Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 4069

Illinois HouseIn House Committee

Summary

HB 4069, “SUPREME COURT ETHICS ACT”, was introduced in the House on May 28, 2025 by Rep. Ryan Spain (R). It was referred to Rules, and last saw action on May 28, 2025: Referred to Rules Committee.


Record

Text

HB 4069 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb4069/introduced.txt
Select Language
×
The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.
Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.
The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.
NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.
Choose Language
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Interlingua
Interlingue
Inuktitut
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Khmer
Korean
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Myanmar
Nepali
Norwegian
Odia
Pashto
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Sango
Sanskrit
Sardinian
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Southern Sotho
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Powered by Translate
Close
Illinois General Assembly
Top Navigation Bar
Translate
Learn
Select General Assembly
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.
ILGA.GOV
Mobile Top Bar
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.
Full Text of HB4069
Home
Legislation
Full Text
HB4069 - 104th General Assembly
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Select Menu
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Open PDF
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
HB4069
Introduced 5/28/2025, by Rep. Ryan Spain
SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
New Act
Creates the Supreme Court Ethics Act. Directs a Supreme Court Judge to disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the Supreme Court Judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Specifies circumstances in which a Supreme Court Judge's impartiality might be reasonably questioned. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to keep informed about the Supreme Court Judge's personal and fiduciary economic interests and to make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal economic interests of the Supreme Court Judge's spouse or domestic partner and the Supreme Court Judge's children. Authorizes a Supreme Court Judge to disclose on the record the basis of the Supreme Court Judge's disqualification and to ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside the presence of the Supreme Court Judge and court personnel, whether to waive disqualification. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to disclose on the record information that the Supreme Court Judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a possible motion for disqualification, even if the Supreme Court Judge believes there is no basis for disqualification. Prohibits a Supreme Court Judge, a Supreme Court Judge's spouse, a Supreme Court Judge's domestic partner, or a Supreme Court Judge's children from accepting any gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, favors, or other things of value, except as specified in the Act. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to file annually with the Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court a verified written statement of economic interests on an Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic Interests Form. Specifies the contents of the Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic Interests Form. Authorizes the Judicial Inquiry Board to investigate any alleged violation of the Act. Provides that, if after an investigation and upon determination by the Judicial Inquiry Board that there is a reasonable basis to publicly charge a Supreme Court Judge with a violation of the Act, the Judicial Inquiry Board may file and prosecute a complaint before the Illinois Courts Commission. Defines terms. Effective immediately.
LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
A BILL FOR
HB4069 LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
AN ACT concerning courts.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
Supreme Court Ethics Act.
Section 5. Definitions. As used in this Section:
"Benefits" means honoraria, reimbursement of expenses, and
waivers of fees.
"Covered person" means the Supreme Court Judge and the
Supreme Court Judge's spouse, the Supreme Court Judge's
domestic partner, and the Supreme Court Judge's children.
"De minimis", in the context of interests pertaining to
disqualification of a Supreme Court Judge, means an
insignificant interest that could not raise a reasonable
question regarding the Supreme Court Judge's impartiality.
"Domestic partner" means a person with whom another person
maintains a household and an intimate relationship, other than
a person's legal spouse.
"Economic interest" means ownership of more than a de
minimis legal or equitable interest. Except for situations in
which the Supreme Court Judge participates in the management
of such a legal or equitable interest or the interest could be
substantially affected by the outcome of a proceeding before a
HB4069 - 2 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Supreme Court Judge, "economic interest" does not include (1)
an interest in the individual holdings within a mutual or
common investment fund; (2) an interest in securities held by
an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic
organization in which the Supreme Court Judge or the Supreme
Court Judge's spouse, domestic partner, parent, or child
serves as a director, an officer, an advisor, or other
participant; (3) a deposit in a financial institution or
deposits or proprietary interests the Supreme Court Judge may
maintain as a member of a mutual savings association or credit
union or similar proprietary interests; or (4) an interest in
the issuer of government securities held by the Supreme Court
Judge.
"Fiduciary" includes relationships such as executor,
administrator, trustee, or guardian.
