Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2103

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 2103, the Protect Postal Performance Act, was introduced in the House on Mar 14, 2025 by Rep. Nikki Budzinski (D) with 31 co-sponsors. It was referred to Oversight And Government Reform, and last saw action on Mar 14, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.


Record

Text

H.R. 2103 has 31 co-sponsors.

hb2103/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 2103 IH: Protect Postal Performance Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-03-14
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I
119th CONGRESS 1st Session
H. R. 2103
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 14, 2025
Ms. Budzinski (for herself, Ms. Hageman , Mr. Golden of Maine , Mr. Bergman , and Mr. Pappas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
A BILL
To modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Protect Postal Performance Act .
2.
Limitation on closure and consolidations of post offices
Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (4)—
(A)
by striking The Postal Service and insert (A) The Postal Service ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(B)
During such 60-day period, the Postal Service shall carry out a public hearing on the closure or consolidation, which may be attended in-person or virtually by any members of the public affected by the closure or consolidation.
(C)
Not later than 7 days after such hearing, the Postal Service shall publish a summary of the hearing on the Postal Service’s public website, and include in such summary a description of any comments made or otherwise submitted at such hearing and the percentage of such comments that were in support or against the closure or consolidation.
(D)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the applicable post office may not be closed or consolidated until the date that is 180 days after the date the summary is published under subparagraph (C).
; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:
(7)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, a post office may not be closed or consolidated if such post office—
(A)
is not located within 15 miles of any other post office; or
(B)
is the closest post office for a population of 15,000 individuals or more.
.
3.
Postal Service processing and distribution centers; transportation optimization
(a)
In general
Chapter 4 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding after section 416 the following:
417.
Postal Service processing and distribution centers
(a)
In general
The United States Postal Service may not close, consolidate, downgrade, or take any other similar action with respect to any processing and distribution center in a State if such action would result in no such center being located in that State in any geographically non-contiguous region of that State inhabited by more than 100,000 permanent residents. In this subsection, the term geographically non-contiguous region means an area of a State that is physically separated from the main body of the State by a significant body of water or land controlled by another State.
(b)
Limitation on changes to mail processing facilities
(1)
In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Postal Service may not implement or otherwise carry out any changes to the operations of its mail processing facilities (including consolidation or partial consolidation, aggregation of processing, distribution, or delivery operations) until on or after the date that the Postal Regulatory Commission issues an advisory opinion on the proposed facility changes.
(2)
Deadline
The Postal Regulatory Commission shall issue the advisory opinion required under paragraph (1) not later than 120 business days after the date the Postal Service submits to the Commission a proposed change to any such facility.
(3)
Other requirements
The Commission shall issue an advisory opinion for each processing and distribution center at which the Postal Service has proposed changes, downsizing, and consolidations.
(4)
Report
If an advisory opinion by the Commission under this subsection determines that a proposed change will lead to slower on-time mail delivery, the Postal Service shall publish a report on the Postal Service’s public website on practices and procedures the Postal Service will implement to ensure mail delivery remains on time. No such changes may be implemented or otherwise carried out for the period of 180 days beginning on the date such report is so published.
(c)
Prohibiting on carrying out mail processing facility review
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Postal Service may not carry out the United States Postal Service Mail Processing Facility Review (or any successor program), and no Federal funds (including amounts in the Postal Service Fund under section 2003) may be obligated or expended to carry out such Review.
(d)
Limitation of the closure of processing and distribution centers in regions that are not meeting on-Time delivery benchmarks
During any calendar year, the Postal Service may not close, consolidate, or otherwise move any operations or services from any processing and distribution center located within any Postal Service district that, during anytime within the immediately preceding calendar year, failed to meet—
(1)
at least 93 percent on-time delivery rate for two-day single first-class mail; and
(2)
at least 90.3 percent on-time delivery rate for three to five-day first-class mail.
(e)
Definitions
In this section—
(1)
the term processing and distribution center means a central mail facility that—
(A)
distributes and dispatches part or all of both incoming mail and outgoing mail for a designated service area;
(B)
provides instructions on the preparation of collection mail, dispatch schedules, and sorting plan requirements to mailers; and
(C)
is a sectional center facility, a general mail facility, or a dedicated mail processing facility without a station or branch; and
(2)
the term State means the 50 States and the District of Columbia.
418.
Local transportation optimization and regional transportation optimization changes
(a)
In general
The Postal Service may not implement or otherwise carry out any local transportation optimization (in this section referred to as LTO ) and regional transportation optimization (in this section referred to as RTO ) efforts that will decrease the number of times mail is either picked up or dropped off for any post office in the country.
(b)
PRC opinion
The Postal Service may not proceed with changing drop off and pick up schedules at post offices as part of the LTO or RTO plans without requesting a Postal Regulatory Commission opinion.
(c)
Limitation
If the Postal Regulatory Commission does not recommend implementing these changes in an opinion under subsection (b), the Postal Service may not move forward with LTO or RTO optimization efforts anywhere in the United States.
.
(b)
Clerical amendment
The table of sections for such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 416 the following:
417. Postal Service processing and distribution centers.
418. Local transportation optimization and regional transportation optimization changes.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-14
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Nikki Budzinski (D) sponsors H.R. 2103, and 31 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 2103 went before 1 committee: Oversight and Government Reform.

Oversight and Government Reform
Oversight and Government Reform
Referred To · Mar 14, 2025 · 696 Bills

Actions

H.R. 2103 has taken 2 actions since Mar 14, 2025.

ChamberAction
Mar 14, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Mar 14, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Votes

H.R. 2103 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 2103.

Titles

H.R. 2103 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Protect Postal Performance Act — Display Title
  • Protect Postal Performance Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 20 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2103 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Postal, Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Retirement, Government Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Medicare/Medicaid, Agriculture.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSVirginia16
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)Virginia14
PACKAGE COALITION LLCTrade associationDistrict of Columbia11$140K
K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLCLaw FirmDistrict of Columbia11$40K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2026 second_quarter$980K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2026 first_quarter$850K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 third_quarter$840K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)2025 fourth_quarter$770K4th Quarter - Report
PACKAGE COALITION LLCK&L GATES, LLP2025 third_quarter$140K3rd Quarter - Report
K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLCMCHUGH LEMAY ASSOC., LLC2025 third_quarter$40K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2026 second_quarter$28K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2026 first_quarter$28K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2025 fourth_quarter$27.3K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2025 third_quarter$27.3K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2025 second_quarter$27.3K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS2025 first_quarter$27.3K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2103 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2103’s is Government Operations and Politics.

hr2103/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2103, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. BUDZINSKI:H.R. 2103.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H1162]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com