Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.Res. 395

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.Res. 395, “Establishing a "Bill of Rights" to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities”, was introduced in the House on May 7, 2025 by Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R) with 11 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 7, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.Res. 395 has 11 co-sponsors.

hres395/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HRES 395 IH: Establishing a “Bill of Rights” to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities.
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-05-07
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
IV 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. RES. 395 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 7, 2025 Mr. Garbarino (for himself, Ms. Malliotakis , Ms. Tenney , Mr. Lawler , Mr. Langworthy , Mr. LaLota , Mr. Fitzpatrick , Mr. Stauber , Mr. Weber of Texas , Mr. Diaz-Balart , and Ms. Stefanik ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary RESOLUTION
Establishing a Bill of Rights to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities.
Whereas calls to defund , disband , dismantle , or abolish the police should be condemned and rule of law should be strictly maintained;
Whereas law enforcement officers take an oath to never betray the public trust;
Whereas in the course of investigations into officers who have allegedly exhibited misconduct, law enforcement should have certain rights to ensure a fair administration of justice, including—
(1)
a law enforcement officer’s inherent right to self-defense against physical threats;
(2)
a law enforcement officer’s right to legal recourse if a civilian attempts to assault the law enforcement officer;
(3)
a law enforcement officer’s right to be protected from physical harassment targeting a law enforcement officer;
(4)
a law enforcement officer’s right to equipment necessary for personal protection;
(5)
a law enforcement officer’s right to counsel and a union representative present at any interview conducted as part of an investigation;
(6)
a law enforcement officer’s right to be informed of the nature of the investigation before any interview commences, including the name of the complainant and sufficient information to reasonably apprise the officer of the allegations;
(7)
during questioning in the course of an investigation a law enforcement officer’s right—
(A)
to not be subjected to any offensive language;
(B)
to not be threatened with departmental, civil, or criminal charges; and
(C)
to not receive financial or promotional inducement;
(8)
a law enforcement officer’s right to a hearing, with notification in advance of the date, access to transcripts, other relevant documents, and evidence;
(9)
a law enforcement officer’s right to have the opportunity to respond to adverse accusations; and
(10)
a law enforcement officer’s right to not be disciplined for exercising a Fifth Amendment right to remain silent unless granted immunity that such statements will not be used against the officer in any criminal proceeding;
Whereas in order to ensure these investigations are conducted in a manner that protects the public, respects the rights of law enforcement personnel, and is conducive to good order and discipline;
Whereas States across the country are encouraged to adopt a Bill of Rights for law enforcement personnel for protections related to investigation and prosecution arising from conduct during official performance of duties;
Whereas the law enforcement community protects our streets, acknowledges the rights of all Americans, and keeps citizens safe from harm;
Whereas law enforcement officers are recognized for their public service to all, knowing they face extremely dangerous situations while carrying out their duties; and
Whereas a healthy and collaborative relationship between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve is essential to creating mutually respectful dialogue: Now, therefore, be it
That the House of Representatives—
(1)
recognizes all law enforcement agencies and officers for their tireless work to protect us and make our communities safer;
(2)
condemns calls to defund , disband , dismantle , or abolish the police;
(3)
encourages dialogue between law enforcement and their respective communities to improve public safety, and engage all of society’s stakeholders; and
(4)
respects the rights of police officers to carry out their duties to protect our communities with integrity and have essential protections during the course of investigations.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-07
  2. Passed House

Establishing a "Bill of Rights" to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities.

Sponsors

Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R) sponsors H.Res. 395, and 11 members have co-sponsored it, 10 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.Res. 395 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 7, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.Res. 395 has taken 2 actions since May 7, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 7, 2025
House
Submitted in House
May 7, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.Res. 395 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.Res. 395 goes by 2 titles.

  • Establishing a "Bill of Rights" to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Establishing a "Bill of Rights" to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities. — Display Title

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 3 registered lobbyists who named H.Res. 395 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Government Issues, Health Issues, Housing, Immigration, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLabor organizationNew York11$30K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
LONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC11$30K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
ANDREW SIFF111
CHRIS GRANBERG111
ROBERT SIMPSON111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC2025 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.Res. 395 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.Res. 395’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hres395/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com