institutions, and other contexts;(4)it is necessary to prevent educational, employment, and other decisions, practices, and policies generated by or reflecting negative biases and stereotypes related to race or national origin;(5)the Federal Government must play a key role in enforcing Federal civil rights laws in a way that secures equal educational, employment, and other opportunities for all individuals regardless of their race or national origin;(6)the Federal Government must play a central role in enforcing the standards established under this Act on behalf of individuals who suffer race or national origin discrimination based upon hair texture and hairstyle;(7)it is necessary to prohibit and provide remedies for the harms suffered as a result of race or national origin discrimination on the basis of hair texture and hairstyle; and(8)it is necessary to mandate that school, workplace, and other applicable standards be applied in a nondiscriminatory manner and to explicitly prohibit the adoption or implementation of grooming requirements that disproportionately impact people of African descent.(c)PurposeThe purpose of this Act is to institute definitions of race and national origin for Federal civil rights laws that effectuate the comprehensive scope of protection Congress intended to be afforded by such laws and Congress’ objective to eliminate race and national origin discrimination in the United States.3.Federally assisted programs(a)In generalNo individual in the United States shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, based on the individual’s hair texture or hairstyle, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).(b)EnforcementSubsection (a) shall be enforced in the same manner and by the same means, including with the same jurisdiction, as if such subsection was incorporated in title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. ), and as if a violation of subsection (a) was treated as if it was a violation of section 601 of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 2000d ).(c)DefinitionsIn this section—(1)the term program or activity has the meaning given the term in section 606 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000d–4a ); and(2)the terms race and national origin mean, respectively, race within the meaning of the term in section 601 of that Act ( 42 U.S.C. 2000d ) and national origin within the meaning of the term in that section 601.4.Housing programs(a)In generalNo person in the United States shall be subjected to a discriminatory housing practice based on the person’s hair texture or hairstyle, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).(b)EnforcementSubsection (a) shall be enforced in the same manner and by the same means, including with the same jurisdiction, as if such subsection was incorporated in the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. ), and as if a violation of subsection (a) was treated as if it was a discriminatory housing practice.(c)DefinitionIn this section—(1)the terms discriminatory housing practice and person have the meanings given the terms in section 802 of the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3602 ); and(2)the terms race and national origin mean, respectively, race within the meaning of the term in section 804 of that Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3604 ) and national origin within the meaning of the term in that section 804.5.Public accommodations(a)In generalNo person in the United States shall be subjected to a practice prohibited under section 201, 202, or 203 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq. ), based on the person’s hair texture or hairstyle, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).(b)EnforcementSubsection (a) shall be enforced in the same manner and by the same means, including with the same jurisdiction, as if such subsection was incorporated in title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as if a violation of subsection (a) was treated as if it was a violation of section 201, 202, or 203, as appropriate, of such Act.(c)DefinitionIn this section, the terms race and national origin mean, respectively, race within the meaning of the term in section 201 of that Act ( 42 U.S.C. 2000a ) and national origin within the meaning of the term in that section 201.6.Employment(a)ProhibitionIt shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining (including on-the-job training programs) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against an individual, based on the individual’s hair texture or hairstyle, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).(b)EnforcementSubsection (a) shall be enforced in the same manner and by the same means, including with the same jurisdiction, as if such subsection was incorporated in title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ), and as if a violation of subsection (a) was treated as if it was a violation of section 703 or 704, as appropriate, of such Act ( 42 U.S.C. 2000e–2 , 2000e–3).(c)DefinitionsIn this section the terms person , race , and national origin have the meanings given the terms in section 701 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000e ).7.Equal rights under the law(a)In generalNo person in the United States shall be subjected to a practice prohibited under section 1977 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1981 ), based on the person’s hair texture or hairstyle, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locs, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).(b)EnforcementSubsection (a) shall be enforced in the same manner and by the same means, including with the same jurisdiction, as if such subsection was incorporated in section 1977 of the Revised Statutes, and as if a violation of subsection (a) was treated as if it was a violation of that section 1977.8.Rule of constructionNothing in this Act shall be construed to limit definitions of race or national origin under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000a et seq. ), the Fair Housing Act ( 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. ), or section 1977 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1981 ).
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-02-26
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Feb 26, 2025
hb1638/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (02/26/2025)
Sponsors
Rep. Bonnie Coleman (D) sponsors H.R. 1638, and 84 members have co-sponsored it, 74 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · D–NJ-12 · Sponsor
Introduced Feb 26, 2025

Rep. · D–DC-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–VI-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–NC-12 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–RI-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–OH-3 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–MO-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–CA-26 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–OH-11 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–OR-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 26, 2025 · Original
Committees
H.R. 1638 went before 2 committees: Education and Workforce and Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 1638 has taken 2 actions since Feb 26, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 26, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Feb 26, 2025 | House | Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 1638 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 1638, as Identical bill.
Titles
H.R. 1638 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- CROWN Act of 2025 — Display Title
- CROWN Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To prohibit discrimination based on an individual's texture or style of hair. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 6 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 1638 in 2 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Aviation/Airlines/Airports, Banking, Budget/Appropriations, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Education.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA | 1 | 1 | — |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| DANIEL MAUER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DINA KASTNER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ELENA LOPEZ | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JA'BREE HARRIS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| STEPHEN SCHEMBS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TYSIANNA MARINO | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA | COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA | 2025 second_quarter | $463K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS | 2025 first_quarter | $17K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1638 under Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 10 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1638’s is Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues.
hr1638/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 1638 carries 10 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Cosmetics and personal care to State and local government operations.
hr1638/subjects.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
