Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 984

Missouri SenateSenate Floor Calendar

Summary

SB 984, which modifies provisions relating to pharmacy benefit managers, was introduced in the Senate on Dec 1, 2025 by Sen. Jill Carter (R). It last saw action on May 15, 2026: Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection.


Record

Text

SB 984 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

sb984/comm-sub.txt
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILLS NOS. 984 & 968
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
5297S.07C KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary
AN ACT
To repeal sections 338.600 and 376.387, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof four new sections
relating to pharmacy benefits managers.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Sections 338.600 and 376.387, RSMo, are
repealed and four new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be
known as sections 338.600, 376.387, 376.394, and 376.399, to
read as follows:
338.600. 1. As used in this section, the following
terms shall mean:
(1) "Audit", any review, inspection, investigation,
examination, or analysis conducted by a pharmacy benefits
manager (PBM) or its representative of a pharmacy's records,
claims, practices, or compliance with contractual
obligations or legal requirements, which may result in
recoupment, repayment demand, chargeback, penalty, or other
financial adjustment. Routine verification or inquiry
regarding claim elements or documentation shall not
constitute an audit; however, no recoupment, repayment
demand, chargeback, penalty, or financial adjustment shall
be based upon or initiated through such inquiry unless the
inquiry is converted to an audit and conducted in compliance
with the requirements of this section;
EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted
and is intended to be omitted in the law.
SCS SBs 984 & 968 2
(2) "Entity", a managed care company, insurance
company or third-party payor, or representative of a managed
care company, insurance company or third-party payor, or a
pharmacy benefits manager or a subcontractor of a pharmacy
benefits manager.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the
contrary, when an audit of the records of a pharmacy
licensed in this state is conducted by a managed care
company, insurance company, third-party payor, or any entity
that represents such companies or groups, such audit shall
be conducted in accordance with the following:
(1) The entity conducting the initial on-site audit
shall provide the pharmacy with notice at least [one week]
fourteen days prior to conducting the initial on-site audit
for each audit cycle and shall specify specific
prescriptions to be audited which may or may not include the
final two digits of the prescription numbers. The notice
required under this subsection shall be in writing and shall
be sent by means that allows tracking of delivery to the
pharmacist or pharmacy not later than the fourteenth day
before the date on which the on-site audit is scheduled to
occur. A pharmacy benefit manager is not required to
provide notice before conducting an audit if, after
reviewing claims data, written or oral statements of
pharmacy staff, wholesalers, or other investigative
information, including patient referrals, the plan issuer or
pharmacy benefit manager suspects the pharmacist or pharmacy
subject to the audit committed fraud or made an intentional
misrepresentation related to the pharmacy business, which
cause and suspicion shall be disclosed to pharmacy upon
initiation of the audit;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 3
(2) Any audit which involves clinical judgment shall
be conducted by or in consultation with a [licensed]
pharmacist licensed by the Missouri board of pharmacy, and
said pharmacist shall be made available to the audited
pharmacy to discuss clinical rationale and Missouri legal
requirements;
(3) Any clerical error, record-keeping error,
typographical error, or scrivener's error regarding a
required document or record shall not constitute fraud or
grounds for recoupment, so long as the prescription was
otherwise legally dispensed and the claim was otherwise
materially correct; except that, such claims may be
otherwise subject to recoupment of overpayments or payment
of any discovered underpayment. No claim arising under this
subdivision shall be subject to criminal penalties without
proof of intent to commit fraud. The pharmacy shall have
the right to submit amended claims within thirty days of the
discovery of an error to correct clerical or record keeping
errors in lieu of recoupment if the prescription was
dispensed according to requirements set forth in state or
federal law;
