H.R. 6519

119 HR 6519 IH: Veterans Affairs Peer Review Neutrality Act of 2025
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2025-12-09
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  1st Session  H. R. 6519  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   December 9, 2025   Mrs. Dingell  (for herself and  Mr. Bergman ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on Veterans' Affairs    A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate conflicts of interest in conduct of quality management and administrative investigations by the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Veterans Affairs Peer Review Neutrality Act of 2025  .
2.
Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration
(a)
In general
Subchapter II of  chapter 73  of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after  section 7311A  the following new section:
7311B.
Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration
(a)
Peer review
(1)
In general
Each individual responsible for conducting peer review for quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department and each member of a peer review committee with respect to quality management of such care shall withdraw from participation in a case review if—
(A)
the individual has direct involvement with the care under review; or
(B)
the individual is unable to conduct an objective, impartial, accurate, and informed review.
(2)
Neutral assessment of conduct of committee members
Each medical facility of the Department shall develop procedures and guidelines for that facility to require that any initial peer review for quality management that is conducted with respect to care provided by a health care provider who is a member of the peer review committee for that facility be evaluated, discussed, and assigned a final level review by a neutral peer review committee at another facility of the Department.
(b)
Administrative investigation boards and factfindings
(1)
Knowledge of confidential information
Individuals with knowledge of confidential quality assurance information specific to a matter under investigation by an administrative investigation board or factfinder with respect to quality management of care provided by a health care provider at a medical facility of the Department may not—
(A)
serve on the administrative investigation board or as a factfinder; or
(B)
disclose such information to an administrative investigation board or a factfinder.
(2)
Personal interest, involvement, or relationship
(A)
In general
The Secretary shall ensure that each member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder does not have—
(i)
any personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted;
(ii)
direct involvement in matters being investigated; or
(iii)
a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation.
(B)
Recusal
If a potential member of an administrative investigative board or factfinder has a personal interest or other bias concerning the investigation being conducted, direct involvement in matters being investigated, or a supervisory or personal relationship with the subject of the investigation, the potential member shall inform the authority responsible for the investigation and recuse themselves from such matter.
 .
(b)
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 7311A the following new item:
7311B. Elimination of conflicts of interest in peer review, administrative investigation boards, and factfindings of Veterans Health Administration.
  .