Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2594

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 2594, to establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector, was introduced in the House on Apr 2, 2025 by Rep. Eric Crawford (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Transportation And Infrastructure, and last saw action on Apr 2, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 2594 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb2594/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 2594 IH: To establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector.
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-04-02
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2594 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 2, 2025 Mr. Crawford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector.
1.
Water risk and resilience organization
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Administrator
The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
(2)
Covered water system
The term covered water system means—
(A)
a community water system (as defined in section 1401 of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300f )) that serves a population of 3,300 or more persons; or
(B)
a treatment works (as defined in section 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1292 )) that serves a population of 3,300 or more persons.
(3)
Cyber resilient
(A)
In general
The term cyber resilient means the ability of a covered water system to withstand or reduce the magnitude or duration of cybersecurity incidents that disrupt the ability of the covered water system to function normally.
(B)
Inclusion
The term cyber resilient includes the ability of a covered water system to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, or rapidly recover from cybersecurity incidents.
(4)
Cybersecurity incident
The term cybersecurity incident means a malicious act or suspicious event that disrupts, or attempts to disrupt, the operation of programmable electronic devices and communication networks, including hardware, software, and data that are essential to the cyber resilient operation of a covered water system.
(5)
Cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement
The term cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement means a requirement that provides for the cyber resilient operation of a covered water system and the cyber resilient design of planned additions or modifications to a covered water system.
(6)
Water risk and resilience organization; wrro
The terms Water Risk and Resilience Organization and WRRO mean the organization certified by the Administrator under subsection (c).
(b)
Applicability
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue a final rule to carry out this section, including regulations for the selection and certification of the WRRO under subsection (c).
(c)
Certification
(1)
In general
Following the issuance of the final rule under subsection (b)(1), any organization may submit an application to the Administrator, at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Administrator may require, for certification as the Water Risk and Resilience Organization.
(2)
Requirements
The Administrator shall certify not more than 1 organization that submitted an application under paragraph (1) as the Water Risk and Resilience Organization if the Administrator determines that the organization—
(A)
demonstrates advanced technical knowledge and expertise in the operations of covered water systems;
(B)
is comprised of 1 or more members with relevant experience as owners or operators of covered water systems;
(C)
has demonstrated the ability to develop and implement cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements that provide for an adequate level of cybersecurity risk and resilience for a covered water system;
(D)
is capable of establishing measures, in line with prevailing best practices, to secure sensitive information and to protect sensitive security information from public disclosure; and
(E)
has established rules that—
(i)
require that the organization be independent of the users, owners, and operators of a covered water system, with balanced and objective stakeholder representation in the selection of directors of the organization and balanced decision making in any committee or subordinate organizational structure;
(ii)
require that the organization allocate reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among end-users for all activities under this section;
(iii)
provide just and reasonable procedures for enforcement of cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements and the imposition of penalties in accordance with subsection (f), including limitations on activities, functions, or operations, or other appropriate sanctions; and
(iv)
provides for reasonable notice and opportunity for public comment, due process, openness, and balancing of interests in developing cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements and otherwise exercising duties described in this section.
(d)
Cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements
(1)
In general
(A)
Proposed requirements
The WRRO shall file with the Administrator each cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement that the WRRO proposes to be made effective under this section.
(B)
Implementation plan
(i)
In general
For each proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement filed pursuant to subparagraph (A), the WRRO shall file an implementation plan, including the schedule for implementation, which may include a specified date, by which covered water systems shall achieve compliance with all of the cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement. The implementation schedule may account for a phased rollout of the requirement, recognizing that the requirement may not apply, in totality, to all covered water systems.
(ii)
Reasonable deadlines
The enforcement date proposed by the WRRO in the implementation plan under clause (i) shall provide a reasonable implementation period for covered water systems to meet the requirements under the implementation plan.
(2)
Approval
(A)
In general
Notwithstanding paragraph (3)(A), the Administrator shall approve a proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement, including the accompanying implementation plan filed under paragraph (1), if the Administrator determines that the requirement is just, reasonable, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.
(B)
Deference to wrro
The Administrator shall defer to the technical expertise of the WRRO with respect to the content of a proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement.
(3)
Disapproval of requirement
(A)
In general
Notwithstanding paragraph (2)(A), if the Administrator disapproves, in whole or in part, a filed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement, the Administrator shall remand such requirement to the WRRO and provide to the WRRO specific recommendations that would lead to the approval of the cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such requirement under paragraph (2).
(B)
Timeline
The Administrator shall remand to the WRRO a proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement disapproved under subparagraph (A), including the submission of the specific recommendations required under that subparagraph, not later than 90 days after the date on which the WRRO filed the requirement or modification with the Administrator under paragraph (1)(A).
(C)
Response and approval
(i)
In general
On receipt of the remand of a proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement and receipt of the specific recommendations of the Administrator pursuant to subparagraph (A), the WRRO shall—
(I)
accept the recommendations of the Administrator and resubmit an amended proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement consistent with those recommendations;
(II)
provide to the Administrator and a reason why the recommendation was not accepted; or
(III)
withdraw the proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement.
(ii)
Amended requirement
If the WRRO files an amended proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement under clause (i)(I) the Administrator shall review such proposed requirement or modification and determine whether to approve such amended requirement or modification in accordance with paragraph (2)(A).
(iii)
Response by WRRO
On receipt of a response from the WRRO pursuant to clause (i)(II), the Administrator shall—