"Impartial", "impartiality", and "impartially" mean
absence of bias or prejudice in favor of, or against,
particular parties or classes of parties, as well as
maintenance of an open mind in considering issues that may
come before a Supreme Court Judge.
"Income" means dividends, interest, rent, royalties, or
distributions.
"Independence" means a Supreme Court Judge's freedom from
influence or controls other than those established by law.
"Integrity" means probity, fairness, honesty, uprightness,
and soundness of character.
HB4069 - 3 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
"Knowingly", "knowledge", "known", and "knows" mean actual
knowledge of the fact in question. A person's knowledge may be
inferred from the circumstances.
"Member of a Supreme Court Judge's family residing in the
Supreme Court Judge's household" means any relative of a
Supreme Court Judge by blood or marriage, or a person treated
by a Supreme Court Judge as a member of the Supreme Court
Judge's family, who resides in the Supreme Court Judge's
household.
"Ordinary social hospitality" includes the routine
amenities, favors, and courtesies which are normally exchanged
between friends and acquaintances, and which would not create
an appearance of impropriety to a reasonable, objective
observer. The touchstone of this objective test is a careful
consideration of social custom. Factors relevant to this
inquiry include (1) the monetary value of the gift, loan,
bequest, or other item transferred from the donor or lender to
the Supreme Court Judge; (2) the relationship between the
Supreme Court Judge and the donor or lender; (3) the social
practices and customs associated with transfers of the type
made between the Supreme Court Judge and donor or lender; and
(4) the circumstances of the transaction.
"Record date" means December 31 of the year immediately
preceding the date upon which the statement of economic
interests must be filed under this Act.
"Retirement/investment accounts" means all assets valued
HB4069 - 4 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
in excess of $1,000 in which any covered person has an
ownership interest, including those assets owned in an
Individual Retirement Account (IRA), 401(k) plan, 403(b) plan,
457 plan, deferred compensation plan administered by the State
of Illinois, 529 college savings plan, Illinois Uniform
Transfers to Minors Act account, or similar account.
"Supreme Court Judge" means a judge of the Illinois
Supreme Court.
"Third degree of relationship" includes the following
persons: great-grandparent, grandparent, parent, uncle, aunt,
brother, sister, child, grandchild, great-grandchild, nephew,
and niece.
Section 10. Judicial disqualification.
(a) A Supreme Court Judge shall disqualify himself or
herself in any proceeding in which the Supreme Court Judge's
impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including, but
not limited to, the following circumstances:
(1) The Supreme Court Judge has a personal bias or
prejudice concerning a party or a party's lawyer or
personal knowledge of facts that are in dispute in the
proceeding.
(2) The Supreme Court Judge knows that the Supreme
Court Judge, the Supreme Court Judge's spouse or domestic
partner, a person within the third degree of relationship
to either of them, or the spouse or domestic partner of
HB4069 - 5 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
such a person is:
(A) a party to the proceeding or an officer,
director, general partner, managing member, or trustee
of a party;
(B) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(C) a person who has more than a de minimis
interest that could be substantially affected by the
proceeding; or
(D) likely to be a material witness in the
proceeding.
(3) The Supreme Court Judge knowingly, individually,
or as a fiduciary or the Supreme Court Judge's spouse,
domestic partner, parent, or child, wherever residing, or
any other member of the Supreme Court Judge's family
residing in the Supreme Court Judge's household has an
economic interest in the subject matter in controversy or
is a party to the proceeding.
(4) The Supreme Court Judge, while a Supreme Court
Judge or a judicial candidate, has made a public
statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial
decision, or opinion that commits or appears to commit the
Supreme Court Judge to reach a particular result or rule
in a particular way in the proceeding or controversy.
(5) The Supreme Court Judge:
(A) served as a lawyer in the matter;
(B) represented any party to the matter while
HB4069 - 6 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
engaged in the private practice of law within a period
of 7 years following the last date on which the Supreme
Court Judge represented the party;
(C) within the preceding 3 years was associated in
the private practice of law with any law firm or lawyer
currently representing any party in the matter,
provided that referral of cases when no monetary
interest was retained shall not be deemed an
association within the meaning of this subparagraph;
(D) served in governmental employment and in such
capacity participated personally and substantially as
a lawyer or public official concerning the matter or
has publicly expressed in such capacity an opinion
concerning the merits of the particular matter;
(E) was a material witness concerning the matter;
or
(F) previously presided as a Supreme Court Judge
over the matter in another court.
(6) During an election cycle, the Supreme Court Judge
and any political committee acting on behalf of the
Supreme Court Judge have accepted, from an individual or
political committee, contributions that, in the aggregate,
exceed the limitations on campaign contributions that may
be made to a political party committee by a political
action committee under Section 9-8.5 of the Election Code
as adjusted from time to time by the State Board of
HB4069 - 7 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Elections under subsection (g) of that Section.
