Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 2188

Washington HouseIntroduced

Summary

HB 2188, “Promoting transparency in certain industrial insurance rate increases”, was introduced in the House on Dec 23, 2025 by Rep. Suzanne Schmidt (R) with 8 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Feb 19, 2026: House Rules "X" file.


Record

Text

HB 2188 has 8 co-sponsors and 1 roll call.

hb2188/introduced.txt
H-2634.1
HOUSE BILL 2188
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session
By Representatives Schmidt, Dufault, Abbarno, McEntire, Jacobsen,
Ybarra, Barnard, Graham, and Couture
Prefiled 12/23/25. Read first time 01/12/26. Referred to Committee
on Labor & Workplace Standards.
AN ACT Relating to promoting transparency in certain industrial
insurance rate increases; amending RCW 51.16.035; and creating a new
section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that:
(a) Open and transparent governance is an absolute necessity for
any state program. With it, the people the government serves are
fully informed of its successes and can appropriately address its
shortfalls. In its absence, failures continue onward unchecked. At a
minimum, the lack of transparent decision making shakes the public's
confidence in the state;
(b) This axiom is strained during the premium rate-setting
process for the state's workers' compensation program. It has become
common practice to artificially limit the premium rate change for
certain risk classes below what it should be based on actuarial
principles. Meanwhile, the rate classes limited, their actual
premium, and how the limited rate is subsidized across other risk
classes is not presented in a clear and concise manner;
(c) This practice leads to increased use of contingency reserves
to further limit proposed rates. The department of labor and
industries has utilized contingency reserves to cap the proposed
p. 1 HB 2188
premium rate for three consecutive years. In the latest rate setting
this is an 8.1 percent reduction from the "break-even" rate, leading
to a $240,000,000 reduction in contingency reserves. Use of reserves
to limit the annual rate increase, while laudable in the short term,
is not a sustainable option;
(d) This practice clouds the workers' compensation program's true
costs, leaves the people uninformed, and makes the legislature slow
to the draw on potential reforms.
(2) Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to promote
open and transparent governance, and to ensure the continued health
of the state's workers' compensation program, through the proper
reporting of annually proposed premium rates.
Sec. 2. RCW 51.16.035 and 2005 c 410 s 1 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The department shall classify all occupations or industries
in accordance with their degree of hazard and fix therefor basic
rates of premium which shall be:
(a) The lowest necessary to maintain actuarial solvency of the
accident and medical aid funds in accordance with recognized
insurance principles; and
(b) Designed to attempt to limit fluctuations in premium rates.
(2) The department shall formulate and adopt rules governing the
method of premium calculation and collection and providing for a
rating system consistent with recognized principles of workers'
compensation insurance which shall be designed to stimulate and
encourage accident prevention and to facilitate collection. The
department may annually, or at such other times as it deems necessary
to achieve the objectives under this section, readjust rates in
accordance with the rating system to become effective on such dates
as the department may designate.
(3)(a) After the first report is issued by the state auditor
under RCW 51.44.115, the workers' compensation advisory committee
shall review the report and, as the committee deems appropriate, may
make recommendations to the department concerning:
(i) The level or levels of a contingency reserve that are
appropriate to maintain actuarial solvency of the accident and
medical aid funds, limit premium rate fluctuations, and account for
economic conditions; and
p. 2 HB 2188
(ii) When surplus funds exist in the trust funds, the
circumstances under which the department should give premium
dividends, or similar measures, or temporarily reduce rates below the
rates fixed under subsection (1) of this section, including any
recommendations regarding notifications that should be given before
taking the action.
(b) Following subsequent reports issued by the state auditor
under RCW 51.44.115, the workers' compensation advisory committee
may, as it deems appropriate, update its recommendations to the
department on the matters covered under (a) of this subsection.
(4) In providing a retrospective rating plan under RCW 51.18.010,
the department may consider each individual retrospective rating
group as a single employing entity for purposes of dividends or
premium discounts.
(5) The department shall publish the actuarially indicated rate
for each risk classification as part of its proposed premium rates
for the upcoming year.
(6)(a) If the director limits the maximum premium rate increase
for any risk classification below the level indicated by applying
generally accepted actuarial principles to the risk class, the
department must publish information about the limitation when it
proposes its premium rates for the upcoming year. Such information
must include, but is not limited to:
(i) The rate classifications limited by the director and the
respective proposed rate;
(ii) What the rate for the class would have been according to
generally accepted actuarial principles had a maximum increase
limitation not been set by the director;
(iii) The premium rate increase imposed upon other risk classes
as a result of the limitation.
(b) The department shall publish the information described in
this subsection (6) on its website and as part of its proposed
premium rates for the upcoming year.
(c) The department shall submit the information described in this
subsection (6) to the appropriate committees of the legislature and
to the workers' compensation advisory committee.
--- END ---
p. 3 HB 2188

Promoting transparency in certain industrial insurance rate increases.

Sponsors

Rep. Suzanne Schmidt (R) sponsors HB 2188, and 8 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

HB 2188 went before 2 committees: Labor & Workplace Standards and Rules.

Labor & Workplace Standards
Labor & Workplace Standards
Referred to · Jan 12, 2026 · 36 Bills
Rules
Rules
Referred to · Feb 4, 2026 · 254 Bills

History

HB 2188 has taken 9 actions since Dec 23, 2025, the latest on Feb 19, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 19, 2026
House
Returned to Rules Committee for second reading.
Feb 19, 2026
House
House Rules "X" file.
Feb 10, 2026
House
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
Feb 4, 2026
House
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
Feb 3, 2026
House
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards at 10:30 AM.

Votes

HB 2188 went to 1 roll call in the House, the latest on Feb 3, 2026 at 80.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Feb 3, 2026
House
House Committee on Labor & Workplace Standards: do pass
8
0

Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com