Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 6547

U.S. HouseHouse Floor Calendar

Summary

H.R. 6547, the Least Cost Exception Act, was introduced in the House on Dec 10, 2025 by Rep. Mike Flood (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Feb 2, 2026: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.


Record

Text

H.R. 6547 has 4 co-sponsors.

hb6547/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 6547 IH: Least Cost Exception Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-12-10
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 6547 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 10, 2025 Mr. Flood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL
To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to provide an exception to the least-cost resolution requirement, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Least Cost Exception Act .
2.
Least cost resolution exception to avoid further concentration among global systemically important banking organizations
(a)
In general
Section 13(c)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4) ) is amended—
(1)
in subparagraph (A)(ii), by inserting except as provided in subparagraph (I), before the total amount ;
(2)
in subparagraph (E)(i), by inserting and except as provided in subparagraph (I), after appropriate, ; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
(I)
Least cost resolution exception
(i)
In general
With respect to an exercise of authority by the Corporation described in subparagraph (A), the Corporation may, at the discretion of the Corporation, select an alternative method of exercising such authority that is not the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund, if—
(I)
the Corporation determines that the selected alternative complies with the requirements of clause (iii); and
(II)
the Corporation and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determine that the potential additional risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the selected alternative are outweighed by the reasonably expected benefits of limiting further concentration of the United States banking system in global systemically important banking organizations.
(ii)
Maximum cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Corporation, by rule, shall specify the maximum amount of the net worth of the Deposit Insurance Fund that may be utilized to account for any determination under clause (i).
(iii)
Requirements described
The requirements for the selected alternative described in clause (i) are as follows:
(I)
The selected alternative is least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund of all alternatives that do not involve a transaction with a global systemically important banking organization and that do not exceed the cost of liquidating the insured depository institution.
(II)
The difference between the cost of the selected alternative and the cost of a covered alternative is less than the maximum cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund specified pursuant to the rule adopted under clause (ii).
(III)
In the case of a selected alternative that involves another person purchasing assets of the insured depository institution or assuming liabilities of the insured depository institution, such person agrees to pay an assessment to the Deposit Insurance Fund comprised of payments—
(aa)
made over a period to be determined by the Corporation, but which may not be less than 5 years; and
(bb)
that, taking into account a realistic discount rate, are in an aggregate amount equal to the difference calculated in subclause (II).
(iv)
Report to Congress
Not later than 30 days after selecting an alternative described in clause (i), the Corporation shall issue a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate containing an analysis of the economic difference between the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the selected alternative and the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund of the least costly alternative that would have been selected absent the application of this subparagraph.
(v)
Definitions
In this subparagraph:
(I)
Covered alternative
The term covered alternative means a method of exercising authority described in subparagraph (A) that is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund of all such methods that involve a sale of all or substantially all assets of the insured depository institution to, and assumption of all or substantially all liabilities of the insured depository institution by, a global systemically important banking organization.
(II)
Global systemically important banking organization
The term global systemically important banking organization means a global systemically important BHC (as such term is defined in section 217.402 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto) and any affiliate thereof.
.
(b)
Rule of construction
Section 13(c)(4)(H) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)(H) ) does not apply to the amendments made by subsection (a).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-12-10
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Reported to House Feb 2, 2026

hb6547/reported-to-house.md

Shown Here:
Reported to House (02/02/2026)

Least Cost Exception Act

This bill allows the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to waive the least-cost resolution requirement for failed insured depository institutions and use alternative methods of resolution, particularly alternatives that do not involve global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).

Under current law, the FDIC must use the resolution method (such as a deposit payoff or the purchase and assumption of a bank’s assets and liabilities) that costs the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund the least to implement when an insured depository institution fails.

The bill provides an exception to this requirement if the following criteria are met:

  • the alternative method is the least costly of all alternatives that do not involve a G-SIB and that do not exceed the cost of liquidation;
  • the difference in cost between the selected alternative and the cost of a resolution involving a purchase and assumption by a G-SIB is less than a maximum cost as established by rule;
  • if the alternative involves a person purchasing assets or assuming liabilities, that person must pay an assessment to the FDIC; and
  • it is determined that the risks to the fund are outweighed by the benefits of limiting the concentration of U.S. banking under G-SIBs.

FDIC must issue a report on any use of the exception established by this bill containing an analysis of the economic impact of cost differences between the selected alternative and the least-cost alternative.

Sponsors

Rep. Mike Flood (R) sponsors H.R. 6547, and 4 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 6547 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Reported By · Feb 2, 2026 · 559 Bills

Reports

1 committee report has been filed on H.R. 6547, the latest H. Rept. 119-474.

Actions

H.R. 6547 has taken 7 actions since Dec 10, 2025, the latest on Feb 2, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 2, 2026
House
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-474.Financial Services Committee
Feb 2, 2026
House
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 405.
Dec 17, 2025
House
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 50 - 0.Financial Services Committee
Dec 17, 2025
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldFinancial Services Committee
Dec 16, 2025
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldFinancial Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 6547 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 6547.

Titles

H.R. 6547 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • Least Cost Exception Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to House
  • Least Cost Exception Act — Display Title
  • Least Cost Exception Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to provide an exception to the least-cost resolution requirement, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 20 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6547 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Banking, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Agriculture, Housing, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Budget/Appropriations, Economics/Economic Development.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICADistrict of Columbia13
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORMDistrict of Columbia11
COMMUNITY BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOISIllinois11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICAINDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA2026 second_quarter$2.2M2nd Quarter - Report
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICAINDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA2025 fourth_quarter$1.3M4th Quarter - Report
INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICAINDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA2026 first_quarter$890K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORMAMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM2025 fourth_quarter$150K4th Quarter - Report
COMMUNITY BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOISCOMMUNITY BANKERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS2025 fourth_quarter$65K4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6547 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 8 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6547’s is Finance and Financial Sector.

hr6547/policy-areas.txt
Finance and Financial SectorAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 6547 carries 8 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Accounting and auditing to User charges and fees.

hr6547/subjects.txt
Accounting and auditingBank accounts, deposits, capitalBanking and financial institutions regulationCongressional oversightCorporate finance and managementFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)Performance measurementUser charges and fees

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6547, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 208 (Wednesday, December 10, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. FLOOD:H.R. 6547.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the U.S. Constitution[Page H5561]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com