(I)
approve the proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement; or
(II)
invite the WRRO to engage in negotiations with the Administrator to reach consensus to address the specific recommendation made by the Administrator under subparagraph (A).
(4)
Effective date
The effective date of an approved cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such a requirement proposed under this subsection shall be set by the Administrator in accordance with the proposed implementation plan submitted by the WRRO under paragraph (1).
(5)
Submission of specific requirement
The Administrator, on the motion of the Administrator or on complaint may, following consultation with the WRRO, order the WRRO to file with the Administrator under paragraph (1) a proposed cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement or modification to such as requirement that addresses a specific matter if the Administrator determines there is a reasonable basis to conclude the existing cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements are insufficient, when implemented by covered water systems, to protect, defend, or recover from or mitigate a cybersecurity incident.
(6)
Conflict
(A)
In general
The final rule adopted under subsection (b)(2) shall include specific processes for the identification and timely resolution of any conflict between a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement and any function, rule, order, tariff, or agreement accepted, approved, or ordered by the Administrator that is applicable to a covered water system.
(B)
Compliance
A covered water system shall continue to comply with a function, rule, order, tariff, or agreement described in subparagraph (A) unless—
(i)
the Administrator finds a conflict exists between a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement and any function, rule, order, tariff, or agreement approved or otherwise accepted or ordered by the Administrator;
(ii)
the Administrator orders a change to that function, rule, order, tariff, or agreement; and
(iii)
the ordered change becomes effective.
(C)
Modification
If the Administrator determines that a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement needs to be changed as a result of a conflict identified under this paragraph, the Administrator shall direct the WRRO to propose and file with the Administrator a modified cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (4) of this section.
(e)
Water system monitoring and assessment
To aid in the development and adoption of appropriate and necessary cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements and modifications to such requirements, the WRRO shall—
(1)
routinely monitor and conduct periodic assessments of the implementation of cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements approved by the Administrator under subsection (d) and the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements for covered systems, including by requiring—
(A)
annual self-attestations of compliance with such cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements by covered water systems; and
(B)
assessments of the covered water system by the WRRO or by a third party designated by the WRRO not less frequently than every 5 years of compliance by covered water systems with such cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements; and
(2)
annually submit to the Administrator a report describing the implementation of cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements approved by the Administrator under subsection (d) and the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements for covered water systems subject to the requirements that reports under this paragraph—
(A)
shall only include aggregated or anonymized findings, observations, and data; and
(B)
shall not contain any sensitive security information.
(f)
Enforcement
(1)
In general
The WRRO may, subject to paragraphs (2) through (5), impose a penalty on the owner or operator of a covered water system for a violation of a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement if the WRRO, after notice and an opportunity for a consultation and a hearing—
(A)
finds that the owner or operator of a covered system has violated or failed to comply with the cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement; and
(B)
files notice of the finding under subparagraph (A) and the record of the proceeding with the Administrator.
(2)
Notice
(A)
In general
The WRRO may not impose a penalty on the owner or operator of a covered water system under paragraph (1) unless the WRRO provides the owner or operator with—
(i)
notice of the alleged violation of or failure to comply with a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement; and
(ii)
an opportunity for a consultation and a hearing prior to finding that the owner or operator has violated or failed to comply with the applicable cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement under paragraph (1)(A).
(B)
Access to counsel
The owner or operator of a covered water system may engage legal counsel to take part in the consultation and hearing described in subparagraph (A)(ii).
(3)
Effective date of penalty
A penalty imposed under paragraph (1) may take effect not earlier than 31 days after the date on which the WRRO files with the Administrator notice of the penalty and the record of proceedings under subparagraph (B) of that paragraph.
(4)
Imposition of penalty
(A)
Maximum amount
A penalty imposed under paragraph (1) shall not exceed $25,000 per day the applicable owner or operator is in violation of a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement approved by the Administrator under subsection (d).
(B)
Limitation
No penalty may be imposed on a covered water system under any other provision of law for a violation of a cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement approved by the Administrator under subsection (d).
(C)
Use of penalty funds
Any penalties collected under this subsection shall be returned to the WRRO to support training initiatives and other resource capabilities of the WRRO in carrying out the duties of the WRRO under this section.
(5)
Review by administrator
(A)
In general
The Administrator may review a penalty imposed under paragraph (1).
(B)
Application for review
The Administrator may conduct a review under subparagraph (A) on the motion of the Administrator or on application by an owner or operator of a covered water system that is the subject of a penalty imposed under paragraph (1), if such application is filed not later than 30 days after the date on which the notice of that penalty is filed with the Administrator.
(C)
Stay of penalty
A penalty under review by the Administrator under this paragraph may only be stayed if, on the motion of the Administrator or on application by the owner or operator of the covered water system that is the subject of the penalty, the Administrator separately orders the stay of the penalty.
(D)
Proceedings
(i)
In general
In any proceeding to review a penalty imposed under paragraph (1), the Administrator, after notice and, subject to clause (ii), opportunity for a hearing, shall by order affirm, set aside, reinstate, or modify the penalty, and, if appropriate, remand to the WRRO for further proceedings.
(ii)
Record below
A hearing under clause (i) may consist solely of the record before the WRRO and an opportunity for the presentation of supporting reasons to affirm, modify, or set aside the applicable penalty.
(iii)
Expedited procedures
The Administrator shall act expeditiously in administering all proceedings under this paragraph.
(g)
Savings provisions
(1)
Authority
Nothing in this section authorizes the WRRO or the Administrator to develop binding cybersecurity risk and resilience requirements for covered water systems, except as specifically provided for in this Act.
(2)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this section preempts any authority of any State to take action to ensure the safety, adequacy, and resilience of water service within that State, as long as such action is not inconsistent with or in conflict with any cybersecurity risk and resilience requirement.
(h)
Status of WRRO
The WRRO is not a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government.
(i)
Authorization of appropriations
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 to remain available to the WRRO until expended.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-04-02
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector.

