Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 2747

Missouri HouseEngrossed

Summary

HB 2747, which modifies provisions relating to proceedings resulting from criminal conduct, was introduced in the House on Jan 6, 2026 by Rep. Bishop Davidson (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 15, 2026: SCS Voted Do Pass (S).


Record

Text

HB 2747 has 4 co-sponsors and 1 roll call.

hb2747/engrossed.txt
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
[PERFECTED]
HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
HOUSE BILL NOS. 2747 & 2047
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
4181H.05P JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk
AN ACT
To repeal section 565.030, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof five new sections relating to
proceedings resulting from criminal conduct.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Section 565.030, RSMo, is repealed and five new sections enacted in lieu
thereof, to be known as sections 476.411, 565.030, 610.141, 610.143, and 610.144, to read as
follows:
476.411. Beginning January 1, 2031, and each year thereafter, the office of state
courts administrator and the Missouri state highway patrol shall submit a report to the
joint committee on the justice system, the house judiciary committee or any successor
committee, and the senate judiciary and civil and criminal jurisprudence committee or
any successor committee providing statistical information for the prior year, arranged
by judicial circuit and county, of:
(1) The number of clean slate eligible offenses as defined under section 610.141
identified by the Missouri state highway patrol under subsection 2 of section 610.141
and transmitted to the courts;
(2) The number of identified clean slate eligible offenses to which a prosecuting
attorney filed an objection under subsection 3 of section 610.141; and
(3) The number of orders of expungement issued under section 610.141.
14 The data shall be aggregated by race, sex, age, circuit, county, and offense type and level
15 if such data is available.
EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is
intended to be omitted from the law. Matter in bold-face type in the above bill is proposed language.
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 2
565.030. 1. Where murder in the first degree is charged but not submitted or where
the state waives the death penalty, the submission to the trier and all subsequent proceedings
in the case shall proceed as in all other criminal cases.
2. Where murder in the first degree is submitted to the trier without a waiver of the
death penalty, the trial shall proceed in two stages before the same trier. At the first stage the
trier shall decide only whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of any submitted offense.
The issue of punishment shall not be submitted to the trier at the first stage. If an offense is
charged other than murder in the first degree in a count together with a count of murder in the
first degree, the trial judge shall assess punishment on any such offense according to law, after
the defendant is found guilty of such offense and after he finds the defendant to be a prior
offender pursuant to chapter 558.
3. If murder in the first degree is submitted and the death penalty was not waived but
the trier finds the defendant guilty of a lesser homicide, a second stage of the trial shall
proceed as in all other criminal cases. The attorneys may then argue as in other criminal cases
the issue of punishment, after which the trier shall assess and declare the punishment as in all
other criminal cases.
4. If the trier at the first stage of a trial where the death penalty was not waived finds
the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, a second stage of the trial shall proceed at
which the only issue shall be the punishment to be assessed and declared. Evidence in
aggravation and mitigation of punishment, including but not limited to evidence supporting
any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances listed in subsection 2 or 3 of section
565.032, may be presented subject to the rules of evidence at criminal trials. Such evidence
may include, within the discretion of the court, evidence concerning the murder victim and
the impact of the offense upon the family of the victim and others. Rebuttal and surrebuttal
evidence may be presented. The state shall be the first to proceed. If the trier is a jury it shall
be instructed on the law. The attorneys may then argue the issue of punishment to the jury,
and the state shall have the right to open and close the argument. The trier shall assess and
declare the punishment at life imprisonment without eligibility for probation, parole, or
release except by act of the governor:
(1) If the trier finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is
intellectually disabled; or
(2) If the trier does not find beyond a reasonable doubt at least one of the statutory
aggravating circumstances set out in subsection 2 of section 565.032; or
(3) If the trier [concludes that there is evidence in mitigation of punishment, including
but not limited to evidence supporting the statutory mitigating circumstances listed in
subsection 3 of section 565.032, which is sufficient to outweigh the evidence in aggravation
of punishment found by the trier] does not determine by unanimous vote that the
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 3
aggravating circumstance or circumstances previously found outweigh the mitigating
circumstance or circumstances including, but not limited to, those mitigating
circumstances set out in subsection 3 of section 565.032; or
(4) If the trier decides under all of the circumstances not to assess and declare the
punishment at death. If the trier is a jury it shall be so instructed.
If the trier assesses and declares the punishment at death it shall, in its findings or verdict, set
