Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 6683

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 6683, the Safer Schools Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Dec 11, 2025 by Rep. Roger Williams (R) with 13 co-sponsors. It was referred to Education and Workforce, and last saw action on Dec 11, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 6683 has 13 co-sponsors.

hb6683/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 6683 IH: Safer Schools Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-12-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 6683 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 11, 2025 Mr. Williams of Texas (for himself and Mr. Moskowitz ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce , and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To establish a grant program to encourage schools to conduct independent facility security risk assessments and make hard security improvements, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Safer Schools Act of 2025 .
2.
Pilot program for grants for independent facility security risk assessments and hard security improvements
(a)
Establishment
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act the Attorney General shall establish a pilot program (hereinafter referred to as the pilot program ) to issue grants pursuant to subsections (b) and (c), including releasing guidelines and applications with respect to such grant programs.
(b)
Independent facility security risk assessment grants
(1)
In general
Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Attorney General shall award grants to public schools to have independent facility security risk assessments performed.
(2)
Application
(A)
In general
To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a public school shall submit to the Attorney General an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Attorney General may require, including—
(i)
the size of the school;
(ii)
a comprehensive report on the financial state of the school, including any Federal, State, or local funds used in the school’s budget; and
(iii)
a certification to the Attorney General that the school is unable to cover the cost of an independent facility security risk assessment without the grant awarded under this section.
(B)
Priority
The Attorney General, in awarding a grant under this section, shall give priority to applications of public schools that have experienced an event in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals.
(3)
Ineligibility
(A)
In general
A public school shall be ineligible to receive a grant under this section if it—
(i)
received a grant under this section in the previous 5 fiscal years; or
(ii)
receives a grant under this section in the same fiscal year.
(B)
Exception
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case that a grant recipient experiences an event in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals, such grant recipient shall be eligible to receive an additional grant under this section in the fiscal year after the date of the event.
(c)
Hard security improvement grants
(1)
In general
Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Attorney General shall award grants to public schools for the purpose of making hard security improvements to schools.
(2)
Application
(A)
In general
To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a public school shall submit to the Attorney General an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Attorney General may require, which application shall include—
(i)
the size of the school;
(ii)
a comprehensive report on the financial state of the school, including any Federal, State, or local funds used in the school’s budget;
(iii)
a comprehensive description of previous improvements made to the school meant to address school security related vulnerabilities;
(iv)
the specific products and services that will be purchased with the grant funds and an estimate of such costs and services; and
(v)
the results of the school’s most recent independent facility security risk assessment.
(B)
Priority
The Attorney General, in awarding a grant under this section, shall give priority to applications of schools that have experienced an event in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals.
(3)
Ineligibility
(A)
In general
A public school shall be ineligible to receive a grant under this section if—
(i)
a public school received a grant under this section in the previous 5 fiscal years; or
(ii)
a public school receives a grant under this section in the same fiscal year.
(B)
Exception
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), in the case that a grant recipient experiences an event in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals, such grant recipient shall be eligible to receive an additional grant under this section in any fiscal year after the date on which the event occurred.
(4)
Matching funds
(A)
In general
The Federal share of a grant received under this subsection may not exceed 50 percent of the hard security improvement costs.
(B)
Waiver
The Attorney General may waive in whole or in part, the matching requirement under paragraph (1) in the case that the recipient has a financial need for such waiver.
(5)
Grant conditions
A recipient of a grant under this section shall—
(A)
use the grant to make hard security improvements identified as necessary by the most recent independent facility security risk assessment;
(B)
in the case that a panic alarm is not installed or operable according to the independent facility risk assessment, use the grant for the installation of at least 1 panic alarm for use in a school security emergency, including a non-fire evacuation, lockdown, or active shooter situation, which alarm—
(i)
shall be directly linked to the local law enforcement agency that is closest in proximity to the grant recipient;
(ii)
shall immediately transmit a signal or message to such law enforcement agency upon activation; and
(iii)
shall not be audible within the public school building;
(C)
before entering into a contract with a vendor, obtain written confirmation from the law enforcement agency or entity that conducted the independent facility security risk assessment that the improvement will mitigate a vulnerability identified in the independent facility security risk assessment; and
(D)
ensure that hard security improvements comply with local building code requirements and standards.
(d)
Information dissemination
(1)
In general
The Attorney General shall disseminate to each local educational agency in the United States information about the availability of grants under this section.
(2)
Event notice
Not later than 30 days after an event in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals occurs in a public school, the Director shall contact verbally the head of such public school to provide notice of priority eligibility for grants under this section and to offer technical assistance in navigating the application process.
(e)
Reports
(1)
Grant recipient report
Not later than one year after receiving a grant under subsection (b) or (c), a recipient shall submit to the Attorney General—
(A)
a copy of the results of each security assessment with how many vulnerabilities were found;
(B)
a list of each hard improvement made and the percentage of vulnerabilities fixed, including the percentage of vulnerabilities outstanding;
(C)
a list of the number of events in which an individual inflicts deadly harm or attempts to inflict deadly harm against multiple individuals, if any, that happened five years before hard security vulnerabilities were fixed or one year after the hard security vulnerabilities were made; and
(D)
a survey assessing how safe students and facility members feel on the school’s campus before hard security improvements were made and one year after they were made.
(2)
Attorney General Report
Not later than two years after the date of enactment, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to appropriate Congressional committees a report on the national state of physical security in schools, including—
(A)
the contents of grant recipient reports under paragraph (1);
(B)
a percentage breakdown of the type of hard security fixes;
(C)
the percentage of outstanding vulnerabilities remaining;
(D)
a percentage breakdown of each type of hard security improvements made; and
(E)
the average percentage of vulnerabilities fixed and average percentage of vulnerabilities outstanding after the hard security improvements were made.
(f)
Sunset
The pilot program shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date on which the pilot program is established.
(g)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional committees means the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Education and Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate.
(2)
Hard security improvements
The term hard security improvements means improvements to the infrastructure of school property perimeter, parking lot perimeter, building perimeter, entrance and exit points of the school building, video monitoring equipment, alert notification equipment, the interior and perimeter of the classroom, and any other physical improvements related to camera systems and related hardware, alarm and notification technology, and visitor management technologies deemed eligible for improvement by the Attorney General.
(3)
Independent facility security risk assessment
The term independent facility security risk assessment means an assessment that—
(A)
identifies active shooter and related security vulnerabilities of public schools, considering security factors, including the strength and maintenance levels of the property perimeter, parking lot perimeter, building perimeter, and classroom and interior perimeter, and the presence of a silent security system signal generated by the manual activation of a device intended to signal a life-threatening or emergency situation requiring a response from law enforcement; and
(B)
is conducted by a Federal, State, or local entity determined to be qualified by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance.
(4)
Public school
The term public school means a public elementary school or a public secondary school, including an elementary school or a secondary school that is predominately funded by an Indian tribal government.
(h)
Authorization of appropriations
(1)
In general
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the pilot program—
(A)
$100,000,000 for fiscal year one of the pilot program;
(B)
$200,000,000 for fiscal year two of the pilot program; and
(C)
$300,000,000 for fiscal years three through five of the pilot program.
(2)
Allocation of funds
Any funds authorized under paragraph (1) shall be allocated—
(A)
with 30 percent of any such funds to the grant program under section 2(b); and
(B)
with 70 percent of any such funds to the grant program under section 2(c).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-12-11
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Dec 11, 2025

