- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 5183
U.S. House•House Floor Calendar
Summary
H.R. 5183, the District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Sep 8, 2025 by Rep. Paul Gosar (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jan 27, 2026: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 396.
Record
Text
H.R. 5183 has 3 co-sponsors.
hb5183/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 5183 IH: District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-09-08text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 5183 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 8, 2025 Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Comer , and Ms. Hageman ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform , and in addition to the Committee on Rules , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILLTo amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authority the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act .2.Uniform 60-day Congressional review period for District of Columbia laws(a)Establishment of 60-Day period; clarification of beginning of period and daysexcludedSection 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended—(1)by striking the 30-calendar-day period (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, and any day on which neither House is in session because of an adjournment sine die, a recess of more than three days, or an adjournment of more than three days) beginning on the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate and inserting the following: the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such act is transmitted by the Chairman to the President of the Senate ; and(2)by striking such 30-day period each place it appears and inserting such 60-day period .(b)Elimination of alternative period for acts affecting criminal lawsSection 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1–206.02(c), D.C. Official Code) is amended—(1)by striking paragraph (2); and(2)by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).(c)Special rule for acts designated by Council as involving emergency circumstances(1)No renewal of waiver of review for succeeding ActsSection 602(c) of such Act (sec. 1–206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by subsection (b), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(3)If an Act is exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1) because of a determination by the Council under section 412(a) that the Act should take effect immediately because of emergency circumstances, an Act of the Council to extend the period during which such Act is effective, or any Act of the Council which is substantially the same as such Act, shall not be exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1)..(2)Conforming amendmentSection 412(a) of such Act (sec. 1–204.12(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ninety days and inserting ninety days, subject to section 602(c)(3) .3.Clarification of expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval(a)Application of all procedures to all resolutions of disapprovalThe third sentence of section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking section 604, except subsections (d), (e), and (f) of such section, and inserting section 604 .(b)Clarification of proceduresSection 604 of such Act (sec. 1–206.04, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking subsections (c) through (j) and inserting the following:(c)Referral to CommitteesA resolution with respect to Council action shall be referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, or the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, by the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as the case may be.(d)Procedures in House of Representatives(1)In the House of Representatives, if the committee to which a resolution has been referred has not reported it at the end of twenty calendar days after its introduction, it is in order to move to discharge the committee from further consideration of any other resolution with respect to the same Council action which has been referred to the committee.(2)In the House, a motion to discharge may be made only by an individual favoring the resolution, is highly privileged (except that it may not be made after the committee has reported a resolution with respect to the same action), and debate thereon shall be limited to not more than one hour, to be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to.(3)In the House, if the motion to discharge is agreed to or disagreed to, the motion may not be renewed, nor may another motion to discharge the committee be made with respect to any other resolution with respect to the same action.(4)In the House, when the committee has reported, or has been discharged from further consideration of, a resolution, it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. The motion is highly privileged and is not debatable. An amendment to the motion is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to.(5)In the House, debate on the resolution shall be limited to not more than one hour, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is not debatable. An amendment to, or motion to recommit, the resolution is not in order, and it is not in order to move to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to.(6)In the House, motions to postpone made with respect to the discharge from committee or the consideration of a resolution, and motions to proceed to the consideration of other business, shall be decided without debate.(7)In the House, appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the Rules of the House of Representatives to the procedure relating to a resolution shall be decided without debate.(e)Procedures in Senate(1)In the Senate, if the committee to which is referred a resolution described in subsection (b) has not reported such joint resolution (or an identical joint resolution) at the end of 20 calendar days after its introduction, such committee may be discharged from further consideration of such joint resolution upon a written demand by any Member of the Senate, and such joint resolution shall be placed on the calendar.(2)(A)In the Senate, when the committee to which a resolution is referred has reported, or when a committee is discharged (under paragraph (1)) from further consideration of a resolution described in subsection (b), it is at any time thereafter in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution, and all points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the Senate until disposed of.(B)In the Senate, debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. An amendment to, or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order.(C)In the Senate, immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in subsection (b), and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the Senate, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur.(D)Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate to the procedure relating to a resolution described in subsection (a) shall be decided without debate.(3)In the Senate the procedure specified in paragraph (1) or (2) shall not apply to the consideration of a resolution after the expiration of the 60 session days beginning with the date of the introduction of the joint resolution.(f)Coordination between HousesIf, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in subsection (b), that House receives from the other House a resolution described in subsection (b), then the following procedures shall apply:(1)The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee.(2)Any Member of that House may at any time offer a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution of the other House, and such motion shall be considered in accordance with paragraph (4) of subsection (d) (in the case of a motion in the House) or in accordance with paragraph (2) of subsection (e) (in the case of a motion in the Senate).