out in writing the aggravating circumstance or circumstances listed in subsection 2 of section
565.032 which it found beyond a reasonable doubt. If the trier is a jury it shall be instructed
before the case is submitted that if it is unable to decide or agree upon the punishment the
court shall assess and declare the punishment at life imprisonment without eligibility for
probation, parole, or release except by act of the governor [or death. The court shall follow
the same procedure as set out in this section whenever it is required to determine punishment
for murder in the first degree].
5. Upon written agreement of the parties and with leave of the court, the issue of the
defendant's intellectual disability may be taken up by the court and decided prior to trial
without prejudicing the defendant's right to have the issue submitted to the trier of fact as
provided in subsection 4 of this section.
6. As used in this section, the terms "intellectual disability" or "intellectually
disabled" refer to a condition involving substantial limitations in general functioning
characterized by significantly subaverage intellectual functioning with continual extensive
related deficits and limitations in two or more adaptive behaviors such as communication,
self-care, home living, social skills, community use, self-direction, health and safety,
functional academics, leisure and work, which conditions are manifested and documented
before eighteen years of age.
7. The provisions of this section shall only govern offenses committed on or after
August 28, 2001.
610.141. 1. As used in this section, section 476.411, and sections 610.143 and
610.144, unless the context otherwise indicates, the following terms mean:
(1) "Automated expungement", technology-assisted, state-initiated bulk closing
of records in the manner established under section 610.120;
(2) "Automated expungement technology", any information technology
equipment, software, systems, or services associated with automated expungement;
(3) "Automated expungement technology implementation date", the date on
which moneys are appropriated for an automated system or software designed to
identify, review, and process clean slate eligible offense records maintained by the
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 4
Missouri state highway patrol for expungement or sealing without requiring manual
initiation or oversight or July 1, 2029, whichever occurs later;
(4) "Central repository", the Missouri state highway patrol central repository
for compiling and disseminating complete and accurate criminal history records;
(5) "Clean slate eligible offense", a misdemeanor or felony not listed under
subsection 3 of section 610.140 for which an electronic record exists in the central
repository;
(6) "Close" or "closed", to make records inaccessible to the general public and
to all individuals other than the defendant, except as provided under section 610.120
and chapter 43;
(7) "Expunge" or "expunged", to close an electronic record in the manner
established under section 610.120, except the provisions of subsection 2 of section
610.120 that require documents to be retyped and rewritten, or blacked out and
recopied, if an agency determines that these provisions are not feasible in relation to
automated expungement;
(8) "Final disposition", the date the person has completed his or her
incarceration, probation, or parole. In the event that the Missouri state highway
patrol cannot determine a final disposition based on data contained in the statewide
court automation system and the central repository, the Missouri state highway patrol
may use the date a person's imposed sentence would end, or, if the Missouri state
highway patrol cannot determine an imposed sentence, it may assume a person received
a maximum sentence and use the end date of such a sentence as the date of final
disposition;
(9) "Petitioner", a person who has petitioned the court to have his or her
conviction or convictions expunged or a person whose conviction or convictions have
been automatically expunged under this section.
2. (1) Subject to the provisions in subsection 3 of this section, all electronic
records and files maintained in the central repository pertaining to clean slate eligible
offenses shall be closed in the manner established under section 610.120 without the
filing of a petition under section 610.140 in the following cases, subject to the limitations
contained in subdivisions (2), (3), and (4) of this subsection:
(a) For misdemeanors, if one year has passed since final disposition and the
individual has not been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor criminal offense in
Missouri during that time;
(b) For felony offenses, if three years have passed since final disposition and the
individual has not been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor criminal offense in
Missouri during that time;
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 5
(c) For all of an individual's offenses, if the individual has attained sixty-five
years of age and has not been convicted of any misdemeanors or felonies in Missouri
other than a technical violation of the terms of his or her probation or parole in the ten
immediately preceding years; or
(d) All offenses for which the governor of Missouri has granted a full pardon.
(2) Records pertaining to juvenile adjudications are not eligible for automated
expungement.
(3) Records pertaining to any arrest, prosecution, or conviction of an offense
under chapters 301, 302, 303, 304, and 307 are not eligible for automated expungement.
(4) No offense shall be eligible for automated expungement if a person has
charges pending that have been filed in a Missouri state court for which an individual
has not yet been sentenced during the period of review for clean slate eligibility as
described in subsection 3 of this section.
(5) (a) An individual may be granted more than one expungement under this