When disqualifying himself or herself in a proceeding, the
Supreme Court Judge shall state the reason for his or her
recusal.
(b) A Supreme Court Judge shall keep informed about the
Supreme Court Judge's personal and fiduciary economic
interests and make a reasonable effort to keep informed about
the personal economic interests of the Supreme Court Judge's
spouse or domestic partner and the Supreme Court Judge's
children.
(c) A Supreme Court Judge subject to disqualification
under this Section, other than for bias or prejudice under
paragraph (1) of subsection (a), may disclose on the record
the basis of the Supreme Court Judge's disqualification and
may ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside the
presence of the Supreme Court Judge and court personnel,
whether to waive disqualification. If, following the
disclosure, the parties and lawyers agree, without
participation by the Supreme Court Judge or court personnel,
that the Supreme Court Judge should not be disqualified, the
Supreme Court Judge may participate in the proceeding. The
agreement shall be incorporated into the record of the
proceeding.
(d) Under this Section, a Supreme Court Judge is
disqualified whenever the Supreme Court Judge's impartiality
might reasonably be questioned, regardless of whether any of
HB4069 - 8 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
the specific provisions of subsection (a) apply.
(e) A Supreme Court Judge's obligation not to hear or
decide matters in which disqualification is required applies
regardless of whether a motion to disqualify is filed.
(f) The rule of necessity may override the rule of
disqualification. In matters that require immediate action,
the Supreme Court Judge must disclose on the record the basis
for possible disqualification.
(g) The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated
with a law firm with which a relative of the Supreme Court
Judge is affiliated does not itself disqualify the Supreme
Court Judge. If, however, the Supreme Court Judge's
impartiality might reasonably be questioned under subsection
(a) or the relative is known by the Supreme Court Judge to have
an interest in the law firm that could be substantially
affected by the proceeding under subparagraph (C) of paragraph
(2) of subsection (a), the Supreme Court Judge's
disqualification is required.
(h) A Supreme Court Judge shall disclose on the record
information that the Supreme Court Judge believes the parties
or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a
possible motion for disqualification, even if the Supreme
Court Judge believes there is no basis for disqualification.
(i) A Supreme Court Judge's use of social media or social
networking platforms may create the appearance of a
relationship between the Supreme Court Judge and litigants or
HB4069 - 9 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
lawyers who may appear before the Supreme Court Judge. Whether
a relationship would cause the Supreme Court Judge's
impartiality to "reasonably be questioned" depends on the
facts. While the labels used by the social media or social
networking platform are not dispositive of the nature of the
relationship, Supreme Court Judges shall consider the manner
in which the rules on disqualification have been applied in
traditional contexts and the additional ways in which social
media or social networking platforms may amplify any
connection to the Supreme Court Judge.
Section 15. Acceptance of gifts, loans, bequests, favors,
benefits, or other things of value.
(a) A covered person shall not accept any gifts, loans,
bequests, benefits, favors, or other things of value, except
as follows:
(1) any items or items from any one source during a
calendar year having a cumulative total value of less than
$100;
(2) gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, favors, or other
things of value from individuals whose relationship with
the covered person would require disqualification of the
Supreme Court Judge under Section 10;
(3) ordinary social hospitality;
(4) commercial or financial opportunities and
benefits, including special pricing and discounts, and
HB4069 - 10 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
loans from lending institutions in their regular course of
business, if the same opportunities and benefits or loans
are made available on the same terms to similarly situated
persons who are not covered persons;
(5) rewards and prizes given to competitors or
participants in random drawings, contests, or other events
that are open to persons who are not covered persons;
(6) scholarships, fellowships, and similar benefits or
awards, if they are available to similarly situated
persons who are not covered persons, based upon the same
terms and criteria;
(7) books, magazines, journals, audiovisual materials,
and other resource materials supplied by publishers on a
complimentary basis for official use;
(8) gifts incident to a public testimonial;
(9) invitations to a covered person or the guest of a
Supreme Court Judge to attend without charge:
(A) an event associated with a bar-related
function or other activity relating to the law, the
legal system, or the administration of justice; or
(B) an event associated with any of the Supreme
Court Judge's educational, religious, charitable,
fraternal, or civic activities permitted by the
Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct of 2023, if the same
invitation is offered to nonjudges who are engaged in
similar ways in the activity as is the Supreme Court
HB4069 - 11 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Judge;
(10) gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, favors, or
other things of value, only if the donor is not a party or
other person whose interests have come or are likely to
come before the Supreme Court Judge, including lawyers who
practice or have practiced before the Supreme Court Judge
or the cumulative total value of the gifts, loans,
bequests, benefits, favors, or other things of value is
less than $100 in a calendar year; and