(3)With respect to a resolution described in subsection (a) of the House receiving the resolution—(A)the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but(B)the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House..4.Authorizing use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws(a)AuthorizationSection 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended—(1)in the second sentence—(A)by striking such act shall take effect and inserting such act and each provision thereof shall take effect ; and(B)by striking a joint resolution disapproving such act. and inserting a joint resolution disapproving such act or any provision thereof. ;(2)in the third sentence—(A)by striking disapproving such an act and inserting disapproving such an act or any provision thereof ; and(B)by striking to have repealed such act and inserting to have repealed such act or such provision (as the case may be) ; and(3)in the fourth sentence, by striking disapproving any act and inserting disapproving any act or any provision thereof .(b)Conforming amendments(1)Application of expedited procedures for consideration of resolutionsThe fourth sentence of section 602(c)(1) of such Act (sec. 1–206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking disapproving such act and inserting disapproving such act or any provision thereof .(2)Clarification of joint resolution definitionSection 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1–206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ; but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action .(c)Rule of constructionSection 602(c)(1) of such Act (sec. 1–206.02(c)(1), D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: The enactment of a resolution disapproving a provision of an act pursuant to this paragraph may not be construed to repeal any of the remaining provisions of such act or prohibit the enactment of any subsequent resolution disapproving any other provision of such act pursuant to this paragraph. .5.Authorizing use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove executive orders and regulations(a)AuthorizationTitle VI of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:605.Limitations on regulatory authority of Mayor(a)Transmission of executive orders and regulationsThe Mayor shall transmit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate a copy of each executive order issued by the Mayor and each regulation promulgated by an officer of the executive branch of the District government.(b)Delay in implementationExcept as provided in paragraph (2), an executive order or regulation transmitted under subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress) beginning on the later of the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the Speaker of the House of Representatives or the day such executive order or regulation is transmitted by the Mayor to the President of the Senate, or upon the date prescribed by such executive order or regulation, whichever is later, unless during such 60-day period, there has been enacted into law a joint resolution disapproving such executive order or regulation.(c)Deemed repealIn any case in which any joint resolution described in subsection (b) disapproving an executive order or regulation has, within the 60-day period described in subsection (b), passed both Houses of Congress and has been transmitted to the President, such joint resolution, upon becoming law, subsequent to the expiration of such 60-day period, shall be deemed to have repealed such executive order or regulation, as of the date such joint resolution becomes law.(d)Application of expedited procedures for consideration of resolutionsThe provisions of section 604 shall apply with respect to any joint resolution disapproving any executive order or regulation pursuant to this section..(b)Description of expedited procedures for consideration of resolutions(1)In generalSection 604 of such Act (sec. 1–206.04, D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 3(b), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(g)Consideration of resolutions disapproving executive orders andregulationsThe provisions of this section shall apply with respect to the issuance of an executive order by the Mayor and the promulgation of a regulation by an officer of the executive branch of the District government in the same manner as such provisions apply with respect to a Council action, except that for purposes of subsection (b) a resolution means only a joint resolution, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: That the _________ approves/disapproves of the action of the Mayor or an officer of the executive branch of the District government described as follows: __________ , with the blank spaces therein being appropriately filled, and either approval or disapproval being appropriately indicated, but does not include a resolution which specifies more than one action..(2)Conforming amendmentSection 604(b) of such Act (sec. 1–206.04(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking (b) For the purpose of this section, and inserting (b) For the purpose of this section with respect to a Council action, .(c)Clerical amendmentThe table of contents of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title VI the following:Sec. 605. Limitations on regulatory authority of Mayor..6.Prohibiting Council from withdrawing Acts already transmittedSection 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), as amended by section 2(c), is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(4)After the Council has transmitted an Act under this subsection, the Council may not withdraw the Act from the Speaker of the House or the President of the Senate during the period described with respect to the Act under paragraph (1), and the Act shall be subject to this subsection without regard to any attempt by the Council to withdraw the Act..7.Prohibiting transmission of acts substantially the same as disapproved acts(a)ProhibitionSection 602 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(d)Prohibiting transmission of Acts substantially the same as disapprovedactsIf a joint resolution has been enacted into law to disapprove an Act transmitted by the Council under this section, the Council may not transmit another Act under this section which is substantially the same as the Act disapproved by the joint resolution, unless the Council is specifically authorized to transmit such an Act by a law enacted after the date of the enactment of the joint resolution to disapprove the original Act..(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia which are disapproved by a joint resolution enacted on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.8.Annual hearing and report on State of District of ColumbiaNot less frequently than once every calendar year, the Chair of the Council of the District of Columbia and the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall appear at a hearing of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives and a hearing of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate to present a report on the state of the District, including recommendations for such measures as they deem necessary and expedient.9.Effective dateExcept as provided in section 7(b), this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to acts of the District of Columbia which are transmitted to Congress by the Council of the District of Columbia under section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1–206.02(c), D.C. Official Code), and with respect to executive orders and regulations with are transmitted to Congress by the Mayor under section 605 of such Act, as added by section 5, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-09-08
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Sep 8, 2025
hb5183/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (09/08/2025)
District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act
This bill establishes a uniform 60-day period of congressional review for all nonemergency legislation enacted by the District of Columbia (DC). It also authorizes congressional disapproval of DC regulations and other executive actions, specific provisions in legislation, and extensions of emergency legislation.
