Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 4880

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 4880, the Primacy Certainty Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Aug 5, 2025 by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Energy And Commerce, and last saw action on Aug 5, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.


Record

Text

H.R. 4880 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb4880/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 4880 IH: Primacy Certainty Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-08-05
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4880 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES August 5, 2025 Mr. Crenshaw (for himself, Mr. Pfluger , and Mr. Weber of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL
To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to clarify the requisite timeline for making a decision on the approval or disapproval of a State underground injection control program, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 .
2.
State primary enforcement responsibility for Class VI wells
(a)
Amendments
Section 1422(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1(b) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (2)—
(A)
by striking (2) Within ninety days and inserting the following:
(2)
Required timeline
(A)
Definition of Class VI well
In this paragraph, the term Class VI well has the meaning given the term in section 40306(a) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–9(a) ).
(B)
General deadline for response
Within 90 days
; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(C)
Notice related to State primary enforcement responsibility for class VI wells
(i)
Notice to State
If the Administrator does not approve, disapprove, or approve in part and disapprove in part the State's underground injection control program for Class VI wells by not later than 180 days after the date on which the application of the State is submitted under paragraph (1)(A) or notice of the State is submitted under paragraph (1)(B), the Administrator shall transmit to the State, in writing, a detailed explanation that describes—
(I)
the status of the review of the application or notice, as applicable;
(II)
the reason for which a decision with respect to that application or notice has not yet been made; and
(III)
an itemized list of specific deficiencies with the application or notice to be addressed to receive approval of that application or notice, in accordance with the requirements of this title.
(ii)
Automatic approval for Class VI wells
(I)
In general
If the Administrator has not approved, disapproved, or approved in part and disapproved in part a complete application submitted under paragraph (1)(A) or notice submitted under paragraph (1)(B) of a State's underground injection control program to regulate Class VI wells in writing by not later than the date that is 30 days after the end of the 180-day period described in clause (i), that application or notice shall be considered approved by the Administrator if the State has established and implemented a primary enforcement authority program for 1 or more other classes of underground injection control wells (including adequate recordkeeping and reporting) to prevent underground injection that endangers drinking water sources.
(II)
Determination of completeness
(aa)
Deadline
The Administrator shall determine whether an application submitted under paragraph (1)(A) or notice submitted under paragraph (1)(B) is complete for purposes of subclause (I), and provide notice to the State of any deficiencies in that application or notice, by not later than 10 days after the date on which the State submits the application or notice.
(bb)
Failure to make determination concerning completeness of Class VI primacy application or notice
If the Administrator has not made a determination under item (aa) by the end of the 10-day period described in that item, on request of the State that submitted the application or notice, the application or notice shall be considered administratively complete.
(D)
Pending permits and applications for Class VI wells
With respect to Class VI wells and the efforts of a State to obtain from the Administrator primary enforcement responsibility of Class VI wells, following the approval of an application under paragraph (1)(A) or notice under paragraph (1)(B) for a State, the Administrator shall, as expeditiously as possible—
(i)
render a decision on any pending permits or applications for the operation of Class VI wells in the State prior to that State assuming primary enforcement responsibility for Class VI wells; and
(ii)
transfer to that State all pending permits, applications, and other information relevant to operating an underground injection control program to regulate Class VI wells not already in possession of the State following that State assuming primary enforcement responsibility for Class VI wells.
(E)
Grounds for denial of class VI well applications
A denial or approval in part and disapproval in part with respect to an application under paragraph (1)(A) or notice under paragraph (1)(B) for a State to operate an underground injection control program to regulate Class VI wells shall be based solely on a finding by the Administrator that the State does not meet the criteria described in paragraph (1)(A).
(F)
No conditions for decisions
The Administrator shall not condition the approval of an application under paragraph (1)(A) or notice under paragraph (1)(B) for a State to operate an underground injection control program to regulate Class VI wells on the inclusion of—
(i)
provisions not otherwise included in the application or notice on the date of submission; or
(ii)
any other provision not otherwise explicitly required by this title.
; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following:
(5)
Preapplication activities for Class VI wells
With respect to Class VI wells (as defined in paragraph (2)(A)) and the efforts of a State to obtain from the Administrator primary enforcement responsibility of Class VI wells (as so defined), the Administrator, acting through the individual designated under paragraph (6), shall work as expeditiously as possible with States to complete any necessary activities prior to the submission of an application under paragraph (1)(A) or notice under paragraph (1)(B), taking into consideration the need for a thorough and detailed application or notice, as applicable.
(6)
Application coordination for Class VI wells
With respect to underground injection control programs of States, or portions of underground injection control programs of States, that regulate Class VI wells (as defined in paragraph (2)(A)), the Administrator shall designate 1 individual to be responsible for coordinating for each State—
(A)
in accordance with paragraph (5), the completion of any necessary activities prior to the submission of an application submitted under paragraph (1)(A) or notice submitted under paragraph (1)(B);
(B)
the review of an application submitted under paragraph (1)(A) or notice submitted under paragraph (1)(B); and
(C)
the hiring of any additional staff necessary to carry out subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(7)
Evaluation of resources
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator, in consultation with the individual designated under paragraph (6), shall submit to the Committees on Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report that describes—
(A)
the availability of staff and resources to promptly carry out the requirements of the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 ; and
(B)
any funding necessary to promptly carry out the requirements of the amendments made by section 2(a) of the Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 .
.
(b)
Use of IIJA funds
(1)
Use for report
Amounts made available to carry out section 40306(b) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–9(b) ) may, beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, be used to carry out paragraph (7) of section 1422(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1(b) ).
(2)
Conforming amendment
Section 40306(b) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–9(b) ) is amended by inserting (including carrying out paragraph (7) of section 1422(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1(b) ) in accordance with section 2(b)(1) of the Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 ) after 2010)) .
(c)
Rules of construction
(1)
Definitions
In this subsection:
(A)
Administrator
The term Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
(B)
Class VI well
The term Class VI well has the meaning given the term in section 40306(a) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–9(a) ).
(2)
Ability to deny or withdraw State primary enforcement responsibility
Nothing in the amendments made by this section limits the ability of the Administrator—
(A)
to deny an application under paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (b) of section 1422 of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1 ) or notice under paragraph (1)(B) of that subsection of a State to operate an underground injection control program to regulate Class VI wells; or
(B)
to revoke primary enforcement responsibility in accordance with that Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq. ).
(3)
Applicability to new submissions
The amendments made by this section shall apply to all applications under paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (b) of section 1422 of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1 ) and notices under paragraph (1)(B) of that subsection for underground injection control programs of States, or portions of underground injection control programs of States, that regulate Class VI wells submitted to the Administrator pursuant to that section on and after the date of enactment of this Act.
(4)
Applicability to prior submissions
With respect to applications under paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (b) of section 1422 of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300h–1 ) and notices under paragraph (1)(B) of that subsection for underground injection control programs of States, or portions of underground injection control programs of States, that regulate Class VI wells that were submitted to the Administrator, but not approved, before the date of enactment of this Act—
(A)
the 180-day period described in paragraph (2)(C)(i) of that section shall begin on the date of enactment of this Act; and
(B)
the Administrator shall process and make decisions, pursuant to the requirements of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, on those applications and notices in the order in which the applications and notices were submitted.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-08-05
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to clarify the requisite timeline for making a decision on the approval or disapproval of a State underground injection control program, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R) sponsors H.R. 4880, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 4880 went before 1 committee: Energy and Commerce.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Aug 5, 2025 · 1,636 Bills

