- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 2103
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 2103, the Protect Postal Performance Act, was introduced in the House on Mar 14, 2025 by Rep. Nikki Budzinski (D) with 31 co-sponsors. It was referred to Oversight And Government Reform, and last saw action on Mar 14, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Record
Text
H.R. 2103 has 31 co-sponsors.
hb2103/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 2103 IH: Protect Postal Performance ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-03-14text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I119th CONGRESS 1st SessionH. R. 2103IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMarch 14, 2025Ms. Budzinski (for herself, Ms. Hageman , Mr. Golden of Maine , Mr. Bergman , and Mr. Pappas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government ReformA BILLTo modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Protect Postal Performance Act .2.Limitation on closure and consolidations of post officesSection 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended—(1)in paragraph (4)—(A)by striking The Postal Service and insert (A) The Postal Service ; and(B)by adding at the end the following:(B)During such 60-day period, the Postal Service shall carry out a public hearing on the closure or consolidation, which may be attended in-person or virtually by any members of the public affected by the closure or consolidation.(C)Not later than 7 days after such hearing, the Postal Service shall publish a summary of the hearing on the Postal Service’s public website, and include in such summary a description of any comments made or otherwise submitted at such hearing and the percentage of such comments that were in support or against the closure or consolidation.(D)Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the applicable post office may not be closed or consolidated until the date that is 180 days after the date the summary is published under subparagraph (C).; and(2)by adding at the end the following:(7)Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, a post office may not be closed or consolidated if such post office—(A)is not located within 15 miles of any other post office; or(B)is the closest post office for a population of 15,000 individuals or more..3.Postal Service processing and distribution centers; transportation optimization(a)In generalChapter 4 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding after section 416 the following:417.Postal Service processing and distribution centers(a)In generalThe United States Postal Service may not close, consolidate, downgrade, or take any other similar action with respect to any processing and distribution center in a State if such action would result in no such center being located in that State in any geographically non-contiguous region of that State inhabited by more than 100,000 permanent residents. In this subsection, the term geographically non-contiguous region means an area of a State that is physically separated from the main body of the State by a significant body of water or land controlled by another State.(b)Limitation on changes to mail processing facilities(1)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of law, the Postal Service may not implement or otherwise carry out any changes to the operations of its mail processing facilities (including consolidation or partial consolidation, aggregation of processing, distribution, or delivery operations) until on or after the date that the Postal Regulatory Commission issues an advisory opinion on the proposed facility changes.(2)DeadlineThe Postal Regulatory Commission shall issue the advisory opinion required under paragraph (1) not later than 120 business days after the date the Postal Service submits to the Commission a proposed change to any such facility.(3)Other requirementsThe Commission shall issue an advisory opinion for each processing and distribution center at which the Postal Service has proposed changes, downsizing, and consolidations.(4)ReportIf an advisory opinion by the Commission under this subsection determines that a proposed change will lead to slower on-time mail delivery, the Postal Service shall publish a report on the Postal Service’s public website on practices and procedures the Postal Service will implement to ensure mail delivery remains on time. No such changes may be implemented or otherwise carried out for the period of 180 days beginning on the date such report is so published.(c)Prohibiting on carrying out mail processing facility reviewNotwithstanding any other provision of law, the Postal Service may not carry out the United States Postal Service Mail Processing Facility Review (or any successor program), and no Federal funds (including amounts in the Postal Service Fund under section 2003) may be obligated or expended to carry out such Review.(d)Limitation of the closure of processing and distribution centers in regions that are not meeting on-Time delivery benchmarksDuring any calendar year, the Postal Service may not close, consolidate, or otherwise move any operations or services from any processing and distribution center located within any Postal Service district that, during anytime within the immediately preceding calendar year, failed to meet—(1)at least 93 percent on-time delivery rate for two-day single first-class mail; and(2)at least 90.3 percent on-time delivery rate for three to five-day first-class mail.(e)DefinitionsIn this section—(1)the term processing and distribution center means a central mail facility that—(A)distributes and dispatches part or all of both incoming mail and outgoing mail for a designated service area;(B)provides instructions on the preparation of collection mail, dispatch schedules, and sorting plan requirements to mailers; and(C)is a sectional center facility, a general mail facility, or a dedicated mail processing facility without a station or branch; and(2)the term State means the 50 States and the District of Columbia.418.Local transportation optimization and regional transportation optimization changes(a)In generalThe Postal Service may not implement or otherwise carry out any local transportation optimization (in this section referred to as LTO ) and regional transportation optimization (in this section referred to as RTO ) efforts that will decrease the number of times mail is either picked up or dropped off for any post office in the country.(b)PRC opinionThe Postal Service may not proceed with changing drop off and pick up schedules at post offices as part of the LTO or RTO plans without requesting a Postal Regulatory Commission opinion.(c)LimitationIf the Postal Regulatory Commission does not recommend implementing these changes in an opinion under subsection (b), the Postal Service may not move forward with LTO or RTO optimization efforts anywhere in the United States..(b)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 416 the following:417. Postal Service processing and distribution centers.418. Local transportation optimization and regional transportation optimization changes..
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-14
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Rep. Nikki Budzinski (D) sponsors H.R. 2103, and 31 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · D–IL-13 · Sponsor
Introduced Mar 14, 2025

