- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 6556
U.S. House•In Senate Committee
Summary
H.R. 6556, the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act, was introduced in the House on Dec 10, 2025 by Rep. Stephen Lynch (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs, and last saw action on Jul 15, 2026: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Record
Text
H.R. 6556 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb6556/engrossed-in-house.txt119 HR 6556 EH: Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness ActU.S. House of Representativestext/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I119th CONGRESS 2d SessionH. R. 6556IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESAN ACTTo prohibit the use of certain concentration limit exceptions with respect to mergers involving a failed bank unless the applicable agency determines such use is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act .2.Concentration limit exceptions only available to avoid serious adverse economic or financial effects(a)Concentration limits with respect to deposits(1)Federal Deposit Insurance ActThe Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq. ) is amended—(A)in section 18(c)(13)—(i)by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows:(B)Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an interstate merger transaction if—(i)such interstate merger transaction involves 1 or more insured depository institutions in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A); or(ii)the Corporation provides assistance under section 13 to facilitate such interstate merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A).; and(ii)in subparagraph (C)—(I)in clause (i), by striking and at the end;(II)in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and(III)by adding at the end the following:(iii)the term qualified bid means an application, proposed application, or bid from a company where—(I)if applicable, the company, any affiliate insured depository institution, and any affiliate depository institution holding company is well capitalized and well managed, as of the date of the application, proposed application, or bid; and(II)upon consummation of the transaction, the resulting insured depository institution is well capitalized;(iv)the term well capitalized —(I)with respect to an insured depository institution, has the meaning given such term in section 38(b) ( 12 U.S.C. 1831o(b) );(II)with respect to a bank holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(1)(B) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ( 12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(1)(B) );(III)with respect to a savings and loan holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 238.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations; and(IV)with respect to a company that is not an insured depository institution, bank holding company, or savings and loan holding company, means maintaining equity capital that the Corporation determines is commensurate with the capital maintained by an insured depository institution that is well capitalized; and(v)the term well managed has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(9) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ( 12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(9) ).; and(B)in section 44, by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:(e)Exception for Banks in Default or in Danger of Default(1)General exceptionThe responsible agency may, without regard to paragraph (1), (3), (4), or (5) of subsection (b) or paragraph (2), (4), or (5) of subsection (a), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if—(A)the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or(B)the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction.(2)Concentration limit exceptionThe responsible agency may, without regard to subsection (b)(2), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if—(A)the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2); or(B)the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2).(3)Qualified bid definedIn this subsection, the term qualified bid has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C)..(2)Bank Holding Company Act of 1956The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ( 12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq. ) is amended—(A)in section 3(d), by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows:(5)Exception for banks in default or in danger of default(A)General exceptionThe Board may, without regard to subparagraph (B) or (D) of paragraph (1) or paragraph (3), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if—(i)the application is for an acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or(ii)the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.(B)Concentration limit exceptionThe Board may, without regard to paragraph (2), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if—(i)the application is for the acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or(ii)the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2).(C)Qualified bid definedIn this paragraph, the term qualified bid has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.; and(B)in section 4(i)(8), by amending subsection (B) to read as follows:(B)ExceptionSubparagraph (A) shall not apply to an acquisition if—(i)such acquisition involves an insured depository institution in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or(ii)the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to facilitate such acquisition and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2)..(b)Concentration limit with respect to consolidated liabilitiesSection 14(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ( 12 U.S.C. 1852(c) ) is amended—(1)by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;(2)by striking With the and inserting the following:(1)In generalWith the; and(3)by adding at the end the following:(2)LimitationThe Board may provide written consent for an acquisition described in paragraph (1)(A) or in paragraph (1)(B) only if the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)..3.Congressional notification and justification for waivers(a)In generalWhenever the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation waives a concentration limit under section 18(c)(13)(B) or section 44(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or under section 3(d)(5), section 4(i)(8)(B), or section 14(c)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, in connection with the acquisition of a bank or insured depository institution in default or in danger of default, or in connection with an acquisition with respect to which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the waiving agency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, jointly, shall, not later than 30 days after such waiver, submit a written report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in the Senate containing—(1)a justification for the waiver, including an analysis of why it was necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability;(2)a description of alternative bids or outcomes considered, including efforts to solicit and encourage bids from entities that would not require a waiver;(3)an explanation of why alternative bids were not selected, if applicable; and(4)any recommendations for legislative or regulatory changes to improve competition in future insured depository institution resolutions.