- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

H 4733
South Carolina House•In House Committee
Summary
H 4733, “Bad faith presumption in insurance settlements”, was introduced in the House on Dec 16, 2025 by Rep. David Martin (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 13, 2026: Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
Record
Text
H 4733 has 4 co-sponsors.
h4733/introduced.txtSouth Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 4733Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)A billTO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ENACTING THE"BAD FAITH PRESUMPTION IN INSURANCE SETTLEMENT OFFER ACT" BY ADDING SECTION38-59-60 SO AS TO PROVIDE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF BAD FAITH BY AN INSURERIN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES INVOLVING INSURANCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS, TO DEFINENECESSARY TERMS, TO PROVIDE THE PRESUMPTION IS REBUTTABLE, AND TO PROVIDE THEADMISSIBILITY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS IN SUBSEQUENT BAD FAITH ACTIONS, AMONGOTHER THINGS.Whereas, the SouthCarolina General Assembly finds that insureds, claimants and defendants oftenreach a mutual agreement to settle a claim within the available liabilitycoverage limits of an insurance policy; andWhereas, when theinsurance company or its adjuster refuses to settle within the policy limitsdespite the agreement of the insured, defendant, and claimant, the insured isexposed to the risk of a judgment in excess of coverage, even though settlementwas available within policy limits; andWhereas, the failure toaccept a settlement within policy limits under such circumstances underminesthe purpose of liability insurance, increases costs to the civil justicesystem, and may constitute bad faith by the insurer; andWhereas, in order toprotect insureds and promote settlement within policy limits, this act createsa rebuttable presumption of bad-faith conduct by the insurer when certainconditions are met. Now, therefore,Be it enacted by theGeneral Assembly of the State of South Carolina:SECTION 1. This act may be cited as the "Bad Faith Presumption in InsuranceSettlement Offer Act."SECTION 2. Article 1, Chapter 59, Title 38 of the S.C. Code isamended by adding:Section38-59-60. (A) For purposes of thissection:(1)"Bad faith" means the insurer's unreasonable refusal to settle within policylimits when liability is reasonably clear and an offer within limits isavailable and accepted by the claimant and defendant, such that the insurer'sconduct falls outside of the standards of good faith and fair dealing.(2)"Claimant" means the person or entity asserting a compensation claim againstthe insured under the subject policy.(3)"Defendant" means the insured or other party covered under the liability policythat is being defended by the insurer against the claimant's claim.(4)"Insurer" means the liability insurance company that issued the policy and isresponsible for handling and settling claims under the policy.(5)"Policy limits" means the maximum amount of liability coverage available underthe insurance policy, including any applicable umbrella or excess coverage, atthe time the settlement offer is made.(6)"Settlement agreement" means a written agreement signed by the claimant, thedefendant, and counsel for each of those parties, specifying resolution of theclaim for the policy limits and designated as confidential under Rule 43(k),South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.(B)(1) A rebuttable presumption of badfaith by the insurer shall arise if all of the following conditions aresatisfied:(a)a settlement agreement has been executed by the claimant, the defendant, andtheir respective counsel, in which the claimant agrees to resolve the claimwithin the available policy limits, and the defendant and counsel join in thatagreement;(b)the insurer, after being timely notified of the settlement agreement and givena reasonable opportunity to accept and execute it, refuses or fails to acceptthe settlement agreement and effectuate payment within the policy limits; and(c)the case thereafter proceeds to trial, and a final judgment or bindingarbitration award is entered in favor of the claimant in an amount that exceedsthe insurer's policy limits.(2)The insurer may rebut this presumption by presenting evidence that the refusalto settle was reasonable under the circumstances including, but not limited to:(a)existence of a material factual or legal defense;(b)exposure to greater liability than reasonably anticipated at the time of theSettlement Agreement; or(c)information not reasonably available to the insurer at the time the SettlementAgreement was proposed.(3)If the presumption is not rebutted, the insurer may be liable for suchadditional damages, interest, and attorney's fees as provided under existingbad-faith law in this State.(C) Asettlement agreement as provided in subsection (B) must be admissible in anysubsequent bad-faith action against the insurer solely for the purpose ofestablishing the presumption referenced in that section. The settlementagreement may not be used in the underlying liability action or for any otherpurpose, except as otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by a court forgood cause shown.(D)Nothing in this section may affect the underlying rights or defenses of theinsurer, insured, claimant, or defendant with respect to coverage, policyinterpretation, liability, contributory negligence, comparative fault, or othermatters in the underlying liability action, except as specifically provided inthis section.SECTION 3. If any section, subsection,paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this act is forany reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such holding shall notaffect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this act,the General Assembly hereby declaring that it would have passed this act, andeach and every section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause,phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more othersections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases,or words hereof may be declared to be unconstitutional, invalid, or otherwiseineffective.SECTION 4. This act takes effect upon approvalby the Governor.----XX----This web page was last updated on December 17, 2025 at 01:42 PM
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Enacting The "bad Faith Presumption In Insurance Settlement Offer Act" By Adding Section 38-59-60 So As To Provide A Rebuttable Presumption Of Bad Faith By An Insurer In Certain Circumstances Involving Insurance Settlement Agreements, To Define Necessary Terms, To Provide The Presumption Is Rebuttable, And To Provide The Admissibility Of Settlement Agreements In Subsequent Bad Faith Actions, Among Other Things.
Sponsors
Rep. David Martin (R) sponsors H 4733, and 4 members have co-sponsored it.
Committees
H 4733 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
History
H 4733 has taken 4 actions since Dec 16, 2025, the latest on Jan 13, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2026 | House | Introduced and read first time | ||
Jan 13, 2026 | House | Referred to Committee on Judiciary | ||
Dec 16, 2025 | House | Prefiled | ||
Dec 16, 2025 | House | Referred to Committee on Judiciary |
Votes
H 4733 has not gone to a roll call.
Source: scstatehouse.gov · legiscan.com