- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 2868
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 2868, the India Shrimp Tariff Act, was introduced in the Senate on Sep 18, 2025 by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Finance, and last saw action on Sep 18, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Record
Text
S. 2868 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb2868/introduced-in-senate.txt101 S2868 IS: India Shrimp Tariff ActU.S. Senate2025-09-18text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 2868 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES September 18 (legislative day, September 16), 2025 Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mrs. Hyde-Smith ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance A BILLTo increase the rate of duty on shrimp originating from India, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the India Shrimp Tariff Act .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)GATT 1947; GATT 1994The terms GATT 1947 and GATT 1994 have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3501 ).(2)HTSThe term HTS means the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.(3)National Trade EstimateThe term National Trade Estimate means the report required to be submitted by the United States Trade Representative under section 181(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2241(b) ).(4)Schedule of concessionsThe term Schedule of Concessions has the meaning given the term Schedule XX in section 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3501 ).(5)World Trade OrganizationThe term World Trade Organization means the organization established pursuant to the WTO Agreement, as defined in section 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act ( 19 U.S.C. 3501 ).3.Sense of Congress on the need to phase-in a duty increase for shrimp from India(a)FindingsCongress makes the following findings:(1)The United States has a grand tradition of shrimp production, but domestic producers are forced to compete in a wide open market while exports from India are heavily subsidized and protected.(2)According to the National Trade Estimate in 2023, India’s bound tariff rates on agricultural products are among the highest in the world, averaging 113.1 percent and ranging as high as 300.0 percent. .(3)India’s basic duty on shrimp is 30 percent.(4)The National Trade Estimate also records that since 2018, India has applied an additional 10 percent social welfare surcharge on imports, assessed on the value of its existing high duties, which includes shrimp.(5)Wild-caught and farm-raised shrimp from the United States now account for less than 10 percent of shrimp consumption in the United States.(6)Shrimp production overseas is able to undercut the costs of shrimp produced in the United States due to poor worker and environmental protections.(7)Shrimp imports from India consist almost entirely of farm-raised aquaculture shrimp, as the importation of wild-caught shrimp from India remains prohibited due to the failure of Indian fisheries to meet the certification requirements under section 609(b)(2) of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1990 ( Public Law 101–162 ; 16 U.S.C. 1537 note).(8)According to Seafood Watch, India’s farmed shrimp industry has expanded rapidly since 2014 and faces challenges with disease outbreaks, health management, farm registration, and data availability. .(9)The United States has taken a lax approach to inspecting imported shrimp, with only 0.1 percent of shipments being inspected for unsafe drug residues. Despite that low inspection rate, every year, shipments of shrimp from India are refused due to testing by the Food and Drug Administration for banned antibiotics.(10)During the 20-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act, shrimp producers in the United States have paid a tremendous cost to litigate trade remedy laws to defend against predatory pricing and illegal subsidies from Indian shrimp imports.(11)The Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization has limited the effectiveness of trade remedy laws of the United States in relation to shrimp imports from India and as a result, tens of millions of dollars in antidumping duties go uncollected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.(12)The United States rate of duty for warm-water shrimp, set under subheadings 0306.17, 1605.21, and 1605.29 of the HTS, is set to free in both the column 1 and column 2 rate of duty columns, meaning there is no duty owed for the entire world absent a trade remedy order.(13)The United States rate of duty for preserved or frozen shrimp, in a product containing fish meat or prepared meals, is 5 percent, but waived under the Generalized System of Preferences under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2461 et seq. ) and all relevant United States free trade agreements under the column 1 special rate of duty column of the HTS.(14)Maintaining a 0 percent tariff on shrimp under both column 1 and column 2 of the HTS negates any benefits, including increased environmental and worker rights protections, stemming from preferential tariff programs or free trade agreements.(15)India maintains a base customs duty for shrimp of 30 percent, before applying an additional 10 percent social welfare surcharge—special duty.(b)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that phasing in an increased duty for shrimp originating from India is prudent and necessary to safeguard sustainable harvesting of shrimp in the United States and from free trade agreement partners of the United States, and would enhance the trade and development goals of the tariff preference programs of the United States.4.Treatment of shrimp from India(a)Phase-In of duty increase(1)Calendar year 2026Effective on January 1, 2026, subheadings 0306.16.00, 0306.17.00, 0306.35, 0306.36, 0306.95, 1605.21, and 1605.29 of the HTS shall be applied and administered with respect to imports from India—(A)in the column 1 general rate of duty column, by substituting 10% for the rate of duty otherwise applicable; and(B)in the column 2 rate of duty column, by substituting 25¢/kg for the rate of duty otherwise applicable.