section, except that during his or her lifetime the total number of offenses for which
expungement can be granted to the individual under this section or section 610.140 shall
not exceed the following limits:
a. No more than two felony offenses; and
b. No more than three misdemeanor offenses.
(b) If an individual's electronic record contains more felonies or misdemeanors
than can be expunged during the individual's lifetime under paragraph (a) of this
subdivision, the individual shall not be eligible for automated expungement under this
section.
(c) For purposes of determining lifetime limits on expungement under this
section:
a. If the offenses were charged as counts in the same case, all such offenses and
violations shall count as only the highest-level offense in that case for purposes of
determining lifetime limits on expungement under this section. However, if one or more
counts in the same indictment or information or conduct committed were a part of the
same course of criminal conduct as an offense listed in subsection 3 of section 610.140,
the entire record shall not be expunged under this section;
b. If the offenses were committed by an individual who has attained sixty-five
years of age and has not been convicted of any misdemeanors or felonies in the
immediate ten preceding years in Missouri, all clean slate eligible offenses shall be
expunged; and
c. Only convictions contained within the central repository shall be considered
when determining eligibility under this section.
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 6
(d) The Missouri state highway patrol shall maintain records to ensure that a
person has not exceeded the limitations provided under this subsection. Nothing in this
section shall be construed to limit or impair the subsequent use of any record expunged
under this section for the purpose of any law enforcement or prosecutorial investigation
or activity, including any arrest or findings of guilt expunged under this section by a law
enforcement agency, criminal justice agency, prosecuting attorney, circuit attorney, or
municipal prosecuting attorney, including its use as a prior offense in a subsequent
criminal or civil investigation or prosecution.
3. (1) Six months after the automated expungement technology implementation
date, and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the Missouri state highway patrol shall identify
records that have become eligible in the last quarter and transmit, or otherwise make
accessible by electronic means, to every prosecuting agency in the state all clean slate
eligible offense records within one hundred days of the record becoming eligible for
automated expungement.
(2) Prior to six months after the automated expungement technology
implementation date, the Missouri state highway patrol shall identify records that
would have been eligible for automated expungement under subsection 2 of this section.
Within twelve months after the automated expungement technology implementation
date, all such records shall be identified and expunged in the manner and according to
the time frames provided under this subsection. The order of such records to be
expunged shall be determined by the Missouri state highway patrol and the office of
state courts administrator.
(3) Delinquent court costs, fines, fees, or other sums ordered by a court, except
restitution owed to a victim of a crime, shall not be considered by the court, prosecuting
agency, or central repository when determining eligibility of a record for automated
expungement under subsection 2 of this section. However, the office of state courts
administrator may seek a setoff of any income tax refund and lottery prize payouts
under section 488.5028 for all delinquent court costs, fines, fees, or other sums ordered
by a court relating to convictions expunged under subsection 2 of this section.
(4) Each prosecuting agency in this state has no more than sixty days from the
day on which the notice described in subdivision (1) of this subsection is transmitted, or
otherwise made accessible by electronic means, to object to an automated expungement
and transmit such objection to the central repository. The prosecuting agency may
object to the automated expungement for any of the following reasons:
(a) After reviewing the prosecuting agency's record, the record does not meet the
definition of a clean slate eligible offense;
(b) The person has not paid court-ordered restitution to the victim;
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 7
(c) The person has charges pending against them in another case in Missouri; or
(d) The prosecuting agency can furnish documentation that the person has
felony or misdemeanor charges pending against him or her in another state or has been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor in another state during the waiting periods
established under subdivision (1) of subsection 2 of this section.
(5) If a prosecuting agency objects for a reason described in subdivision (4) of
this subsection, within sixty days of the day on which the notice described in subdivision
(1) of this subsection is transmitted, or otherwise made accessible by electronic means,
the record shall not be expunged.
(6) If sixty days have passed without an objection from a prosecuting agency for
one of the reasons set forth under this subsection, the Missouri state highway patrol
shall transmit, or otherwise make accessible by electronic means, within fifteen days all
the records to be expunged to the office of state courts administrator for distribution to
the circuit courts.
(7) Within fifteen days of receiving all records to be expunged from the Missouri
highway patrol, the office of state courts administrator shall transmit, or otherwise
make accessible by electronic means, copies of all records to be expunged to the circuit
court.
(8) Within thirty days of receiving a notice to expunge, the circuit court shall
