- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 1102
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 1102, the Quality Defense Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Mar 25, 2025 by Sen. Cory Booker (D) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 25, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
S. 1102 has 2 co-sponsors.
sb1102/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S1102 IS: Providing a Quality Defense Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-03-25text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1102 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 25, 2025 Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Durbin , and Mr. Welch ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo incentivize States and localities to improve access to justice, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Providing a Quality Defense Act of 2025 or the Quality Defense Act of 2025 .2.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are—(1)to protect the constitutional rights to due process and a fair criminal prosecution under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, including the right to counsel, in State and local courts, as articulated by the Supreme Court of the United States in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), and its progeny;(2)to protect the right to counsel for juveniles in delinquency proceedings, including the determination of whether a juvenile should be tried as an adult, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as articulated by the Supreme Court in In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967);(3)to collect data related to public defense in order to facilitate evidence-based reforms and improvements; and(4)to ensure that compensation for public defenders and panel attorneys reflects the constitutional guarantee of the right to counsel and does not disincentivize attorneys from pursuing a career in public defense.3.DefinitionsIn this Act, except as otherwise provided in section 7:(1)Applicable public defender's officeThe term applicable public defender's office , with respect to an eligible entity that is—(A)a public defender's office, means the eligible entity;(B)a State or unit of local government, means—(i)the public defender's office of the eligible entity; and(ii)a public defender's office of a unit of local government within the eligible entity; and(C)a Tribal organization, means the public defender's office of the Tribal organization.(2)Assigned counsel programThe term assigned counsel program means a program or procedure by which a court assigns a panel attorney to provide quality legal representation to a client.(3)CaseThe term case includes all charges against an individual involved in a single incident of alleged criminal or delinquent conduct.(4)Case type(A)In generalThe term case type means the classification of a client’s case into 1 of the following categories, as defined under State or local law:(i)Juvenile.(ii)Misdemeanor.(iii)Felony for which the death penalty may be imposed.(iv)Felony for which a sentence of up to life imprisonment may be imposed.(v)Felony not described in clause (iii) or (iv).(vi)Violation of probation or parole.(vii)School proceeding.(viii)Other.(B)Multiple chargesIf a case involves multiple charges, the case type shall be determined according to the most serious charge under the applicable State or local law.(5)Corresponding prosecutor's officeThe term corresponding prosecutor's office , with respect to a public defender’s office or panel attorneys, means a prosecutorial unit that appears adverse to the public defender’s office or panel attorneys in criminal proceedings.(6)Data grantThe term data grant means a grant awarded under section 4(a)(1).(7)Eligible entityThe term eligible entity means a State, unit of local government, Tribal organization, public defender's office, or assigned counsel program that—(A)in the case of an application for a data grant, has not, as of the date of application, developed and implemented a data collection process that meets the requirements under section 4(b)(2); and(B)in the case of an application for a hiring grant, as of the date of the application, has—(i)received a data grant; and(ii)fulfilled the requirements of the data grant.(8)Hiring grantThe term hiring grant means a grant awarded under section 4(a)(2).(9)Most serious chargeThe term most serious charge , with respect to a case that involves multiple charges, means the charge that carries the most severe or lengthy maximum penalty.(10)Panel attorneyThe term panel attorney means a private attorney assigned by the court who serves the same function as a public defender, without regard to whether the role is full-time or part-time.(11)ProsecutorThe term prosecutor —(A)has the meaning given the term in section 3001(b) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10671(b) ); and(B)includes a full-time employee of a Tribal organization who—(i)is continually licensed to practice law; and(ii)carries out activities equivalent to those of a prosecutor referred to in subparagraph (A).(12)Public defenderThe term public defender —(A)has the meaning given the term in section 3001(b) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10671(b) ); and(B)includes an attorney employed by a Tribal organization who—(i)is continually licensed to practice law; and(ii)carries out activities equivalent to those of a public defender referred to in subparagraph (A).(13)Prosecutor's office; public defender's officeThe terms prosecutor's office and public defender's office mean an agency or office of a State, unit of local government, or Tribal organization that employs prosecutors or public defenders, respectively.(14)ResolutionThe term resolution , with respect to a case, means the manner in which the case concludes, including by—(A)dismissal by the prosecutor;(B)dismissal based on a motion, such as a motion to suppress evidence;(C)a plea agreement at first appearance;(D)a plea agreement entered into at any point in the criminal prosecution other than first appearance;(E)diversion; or(F)a bench or jury trial and the outcome of the trial, including the sentence if the defendant is convicted of any offense charged.