(4) A pharmacy may use the records of a hospital,
physician, or other authorized practitioner of the healing
arts involving drugs or medicinal supplies written or
transmitted by any means of communication for purposes of
validating the pharmacy record with respect to orders or
refills of a legend or narcotic drug. Electronically stored
images of prescriptions, electronically created annotations
and other related supporting documentation shall be
considered valid prescription records. Hard copy and
electronic signature logs that indicate the delivery of
SCS SBs 984 & 968 4
pharmacy services shall be considered valid proof of receipt
of such services by a program enrollee;
(5) A finding of an overpayment or underpayment may be
a projection based on the number of patients served and
having a similar diagnosis or on the number of similar
orders or refills for similar drugs; except that, recoupment
of claims shall be based on the actual overpayment or
underpayment unless the projection for overpayment or
underpayment is part of a settlement as agreed to by the
pharmacy;
(6) Each pharmacy shall be audited under the same
standards and parameters as other pharmacies audited by the
entity;
(7) A pharmacy shall be allowed at least thirty days
following receipt of the preliminary audit report in which
to produce documentation to address any discrepancy found
during an audit;
(8) An audit shall be limited to forty unique
prescriptions, with a maximum of two hundred separately
adjudicated claims, that have been randomly selected, and
such randomness shall be reflected by auditing a similar
type of prescriptions as are collectively adjudicated.
(a) If an audit reveals the necessity for a review of
additional claims, the audit shall be conducted on site.
(b) An entity shall not initiate an audit of a
pharmacy more than two times in a calendar year, unless
fraud is suspected as described in subdivision (1) of this
subsection; such audit of pharmacy records includes any
prescription information request by an auditing entity that
could result in recoupment.
(c) The list of the claims subject to an on-site audit
shall be provided in the notice under paragraph (a) of this
SCS SBs 984 & 968 5
subdivision to the pharmacist or pharmacy and shall identify
the claims only by the prescription numbers or a date range
for prescriptions subject to the audit. The last two digits
of the prescription numbers provided may be omitted;
(9) A recoupment shall not be based on a requirement
that a pharmacy or pharmacist perform a professional duty in
addition to or exceeding professional duties prescribed by
the Missouri board of pharmacy;
(10) Recoupment shall only occur following the
correction of a claim and shall be limited to amounts
adjudicated by a pharmacy benefits manager;
(11) Except for MO HealthNet claims, approval of drug,
prescriber, or patient eligibility upon adjudication of a
claim shall not be reversed unless the pharmacy or
pharmacist obtained the adjudication by fraud, waste, or
abuse, a misrepresentation of claim elements, or claims that
were not properly rendered or billed by a pharmacy or
pharmacist, or otherwise in accordance with state pharmacy
audit laws.
(a) This subdivision does not preclude a pharmacy
benefits manager from engaging in claims reconciliation
activities relating to brand effective rates and generic
effective rates if:
a. They are identified and agreed to in contract; and
b. The activities do not result in a retroactive
reduction or recoupment of payment to the pharmacist or
pharmacy for a previously adjudicated covered claim.
(b) A pharmacy benefits manager may not charge a
pharmacy or pharmacist a fee relating to the adjudication of
a claim;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 6
(12) Any entity conducting an audit shall not be
compensated, nor shall any of its employees be compensated,
directly or indirectly, based on any amounts recouped;
(13) An entity shall not charge a fee for conducting
an on-site or a desk audit unless there is a finding of
actual fraud;
(14) The period covered by the audit shall not exceed
a two-year period beginning [two years prior to the initial
date of the on-site portion of the audit unless otherwise
provided by contractual agreement or if] the date the claim
was submitted for payment there has been a previous finding
of fraud or as otherwise provided by state or federal law;
[(9)] (15) An audit shall not be initiated or
scheduled during the first [three] five business days of any
month due to the high volume of prescriptions filled during
such time unless otherwise consented to by the pharmacy;
[(10)] (16) The preliminary audit report shall be
delivered to the pharmacy within one hundred twenty days
after conclusion of the audit, with reasonable extensions