Sponsors

Rep. Eric Crawford (R) sponsors H.R. 2594, and 3 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 2594 went before 3 committees: Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure and Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Apr 2, 2025 · 1,636 Bills
Transportation and Infrastructure
Transportation and Infrastructure
Referred To · Apr 2, 2025 · 156 Bills
Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee
Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee
Referred to · Apr 2, 2025 · 85 Bills

Actions

H.R. 2594 has taken 3 actions since Apr 2, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 2, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Apr 2, 2025
House
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee
Apr 2, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Votes

H.R. 2594 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 2594 goes by 2 titles.

  • To establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector. — Official Title as Introduced
  • To establish a Water Risk and Resilience Organization to develop risk and resilience requirements for the water sector. — Display Title

Lobbying

7 clients hired 7 firms and 20 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2594 in 29 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Clean Air and Water (quality), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Homeland Security, Environment/Superfund, Agriculture, Natural Resources, Science/Technology.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN WATERNew Jersey16
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia15
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIESDistrict of Columbia15
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict of Columbia15
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIADistrict of Columbia14
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIESDistrict of Columbia13
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTCalifornia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 second_quarter$540K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 first_quarter$506.4K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 fourth_quarter$465.8K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 third_quarter$442.1K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 second_quarter$435.7K2nd Quarter - Report
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMETROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA2026 first_quarter$220K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$200K2nd Quarter - Report
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMETROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA2026 second_quarter$190K2nd Quarter - Report
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMETROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA2025 fourth_quarter$190K4th Quarter - Report
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAMETROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA2025 third_quarter$190K3rd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIES2026 second_quarter$120K2nd Quarter - Report
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTSANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT2025 second_quarter$120K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES2025 fourth_quarter$115K4th Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES2025 third_quarter$115K3rd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES2025 second_quarter$115K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIES2026 first_quarter$110K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN WATERAMERICAN WATER2026 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN WATERAMERICAN WATER2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN WATERAMERICAN WATER2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIESASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WATER AGENCIES2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2594 under Environmental Protection, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2594’s is Environmental Protection.

hr2594/policy-areas.txt
Environmental ProtectionAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2594, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 59 (Wednesday, April 2, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. CRAWFORD:H.R. 2594.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution[Page H1413]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com