(b)Public disclosureThe waiving agency submitting a report under subsection (a) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall make the report publicly available on their respective websites, subject to redactions for confidential supervisory information and any other information described under section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code.4.Limitation on considering bad faith bids in least cost determinationSection 13(c)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4) ) is amended by adding at the end the following:(I)Limitation on considering bad faith bidsIn making a determination under this paragraph of whether an exercise of authority is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund, any application, proposed application, or bid that would result in violation of—(i)section 18(c)(13) or 44(b)(2), or(ii)section 3(d)(2), 4(i)(8), or 14 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,shall not be considered a possible method for meeting the Corporation’s obligation under this section for purposes of subparagraph (A)..5.Discretionary Surplus Fund(a)In generalThe dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act ( 12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A) ) is reduced by $2,000,000.(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 1, 2036.Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2026. Kevin F. McCumber, Clerk.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-12-10
- Passed House2026-07-14
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Dec 10, 2025
hb6556/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (12/10/2025)
Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act
This bill tightens restrictions on certain waivers granted by federal financial regulators to companies that acquire insured depository institutions. Under current law, a regulator may not approve an acquisition if it would result in an institution exceeding a set concentration limit (i.e., controlling more than 10% of total insured U.S. deposits). This may be waived if one or more of the institutions involved is in default or in danger of default or if the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is providing certain assistance.
In addition to these requirements, the bill requires the regulator to determine that (1) the merger is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or financial instability, and (2) FDIC has not received a qualified bid from a company not subject to this concentration limit.
The bill also provides capitalization and management standards for qualified bids.
Regulators that waive these concentration limits must report to Congress on the circumstances and justification of the waiver.
Sponsors
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D) sponsors H.R. 6556, and 1 member has co-sponsored it.
Committees
H.R. 6556 went before 2 committees: Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Financial Services.

Reports
1 committee report has been filed on H.R. 6556, the latest H. Rept. 119-475.
- H. Rept. 119-475 — FAILING BANK ACQUISITION FAIRNESS ACT
Actions
H.R. 6556 has taken 14 actions since Dec 10, 2025, the latest on Jul 15, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 15, 2026 | Senate | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee | ||
Jul 14, 202615:03 | House | Mr. Hill (AR) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. | ||
Jul 14, 202615:03 | House | Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4438-4441) | ||
Jul 14, 202615:03 | House | DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6556. | ||
Jul 14, 202615:16 | House | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4438-4440) |
Votes
H.R. 6556 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 6556 goes by 7 titles, 4 of them short titles.
- Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act — Short Titles from RFS (Referred to Senate) bill text
- Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act — Short Title(s) as Passed House
- To prohibit the use of certain concentration limit exceptions with respect to mergers involving a failed bank unless the applicable agency determines such use is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and for other purposes. — Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text
- Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to House
- Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act — Display Title
- Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To prohibit the use of certain concentration limit exceptions with respect to mergers involving a failed bank unless the applicable agency determines such use is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 19 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6556 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Banking, Housing, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Agriculture, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Health Issues.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | 1 | 3 | — |
| AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMBER MILENKEVICH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BRIAN LAVERDURE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHARLES YI | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JAMES KELLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JENNA BURKE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| LILLIANE THOMAS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MARK SCANLAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MICHAEL EMANCIPATOR | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MICHAEL MARSHALL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| PAUL MERSKI | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| REBECA ROMERO RAINEY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SAMUEL BEAVER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| STEPHEN KEEN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SUSAN KINNEY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| TIMOTHY ROY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| WALTER HAYNIE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER SHARER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARK HAYS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RUKMANI BHATIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | 2026 second_quarter | $2.2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.3M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA | 2026 first_quarter | $890K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM | AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM | 2025 fourth_quarter | $150K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6556 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 8 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6556’s is Finance and Financial Sector.
hr6556/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 6556 carries 8 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Administrative law and regulatory procedures to Performance measurement.
hr6556/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6556, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 208 (Wednesday, December 10, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. LYNCH:H.R. 6556.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8, Cl. 18[Page H5561]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com