Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 1095

U.S. SenateSenate Floor Calendar

Summary

S. 1095, the Stop STALLING Act, was introduced in the Senate on Mar 24, 2025 by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) with 6 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 10, 2025: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 45.


Record

Text

S. 1095 has 6 co-sponsors.

sb1095/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S1095 IS: Stop Significant and Time-wasting Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act
U.S. Senate
2025-03-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1095 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 24, 2025 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Grassley , Mr. Durbin , Mr. Blumenthal , Mr. Cruz , Mr. Welch , and Mr. Booker ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To enable the Federal Trade Commission to deter filing of sham citizen petitions to cover an attempt to interfere with approval of a competing generic drug or biosimilar, to foster competition, and facilitate the efficient review of petitions filed in good faith to raise legitimate public health concerns, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Stop Significant and Time-wasting Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act or the Stop STALLING Act .
2.
Federal Trade Commission enforcement against sham petitions
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Commission
The term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.
(2)
Covered application
The term covered application means an application filed pursuant to subsection (b)(2) or (j) of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 355 ) or section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 262(k) ).
(3)
Covered petition
The term covered petition means a petition, or a supplement to a petition, filed under section 505(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 355(q) ).
(4)
Person
The term person —
(A)
means an individual or entity; and
(B)
includes—
(i)
a successor or an assign of an entity;
(ii)
a joint venture, subsidiary, partnership, division, group, or affiliate controlled by an entity; and
(iii)
a successor or an assign of a joint venture, subsidiary, partnership, division, group, or affiliate controlled by an entity.
(5)
Series of covered petitions
The term series of covered petitions means any group of more than 1 covered petition relating to the same covered application.
(6)
Sham
The term sham means—
(A)
a covered petition that—
(i)
is objectively baseless; and
(ii)
attempts to use a governmental process, as opposed to the outcome of that process, to interfere with the business of a competitor; or
(B)
a series of covered petitions that attempts to use a governmental process, as opposed to the outcome of that process, to interfere with the business of a competitor.
(b)
Violation
A person submitting or causing the submission of a covered petition or a series of covered petitions that is a sham shall be liable for engaging in an unfair method of competition under section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1) ).
(c)
Civil action
(1)
In general
If the Commission has reason to believe that the submission of a covered petition or a series of covered petitions constitutes a violation of section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1) ), the Commission may commence a civil action to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in a district court of the United States against any person that submitted or caused to be submitted such covered petition or such series of covered petitions.
(2)
Presumption
In a civil action under paragraph (1), a covered petition shall be presumed to be part of a series of covered petitions that is a sham under subsection (b) of this section if—
(A)
the Secretary of Health and Human Services—
(i)
has determined that the covered petition was submitted with the primary purpose of delaying the approval of a covered application; and
(ii)
has referred such determination to the Commission in writing, including a reasoned basis for the determination; and
(B)
the covered petition was part of a series of covered petitions.
(3)
Exception
The presumption in paragraph (2) shall not apply if the defendant establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the series of covered petitions that includes the covered petition referred to the Commission by the Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a sham.
(4)
Civil penalty
In an action under paragraph (1), any person that has been found liable for a violation of section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1) ) shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation of not more than the greater of—
(A)
any revenue earned from the sale by such person of any drug product, referenced in a covered application that was the subject of a covered petition or a series of covered petitions that is a sham, during the period during which the covered petition or series of covered petitions was under review by the Secretary of Health and Human Services; or
(B)
$50,000 for each calendar day that each covered petition that is a sham or that was part of a series of covered petitions that is a sham was under review by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(5)
Review of referral
No referral by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under paragraph (2)(A) shall be subject to judicial review, except as a third-party claim asserted by the defendant under section 706(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, against the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Department of Health and Human Services, as part of a civil action commenced under paragraph (1).
(6)
Antitrust laws
Nothing in this section shall modify, impair, limit, or supersede the applicability of the antitrust laws, as defined in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 ), and of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45 ) to the extent that it applies to unfair methods of competition.
(7)
Rule of construction
The civil penalty provided in this subsection is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies provided by Federal law, including under section 16 of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 26 ) or under section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 53(b) ).
(d)
Applicability
This section shall apply to any covered petition submitted on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(e)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit any authority of the Commission under any other provision of law.
3.
Severability
If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provisions of such Act to any person or circumstance shall not be affected.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-24
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate Mar 24, 2025

sb1095/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (03/24/2025)

Stop Significant and Time-wasting Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act or the Stop STALLING Act

This bill makes it an unfair method of competition to submit an objectively baseless petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in an attempt to interfere with a competitor's application for market approval of a drug.

