Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 1869

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 1869, the HOVER Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on May 22, 2025 by Sen. Ted Cruz (R). It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on May 22, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.


Record

Text

S. 1869 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

sb1869/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S1869 IS: Helicopter Operational Versatility and Enhanced Readiness Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-05-22
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1869
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 22, 2025
Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services
A BILL
To require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an operational
experimentation program to evaluate the military utility of optionally piloted vehicle
rotary-wing aircraft, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Helicopter Operational Versatility and Enhanced Readiness Act of 2025 or the HOVER Act of 2025 .
2.
Operational experimentation program for optionally piloted vehicle (OPV)
rotary-wing aircraft
(a)
Operational experimentation program
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall establish an operational experimentation program using optionally piloted vehicle (OPV) technology, including such rotary-wing platforms as the Secretary determines suitable—
(1)
to evaluate the military utility of optionally piloted vehicle aircraft in contested environments;
(2)
to assess integration of such aircraft with crewed aircraft in multi-domain operations;
(3)
to analyze cost and maintenance benefits of autonomous flight;
(4)
to develop future tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) for Army aviation; and
(5)
to complement and inform ongoing Army science and technology efforts relating to autonomy, such as the Autonomy for Combat Environment Sustainment (ACES), Mission Adaptive Autonomy (MAA), and the ALIAS transition agreement with the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
(b)
Duration
The Secretary shall carry out the program required by subsection (a) during the two-year period beginning on the date of the commencement of the program.
(c)
Conversion
Under the program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall convert at least three existing rotary-wing aircraft of the Army into optionally piloted vehicles.
(d)
Special use airspace
The Secretary shall ensure that all testing and evaluation under the program required by subsection (a) is conducted in special use airspace of the Department of Defense.
(e)
Program management
The Secretary shall carry out the program required by subsection (a) by acting through the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology in coordination with the head of the Program Executive Office for Aviation.
(f)
Partnerships
In carrying out the program required by subsection (a), the Secretary may collaborate with stakeholders in the United States defense industry, universities, and research institutions to advance optionally piloted vehicle technologies and integrate best practices to support rapid prototyping and ensure interoperability with broader Joint All-Domain Operations initiatives.
(g)
Report
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report detailing—
(1)
progress on the conversion required by subsection (c) and experimentation efforts under the program required by subsection (a);
(2)
initial findings of the Secretary with respect to the program on operational efficiency, cost savings, and effectiveness; and
(3)
recommendations for potential future procurement of optionally piloted vehicle platforms.
(h)
Implementation flexibility
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of the Secretary to adjust the scope, platform selection, or methodology of experimentation to ensure alignment with existing service priorities and long-term modernization objectives.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-22
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an operational experimentation program to evaluate the military utility of optionally piloted vehicle rotary-wing aircraft, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Ted Cruz (R) sponsors S. 1869 alone.

Committees

S. 1869 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.

Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · May 22, 2025

Actions

S. 1869 has taken 2 actions since May 22, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 22, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee
May 22, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 1869 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 1869 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • HOVER Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • HOVER Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Helicopter Operational Versatility and Enhanced Readiness Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an operational experimentation program to evaluate the military utility of optionally piloted vehicle rotary-wing aircraft, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

14 clients hired 14 firms and 37 registered lobbyists who named S. 1869 in 46 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Pharmacy, Budget/Appropriations, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Education, Insurance, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREBusiness trade associationDistrict of Columbia16$960K
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERTexas16
BCBSM INCMinnesota14
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEETennessee14
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEYNew Jersey14
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia13
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INCFlorida13
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INCKansas13
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANDistrict of Columbia13
CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONSDistrict of Columbia13
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)Illinois13
NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNIONDistrict of Columbia12
CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE REGENCE GROUP)Not-for-profit health insurer covering four states in the Northwest, USOregon11$80K
NISKANEN CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICYDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 37.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)2025 first_quarter$1.9M1st Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATIONBLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$1.2M2nd Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATIONBLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$1.2M1st Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATIONBLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$1.2M3rd Quarter - Report
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)2025 third_quarter$840K3rd Quarter - Report
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL RESERVE COMPANY (HCSC)2025 second_quarter$820K2nd Quarter - Report
CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONSCAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS2025 third_quarter$680K3rd Quarter - Report
CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONSCAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS2025 fourth_quarter$630K4th Quarter - Report
CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONSCAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS2025 second_quarter$630K2nd Quarter - Report
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEEBLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEE2025 fourth_quarter$570K4th Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANBLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN2025 third_quarter$266K3rd Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANBLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN2025 second_quarter$266K2nd Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANBLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN2025 first_quarter$266K1st Quarter - Report
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEEBLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEE2025 first_quarter$215K1st Quarter - Report
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA INCBLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.2025 first_quarter$210K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREERNST & YOUNG LLP (WASHINGTON COUNCIL ERNST & YOUNG)2026 second_quarter$160K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREERNST & YOUNG LLP (WASHINGTON COUNCIL ERNST & YOUNG)2026 first_quarter$160K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREERNST & YOUNG LLP (WASHINGTON COUNCIL ERNST & YOUNG)2025 fourth_quarter$160K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREERNST & YOUNG LLP (WASHINGTON COUNCIL ERNST & YOUNG)2025 third_quarter$160K3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CAREERNST & YOUNG LLP (WASHINGTON COUNCIL ERNST & YOUNG)2025 second_quarter$160K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 1869 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1869’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

s1869/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com