permitted. A final audit report shall be delivered to the
pharmacy within six months of receipt by the pharmacy of the
preliminary audit report or final appeal, as provided for in
subsection 3 of this section, whichever is later. Audit
reports not delivered to the pharmacy in this time line
shall be deemed to have no discrepancies and no recoupment
shall be made;
[(11)] (17) Notwithstanding any other provision in
this subsection, the entity conducting the audit shall not
use the accounting practice of extrapolation in calculating
recoupments or penalties for audits, except as otherwise
authorized under subdivision (5) of this subsection;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 7
(18) The days' supply for unit-of-use items, such as
topicals, drops, vials, and inhalants, shall not be limited
beyond manufacturer recommendations;
(19) If the only commercially available package size
exceeds an entity's maximum days' supply, the dispensing of
such package size shall be accepted by the entity and shall
not be the basis for recoupment;
(20) If the only commercially available package size
exceeds an entity's maximum days' supply and the entity
accepts the refill of such prescription, the entity shall
not recoup such claim as an early refill;
(21) The failure of a pharmacy to collect a copayment
shall not be the basis for recoupment if the pharmacy
provides documentation of billing of the claim and a
reasonable attempt to collect the copayment; and
(22) In a wholesale invoice audit conducted by an
entity:
(a) An entity shall not audit the claims of another
entity;
(b) The following shall not form the basis for
recoupment:
a. The national drug code for the dispensed drug is in
a quantity that is a sub-unit or multiple of the purchased
drug as reflected on a supporting wholesale invoice;
b. The correct quantity dispensed is reflected on the
audited pharmacy claim; or
c. The drug dispensed by the pharmacy on an audited
pharmacy claim is identical to the strength and dosage form
of the drug purchased;
(c) The entity shall accept as evidence:
a. Supplier invoices issued prior to the date of
dispensing the drug underlying the audited claim;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 8
b. Invoices from any supplier authorized by law to
transfer ownership of the drug acquired by the audited
pharmacy;
c. Copies of supplier invoices in the possession of
the audited pharmacy; and
d. Reports required by any state board or agency; and
(d) Within five business days of a request by the
audited pharmacy, the entity shall provide supporting
documentation provided to the entity by the audited
pharmacy's suppliers.
[2.] 3. Recoupments of any disputed moneys shall only
occur after final internal disposition of the audit,
including the appeals process set forth in subsection 3 of
this section. Should the identified discrepancy for an
individual audit exceed twenty-five thousand dollars, future
payments to the pharmacy in excess of twenty-five thousand
dollars may be withheld pending finalization of the audit.
[3.] 4. Each entity conducting an audit shall
establish an appeals process, lasting no longer than six
months, under which a licensed pharmacy may appeal an
unfavorable preliminary audit report to the entity. If,
following such appeal, the entity finds that an unfavorable
audit report or any portion thereof is unsubstantiated, the
entity shall dismiss the audit report or such portion
without the necessity of any further proceedings.
[4.] 5. Each entity conducting an audit shall provide
a copy of the final audit report, after completion of any
appeal process, to the plan sponsor. Such report shall
include the total amount of recoupment returned to the plan
sponsor, if any.
SCS SBs 984 & 968 9
[5.] 6. This section shall not apply to any
investigative audit that involves probable fraud, willful
misrepresentation, or abuse.
[6.] 7. This section shall not apply to any audit
conducted as part of any inspection or investigation
conducted by any governmental entity or law enforcement
agency.
376.387. 1. For purposes of this section, the
following terms shall mean:
(1) ["Covered person", the same meaning as such term
is defined in section 376.1257] "Contracted pharmacy", a
pharmacy located in Missouri participating in the network of
a pharmacy benefits manager through a direct or indirect
contract;
(2) ["Health benefit plan", the same meaning as such
term is defined in section 376.1350;
(3)] "Health carrier" [or "carrier", the same meaning
as such term is defined in section 376.1350], an entity
subject to the insurance laws and regulations of this state
that contracts or offers to contract to provide, deliver,
arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of the costs of