enter an order of expungement in the case record associated with the clean slate eligible
offense being expunged.
(9) On a quarterly basis, each circuit court shall transmit, or otherwise make
accessible by electronic means, copies of all orders for expungement that the court issues
under this section to the office of state courts administrator.
(10) Within thirty days of the order of expungement being entered and a copy
being transmitted to the office of state courts administrator, the office of state courts
administrator shall provide notice of the order of expungement to the prosecuting or
circuit attorneys, the department of corrections, and the Missouri state highway patrol.
The Missouri state highway patrol shall notify law enforcement agencies. Each entity
possessing records subject to the order shall close such records in the manner
established under section 610.120. The records shall be confidential from the date of
expungement and shall be made available only to the individuals or entities and for the
purposes set forth in subdivision (11) of this subsection.
(11) (a) The Missouri state highway patrol shall retain a nonpublic record of the
order expunging a conviction or other notification regarding a conviction that was
automatically expunged under this section and of the record of the arrest, fingerprints,
conviction, and sentence of the person in the case to which the order or other
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 8
notification applies. The nonpublic record shall be made available only to a court of
competent jurisdiction, the state public defender system, the department of corrections,
a law enforcement agency, a prosecuting attorney, the attorney general, the department
of revenue, or the governor upon request and only for the following purposes:
a. To show that a person who has filed a petition to expunge a conviction has
previously had a conviction expunged under this section;
b. The court's consideration in determining the sentence to be imposed upon
conviction for a subsequent offense that is punishable as a felony or by imprisonment
for more than one year;
c. Consideration by the governor if a person whose conviction has been
expunged applies for a pardon for another offense;
d. Consideration by the department of corrections or a law enforcement agency
if a person whose conviction has been expunged applies for employment with the
department of corrections or a law enforcement agency;
e. Consideration by a court, law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or
the attorney general in determining whether a person required to register under
sections 589.400 to 589.425 has committed an offense that requires registration under
sections 589.400 to 589.425, or in prosecuting a person for committing an offense
requiring registration under sections 589.400 to 589.425;
f. Consideration by a court, law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney, or
the attorney general for use in making determinations regarding charges, plea offers,
and sentencing, as applicable; or
g. Consideration by any entity responsible for issuing commercial driver's
licenses for the purpose of meeting state and federal requirements to obtain commercial
driver's licenses.
(b) A copy of the nonpublic record created under paragraph (a) of this
subdivision may be provided upon request to the person whose conviction is expunged
under this section upon payment of a fee determined and charged by the Missouri state
highway patrol.
(c) The nonpublic record maintained under paragraph (a) of this subdivision is
exempt from disclosure under this chapter.
(d) An entity shall not be liable for damages or subject to criminal penalties for
reporting a public record of conviction that has been expunged by court order or
operation of law prior to six months after the automated expungement technology
implementation date if that record was available as a public record on the date of the
report.
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 9
(e) The Missouri state highway patrol shall provide a consumer reporting agency
with information sufficient to accurately identify and delete records associated with the
clean slate eligible offense being expunged.
4. Any court sentencing an individual for a clean slate eligible offense shall
provide the individual a document outlining the state's clean slate expungement
program at the time of sentencing.
5. Any probation or parole office releasing an individual from supervision for a
clean slate eligible offense shall provide the individual a document outlining the state's
clean slate expungement program at the time of release.
6. The provisions of this section shall apply retroactively to any arrest, charge,
trial, or conviction for which there is an electronic record regardless of the date that the
arrest was made, the charge or charges were brought, the trial occurred, or the
conviction was entered.
7. Nothing in this section precludes an individual from filing a petition for
expungement of records under section 610.140 if an individual is eligible for automated
expungement under this section but such automated expungement has not yet occurred
or cannot occur.
8. If it is determined that a conviction was improperly or erroneously expunged
under this section because the conviction was not eligible to be expunged under this
section, the court shall, on its own motion, reinstate the conviction.
9. (1) Upon the entry of an order under section 610.140, or upon the automated
expungement of a conviction under this section, the petitioner, for purposes of the law, is
considered not to have been previously convicted, except as provided under this
subsection and subsection 10 of section 610.140.
(2) The petitioner shall not be entitled to the remission of any fine, costs, or other
moneys paid as a consequence of a conviction that is expunged.
(3) This section shall not affect the right of the petitioner to rely upon the
