Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 1692

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 1692, the Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 8, 2025 by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Finance, and last saw action on May 8, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


Record

Text

S. 1692 has 4 co-sponsors.

sb1692/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S1692 IS: Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act
U.S. Senate
2025-05-08
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1692 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 8, 2025 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and
Ms. Cortez Masto ) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collection
requirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for other
purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act .
2.
Modification of appropriate use criteria data collection for applicable imaging
services
(a)
In general
Section 1834(q) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395m(q) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3)(B)(ii)—
(A)
in subclause (IV), by striking generates and provides to the ordering professional a certification or documentation that ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subclause:
(VIII)
Beginning with January 1, 2026, the mechanism provides to the Secretary—
(aa)
the information described in subclauses (III) and (IV);
(bb)
the information described in paragraph (4)(B); and
(cc)
such other information as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, at such time, and in such form and manner, as the Secretary may specify.
;
(2)
in paragraph (4)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
(ii)
beginning January 1, 2026, comply with such requirements as the Secretary may establish.
;
(B)
in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
in the heading, by striking
furnishing professional and inserting
qualified clinical decision support mechanism ;
(ii)
in the matter preceding clause (i)—
(I)
by striking January 1, 2017 and inserting January 1, 2026 ; and
(II)
by striking payment for such service may only be made if the claim for the service includes and inserting the qualified decision support mechanism shall maintain and report to the Secretary under subparagraph (F) ; and
(iii)
in clause (iii), by striking (if different from the furnishing professional) ;
(C)
in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following new clauses:
(iv)
Clinical trials
An applicable imaging service that is ordered for an individual as part of a clinical trial.
(v)
Small and rural practices
An applicable imaging service ordered by an ordering professional practicing in a small practice (consisting of 15 or fewer ordering professionals), or a practice in a health professional shortage area (as designated under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act) located in a rural area.
(vi)
Specified exemptions
The following types of applicable imaging services:
(I)
A mammography.
(II)
A lung cancer screening performed using computed tomography.
(III)
A colonography performed using computed tomography.
(IV)
Such other preventive or screening imaging services as the Secretary determines appropriate.
;
(D)
in subparagraph (D), by adding at the end the following new clause:
(iv)
Any other payment system determined appropriate by the Secretary.
; and
(E)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
(E)
Furnishing professional requirement
Beginning January 1, 2026, with respect to an applicable imaging service furnished in an applicable setting and paid for under an applicable payment system (as defined in subparagraph (D)), the furnishing professional shall include the national provider identifier of the ordering professional (if different from the furnishing professional) on the claim for the service.
(F)
Reporting requirements
The Secretary shall provide, through guidance or rulemaking, information on appropriate ways that each qualified clinical decision support mechanism may report the information maintained under subparagraph (B) to the Secretary to support the Secretary in implementing paragraphs (5) and (6).
;
(3)
in paragraph (5)—
(A)
in the heading, by striking
outlier and inserting
low compliant ;
(B)
by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following:
(A)
In general
With respect to applicable imaging services furnished on or after January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall determine on an annual basis the total number of ordering professionals who are designated as low compliant ordering professionals under subparagraph (B).
(B)
Low compliant ordering professionals
The Secretary shall designate ordering professionals with a compliance rate (as determined under subparagraph (D)) lower than an amount determined by the Secretary as low compliant ordering professionals.
;
(C)
in paragraph (C), by striking outlier and inserting low compliant ;
(D)
by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:
(D)
Determination of compliance rate
(i)
In general
(I)
Compliance rates
For applicable imaging services furnished on or after January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall determine a compliance rate (as defined in clause (ii)) for each ordering professional for a period specified by the Secretary.
(II)
Use of data
In determining a compliance rate for an ordering professional under subclause (I), the Secretary shall use data made available to the Secretary by qualified clinical decision support mechanisms published in the list under paragraph (3)(C) that were consulted by the ordering professional for the period specified by the Secretary under subclause (I).
(ii)
Definition of compliance rate
(I)
In general
In this subparagraph, the term compliance rate means, with respect to the requirement that an ordering professional consult with a qualified decision support mechanism when ordering an applicable imaging service under paragraph (4)(A)(i), the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of—
(aa)
the number of claims for orders for an applicable imaging service from such ordering professional during the period specified by the Secretary under clause (i)(I) that provided the qualified decision support mechanism consulted by such ordering professional; and
(bb)
the total number of orders for an applicable imaging service from such ordering professional during such period.
(II)
Exclusion of excepted orders
In calculating the compliance rate for an ordering professional under subclause (I), the Secretary shall exclude from the total number of orders in item (bb) of such subclause any order for an applicable imaging service described in paragraph (4)(C).
; and
(E)
in subparagraph (E), by striking outlier and inserting low compliant ;
(4)
by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:
(6)
Study and report on low compliant ordering professionals and utilization of applicable imaging services
(A)
In general
Not later than January 1, 2031, and every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall conduct a study regarding the compliance rates calculated under paragraph (5) and submit a report to Congress that—
(i)
discusses—
(I)
such rates and compliance with this subsection;
(II)
the impact this subsection has on the utilization of applicable imaging services; and
(III)
potential mechanisms for improving compliance with this subsection, including—
(aa)
prior authorization for applicable imaging services ordered by low compliant ordering professionals;
(bb)
any payment adjustment related to the services, or a subset of services, that the Secretary may designate under the fee schedule under section 1848; or
(cc)
other mechanisms determined appropriate by the Secretary; and
(ii)
proposes alternative compliance rate thresholds for low compliant ordering professionals for purposes of paragraph (5)(B).
; and
(5)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(8)
Specialty society endorsement
In specifying applicable appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services under paragraph (2) and qualified clinical decision support mechanisms under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall substantially adhere to the approach described in section 414.94 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2023).
.
(b)
Effective date
The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2026.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-08
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collection requirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) sponsors S. 1692, and 4 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 1692 went before 1 committee: Finance.

Finance
Finance
Referred To · May 8, 2025 · 902 Bills

Actions

S. 1692 has taken 2 actions since May 8, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 8, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.Finance Committee
May 8, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 1692 has not gone to a roll call.

2 bills are related to S. 1692.

Titles

S. 1692 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act — Display Title
  • Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collection requirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 33 registered lobbyists who named S. 1692 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Budget/Appropriations, Education, Immigration, Medical/Disease Research/Clinical Labs, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Indian/Native American Affairs.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONOrganization of radiologists, radiologist oncologists & clinical medical physicists i…Virginia15$250K
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia15
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGYHealth Trade AssociationMaryland12$45K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION15
FORBES-TATE15$250K
SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING12$45K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 33.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$5.5M4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$4.6M3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFORBES-TATE2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFORBES-TATE2026 first_quarter$50K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFORBES-TATE2025 fourth_quarter$50K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFORBES-TATE2025 third_quarter$50K3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATIONFORBES-TATE2025 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGYSUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING2026 second_quarter$22.5K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGYSUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING2025 second_quarter$22.5K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 1692 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1692’s is Health.

s1692/policy-areas.txt
HealthAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com