Actions

H.R. 4880 has taken 2 actions since Aug 5, 2025.

ChamberAction
Aug 5, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Aug 5, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.Energy and Commerce Committee

Votes

H.R. 4880 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 4880, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 4880 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Primacy Certainty Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to clarify the requisite timeline for making a decision on the approval or disapproval of a State underground injection control program, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 4880 in 8 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Energy/Nuclear, Environment/Superfund, Natural Resources, Budget/Appropriations, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Clean Air and Water (quality), Fuel/Gas/Oil, Marine/Maritime/Boating/Fisheries.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.District of Columbia14
HEIMDAL, INC.Direct air capture (DAC) carbon capture and storage.California12$40K
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTEDistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTEAMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE2025 fourth_quarter$1.9M4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTEAMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE2025 third_quarter$1.9M3rd Quarter - Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2025 third_quarter$370K3rd Quarter - Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2026 first_quarter$280K1st Quarter - Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2026 second_quarter$260K2nd Quarter - Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$260K4th Quarter - Report
HEIMDAL, INC.DB3, LLC (FKA THE DASCHLE GROUP)2025 fourth_quarter$20K4th Quarter - Report
HEIMDAL, INC.DB3, LLC (FKA THE DASCHLE GROUP)2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 4880 under Environmental Protection, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 4880’s is Environmental Protection.

hr4880/policy-areas.txt
Environmental ProtectionAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com