(2)Calendar year 2027Effective on January 1, 2027, subheadings 0306.16.00, 0306.17.00, 0306.35, 0306.36, 0306.95, 1605.21, and 1605.29 of the HTS shall be applied and administered with respect to imports from India—(A)in the column 1 general rate of duty column, by substituting 20% for the rate of duty otherwise applicable; and(B)in the column 2 rate of duty column, by substituting 50¢/kg for the rate of duty otherwise applicable.(3)Calendar year 2028 and thereafterEffective on January 1, 2028, subheadings 0306.16.00, 0306.17.00, 0306.35, 0306.36, 0306.95, 1605.21, and 1605.29 of the HTS shall be applied and administered with respect to imports from India—(A)in the column 1 general rate of duty column, by substituting 40% for the rate of duty otherwise applicable; and(B)in the column 2 rate of duty column, by substituting $1/kg for the rate of duty otherwise applicable.(b)Customs valuationNotwithstanding section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1401a ), or any other provision of law, shrimp imported into the United States from India shall be appraised, for purposes of that Act, as not less than the average of United States ex-vessel shrimp prices as of the date of exportation.5.Country of origin labeling for cooked shrimp and crawfish(a)In generalSection 281(7)(B) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 ( 7 U.S.C. 1638(7)(B) ) is amended—(1)by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ;(2)by striking includes a fillet and inserting “includes—(i)a fillet; and(3)by adding at the end the following:(ii)whole cooked shrimp and crawfish and cooked shrimp and crawfish sections..(b)Modification of definition of processed food itemThe Secretary of Agriculture shall modify section 60.119 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), to ensure that cooked shrimp, cooked crawfish, cooked shrimp sections, and cooked crawfish sections are not considered processed food items for purposes of that section.6.Additional duty on shrimp(a)In generalThe President shall impose a duty on imports of shrimp under subheadings 0306.16.00, 0306.17.00, 0306.35, 0306.36, 0306.95, 1605.21, and 1605.29 of the HTS in an amount equal to $0.10 per kilogram.(b)Use of amountsThe President shall use an amount equal to the amount received by the United States pursuant to duties under subsection (a) to conduct inspections of shrimp and catfish imported into the United States.7.Treatment of dutiesDuties under this Act are to be imposed in addition to any duty imposed under any other provision of law or pursuant to any other authority.8.Modification of schedule of concessions to GATT 1994With due regard for the international obligations of the United States, particularly Article XXXVIII of the GATT 1947 requiring any suspension of trade agreement concessions to be made on a most-favored nation basis, the United States Trade Representative shall take the necessary steps to modify the Schedule of Concessions to accommodate the increase in the rate of duty applicable to shrimp from India under section 4 and the additional increase under section 6.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-09-18
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to increase the rate of duty on shrimp originating from India, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R) sponsors S. 2868, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 2868 went before 1 committee: Finance.
Actions
S. 2868 has taken 2 actions since Sep 18, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 18, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.Finance Committee | ||
Sep 18, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 2868 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 2868 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- India Shrimp Tariff Act — Display Title
- India Shrimp Tariff Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to increase the rate of duty on shrimp originating from India, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 7 registered lobbyists who named S. 2868 in 7 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.), Trade (domestic/foreign), Agriculture, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Environment/Superfund, Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Minting/Money/Gold Standard.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC | — | Virginia | 1 | 4 | — |
| SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE | Trade association representing the U.S. shrimp industry. | Florida | 1 | 3 | $90K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC. | 1 | 4 | — |
| PICARD KENTZ & ROWE LLP | 1 | 3 | $90K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW HARIG | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| CHRISTINE POLLACK | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| JENNIFER HATCHER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PETER MATZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| LAUREN SCHWARZE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| NATHANIEL MAANDIG RICKARD | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ERIN MCCARTHY | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC | FOOD MARKETPLACE INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $800K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC | FOOD MARKETPLACE INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $670K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC | FOOD MARKETPLACE INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $584K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FOOD MARKETPLACE INC | FOOD MARKETPLACE INC. | 2025 third_quarter | $230K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE | PICARD KENTZ & ROWE LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $45K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE | PICARD KENTZ & ROWE LLP | 2026 first_quarter | $45K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE | PICARD KENTZ & ROWE LLP | 2026 first_quarter | — | Registration |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 2868 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2868’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.
s2868/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com