health care services, including a sickness and accident
insurance company, a health maintenance organization, a
nonprofit hospital and health service corporation, or any
other entity providing a plan of health insurance, health
benefits, or health services, except that such plan shall
not include any coverage pursuant to a liability insurance
policy, workers' compensation insurance policy, or medical
payments insurance issued as a supplement to a liability
policy;
(3) "Maximum allowable cost", the per-unit amount that
a pharmacy benefits manager reimburses a pharmacist for a
SCS SBs 984 & 968 10
prescription drug, excluding a dispensing or professional
fee;
(4) "Maximum allowable cost list" or "MAC list", a
listing of drug products that meet the standard described in
this section;
[(4)] (5) "Pharmacy", the same meaning as such term is
defined in chapter 338;
[(5)] (6) "Pharmacy benefits manager", [the same
meaning as such term is defined in section 376.388] an
entity that contracts with pharmacies on behalf of health
carriers or health benefit plans to provide prescription
drug and pharmacist services;
(7) "Pharmacy benefits manager affiliate", a pharmacy
or pharmacist that directly or indirectly, through one or
more intermediaries, owns or controls, is owned or
controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with
a pharmacy benefits manager.
2. [No pharmacy benefits manager shall include a
provision in a contract entered into or modified on or after
August 28, 2018, with a pharmacy or pharmacist that requires
a covered person to make a payment for a prescription drug
at the point of sale in an amount that exceeds the lesser of:
(1) The copayment amount as required under the health
benefit plan; or
(2) The amount an individual would pay for a
prescription if that individual paid with cash.
3. A pharmacy or pharmacist shall have the right to
provide to a covered person information regarding the amount
of the covered person's cost share for a prescription drug,
the covered person's cost of an alternative drug, and the
covered person's cost of the drug without adjudicating the
claim through the pharmacy benefits manager. Neither a
SCS SBs 984 & 968 11
pharmacy nor a pharmacist shall be proscribed by a pharmacy
benefits manager from discussing any such information or
from selling a more affordable alternative to the covered
person.
4. No pharmacy benefits manager shall, directly or
indirectly, charge or hold a pharmacist or pharmacy
responsible for any fee amount related to a claim that is
not known at the time of the claim's adjudication, unless
the amount is a result of improperly paid claims or charges
for administering a health benefit plan.
5. This section shall not apply with respect to claims
under Medicare Part D, or any other plan administered or
regulated solely under federal law, and to the extent this
section may be preempted under the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 for self-funded employer-
sponsored health benefit plans.
6. A pharmacy benefits manager shall notify in writing
any health carrier with which it contracts if the pharmacy
benefits manager has a conflict of interest, any commonality
of ownership, or any other relationship, financial or
otherwise, between the pharmacy benefits manager and any
other health carrier with which the pharmacy benefits
manager contracts.
7. The department of commerce and insurance shall
enforce this section] Upon each contract execution or
renewal between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy
or between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy's
contracting representative or agent, such as a pharmacy
services administrative organization, a pharmacy benefits
manager shall, with respect to such contract or renewal:
SCS SBs 984 & 968 12
(1) Include in such contract or renewal the sources
utilized to determine maximum allowable cost and update such
pricing information at least every seven days; and
(2) Maintain a procedure to eliminate products from
the maximum allowable cost list of drugs subject to such
pricing or modify maximum allowable cost pricing at least
every seven days, if such drugs do not meet the standards
and requirements of this section, in order to remain
consistent with pricing changes in the marketplace.
3. A pharmacy benefits manager shall reimburse
pharmacies for drugs subject to maximum allowable cost
pricing that has been updated to reflect market pricing at
least every seven days as set forth under subdivision (1) of
subsection 2 of this section.
4. A pharmacy benefits manager shall not place a drug
on a maximum allowable cost list unless there are at least
two therapeutically equivalent multisource generic drugs, or
at least one generic drug available from at least one