conviction to bar subsequent proceedings for the same offense.
(4) This section shall not affect the right of a victim of an offense to bring or
defend a civil action for damages.
(5) This section shall not create a right to commence an action for damages for
incarceration under the sentence that the petitioner served before the conviction is
expunged under this section.
(6) This section shall not relieve any obligation to pay restitution owed to the
victim of an offense nor shall such section affect the jurisdiction of the convicting court
or the authority of any court order with regard to enforcing an order for restitution.
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 10
(7) A conviction, including any records relating to the conviction and any
records concerning a collateral action, that has been expunged under this section shall
not be used as evidence in an action for negligent hiring, admission, or licensure against
any person.
(8) A conviction that is expunged under this section or section 610.140 may be
considered a prior conviction by a court, law enforcement agency, prosecuting attorney,
or the attorney general, as applicable, for purposes of charging a crime as a second or
subsequent offense or for sentencing under section 558.016.
10. The office of state courts administrator shall collaborate with the Missouri
state highway patrol to establish and implement data-sharing procedures regarding the
information required under this section.
11. Any person eligible for expungement under this section who has filed a
petition for expungement under section 610.140 shall be granted an expungement,
subject to subsection 3 of this section.
610.143. 1. A credit bureau may report records of arrests, indictments pending
trial, and convictions of crimes for no longer than seven years from final disposition.
Records of arrests, indictments pending trial, and convictions of crimes shall no longer
be reported if at any time after a conviction it is learned that a full pardon or
expungement has been granted for that conviction, or at any time after an arrest or
indictment it is learned that a conviction did not result.
2. Any credit bureau or user of information that willfully fails to comply with
any requirement of this section with respect to any consumer is liable to that consumer
in an amount equal to:
(1) Any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure;
(2) Punitive damages as the court may allow; and
(3) In the case of any successful action under this section, costs of the action and
reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court.
3. Any credit bureau or user of information that is negligent in failing to comply
with any requirement of this section with respect to any consumer is liable to that
consumer in an amount equal to:
(1) Any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure; and
(2) In the case of any successful action under this section, costs of the action and
reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court.
4. Injunctive relief shall be available to any consumer aggrieved by a violation or
a threatened violation of this section regardless of whether the consumer seeks any other
remedy under this section.
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 11
5. An employer, volunteer organization, or landlord who employs, qualifies, or
otherwise engages an individual whose criminal history record has been expunged shall
be immune from liability for any claim arising out of the misconduct of the individual if
the misconduct relates to the portion of the criminal history record that has been
expunged.
6. A person granted an expungement shall disclose any expunged offense if the
disclosure of such information is necessary to complete any application for employment
with any:
(1) Federally insured bank or savings institution or credit union or an affiliate of
such institution or credit union for the purpose of compliance with 12 U.S.C. Section
1829 and 12 U.S.C. Section 1785; or
(2) Entity engaged in the business of insurance or any insurer for the purpose of
complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1033, 18 U.S.C. Section 1034, or other similar law that
requires an employer engaged in the business of insurance to exclude applicants with
certain criminal convictions from employment.
610.144. 1. (1) There is hereby created in the state treasury the "Missouri
Expungement Fund", which shall consist of moneys appropriated to it by the general
assembly and gifts, donations, grants, and bequests. The state treasurer shall be
custodian of the fund. In accordance with sections 30.170 and 30.180, the state treasurer
may approve disbursements. The fund shall be a dedicated fund and, upon
appropriation, moneys in this fund shall be used solely as provided in subsection 2 of
this section.
(2) The state treasurer shall invest moneys in the fund in the same manner as
other funds are invested. Any interest and moneys earned on such investments shall be
credited to the fund.
2. The office of state courts administrator, the department of public safety, and
the information technology services division within the office of administration shall
expend moneys from the fund, upon appropriation, on the statewide court automation
case management system and the Missouri criminal history record information system
established under sections 43.500 to 43.530 for one or more of the following purposes:
(1) Expenses that may be incurred to develop, establish, maintain, or operate
any information technology equipment, software, systems, or services associated with
the expungement or closing of records under Missouri law, including the development
and implementation of any technology-assisted, state-initiated bulk expungement or
sealing of records under Missouri law; or
HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 12
(2) The cost of necessary personnel or contractors.