(11) gifts loans, bequests, benefits, favors, or other
things of value the acceptance of which is allowed under
subsection (c).
(b) Whenever a covered person accepts a gift or other
thing of value without paying fair market value, there is a
risk that the benefit might be viewed as intended to influence
the Supreme Court Judge's decision in a case. This Section
prohibits the acceptance of benefits except in circumstances
where the risk of improper influence is low.
(c) Gift giving between friends and relatives is a common
occurrence and ordinarily does not create an appearance of
impropriety or cause reasonable persons to believe that the
Supreme Court Judge's independence, integrity, or impartiality
has been compromised. In addition, when the appearance of
friends or relatives in a case would require the Supreme Court
Judge's disqualification under Section 10, there would be no
opportunity for a gift to influence the Supreme Court Judge's
HB4069 - 12 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
decision-making. Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) places no
restrictions upon the ability of a covered person to accept
gifts or other things of value from friends or relatives under
these circumstances.
(d) Businesses and financial institutions frequently make
available special pricing, discounts, and other benefits,
either in connection with a temporary promotion or for
preferred customers based upon longevity of the relationship,
volume of business transacted, and other factors. A covered
person may freely accept such benefits if they are available
to the general public or if the covered person qualifies for
the special price or discount according to the same criteria
as are applied to persons who are not covered persons.
(e) This Section applies only to acceptance of gifts or
other things of value by covered persons.
(f) Contributions to a Supreme Court Judge's campaign for
judicial office are governed by paragraph (6) of subsection
(a) of Section 10 of this Act and the Illinois Code of Judicial
Conduct of 2023.
(g) Disclosure of economic interests, including gifts, is
governed by Sections 20 and 25.
Section 20. Reporting requirements.
(a) A Supreme Court Judge shall file annually with the
Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court a verified written
statement of economic interests on an Illinois Judicial
HB4069 - 13 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Statement of Economic Interests Form that is substantially
similar to the form prescribed in Section 25.
(b) The disclosure of economic interests under this
Section is intended to (1) maintain and promote public
confidence in the integrity, impartiality, fairness, and
independence of the judiciary; (2) provide public information
bearing on Supreme Court Judges' potential conflicts of
interest; and (3) foster compliance with this Act and Illinois
Supreme Court Rules. The statement of economic interests is
designed to achieve an appropriate balance with respect to
particular information that might reasonably bear on these
objectives between the value of public disclosure of that
information, on the one hand, and Supreme Court Judges'
legitimate privacy interests, on the other hand.
(c) The verified written statement of economic interests
required under this Section shall be filed annually by all
Supreme Court Judges on or before April 30. Statements also
shall be filed by every person who becomes a Supreme Court
Judge, within 45 days after assuming office. However, Supreme
Court Judges who assume office on or after December 1 and who
file the statement before the following April 30 shall not be
required to file another statement until the next year.
(d) Before the first Monday in March of each year, the
Director of the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts
shall inform each Supreme Court Judge of the requirements of
this Section and shall provide a copy of the Illinois Judicial
HB4069 - 14 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Statement of Economic Interests Form described in Section 25.
The Director of the Administrative Office of the Illinois
Courts shall do the same for each new Supreme Court Judge
within 10 days of the Supreme Court Judge assuming office.
(e) The Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court is authorized
to redact any personal information that is not required to be
disclosed in the statement.
(f) The Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court shall maintain
a publicly available list of all Supreme Court Judges and the
last date on which each Supreme Court Judge filed the
statement.
(g) The Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court shall send a
Supreme Court Judge acknowledgment of receipt of the Supreme
Court Judge's statement and the date of filing.
(h) The Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court shall post the
contents of each statement filed with him or her and make the
contents of the statement available for inspection and copying
on a publicly accessible website. The postings under this
subsection (h) shall not include the addresses or signatures
of the filers.
Section 25. Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic
Interests Form. The Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic
Interests Form shall be substantially as follows:
1. NAME OF FILING SUPREME COURT JUDGE:.......................
2. COURT AND DISTRICT/CIRCUIT:...............................
HB4069 - 15 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
3. CURRENT ECONOMIC INTERESTS.
a. FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.
i. List each financial institution in which any
covered person has assets valued in excess of $1,000,
including assets held in savings accounts, checking
accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposits,
or retirement/investment accounts.
ii. Do not provide account numbers. Multiple accounts
at the same financial institution need not be separately
listed.
Financial Institution
.
.
.
.
.
.
