- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 1637
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 1637, the MVP Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 7, 2025 by Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Finance, and last saw action on May 7, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Record
Text
S. 1637 has 2 co-sponsors.
sb1637/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S1637 IS: Medicaid VBPs for Patients ActU.S. Senate2025-05-07text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 1637IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESMay 7, 2025Mr. Mullin (for himself, Ms. Hassan , and Mr. Scottof South Carolina ) introduced the following bill; which was readtwice and referred to the Committee onFinanceA BILLTo amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to codify value-basedpurchasing arrangements under the Medicaid program and reforms related to pricereporting under such arrangements, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act or the MVP Act .2.Codifying value-based purchasing arrangements under Medicaid and reforms relatedto price reporting under such arrangements(a)Codifying multiple best price points(1)In generalSection 1927(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(c)(1)(C)(ii) ) is amended—(A)in subclause (III), by adding a semicolon at the end;(B)in subclause (IV), by striking and at the end;(C)in subclause (V), by striking the period and inserting ; and ; and(D)by adding at the end the following new subclause:(VI)may include multiple best price points for a single dosage form and strength of a drug of a manufacturer subject to a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in subsection (k)(12)), but only if such manufacturer offers such arrangement to all States..(2)Rule of constructionNothing in the amendments made by this subsection may be construed to prohibit a manufacturer from treating a value-based purchasing arrangement as a bundled sale.(b)Definition of average manufacturer price(1)In generalSection 1927(k)(1) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(1) ) is amended—(A)in subparagraph (B)(i)—(i)in subclause (IV), by adding a semicolon at the end;(ii)in subclause (VII), by striking at the end and ;(iii)in subclause (VIII), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and(iv)by adding at the end the following new subclause:(IX)with respect to a covered outpatient drug that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in paragraph (12)) during the rebate period, including such a drug that is an inhalation, infusion, instilled, implanted, or injectable drug that is not generally dispensed through a retail community pharmacy—(aa)a refund, rebate, reimbursement, or free goods from the manufacturer or third party on behalf of the manufacturer; or(bb)the withholding or reduction of a payment to the manufacturer or third party on behalf of the manufacturer;that is triggered by a patient whofails to achieve outcomes or measures defined under theterms of such value-based purchasing arrangement during theperiod for which such arrangement iseffective.; and(B)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(D)Special rule for certain value-based purchasing arrangementsFor purposes of subparagraph (A), in determining the average price paid to a manufacturer for a covered outpatient drug that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in paragraph (12)) that provides that payment for such drug is made in installments over the course of such arrangement, such price shall be determined as if the aggregate price per the terms of the arrangement were paid in full in the first installment during the rebate period..(2)RulemakingNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall implement the amendments made by this subsection through rulemaking.(c)Definition of value-Based purchasing arrangementSection 1927(k) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k) ) is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:(12)Value-Based Purchasing ArrangementThe term value-based purchasing arrangement has the meaning given such term in section 447.502 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation)..3.Calculation of average sales price under MedicareSection 1847A(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3a(c)(3)) is amended—(1)by striking In calculating and inserting the following:(A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (B), in calculating; and(2)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(B)Certain remuneration under value-based purchasing arrangements excludedIn calculating the manufacturer’s average sales price under this subsection for a drug or biological that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in section 1927(k)(12)) and with respect to which the manufacturer of such drug or biological has elected to include multiple best price points (as described in section 1927(c)(1)(C)(ii)(VI)) in reporting the best price of such drug under section 1927(b), such manufacturer's average sales price shall not include any amount that is excluded from the calculation of the average manufacturer price of such drug or biological under section 1927(k)(1)(B)(i)(IX)..4.Guidance on value-based purchasing arrangements for inpatient drugs underMedicaidNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall issue guidance to State Medicaid agencies on the option of entering into a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in section 1927(k)(12) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(12) )) with manufacturers for drugs or biological products provided as part of, or as incident to and in the same setting as, inpatient hospital services furnished under a State plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq. ), or under a waiver of such plan, where such drugs or biological products are reimbursed directly and not paid for as part of payment for such inpatient hospital services, including guidance on how multiple States may enter into agreements with one another and with manufacturers which permit the transfer of funds between the participating States so that individuals who reside in a State different from the State in which they receive a drug subject to a value-based purchasing arrangement as an inpatient may be treated as if they received such drug in the State in which they reside.5.Exception under the antikickback statute(a)In generalSection 1128B(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b(b)(3)) is amended—(1)in subparagraph (J), by moving the left margin of such subparagraph 2 ems to the left;(2)in subparagraph (K)—(A)by moving the left margin of such subparagraph 2 ems to the left; and(B)by striking and at the end;(3)in subparagraph (L)(iii), by striking the period and inserting ; and ; and(4)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(M)any remuneration provided by a manufacturer or third party on behalf of a manufacturer to a State under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in section 1927(k)(12)) under a State plan under title XIX (or waiver of such plan) in the case a patient fails to achieve outcomes or measures defined in such arrangement following the administration of a covered outpatient drug (as defined in section 1927(k)(2))..