hb6683/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (12/11/2025)

Safer Schools Act of 2025

This bill establishes a pilot program through which the Department of Justice must award grants to public elementary and secondary schools to conduct independent facility security risk assessments and make hard security improvements (e.g., video monitoring and alert notification equipment).

Sponsors

Rep. Roger Williams (R) sponsors H.R. 6683, and 13 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 6683 went before 2 committees: Judiciary and Education and Workforce.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Dec 11, 2025 · 2,181 Bills
Education and Workforce
Education and Workforce
Referred To · Dec 11, 2025 · 824 Bills

Actions

H.R. 6683 has taken 2 actions since Dec 11, 2025.

ChamberAction
Dec 11, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Dec 11, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Education and Workforce Committee

Votes

H.R. 6683 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 6683 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Safer Schools Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Safer Schools Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To establish a grant program to encourage schools to conduct independent facility security risk assessments and make hard security improvements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 17 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6683 in 10 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Health Issues, Firearms/Guns/Ammunition, Medicare/Medicaid, Budget/Appropriations, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Retirement, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICEDistrict of Columbia14
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSDistrict of Columbia13
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETYMassachusetts12
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGYVirginia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGYAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY2025 first_quarter$275.2K1st Quarter - Report
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSCOLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS2025 first_quarter$217.6K1st Quarter - Report
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSCOLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS2025 second_quarter$149.4K2nd Quarter - Report
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTSCOLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS2025 third_quarter$124.8K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 second_quarter$100K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Amendme…
NATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICENATIONAL FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETYMASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY2025 first_quarter$80K1st Quarter - Report
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETYMASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCIETY2025 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6683 under Education, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6683’s is Education.

hr6683/policy-areas.txt
EducationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6683, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 209 (Thursday, December 11, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas:H.R. 6683.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution[Page H5811]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com