Modifies provisions relating to proceedings resulting from criminal conduct

Sponsors

Rep. Bishop Davidson (R) sponsors HB 2747, and 4 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

HB 2747 went before 4 committees: Economic Development, Rules - Legislative, Fiscal Review and Judiciary And Civil And Criminal Jurisprudence.

Economic Development
Economic Development
Referred to · Jan 22, 2026
Rules - Legislative
Rules - Legislative
Referred to · Feb 18, 2026
Fiscal Review
Fiscal Review
Referred to · Feb 26, 2026 · 3 Bills
Judiciary And Civil And Criminal Jurisprudence
Judiciary And Civil And Criminal Jurisprudence
Referred to · Mar 12, 2026

History

HB 2747 has taken 31 actions since Jan 6, 2026, the latest on Apr 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
Apr 15, 2026
Senate
Executive Session Held (S)
Apr 15, 2026
Senate
SCS Voted Do Pass (S)
Apr 8, 2026
Senate
Public Hearing Held (S)
Apr 2, 2026
Senate
Public Hearing Scheduled (S) - Wednesday, April 8, 2026, 8:15 a.m., Senate Lounge - 3rd Floor
Mar 30, 2026
Senate
Public Hearing Scheduled (S) - CANCELLED: Wednesday, April 1, 2020, 8:15 a.m., Senate Lounge-3rd Floor

Votes

HB 2747 went to 1 roll call in the House, the latest on Mar 2, 2026 at 1407.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Mar 2, 2026
House
House: HBs FOR THIRD READING HCS HBs 2747 & 2047
140
7

Source: house.mo.gov · legiscan.com