Check if none ..........
b. STOCKS, BONDS, ETF, AND MUTUAL FUNDS.
i. List stocks, bonds, exchange traded funds (ETF),
and mutual funds valued in excess of $1,000 owned by a
covered person, including such assets held in a
retirement/investment account.
ii. Do not list (1) multiple holdings of the same
HB4069 - 16 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
security (e.g., multiple U.S. Treasury Notes), (2)
multiple securities issued by the same issuer, (3)
different mutual funds in the same mutual fund family, (4)
assets owned by a mutual fund or ETF, or (5) deposits or
proprietary interests held as a member of a mutual savings
association or credit union.
Name of Issuer or Mutual Fund
or ETF Family Nature of Security (i.e., stock, bond, mutual fund, ETF)
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
c. REAL ESTATE.
i. List all real estate in which any covered person
has an ownership interest, including a beneficial interest
in a land trust.
ii. For each personal residence of a covered person or
a covered person's family member, state "personal
residence" and do not provide address.
HB4069 - 17 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Address (other than
for a personal
residence)
Type of Property (e.g., single-family residence, condominium, farmland, etc.) Income Received? (Yes/No)
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
d. PENSION PLANS. List any nonjudicial pension plan in
which any covered person has an interest. This does not
include (1) Individual Retirement Accounts, 401(k) plans,
403(b) plans, or 457 plans or (2) any benefits from the Social
Security Administration.
Plan Sponsor/Administrator Income Received? (Yes/No)
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
e. INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE PROPERTY. List any interest
valued in excess of $1,000 in intangible property, not
HB4069 - 18 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
reported above, owned by any covered person. This includes,
but is not limited to, an interest in any partnership,
corporation, limited liability company, trust, copyright,
trademark, or chose in action.
Description of
Intangible Property Nature of Interest Income Received? (Yes/No)
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
f. EMPLOYMENT. List every paid employment of a covered
person, with the exception of the filing Supreme Court Judge's
judicial employment.
Name of Employer
.
.
.
.
Check if none ..........
g. NONINVESTMENT INCOME. List the nature of all
noninvestment income, other than employment income, received
by a covered person from any one source that totals at least
HB4069 - 19 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
$1,000 in the 12-month period before the record date. Income
includes, but is not limited to, fees, commissions, payments
for personal services, and royalties. Do not include the
amount.
Source of Noninvestment Income Nature of Noninvestment Income (Commission, Royalty, etc.)
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
4. INDEBTEDNESS.
a. List all creditors to whom amounts in excess of $1,000
were owed by any covered person on the record date, and
identify any sureties or guarantors of any such indebtedness.
b. Do not include any debt, including credit card debt,
that was paid in its entirety within 90 days of when it was
incurred. For these purposes, medical or dental expenses are
not considered to be incurred until the amount of the covered
person's financial responsibility is determined after the
application of any insurance benefits.
c. The amount of each listed indebtedness shall be
HB4069 - 20 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
reported by reference to a letter category, as follows:
Category A ($1,000.01 - $5,000); Category B ($5,000.01 -
$15,000); Category C ($15,000.01 - $50,000); Category D
($50,000.01 - $100,000); Category E ($100,000.01 - $250,000);
and Category F (greater than $250,000). This categorization
shall be reported as of the record date.
Name of Creditor
Valuation Category on Record Date Identity of any Surety or Guarantor of the Indebtedness
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
5. RELATIONSHIPS WITH LAWYERS.
a. Identify all persons, other than covered persons, known
by the filing Supreme Court Judge to be licensed or registered
to practice law who, at any time within the 12-month period
before the record date, was a co-owner with a covered person of
any economic interest, a co-obligor with or a creditor of a
covered person, or the payor to a covered person of any income,
HB4069 - 21 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
payments, or benefits, required to be disclosed in paragraphs
3 or 4. State the nature of each economic interest,
indebtedness, or income, payments, or benefits and whether it
is ongoing or terminated as of the record date.
Name of Lawyer
Nature of Economic Interest, Indebtedness, or Income, Payments, or Benefits Ongoing or Terminated
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
b. Identify all lawyers with whom the filing Supreme Court
Judge was associated in the private practice of law within 3
years of the date of this filing. The name of the firm may be
substituted where the association was with 5 or more lawyers.
Name of Lawyer or Law Firm Address
. .
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
HB4069 - 22 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
6. BOARD SERVICE. List every office or directorship held by a
covered person, regardless of whether compensation is
received. Do not include any uncompensated or honorary
positions in educational, religious, charitable, fraternal,
civic, social, or law-related organizations unless those
organizations are either conducted for profit or regularly
engaged in adversary proceedings in any court.
Name of Organization Position Held Compensation Received? (Yes/No)
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
7. LITIGATION.
a. List all court cases or arbitration proceedings known
