Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 4720

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 4720, the Cracking Down on Price Gouging Act, was introduced in the House on Jul 23, 2025 by Rep. Josh Riley (D). It was referred to Financial Services, and last saw action on Jul 23, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


Record

Text

H.R. 4720 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb4720/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 4720 IH: Cracking Down on Price Gouging Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-07-23
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4720 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 23, 2025 Mr. Riley of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL
To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to provide for stricter prohibitions on price gouging of certain materials, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Cracking Down on Price Gouging Act .
2.
Prohibition on price gouging of certain materials
The Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4512 ) is amended—
(1)
in section 102—
(A)
by striking In and inserting the following:
(a)
Prohibition on hoarding and price gouging of certain materials or goods
In
;
(B)
by inserting and price gouging after prevent hoarding ;
(C)
by striking accumulate (1) and inserting (1) accumulate ;
(D)
by striking for the purpose of resale at prices in excess of prevailing market prices and inserting sell or offer to sell at prices that grossly exceed prevailing market prices for the same or similar materials or critical goods in the trade area or at an unfairly excessive price ;
(E)
by striking accumulation. and inserting accumulation, or any critical good under an acute shortage. ;
(F)
by inserting scarce after designation of ; and
(G)
by adding at the end the following:
(b)
Unfairly excessive price
(1)
In general
A price is an unfairly excessive price if there is a gross disparity in the price of a material or critical good at the time of the transaction and the price of the material or critical good immediately prior to—
(A)
the effective date of the President designating the material as a scarce material; or
(B)
the date on which an acute shortage of the critical good begins.
(2)
Gross disparity
(A)
Presumptive
A presumptive gross disparity includes a 10 percent increase of price relative to—
(i)
the effective date of the President designating the material as a scarce material; or
(ii)
the date on which an acute shortage of the critical good begins.
(B)
Other price increase
Nothing in this subsection shall preclude a price increase that is less than a 10 percent increase of the price of a material or critical good relative to the price on the effective date of the President designating such material as a scarce material, or the date on which an acute shortage begins, from constituting a gross disparity.
(3)
Exception
Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), a price is not an unfairly excessive price if it is the result of—
(A)
a legitimate business need of the seller; or
(B)
additional costs outside the control of the seller.
(c)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Acute shortage
The term acute shortage means any negative supply impact that is caused by—
(A)
a disease;
(B)
a pathogen;
(C)
a natural disaster;
(D)
a military conflict;
(E)
terrorism;
(F)
supply-chain disruptions;
(G)
extreme industry consolidation; or
(H)
any other similar exigent constraint.
(2)
Critical good
The term critical good means—
(A)
any consumer food item, good, or service that is used, bought, or rendered primarily for personal, family, or household purposes;
(B)
any essential medical or emergency supply or service;
(C)
any energy resource, including—
(i)
fuel;
(ii)
electricity; or
(iii)
home heating oil; or
(D)
any other essential good or service used to promote the health, safety, or welfare of the public.
; and
(2)
in section 103—
(A)
by striking Any and inserting the following:
(a)
In general
Except as described in subsection (b), any
; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(b)
Penalty for violation of section 102
Any person who willfully performs any act prohibited by the provisions of section 102 or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, shall, upon conviction, be fined the greater of $20,000 or 300 percent of the revenue generated in violation of such section.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-07-23
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to provide for stricter prohibitions on price gouging of certain materials, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Josh Riley (D) sponsors H.R. 4720 alone.

Committees

H.R. 4720 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Jul 23, 2025 · 559 Bills

Actions

H.R. 4720 has taken 2 actions since Jul 23, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jul 23, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jul 23, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.Financial Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 4720 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 4720 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Cracking Down on Price Gouging Act — Display Title
  • To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to provide for stricter prohibitions on price gouging of certain materials, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Cracking Down on Price Gouging Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 91 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 4720 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Aerospace, Automotive Industry, Aviation/Airlines/Airports, Banking, Bankruptcy, Budget/Appropriations, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Copyright/Patent/Trademark.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.District of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 91.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2025 first_quarter$19.3M1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 4720 under Energy, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 4720’s is Energy.

hr4720/policy-areas.txt
EnergyAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 4720, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 23, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. RILEY of New York:H.R. 4720.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I Section VIII[Page H3649]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com