(b)RulemakingNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services shall through rulemaking implement the amendments made by this section.6.GAO study and report on use of value-based purchasing arrangements(a)StudyThe Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the extent to which value-based purchasing arrangements (as defined in section 1927(k)(12) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(12) )) facilitate patient access to covered outpatient drugs, improve patient outcomes, lower overall health system costs, and lower costs for patients in Federal health care programs. In conducting such study, the Comptroller General shall—(1)study the impact of this Act on—(A)access to transformative therapies, including rare disease gene therapies, generally;(B)mitigating socioeconomic disparities in accessing covered outpatient drugs sold under value-based purchasing arrangements through its requirement that State Medicaid programs have access to the same value-based purchasing arrangement pricing structure that are available in the commercial market for such drugs;(C)the Medicaid drug rebate program under section 1927 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8 ), the 340B drug pricing program under section 340B of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 256b ), and part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq. ), including compliance with such programs;(D)expenditures under State Medicaid programs; and(E)prices for such drugs under the Medicaid program in States that do not enter into such arrangements;(2)analyze all the types of value-based purchasing arrangement pricing structures, which structures are working well (as measured by price and ease of implementing), and which need improvement; and(3)study the potential long-term savings for States that enter into such arrangements under State Medicaid programs.(b)ReportNot later than June 30, 2029, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-05-07
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in Senate May 7, 2025
sb1637/introduced-in-senate.mdShown Here:
Introduced in Senate (05/07/2025)
Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act or the MVP Act
This bill provides statutory authority for regulations that allow for the use of varying best price points under value-based purchasing arrangements for purposes of the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. (Value-based purchasing arrangements refer to arrangements in which the price of a drug is linked to clinical outcomes; such arrangements are particularly used for new high-cost treatments, such as gene therapies.)
The Government Accountability Office must study the impact of value-based purchasing arrangements on federal health care programs, including with respect to the bill's changes.
Additionally, the bill (1) exempts sales of drugs that are made under value-based purchasing arrangements from calculations of the manufacturer average sales price for purposes of payments under Medicare medical services, if the manufacturer reports multiple best prices under Medicaid in accordance with the bill's changes; and (2) requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to issue guidance on how state Medicaid programs may cover drugs in inpatient settings via value-based purchasing arrangements.
Sponsors
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R) sponsors S. 1637, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 1637 went before 1 committee: Finance.
Actions
S. 1637 has taken 2 actions since May 7, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.Finance Committee | ||
May 7, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 1637 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 1637, as Identical bill.
Titles
S. 1637 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- MVP Act — Display Title
- MVP Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to codify value-based purchasing arrangements under the Medicaid program and reforms related to price reporting under such arrangements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
9 clients hired 10 firms and 68 registered lobbyists who named S. 1637 in 27 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Pharmacy, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Insurance, Trade (domestic/foreign).
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | Advocacy organization supporting advances in regenerative medicine. | District of Columbia | 2 | 7 | $150K |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | — | California | 1 | 3 | — |
| PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | no change | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| ACADEMY OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY | Professional association of managed care pharmacists. | Virginia | 1 | 2 | $160K |
| GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.) | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| ORCHARD THERAPEUTICS NORTH AMERICA | Health | Massachusetts | 1 | 1 | — |
| SPARK THERAPEUTICS, INC. | — | Pennsylvania | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 68.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAM BECK | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANDREW SHINE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANNA DUNBAR-HESTER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANTHONY MITCHELL | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ARON GRIFFIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GARY BECK | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JEANETTE THORNTON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARK HAMELBURG | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MICHAEL TUFFIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| SEAN DICKSON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| SEAN DUGAN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| SHANE HAND | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| SOHINI GUPTA | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KELLEY SCHULTZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ANTHONY BUSH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BART FORSYTH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CATHERINE DOUGLAS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DAVID KORN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DAVID MARIN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ELENORA CONNORS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | 2026 first_quarter | $12.2M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | 2025 third_quarter | $9M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA | 2025 fourth_quarter | $8.4M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP) | 2026 first_quarter | $5.3M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP) | 2025 third_quarter | $4.2M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP) | 2025 fourth_quarter | $4.1M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP) | 2025 second_quarter | $4.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $3.3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP) | AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP) | 2026 second_quarter | $3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $3M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.) | GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.) | 2026 first_quarter | $1.6M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.) | GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.) | 2025 fourth_quarter | $810K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $390K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $299.7K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | 2025 third_quarter | $270K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. | 2025 second_quarter | $270K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $230K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| ORCHARD THERAPEUTICS NORTH AMERICA | ORCHARD THERAPEUTICS NORTH AMERICA | 2026 second_quarter | $190K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | 2025 second_quarter | $160K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | ALLIANCE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | 2025 third_quarter | $140K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 1637 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1637’s is Health.
s1637/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