manufacturer, generally available for purchase by network
pharmacies from national or regional wholesalers.
5. All contracts between a pharmacy benefits manager
and a contracted pharmacy or between a pharmacy benefits
manager and a pharmacy's contracting representative or
agent, such as a pharmacy services administrative
organization, shall include a process to internally appeal,
investigate, and resolve disputes regarding maximum
allowable cost pricing. The process shall include the
following:
(1) The right to appeal shall be limited to fourteen
calendar days following the reimbursement of the initial
claim; and
SCS SBs 984 & 968 13
(2) A requirement that the pharmacy benefits manager
shall respond to an appeal described in this subsection no
later than fourteen calendar days after the date the appeal
was received by such pharmacy benefits manager.
6. For appeals that are denied, the pharmacy benefits
manager shall provide the reason for the denial and identify
the national drug code of a drug product that may be
purchased by contracted pharmacies at a price at or below
the maximum allowable cost and, when applicable, may be
substituted lawfully.
7. If the appeal is successful, the pharmacy benefits
manager shall:
(1) Adjust the maximum allowable cost price that is
the subject of the appeal effective on the day after the
date the appeal is decided;
(2) Apply the adjusted maximum allowable cost price to
all similarly situated pharmacies as determined by the
pharmacy benefits manager; and
(3) Allow the pharmacy that succeeded in the appeal to
reverse and rebill the pharmacy benefits claim giving rise
to the appeal.
8. Appeals shall be upheld if:
(1) The pharmacy being reimbursed for the drug subject
to the maximum allowable cost pricing in question was not
reimbursed as required under subsection 3 of this section; or
(2) The drug subject to the maximum allowable cost
pricing in question does not meet the requirements set forth
under subsection 4 of this section.
9. A pharmacy benefits manager shall provide plan
sponsors with such plan sponsor's pharmacy claims data as
reasonably requested by a plan sponsor.
SCS SBs 984 & 968 14
10. The pharmacy benefits manager or plan sponsor
shall provide the plan sponsor and department of commerce
and insurance documentation of any benefit design that
encourages or requires enrollees to fill prescriptions at
affiliated pharmacies.
11. A pharmacy benefits manager shall exercise good
faith and fair dealing in the administration of pharmacy
benefits and shall ensure that any conflicts of interest
that may clinically or financially impact covered patients
or the health benefit plan sponsor in a negative manner are
disclosed.
12. All disclosures required under this section shall
be provided to the plan sponsor or its authorized agent in a
universal manner.
13. If a pharmacy benefits manager or health plan has
an affiliated pharmacy or a pharmacy under common ownership,
the pharmacy benefits manager shall disclose to the plan
sponsor and the department of commerce and insurance:
(1) The amount charged per dosage unit to the
affiliated pharmacy; and
(2) The median amount charged per dosage unit at non
affiliated, in-network pharmacies.
14. The department of commerce and insurance may audit
pharmacy benefits manager to ensure compliance with this
section.
376.394. 1. As used in this section, the following
terms shall mean:
(1) "Acquisition cost", the set of National Average
Drug Acquisition Costs, "NADAC", as calculated by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and reflected in
the most recently released public file;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 15
(2) "Critical access care pharmacy", a Missouri-
domiciled pharmacy with a physical location in the state of
Missouri that employs less than five hundred employees
across common ownership which is:
(a) Located in a county or city with fewer than fifty
thousand residents; or
(b) In a county or city with fifty thousand or more
residents and in an area within Missouri that is designated
as a Primary Care or Mental Health Health Professional
Shortage Area (HPSA) or a Medically Underserved Area by the
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an
agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;
or
(c) Any essential pharmacy as defined in Section 1860D-
42 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1395-152;
(3) "Similarly situated", a critical access care
pharmacy:
(a) That is in any of the pharmacy benefits manager's
networks;
(b) That purchases the particular drug or medical
product or device to which the finding applies from the same
pharmaceutical wholesaler as the pharmacy that prevailed in
the appeal; and
(c) To which the pharmacy benefits manager also