Currently, DC legislation is generally subject to a 30-day period of congressional review during which time Congress may enact a joint resolution of disapproval to nullify the legislation. Legislation involving criminal law is subject to a 60-day period of congressional review. Emergency legislation is not subject to congressional review.
The bill applies a 60-day period of congressional review to all DC legislation other than emergency legislation. It also authorizes Congress to nullify (1) extensions of emergency DC legislation, and (2) one or more discrete provisions in DC legislation. The bill prohibits the DC Council from withdrawing legislation that it has transmitted to Congress for review or enacting legislation that is substantially the same as legislation that Congress disapproved.
The bill also establishes a 60-day period of congressional review for DC executive orders and regulations according to procedures comparable to those for legislation.
The bill additionally specifies the procedures for expedited consideration of joint resolutions of disapproval for DC legislation in each chamber, particularly the Senate.
Finally, the bill requires the DC Mayor and the chair of the DC Council to present a report on DC to specified congressional committees at least once every calendar year.
Sponsors
Rep. Paul Gosar (R) sponsors H.R. 5183, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 2 of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 5183 went before 2 committees: Rules and Oversight and Government Reform.

Reports
1 committee report has been filed on H.R. 5183, the latest H. Rept. 119-463.
- H. Rept. 119-463 — DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOME RULE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2025
Actions
H.R. 5183 has taken 7 actions since Sep 8, 2025, the latest on Jan 27, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 27, 2026 | House | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-463, Part I.Oversight and Government Reform Committee | ||
Jan 27, 2026 | House | Committee on Rules discharged.Rules Committee | ||
Jan 27, 2026 | House | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 396. | ||
Sep 10, 2025 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldOversight and Government Reform Committee | ||
Sep 10, 2025 | House | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 18.Oversight and Government Reform Committee |
Votes
H.R. 5183 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 5183.
Titles
H.R. 5183 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Reported to House
- District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2025 — Display Title
- District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day congressional review period for District of Columbia laws, to clarify the expedited procedures applicable to consideration of resolutions of disapproval of District of Columbia laws, to authority the use of resolutions of disapproval to disapprove provisions of District of Columbia laws and District of Columbia executive orders and regulations, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 5183, the latest on Oct 3, 2025.
- H.R. 5183, District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2025 — 2025-10-03As ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on September 10, 2025
Lobbying
3 clients hired 3 firms and 15 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 5183 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Budget/Appropriations, District of Columbia, Government Issues, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Health Issues, Immigration, Clean Air and Water (quality).
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 1 | 2 | — |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | 1 | 2 | — |
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CELINA STEWART | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CHRISTOPHER WYATT | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIEL WEST | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JESSICA CAPPARELL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KRISTEN KERN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MARCIA JOHNSON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| REBECCA GOLDMAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CATHERINE FINNERTY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRISTOPHER BROWN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DESIREE HOFFMAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ELIZABETH WATSON | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LAURA MACDONALD | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LINDA BENNETT | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARC GRANOWITTER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| REBECCA LEVIN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES | 2025 third_quarter | $750K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 2026 first_quarter | $250K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | 2025 third_quarter | $140K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S. | 2026 first_quarter | $100K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 2025 third_quarter | $20K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 5183 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 9 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 5183’s is Government Operations and Politics.
hr5183/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 5183 carries 9 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Administrative law and regulatory procedures to State and local government operations.
hr5183/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 5183, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 146 (Monday, September 8, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. GOSAR:H.R. 5183.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, provides Congress with theexclusive jurisdiction over the District of Columbia[Page H3893]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
