Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 3881

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 3881, the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act, was introduced in the House on Jun 10, 2025 by Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R) with 20 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jun 10, 2025: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 3881 has 20 co-sponsors.

hb3881/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 3881 IH: Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-06-10
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3881 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 10, 2025 Mr. Langworthy (for himself, Mr. Donalds , Mr. Collins , Mr. Van Orden , Mr. Edwards , Mr. McGuire , Mr. Harrigan , Mrs. Harshbarger , Mr. Timmons , Ms. Tenney , Mr. Taylor , Mr. Carter of Georgia , Ms. Boebert , Ms. Stefanik , Mr. Higgins of Louisiana , Mr. Schmidt , Mr. Stauber , Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania , Mr. Rose , and Mr. Moore of North Carolina ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure , and Financial Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To ensure State and local law enforcement officers are permitted to cooperate with Federal officials to protect our communities from violent criminals and suspected terrorists who are illegally present in the United States.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act .
2.
Ensuring cooperation between Federal law enforcement officers and State and local law enforcement officers to safeguard our communities
(a)
Authority To cooperate with Federal officials
A State, a political subdivision of a State, or an officer, employee, or agent of such State or political subdivision that complies with a detainer issued by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357)—
(1)
shall be deemed to be acting as an agent of the Department of Homeland Security; and
(2)
with regard to actions taken to comply with such detainer, shall have all authority available to officers and employees of the Department of Homeland Security.
(b)
Legal proceedings
In any legal proceeding brought against a State, a political subdivision of State, or an officer, employee, or agent of such State or political subdivision, which challenges the legality of the seizure or detention of an individual pursuant to a detainer issued by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357)—
(1)
no liability shall lie against such State or political subdivision for actions taken in compliance with such detainer; and
(2)
if the actions of the officer, employee, or agent of the State or political subdivision were taken in compliance with such detainer—
(A)
the officer, employee, or agent shall be deemed—
(i)
to be an employee of the Federal Government and an investigative or law enforcement officer; and
(ii)
to have been acting within the scope of his or her employment under section 1346(b) and chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code;
(B)
section 1346(b) of title 28, United States Code, shall provide the exclusive remedy for the plaintiff; and
(C)
the United States shall be substituted as defendant in the proceeding.
(c)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this section may be construed to provide immunity to any person who knowingly violates the civil or constitutional rights of an individual.
3.
Sanctuary jurisdiction defined
(a)
In general
Except as provided under subsection (b), for purposes of this Act, the term sanctuary jurisdiction means any State or political subdivision of a State that has in effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts any government entity or official from—
(1)
sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; or
(2)
complying with a request lawfully made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer for, or notify about the release of, an individual.
(b)
Exception
A State or political subdivision of a State shall not be deemed a sanctuary jurisdiction based solely on its having a policy whereby its officials will not share information regarding, or comply with a request made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer regarding, an individual who comes forward as a victim or a witness to a criminal offense.
4.
Sanctuary jurisdictions ineligible for certain Federal funds
(a)
Economic Development Administration grants
(1)
Grants for public works and economic development
Section 201(b) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 ( 42 U.S.C. 3141(b) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end;
(B)
in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:
(4)
the area in which the project is to be carried out is not a sanctuary jurisdiction (as defined in section 3 of the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act ).
.
(2)
Grants for planning and administrative expenses
Section 203(a) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 ( 42 U.S.C. 3143(a) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: A sanctuary jurisdiction (as defined in section 3 of the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act ) may not be deemed an eligible recipient under this subsection. .
(3)
Supplementary grants
Section 205(a) of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 ( 42 U.S.C. 3145(a) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (2), by striking and at the end;
(B)
in paragraph (3)(B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:
(4)
will be carried out in an area that does not contain a sanctuary jurisdiction (as defined in section 3 of the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act ).
.
(4)
Grants for training, research, and technical assistance
Section 207 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 ( 42 U.S.C. 3147 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(c)
Ineligibility of sanctuary jurisdictions
Grant funds authorized under this section may not be used to provide assistance to a sanctuary jurisdiction (as defined in section 3 of the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act ).
.
(b)
Community Development Block Grants
Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. ) is amended—
(1)
in section 102(a) ( 42 U.S.C. 5302(a) ), by adding at the end the following:
(25)
The term sanctuary jurisdiction has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act .
;
(2)
in section 104(b) ( 42 U.S.C. 5304(b) )—
(A)
in paragraph (5), by striking and at the end;
(B)
by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
(C)
by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
(6)
the grantee is not a sanctuary jurisdiction and will not become a sanctuary jurisdiction during the period for which the grantee receives a grant under this title; and
; and
(3)
in section 106 ( 42 U.S.C. 5306 ), by adding at the end the following:
(g)
Protection of individuals against crime
(1)
In general
No funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title may be obligated or expended for any State or unit of general local government that is a sanctuary jurisdiction.
(2)
Returned amounts
(A)
State
If a State is a sanctuary jurisdiction during the period for which it receives amounts under this title, the Secretary—
(i)
shall direct the State to immediately return to the Secretary any amounts received by the State under this title for such period; and
(ii)
shall reallocate amounts returned under clause (i) for grants under this title to other States that are not sanctuary jurisdictions.
(B)
Unit of general local government
If a unit of general local government is a sanctuary jurisdiction during the period for which it receives amounts under this title, any such amounts that the unit of general local government received for that period—
(i)
in the case of a unit of general local government that is not in a nonentitlement area, shall be returned to the Secretary for grants under this title to States and other units of general local government that are not sanctuary jurisdictions; and
(ii)
in the case of a unit of general local government that is in a nonentitlement area, shall be returned to the Governor of the State for grants under this title to other units of general local government in the State that are not sanctuary jurisdictions.
(C)
Reallocation rules
In reallocating amounts pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B), the Secretary—
(i)
shall apply the relevant allocation formula under subsection (b), with all sanctuary jurisdictions excluded; and
(ii)
shall not be subject to the rules for reallocation under subsection (c).
.
(c)
Effective date
This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2025.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-06-10
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jun 10, 2025