applies the challenged rate of reimbursement or actual cost.
2. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the
contrary, a pharmacy benefits manager shall not reimburse a
critical access care pharmacy for a prescription drug or
device an amount that is less than the actual cost to that
pharmacy for the prescription drug or device.
(1) A pharmacy benefits manager shall establish a
process for a pharmacy to appeal a reimbursement for failing
SCS SBs 984 & 968 16
to pay at least the actual cost and dispensing fee to the
critical access care pharmacy for the prescription drug or
device and shall permit a critical access care pharmacy or
its designated agent to file an appeal using the standard
appeal form described in this section.
(2) If a critical access care pharmacy chooses to
contest a reimbursement for failing to pay at least the
actual cost the critical access care pharmacy incurred for a
particular drug or medical product or device, then the
critical access care pharmacy has the right to designate a
pharmacy services administrative organization or other agent
to file and handle its appeal.
(3) The department of commerce and insurance shall
create and make available to pharmacy benefits managers and
covered entities a standard form to be used by a critical
access care pharmacy or its designated agent to file an
appeal pursuant to this subsection with a pharmacy benefits
manager or covered entity.
3. If a critical access care pharmacy or agent acting
on behalf of a critical access care pharmacy prevails in an
appeal provided for in this section, then within seven
business days after notice of the appeal is received by the
pharmacy benefits manager or covered entity, the pharmacy
benefits manager or covered entity shall:
(1) Make the necessary change to the challenged rate
of reimbursement or actual cost;
(2) If the product involved in the appeal is a drug,
provide to the critical access care pharmacy or agent the
national drug code number for the drug on which the change
is based;
SCS SBs 984 & 968 17
(3) Permit the challenging critical access care
pharmacy to reverse and rebill the claim upon which the
appeal is based;
(4) Pay or waive the cost of any transaction fee
required to reverse and rebill the claim;
(5) Reimburse the critical access care pharmacy at
least in an amount equal to the critical access care
pharmacy's actual cost for the prescription drug or device;
and
(6) Apply the findings from the appeal as to the rate
of reimbursement and actual cost for the particular drug or
medical product or device to other similarly situated
critical access care pharmacies.
4. It is a violation of this section if, after an
appeal in which a pharmacy or agent acting on behalf of a
critical access care pharmacy prevails, a pharmacy benefits
manager or covered entity fails to reimburse the critical
access care pharmacy at least actual cost.
5. If a critical access care pharmacy or agent acting
on behalf of a critical access care pharmacy loses or is
denied an appeal provided for in this section, then:
(1) If the product associated with the national drug
code number or unique device identifier is available at a
cost that is less than the challenged rate of reimbursement
from a pharmaceutical wholesaler in this state, then within
seven business days after notice of the appeal is received
by the pharmacy benefits manager or covered entity, the
pharmacy benefits manager or covered entity shall provide
the appealing critical access care pharmacy or agent with:
(a) The name of the national or regional
pharmaceutical wholesalers operating in this state that have
the particular drug or medical product or device currently
SCS SBs 984 & 968 18
in stock at a price that is less than the amount of the
challenged rate of reimbursement; and
(b) If the product involved in the appeal is a drug,
then the national drug code number for the drug; or
(c) If the product involved is a medical device, then
the unique device identifier for the device; and
(2) If the product associated with the national drug
code number or unique device identifier is not available at
a cost that is less than the challenged rate of
reimbursement from the pharmaceutical wholesaler from whom
the critical access care pharmacy purchases the majority of
prescription pharmaceutical products for resale, then the
pharmacy benefits manager shall adjust the challenged rate
of reimbursement to an amount equal to or greater than the
appealing critical access care pharmacy's actual cost and
permit the critical access care pharmacy to reverse and
rebill each claim affected by the inability to procure the
pharmaceutical product at a cost that is equal to or less
than the previously challenged rate of reimbursement. The