The bill authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to sue an individual or entity that submits such a petition to the FDA. A party found liable in such a lawsuit is subject to civil penalties, such as a fine of up to $50,000 for each day that the FDA spent reviewing the baseless petition.

Sponsors

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D) sponsors S. 1095, and 6 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 1095 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Reported By · Apr 10, 2025

Actions

S. 1095 has taken 5 actions since Mar 24, 2025, the latest on Apr 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 10, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report.Judiciary Committee
Apr 10, 2025
Senate
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 45.
Apr 3, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.Judiciary Committee
Mar 24, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 1095 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 1095 goes by 6 titles, 4 of them short titles.

  • Stop STALLING Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
  • Stop Significant and Time-wasting Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
  • Stop STALLING Act — Display Title
  • Stop STALLING Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Stop Significant and Time-wasting Abuse Limiting Legitimate Innovation of New Generics Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to enable the Federal Trade Commission to deter filing of sham citizen petitions to cover an attempt to interfere with approval of a competing generic drug or biosimilar, to foster competition, and facilitate the efficient review of petitions filed in good faith to raise legitimate public health concerns, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

22 clients hired 23 firms and 203 registered lobbyists who named S. 1095 in 109 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Medicare/Medicaid, Health Issues, Pharmacy, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Budget/Appropriations, Trade (domestic/foreign), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 22.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICArepresents biopharmaceutical research companiesDistrict of Columbia212$310K
NOVARTISDistrict of Columbia18
GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.)District of Columbia17
THE CAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICINGA coalition of organizations working on market-based solutions to drug pricing.District of Columbia16$540K
CAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DRUG PRICING (CSRXP)Coalition to promote lowering prescription drug prices.District of Columbia16$300K
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)District of Columbia16
BCBSM INCMinnesota16
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia16
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INCFlorida16
GUIDEWELL MUTUAL HOLDING CORPORATIONFlorida16
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONno changeDistrict of Columbia16
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INCCalifornia15
AARPDistrict of Columbia14
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONDistrict of Columbia14
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INCKansas14
COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION PROMOTION (C4IP)A coalition dedicated to promoting strong IP rights that drive innovation.District of Columbia14
T1INTERNATIONAL USAMaine14
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA INCDistrict of Columbia13$860K
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEETennessee12
PUBLIC CITIZENDistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 203.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2025 first_quarter$12.9M1st Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2026 first_quarter$12.2M1st Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2025 third_quarter$9M3rd Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2025 fourth_quarter$8.4M4th Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2025 second_quarter$7.6M2nd Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2026 second_quarter$7.4M2nd Quarter - Report
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2026 first_quarter$5.3M1st Quarter - Report
AARPAARP2025 second_quarter$5.1M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 first_quarter$4.8M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 third_quarter$4.2M3rd Quarter - Report
NOVARTISNOVARTIS2025 first_quarter$4.2M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 fourth_quarter$4.1M4th Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$4.1M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 second_quarter$4.1M2nd Quarter - Report
NOVARTISNOVARTIS2026 first_quarter$3.9M1st Quarter - Report
AARPAARP2026 first_quarter$3.8M1st Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$3.4M2nd Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$3.3M2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 1095 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 10 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1095’s is Health.

s1095/policy-areas.txt
HealthAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 1095 carries 10 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Administrative remedies to Public participation and lobbying.

s1095/subjects.txt
Administrative remediesBusiness ethicsCivil actions and liabilityCompetition and antitrustDepartment of Health and Human ServicesDrug safety, medical device, and laboratory regulationFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Licensing and registrationsPrescription drugsPublic participation and lobbying

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com