hb3881/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (06/10/2025)

Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act

This bill addresses issues related to state and local government cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts, including by prohibiting uncooperative jurisdictions from receiving certain grants.

Specifically, the bill prohibits a sanctuary jurisdiction from receiving grants under certain Economic Development Assistance Programs and the Community Development Block Grant Program. Under the bill, a sanctuary jurisdiction is a state or local government that has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts (1) information sharing with another government entity about an individual's immigration status, or (2) compliance with a lawfully issued Department of Homeland Security (DHS) detainer request or notification of release request.

When complying with a DHS-issued detainer, a state or local government shall be deemed to be acting as an agent of DHS with all authority available to DHS officers and employees. The bill also limits the legal liability of a state or local government for complying with a detainer.

Sponsors

Rep. Nicholas Langworthy (R) sponsors H.R. 3881, and 20 members have co-sponsored it, 19 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 3881 went before 3 committees: Financial Services, Transportation and Infrastructure and Judiciary.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Jun 10, 2025 · 559 Bills
Transportation and Infrastructure
Transportation and Infrastructure
Referred To · Jun 10, 2025 · 156 Bills
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jun 10, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 3881 has taken 2 actions since Jun 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jun 10, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jun 10, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 3881 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 3881, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 3881 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act — Display Title
  • Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To ensure State and local law enforcement officers are permitted to cooperate with Federal officials to protect our communities from violent criminals and suspected terrorists who are illegally present in the United States. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

16 clients hired 19 firms and 85 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 3881 in 45 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Banking, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Transportation, Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.).

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITIONCoalition of financial institutions and credit cards to oppose interchange and swipe feesDistrict of Columbia16$660K
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia16
RACETRAC, INC.Georgia16
VISA, INC.Payment networkDistrict of Columbia24$140K
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCDistrict of Columbia14
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE STORESOhio14
UNITED AIRLINES INCIllinois23$80K
H-E-B GROCERY COMPANY, LPSupermarket chain operating in Texas and northeast MexicoTexas12$160K
MASTERCARD WORLDWIDECredit card services / processingDistrict of Columbia22$80K
GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC.Georgia12
WEX INC.Commerce platform supporting businesses employee benefits, fleet management, and paymentsMaine11$50K
ARKANSAS OIL MARKETERS ASSOCIATIONWholesale & retail fuel industry assoicationArkansas11$20K
TOWER 19 ON BEHALF OF MASTERCARD INC.Lobbying firmCalifornia11$20K
AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INCKansas11
KEYCORPOhio11
NEW YORK CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION, INC.Advocates, educates, unites, and supports the interests of New York credit unions.New York11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 85.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCAMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC2025 second_quarter$4.5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCAMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC2025 first_quarter$4.4M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCAMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC2025 third_quarter$4.4M3rd Quarter - Report
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLCAMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC2025 first_quarter$4.3M1st Quarter - Report
MASTERCARD WORLDWIDEMASTERCARD WORLDWIDE2025 second_quarter$1.5M2nd Quarter - Report
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$1.2M3rd Quarter - Report
UNITED AIRLINES INCUNITED AIRLINES, INC.2025 first_quarter$1.1M1st Quarter - Amendme…
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$1M2nd Quarter - Report
UNITED AIRLINES INCUNITED AIRLINES, INC.2025 first_quarter$1M1st Quarter - Report
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$970K4th Quarter - Report
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$850K1st Quarter - Report
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$830K1st Quarter - Report
CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATIONCONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$650K2nd Quarter - Report
GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC.GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC.2025 first_quarter$350K1st Quarter - Report
KEYCORPKEYCORP2025 third_quarter$260K3rd Quarter - Report
GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC.GLOBAL PAYMENTS, INC.2025 second_quarter$210K2nd Quarter - Report
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITIONMILLER STRATEGIES, LLC2026 second_quarter$110K2nd Quarter - Report
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITIONMILLER STRATEGIES, LLC2026 first_quarter$110K1st Quarter - Report
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITIONMILLER STRATEGIES, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$110K4th Quarter - Report
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS COALITIONMILLER STRATEGIES, LLC2025 third_quarter$110K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 3881 under Immigration, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 3881’s is Immigration.

hr3881/policy-areas.txt
ImmigrationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 3881, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 99 (Tuesday, June 10, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. LANGWORTHY:H.R. 3881.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Clause 3 of Section 8 of Article 1 of the Constitution[Page H2616]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com