pharmacy benefits manager shall pay or waive the cost of any
transaction fee required to reverse and rebill the claim.
6. The department of commerce and insurance shall
enforce this section.
376.399. 1. Health benefit plans beginning on or
after January 1, 2027 shall comply with H.R. 7148, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.
2. For plan years beginning on or after January 1,
2027, no contract or arrangement or renewal or extension of
a contract or arrangement, entered into on or after January
1, 2027, for services between a covered plan and a covered
service provider, or between a sponsor of a covered plan and
a covered service provider, through a health insurance
SCS SBs 984 & 968 19
issuer offering group health insurance coverage, a third-
party administrator, an entity providing pharmacy benefit
management services, or other entity, for pharmacy benefit
management services, is reasonable within the meaning of
this section unless such entity providing pharmacy benefit
management services:
(1) Remits one hundred percent of rebates, fees,
alternative discounts, and other remuneration received from
any applicable entity that are related to utilization of
drugs or drug spending under such health plan or health
insurance coverage, to the group health plan or, in the case
of a health insurance issuer offering group health insurance
coverage in connection with a group health plan, to the
health insurance issuer offering group health insurance
coverage on behalf of the plan; and
(2) Does not enter into any contract for pharmacy
benefit management services on behalf of such a plan or
coverage, with an applicable entity unless one hundred
percent of rebates, fees, alternative discounts, and other
remuneration received under such contract that are related
to the utilization of drugs or drug spending under such
group health plan or health insurance coverage are remitted
to the group health plan or, in the case of a health
insurance issuer offering group health insurance coverage in
connection with a group health plan, to the health insurance
issuer on behalf of the plan by the entity providing
pharmacy benefit management services.
Nothing this subsection shall be construed to affect the
term of a contract or arrangement, as in effect on January
1, 2027, except that such subdivision shall apply to any
renewal or extension of such a contract or arrangement
SCS SBs 984 & 968 20
entered into on or after such effective date, as so
described.
3. With respect to such rebates, fees, alternative
discounts, and other remuneration, the rebates, fees,
alternative discounts, and other remuneration under this
section shall be remitted:
(1) On a quarterly basis, to the group health plan or,
in the case of a health insurance issuer offering group
health insurance coverage in connection with a group health
plan, to the group health insurance issuer on behalf of the
plan, not later than ninety days after the end of each
quarter; or
(2) In the case of an underpayment in a remittance for
a prior quarter, as soon as practicable, but not later than
ninety days after notice of the underpayment is first given;
(3) Fully disclosed and enumerated to the group health
plan or health insurance issuer; and
(4) Returned to the covered service provider for
pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of the group
health plan if any audit by a plan sponsor, issuer or a
third party designated by a plan sponsor, indicates that the
amounts received are in excess of correct amounts after such
amounts have been paid to the group health plan, in the
amount of such excess.
4. The department of commerce and insurance shall
enforce this section and shall have the right to any
information in the section from any pharmacy benefits
manager under investigation individually or in aggregate per
their request.

Modifies provisions relating to pharmacy benefit managers

Sponsors

Sen. Jill Carter (R) sponsors SB 984 alone.

Committees

SB 984 went before 1 committee: Families, Seniors and Health.

Families, Seniors and Health
Families, Seniors and Health
Referred to · Jan 8, 2026

History

SB 984 has taken 15 actions since Dec 1, 2025, the latest on May 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 15, 2026
Senate
Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection
Apr 20, 2026
Senate
SS for SCS S offered (Carter)--(5297S.17F)
Apr 20, 2026
Senate
SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & defeated (Gregory-21)--(5297S17.08S)
Apr 20, 2026
Senate
SA 2 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Coleman)--(5297S17.20S)
Apr 20, 2026
Senate
SA 3 to SS for SCS S offered & defeated (McCreery)--( 5297S17.05S)

Votes

SB 984 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: senate.mo.gov · legiscan.com