Rep. · R–MI-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 14, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–ME-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 14, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–WY-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 14, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–NH-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 14, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–MN-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 24, 2025

Rep. · R–PA-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 24, 2025

Rep. · D–TN-9 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 9, 2025

Rep. · D–NY-3 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 13, 2025

Rep. · D–CO-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jun 3, 2025
Committees
H.R. 2103 went before 1 committee: Oversight and Government Reform.

Actions
H.R. 2103 has taken 2 actions since Mar 14, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 14, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 14, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.Oversight and Government Reform Committee |
Votes
H.R. 2103 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 2103.
Titles
H.R. 2103 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Protect Postal Performance Act — Display Title
- Protect Postal Performance Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To modify the procedures used by the United States Postal Service for the closure or consolidation of any post office or any processing and distribution center, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
4 clients hired 4 firms and 20 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2103 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Postal, Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Retirement, Government Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Medicare/Medicaid, Agriculture.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | — | Virginia | 1 | 6 | — |
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | — | Virginia | 1 | 4 | — |
| PACKAGE COALITION LLC | Trade association | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $140K |
| K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLC | Law Firm | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $40K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 1 | 6 | — |
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | 1 | 4 | — |
| K&L GATES, LLP | 1 | 1 | $140K |
| MCHUGH LEMAY ASSOC., LLC | 1 | 1 | $40K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERT LEVI | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| HANNAH SCOTT | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| HILL THOMAS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| JASON COOKE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| JOSEPH CIRRINCIONE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| KATIE CULLETON | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| LOUIS FINKEL | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MARY KIRLIN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MICHAEL HORDER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MONTEE WYNN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PAUL GUTIERREZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| WILL MITCHELL | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GRANT CUMMINGS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTIANA GOFF | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JOHN MCHUGH | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MICHAEL SCANLON | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RYAN CARNEY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| SCOTT GELBMAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| W STEPHENS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | 2026 second_quarter | $980K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | 2026 first_quarter | $850K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | 2025 third_quarter | $840K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) | 2025 fourth_quarter | $770K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| PACKAGE COALITION LLC | K&L GATES, LLP | 2025 third_quarter | $140K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLC | MCHUGH LEMAY ASSOC., LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $40K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2026 second_quarter | $28K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2026 first_quarter | $28K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2025 fourth_quarter | $27.3K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2025 third_quarter | $27.3K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2025 second_quarter | $27.3K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS | 2025 first_quarter | $27.3K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2103 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2103’s is Government Operations and Politics.
hr2103/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2103, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. BUDZINSKI:H.R. 2103.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H1162]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
