Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 3460

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 3460, the AI Whistleblower Protection Act, was introduced in the House on May 15, 2025 by Rep. Jay Obernolte (R) with 7 co-sponsors. It was referred to Education and Workforce, and last saw action on May 15, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.


Record

Text

H.R. 3460 has 7 co-sponsors.

hb3460/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 3460 IH: AI Whistleblower Protection Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-05-15
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3460 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 15, 2025 Mr. Obernolte (for himself and Mr. Lieu ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce A BILL
To prohibit employment discrimination against whistleblowers reporting AI security vulnerabilities or AI violations, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the AI Whistleblower Protection Act .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
AI security vulnerability
The term AI security vulnerability means any failure or lapse in security that could potentially allow emerging artificial intelligence technology to be acquired by a person (including a foreign entity) by theft or other means.
(2)
AI violation
The term AI violation means—
(A)
any violation of Federal law, including rules and regulations, related to or committed during the development, deployment, or use of artificial intelligence; or
(B)
any failure to appropriately respond to a substantial and specific danger that the development, deployment, or use of artificial intelligence may pose to public safety, public health, or national security.
(3)
Artificial intelligence
The term artificial intelligence includes any of the following:
(A)
An artificial system that performs tasks under varying and unpredictable circumstances without significant human oversight, or that can learn from experience and improve performance when exposed to data sets.
(B)
An artificial system developed in computer software, physical hardware, or other context that solves tasks requiring human-like perception, cognition, planning, learning, communication, or physical action.
(C)
An artificial system designed to think or act like a human, including cognitive architectures and neural networks.
(D)
A set of techniques, including machine learning, that are designed to approximate a cognitive task.
(E)
An artificial system designed to act rationally, including an intelligent software agent or embodied robot that achieves goals using perception, planning, reasoning, learning, communicating, decision making, and acting.
(4)
Artificial system
The term artificial system —
(A)
means any data system, software, application, tool, or utility that operates in whole or in part using dynamic or static machine learning algorithms or other forms of artificial intelligence, including in the case—
(i)
the data system, software, application, tool, or utility is established primarily for the purpose of researching, developing, or implementing artificial intelligence technology; or
(ii)
artificial intelligence capability is integrated into another system or agency business process, operational activity, or technology system; and
(B)
does not include any common commercial product within which artificial intelligence is embedded, such as a word processor or map navigation system.
(5)
Commerce
The terms commerce and industry or activity affecting commerce mean any activity, business, or industry in commerce or in which a labor dispute would hinder or obstruct commerce or the free flow of commerce, and include commerce and any industry affecting commerce , as defined in paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 501 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 142 (1) and (3)).
(6)
Covered individual
The term covered individual includes—
(A)
an employee, including a former employee; and
(B)
an independent contractor, including a former independent contractor.
(7)
Emerging artificial intelligence technology
The term emerging artificial intelligence technology , with respect to an AI security vulnerability, means any artificial system that exhibits a level of performance, complexity, or autonomy that is comparable to or exceeds capabilities that are generally considered state-of-the-art as of the time of the AI security vulnerability.
(8)
Employer
The term employer means any person (including any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, agent, company, partnership, or other individual or entity) engaged in commerce or an industry or activity affecting commerce who pays any compensation to a covered individual in exchange for the covered individual providing work to the person.
3.
Anti-retaliation protection for AI whistleblowers
(a)
Prohibition against retaliation
No employer may, directly or indirectly, discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, blacklist, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against a covered individual in the terms and conditions of employment or post-employment of the covered individual (or the terms and conditions of work provided by the covered individual as an independent contractor) because of any lawful act done by the covered individual—
(1)
in providing information regarding an AI security vulnerability or AI violation, or any conduct that the covered individual reasonably believes constitutes an AI security vulnerability or AI violation, to—
(A)
the appropriate regulatory official or the Attorney General;
(B)
a regulatory or law enforcement agency; or
(C)
any Member of Congress or any committee of Congress;
(2)
in initiating, testifying in, or assisting in any investigation or judicial or administrative action of an appropriate regulatory or law enforcement agency or the Department of Justice, or any investigation of Congress, based upon or related to the information described in paragraph (1); or
(3)
in providing information regarding an AI security vulnerability or AI violation, or any conduct that the covered individual reasonably believes constitutes an AI security vulnerability or AI violation, to—
(A)
a person with supervisory authority over the covered individual at the employer of the covered individual; or
(B)
another individual working for the employer described in subparagraph (A) whom the covered individual reasonably believes has the authority to—
(i)
investigate, discover, or terminate the misconduct; or
(ii)
take any other action to address the misconduct.
(b)
Enforcement
(1)
In general
A covered individual who alleges they are aggrieved by a violation of subsection (a) may seek relief under paragraph (3) by—
(A)
filing a complaint with the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (2)(A); or
(B)
if the Secretary of Labor has not issued a final decision in accordance with such paragraph within 180 days of the filing of a complaint under subparagraph (A), and there is no showing that such a delay is due to the bad faith of the covered individual, bringing an action against the employer at law or in equity in the appropriate district court of the United States, which shall have jurisdiction over such an action without regard to the amount in controversy.
(2)
Procedure
(A)
Department of labor complaints
(i)
In general
Except as provided in clause (ii) and paragraph (3), a complaint filed with the Secretary of Labor under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed by the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code, including the legal burdens of proof described in such section.
(ii)
Exceptions
With respect to a complaint filed under paragraph (1)(A), notification required under section 42121(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, shall be made to each person named in the complaint, including the employer.
(B)
District court actions
(i)
Jury trial
A party to an action brought under paragraph (1)(B) shall be entitled to trial by jury.
(ii)
Statute of limitations
(I)
In general
An action may not be brought under paragraph (1)(B)—
(aa)
more than 6 years after the date on which the violation of subsection (a) occurs; or
(bb)
more than 3 years after the date on which facts material to the right of action are known, or reasonably should have been known, by the covered individual bringing the action.
(II)
Required action within 10 years
Notwithstanding subclause (I), an action under paragraph (1)(B) may not in any circumstance be brought more than 10 years after the date on which the violation occurs.
(3)
Relief
Relief for a covered individual prevailing with respect to a complaint filed under paragraph (1)(A) or an action under paragraph (1)(B) shall include—
(A)
reinstatement with the same seniority status that the covered individual would have had, but for the violation;
(B)
2 times the amount of back pay otherwise owed to the covered individual, with interest;
(C)
the payment of compensatory damages, which shall include compensation for litigation costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable attorneys’ fees; and
(D)
any other appropriate remedy with respect to the violation as determined by the Secretary of Labor in a complaint under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) or by the court in an action under subparagraph (B) of such paragraph.
(c)
Nonenforceability waivers of rights or remedies
The rights and remedies provided for in this section may not be waived or altered by any contract, agreement, policy form, or condition of employment (or condition of work as an independent contractor), including by any agreement requiring a covered individual to engage in arbitration, mediation, or any other alternative dispute resolution process prior to seeking relief under subsection (b).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-15
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To prohibit employment discrimination against whistleblowers reporting AI security vulnerabilities or AI violations, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Jay Obernolte (R) sponsors H.R. 3460, and 7 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 3460 went before 1 committee: Education and Workforce.