(15)Secondary chargeThe term secondary charge , with respect to a case that involves multiple charges, means any charge that is not the most serious charge.(16)StateThe term State has the meaning given the term in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10251 ).(17)Tribal organizationThe term Tribal organization has the meaning given the term tribal organization in section 4(l) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act ( 25 U.S.C. 5304(l) ).(18)Unit of local governmentThe term unit of local government has the meaning given the term in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10251 ).4.Public defense grant program(a)Grant authorityThe Attorney General may award a grant to an eligible entity to—(1)develop, implement, and update a data collection process under subsection (b)(2); or(2)hire additional public defense attorneys or carry out related activities under subsection (c)(3).(b)Data grants(1)TermThe term of a data grant shall be 3 fiscal years.(2)Required data collectionAn eligible entity that receives a data grant shall develop and implement a process for collecting the following data for attorneys employed by each applicable public defender’s office, and for panel attorneys within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, during each fiscal year of the grant period:(A)The mean number of hours per month worked per attorney.(B)The mean number of hours spent per month by an attorney on—(i)discovery and investigation, including witness interviews;(ii)court time, including preparation and appearances;(iii)client communication and care;(iv)research and writing, including motions practice; and(v)administrative work.(C)The number of cases handled, broken down by—(i)case type, including by—(I)the most serious charge; and(II)each secondary charge;(ii)the race, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client;(iii)the date on which the attorney was appointed to the case;(iv)whether the case remained open as of the last day of the fiscal year, and if not, the date on which the case was closed; and(v)the resolution of the case, if the case was concluded by the last day of the fiscal year.(D)Any other information as the Attorney General determines appropriate.(3)RenewalUpon application from an eligible entity that received a data grant, the Attorney General may award a subsequent data grant to the eligible entity for an additional term that may begin upon termination of the initial data grant.(c)Hiring grants(1)Application requirementsAn eligible entity desiring a hiring grant shall submit to the Attorney General an application that includes, as of the date of the application—(A)the caseload and number of, and pay scale for, attorneys and other staff of each applicable public defender's office; and(B)(i)the number of panel attorneys within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity;(ii)the total number of cases assigned to the attorneys described in clause (i); and(iii)the average number of hours spent on a case by an attorney described in clause (i).(2)TermThe term of a hiring grant shall be 3 years.(3)Use of fundsAn eligible entity may use a hiring grant to—(A)hire additional public defenders;(B)increase compensation for public defenders or panel attorneys to achieve pay parity with corresponding prosecutor's offices;(C)hire case workers, social workers, investigators, or paralegals; or(D)establish or fund a loan assistance program for public defenders.(4)Supplement, not supplantAn eligible entity may not use a hiring grant to supplant funds that the eligible entity would otherwise have used for any authorized purpose described in paragraph (3) during the grant period.(5)Required data collectionDuring each fiscal year of the grant period, an eligible entity that receives a hiring grant shall collect the data described in subsection (b)(2).(d)Submission requirementNot later than 60 days after the end of a fiscal year, an eligible entity that receives a data grant or hiring grant shall submit to the Attorney General the data described in subsection (b)(2) for that fiscal year.(e)Multiple defendantsIf a prosecutor’s charging document states that multiple defendants were involved in a single incident of alleged criminal or delinquent conduct, each defendant shall be considered a separate case for purposes of the collection of data described in subsection (b)(2).(f)Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out this section—(1)$250,000,000 for each of the first 5 fiscal years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act; and(2)such sums as may be necessary for each fiscal year thereafter.5.Studies(a)Studies(1)Caseload limits study(A)In generalAfter the end of the first fiscal year for which data grants are awarded, the Attorney General, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Director of the Office for Access to Justice, shall—(i)conduct a study to analyze the data submitted to the Attorney General under section 4(d) for that fiscal year related to public defender and panel attorney caseloads and correlated outcomes;(ii)review studies, reports, and other data published or provided by professional organizations, legal associations, and bar associations related to public defender and panel attorney caseloads; and(iii)develop and publish best practices and recommendations for setting public defender and panel attorney caseloads based on the information described in clauses (i) and (ii) to ensure—(I)reasonably effective assistance of counsel pursuant to constitutional standards and prevailing professional norms; and(II)competent representation pursuant to applicable rules of professional responsibility.