to the filing Supreme Court Judge pending on or within 12
months before the record date in which a covered person either
was a party or had more than a de minimis financial interest
(i.e., a monetary interest that could not raise a reasonable
question as to the Supreme Court Judge's impartiality). Do not
include (1) proceedings in which a covered person is a party
solely in an official capacity, (2) class actions in which a
HB4069 - 23 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
covered person is not a named class representative, or (3)
motor vehicle offenses that are punishable by fine only.
Case Name, Tribunal, and Case Number
.
.
.
Check if none ..........
b. List all cases in which the filing Supreme Court Judge
was a referring lawyer with an economic interest that are
still pending on the record date or that were resolved within 3
years before the record date. Include the name of the lawyer or
law firm to which the case was referred.
Case Name, Court
Where Pending, and
Case Number Identity of Lawyer or Law Firm to Which the Case Was Referred Pending Case? (Yes/No)
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
Check if none ..........
8. FIDUCIARY POSITIONS. List all fiduciary positions held by
HB4069 - 24 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
the filing Supreme Court Judge on the record date. Examples
include service as a trustee, executor, estate administrator,
guardian of the estate, or agent under a power of attorney for
property. Do not include fiduciary positions held for the
benefit of a family member of a covered person. Identify by
name each person, other than a covered person, for whom the
filing judge is serving as fiduciary.
Fiduciary Position
Name of Person for Whom the Filing Supreme Court Judge Is Serving as Fiduciary
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
9. HONORARIA, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND WAIVERS OF FEES.
List all benefits that (a) either individually or in the
aggregate from the same provider of the benefits exceed $500
and (b) were received by a covered person, or a guest of the
filing Supreme Court Judge in connection with an event at
which the benefits were received, during the 12-month period
prior to the record date. Do not report (a) waivers of fees to
any unit of government or (b) reimbursement or payment of
expenses, or provision of resources, by any unit of
government. Identify the provider of each benefit, and state
HB4069 - 25 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
the type of the recipient of each benefit (i.e., filing
Supreme Court Judge, filing Supreme Court Judge's guest,
spouse, domestic partner, or child) rather than the specific
name. The value of each benefit shall be reported by reference
to a letter category, as follows: Category A ($500 - $2,500);
Category B ($2,500.01 - $5,000); and Category C (greater than
$5,000).
Identity of
Provider of the
Benefit Description of the Benefit Type of Recipient of the Benefit Value of the Benefit
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
Check if none ..........
10. GIFTS. List all gifts that (a) either individually or in
the aggregate from the same donor exceed $500 and (b) were
received by a covered person during the 12-month period prior
to the record date. Do not include gifts between covered
persons or between covered persons and any of their
great-grandparents, grandparents, parents, uncles, aunts,
brothers, sisters, grandchildren, great-grandchildren,
nephews, and nieces. Identify the provider of each gift, and
state the type of the recipient of each gift (i.e., filing
HB4069 - 26 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Supreme Court Judge, spouse, domestic partner, or child)
rather than the specific name. The value of each gift shall be
reported by reference to a letter category, as follows:
Category A ($500 - $2,500); Category B ($2,500.01 - $5,000);
and Category C (greater than $5,000).
Identity of
Provider of the
Gift Description of the Gift Type of Recipient of the Gift Value of the Gift
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
Check if none ..........
11. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES. List any economic interest not
previously disclosed in this statement that could create a
basis for disqualification of the filing Supreme Court Judge
under Section 5 or Illinois Supreme Court Rules. Identify the
person whose economic interest could create a basis for
disqualification, but if that person is a covered person state
the type of that covered person (i.e., filing Supreme Court
Judge, spouse, domestic partner, or child) rather than the
specific name.
HB4069 - 27 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
Type of Covered Person or
Identity of Other Person with
an Economic Interest That Could
Create a Basis for
Disqualification Nature of Economic Interest
. .
. .
. .
. .
Check if none ..........
VERIFICATION
As required under Section 20 of the Supreme Court Ethics Act, I
declare that this Statement of Economic Interests, including
any accompanying schedules and statements, has been examined
by me and to the best of my knowledge and belief is true,
correct, and complete.
.............................................................
(Signature of Filing Supreme Court Judge)
(Date)
.............................................................
(Printed Name of Filing Supreme Court Judge)
.............................................................
HB4069 - 28 - LRB104 13961 JDS 26907 b
(Email Address of Filing Supreme Court Judge)
Section 30. Investigation of violation by Judicial Inquiry
Board. The Judicial Inquiry Board may investigate any alleged
violation of this Act. If after an investigation and upon
determination by the Judicial Inquiry Board that there is a
reasonable basis to publicly charge a Supreme Court Judge with
a violation of this Act, the Judicial Inquiry Board may file
and prosecute a complaint before the Illinois Courts
Commission.
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
becoming law.