Education and Workforce
Education and Workforce
Referred To · May 15, 2025 · 824 Bills

Actions

H.R. 3460 has taken 2 actions since May 15, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 15, 2025
House
Introduced in House
May 15, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.Education and Workforce Committee

Votes

H.R. 3460 has not gone to a roll call.

2 bills are related to H.R. 3460.

Titles

H.R. 3460 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • AI Whistleblower Protection Act — Display Title
  • AI Whistleblower Protection Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To prohibit employment discrimination against whistleblowers reporting AI security vulnerabilities or AI violations, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 25 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 3460 in 10 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Agriculture, Banking, Science/Technology, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Automotive Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict of Columbia15
AFL-CIODistrict of Columbia12
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL U.S. (A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVT)nonprofit organizationDistrict of Columbia12
THE AI POLICY NETWORK INC.A nonpartisan 501(c)(4) organization dedicated to preparing USGOV for powerful AI systems.Delaware11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 25.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AFL-CIOAFL-CIO2026 first_quarter$880K1st Quarter - Report
AFL-CIOAFL-CIO2026 second_quarter$760K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 second_quarter$540K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 first_quarter$506.4K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 fourth_quarter$465.8K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 third_quarter$442.1K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 second_quarter$435.7K2nd Quarter - Report
THE AI POLICY NETWORK INC.THE AI POLICY NETWORK INC.2025 third_quarter$124K3rd Quarter - Report
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL U.S. (A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVT)TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL U.S. (A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVT)2025 fourth_quarter$30K4th Quarter - Amendme…
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL U.S. (A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVT)TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL U.S. (A PROJECT OF THE FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVT)2025 fourth_quarter$30K4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 3460 under Labor and Employment, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 3460’s is Labor and Employment.

hr3460/policy-areas.txt
Labor and EmploymentAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 3460, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 82 (Thursday, May 15, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. OBERNOLTE:H.R. 3460.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H2105]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com