(B)Continuing studyNot less frequently than once every 5 years, the Attorney General shall—(i)study and review new studies, reports, or other data as described in subparagraph (A)(ii); and(ii)update the best practices and recommendations under subparagraph (A)(iii).(2)Compensation studyNot later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Director of the Office for Access to Justice, shall—(A)conduct a national study of public defender salaries and panel attorney rates, using prosecutors’ salaries as one benchmark; and(B)develop and publish best practices and recommendations relating to compensation of public defenders and panel attorneys.(b)Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.6.State data collection(a)In generalFor any fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, a State that receives funds under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq. ) may submit to the Office for Access to Justice of the Department of Justice data on, with respect to criminal cases heard by a court of the State or of a unit of local government in the State during that fiscal year, the number of cases for which a defendant was represented in court by a public defender or panel attorney, broken down by—(1)the most serious charge and the total number of secondary charges in each case; and(2)race, ethnicity, age, and gender of the defendant.(b)Applicable criminal offensesA State that elects to submit data under subsection (a) shall include data with respect to—(1)criminal offenses for which a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year may be imposed;(2)criminal offenses for which a term of imprisonment of 1 year or less may be imposed, including misdemeanors, traffic violations, and violations of municipal ordinances; and(3)acts of juvenile delinquency or juvenile status offenses for which any term of detention may be imposed.(c)FundingA State that receives funds under subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq. ) may apply for, and the Attorney General may award, a 5 percent increase in those funds, to be used by the State to collect and provide to the Office for Access to Justice of the Department of Justice the data described in subsection (a) of this section.7.Funding for educational programs(a)DefinitionIn this section, the term eligible entity means an entity that is—(1)an organization—(A)described in paragraph (3) or (6) of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code; or(B)funded by a State or unit of local government; or(2)a State, unit of local government, Indian Tribal government, or political subdivision of an Indian Tribe.(b)GrantsThe Attorney General shall award grants to eligible entities to provide a comprehensive educational program to public defenders and panel attorneys that offers—(1)ongoing training and support; and(2)programming that includes—(A)skills training, including pretrial practice, negotiation skills, trial skills, and sentencing advocacy;(B)client-centered values;(C)implicit bias training;(D)leadership development; and(E)ongoing support to reinforce the training curriculum.(c)Authorization of appropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of the first 5 fiscal years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-25
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to incentivize States and localities to improve access to justice, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Cory Booker (D) sponsors S. 1102, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 1102 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
S. 1102 has taken 2 actions since Mar 25, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 25, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee | ||
Mar 25, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 1102 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 1102 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- Quality Defense Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Quality Defense Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Providing a Quality Defense Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to incentivize States and localities to improve access to justice, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 12 registered lobbyists who named S. 1102 in 7 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Constitution, Intelligence, Budget/Appropriations, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Foreign Relations, Government Issues.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 1 | 6 | — |
| AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| JASON PYE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| SHANA-TARA O'TOOLE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHRISTINA ENNIS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DAVID EPPSTEIN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DENISE CARDMAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HOLLY COOK | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JAMES O'NEILL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KENNETH GOLDSMITH | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KRISTI GAINES | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LARSON FRISBY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MEANNA GRAY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| THOMAS SUSMAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION | 2025 first_quarter | $260K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2025 third_quarter | $40K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2025 second_quarter | $40K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2025 first_quarter | $40K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2026 second_quarter | $15K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2026 first_quarter | $15K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $10K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 1102 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1102’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.
s1102/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com