Creates the Supreme Court Ethics Act. Directs a Supreme Court Judge to disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the Supreme Court Judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Specifies circumstances in which a Supreme Court Judge's impartiality might be reasonably questioned. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to keep informed about the Supreme Court Judge's personal and fiduciary economic interests and to make a reasonable effort to keep informed about the personal economic interests of the Supreme Court Judge's spouse or domestic partner and the Supreme Court Judge's children. Authorizes a Supreme Court Judge to disclose on the record the basis of the Supreme Court Judge's disqualification and to ask the parties and their lawyers to consider, outside the presence of the Supreme Court Judge and court personnel, whether to waive disqualification. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to disclose on the record information that the Supreme Court Judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to a possible motion for disqualification, even if the Supreme Court Judge believes there is no basis for disqualification. Prohibits a Supreme Court Judge, a Supreme Court Judge's spouse, a Supreme Court Judge's domestic partner, or a Supreme Court Judge's children from accepting any gifts, loans, bequests, benefits, favors, or other things of value, except as specified in the Act. Requires a Supreme Court Judge to file annually with the Clerk of the Illinois Supreme Court a verified written statement of economic interests on an Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic Interests Form. Specifies the contents of the Illinois Judicial Statement of Economic Interests Form. Authorizes the Judicial Inquiry Board to investigate any alleged violation of the Act. Provides that, if after an investigation and upon determination by the Judicial Inquiry Board that there is a reasonable basis to publicly charge a Supreme Court Judge with a violation of the Act, the Judicial Inquiry Board may file and prosecute a complaint before the Illinois Courts Commission. Defines terms. Effective immediately.

Sponsors

Rep. Ryan Spain (R) sponsors HB 4069 alone.

Committees

HB 4069 went before 1 committee: Rules.

Rules
Rules
Referred to · May 28, 2025 · 5,290 Bills

History

HB 4069 has taken 3 actions since May 28, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 28, 2025
House
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Ryan Spain
May 28, 2025
House
First Reading
May 28, 2025
House
Referred to Rules Committee

Votes

HB 4069 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: ilga.gov · legiscan.com