- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

SCR 9
Kentucky Senate•Signed by Governor
Summary
SCR 9, “A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION directing the Legislative Research Commission to conduct a feasibility study for an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project”, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 6, 2026 by Sen. Stephen Meredith (R). It last saw action on Apr 13, 2026: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 139).
Record
Text
SCR 9 has 3 roll calls.
scr9/chaptered.txtCHAPTER 139 1CHAPTER 139( SCR 9 )A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION directing the Legislative Research Commission to conduct a feasibilitystudy for an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project.WHEREAS, Kentucky persistently ranks among the worst states nationally for key health indicators, includingchronic disease prevalence, maternal health outcomes, tobacco use, and preventable hospitalizations; andWHEREAS, many Kentuckians are living with three or more chronic health conditions, including asthma,kidney disease, heart disease, cancer, and diabetes; andWHEREAS, Kentucky's health issues are deeply tied to the social and economic conditions of ruralcommunities, which remain inadequately and insufficiently addressed; andWHEREAS, Kentucky has operated its Medicaid program primarily under a managed care delivery modelsince 2010; andWHEREAS, the current Medicaid delivery model employed in the Commonwealth has failed to producevaluable outcomes as Medicaid expenditures have continued to increase while health outcomes have deteriorated anddisparities have widened; andWHEREAS, the transition from a fee-for-service Medicaid program to a managed care model was chieflymotivated by a belief that contracting with Medicaid managed care organizations to administer large portions of theMedicaid program would result in budget stability and predictability; andWHEREAS, despite the transition to managed care under former Governor Steve Beshear, since 2010 the costof the Kentucky Medicaid program has skyrocketed, increasing from approximately $5,900,000,000 a year in 2010 toa projected amount of over $20,600,000,000 a year in 2026; andWHEREAS, since 2010, the number of Kentuckians enrolled in the Medicaid program has risen from roughly920,000 to approximately 1,400,000 in 2025, an increase of roughly 50 percent resulting largely from formerGovernor Steve Beshear's decision to expand Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act in 2014; andWHEREAS, expanded Medicaid eligibility and the resulting 50 percent increase in enrollment fails to explainthe nearly 400 percent increase in the cost of the program over the same period of time; andWHEREAS, the historic trend of rapid cost increases in the Medicaid program has not resulted in enhancedreimbursement rates for rural healthcare providers; andWHEREAS, access to essential, comprehensive healthcare services in rural communities continues to erodeunder the managed care delivery model, underscoring the urgent need for targeted interventions to reverse this trend;andWHEREAS, under federal law, Medicaid managed care organizations are required to achieve a minimummedical loss ratio of at least 85 percent, which means that at least 85 cents of every dollar paid to a managed careorganization by a state Medicaid program must be spent on the delivery of healthcare services for Medicaid enrollees;andWHEREAS, current contracts between the Department for Medicaid Services and the Commonwealth's fivecontracted Medicaid managed care organizations require managed care organizations to achieve at least a 90 percentmedical loss ratio; andWHEREAS, federal and state established medical loss ratios for Medicaid managed care organizations havethe effect of limiting a managed care organization's profit from a Medicaid managed care contract to no more than 10percent of the total contract value; andWHEREAS, the five managed care organizations currently under contract with the Department for MedicaidServices to administer Medicaid benefits in Kentucky are all either publicly traded, for-profit corporations or ownedby publicly traded, for-profit corporations; andWHEREAS, publicly traded, for-profit corporations have a legally binding fiduciary duty to their shareholdersto increase profits quarter over quarter and year over year; andLegislative Research Commission PDF Version2 ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLYWHEREAS, existing medical loss ratio requirements effectively mean that the only way a contractedMedicaid managed care organization can fulfill its fiduciary duty to shareholders to increase profits is to see anincrease in the overall cost of the Medicaid program, typically by increasing the per member per month capitationpayments made by the state to the managed care organizations; andWHEREAS, Kentucky's current health data landscape is fragmented and lacks a unified, inclusive datasetspanning the full continuum of care, limiting its effectiveness in guiding informed health policy and appropriations;andWHEREAS, Kentucky's healthcare system remains fragmented, with hospitals, clinics, schools, social serviceorganizations, and managed care organizations often operating in silos, which has resulted in reactive care that seeksto treat symptoms rather than coordinated strategies that tackle root causes of illness; andWHEREAS, Kentucky must identify proven strategies to unite healthcare providers, coordinate care, andconnect communities while holding the entire system accountable for both outcomes and costs; andWHEREAS, the current cost of the Kentucky Medicaid program, paired with the historical trend of rapid costincreases, is unsustainable and represents a catastrophic threat to the stability and solvency of the Commonwealth'sentire biennial budget; andWHEREAS, given the current Medicaid landscape in Kentucky, as described above, the Commonwealth mustendeavor to identify a less costly and more sustainable alternative to the current managed care delivery model; andWHEREAS, transformative healthcare delivery models are reshaping access to care and improving healthoutcomes across the United States; andWHEREAS, an increasing number of states are seeing positive results, including reduced costs and significantimprovements in healthcare outcomes, by transitioning away from managed care toward an accountable care deliverymodel; andWHEREAS, accountable care organizations (ACO) prioritize whole-person care, adopt value-based paymentmodels over volume-driven approaches, and incorporate mechanisms for shared savings and financial risk; andWHEREAS, accountable communities for health (ACH) aim to improve population health by fosteringregional collaboration, investing in community-based supports, and advancing policies that promote and sustainhealthier communities; andWHEREAS, ACO and ACH models represent more strategic, provider-endorsed, community-led models thatenhance health outcomes while driving cost efficiencies; andWHEREAS, ACO and ACH models are proven Medicaid delivery models currently producing positiveoutcomes for state Medicaid programs across the United States and have demonstrated that smarter investments inprevention and access to care can reduce the costs of a state's Medicaid program while improving healthcareoutcomes; andWHEREAS, by implementing a comprehensive community-driven alternative healthcare delivery model thatintegrates physical, behavioral, and spiritual care while addressing the social conditions in which people live, work,play, and learn, the Commonwealth could realize a 20 percent improvement in both patient and provider satisfactionand significant, measurable gains in overall population health by 2030; andWHEREAS, Kentucky's area development districts have an established track record for delivering community-based Medicaid services tailored to the needs of specific geographic regions; andWHEREAS, Kentucky's area development districts serve a large enough population to effectively evaluate andbenchmark the impact of an ACH delivery model on improving outcomes and reducing costs;NOW, THEREFORE,Be it resolved by the Senate of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the House ofRepresentatives concurring therein:Section 1. The Legislative Research Commission is hereby directed to conduct a feasibility study for anAccountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project. The feasibility study shall assess,consider, and make recommendations concerning the following:(1) Examples of state Medicaid programs that have implemented an accountable care Medicaid deliverymodel, including but not limited to accountable care organizations, accountable communities for health, andCHAPTER 139 3accountable health community models, to identify best practices and potential governance structure suitable forKentucky;(2) Opportunities, barriers, and organizational capacity for implementing an Accountable Communities forHealth Medicaid delivery model pilot project under the Kentucky Medicaid program;(3) Potential geographic regions and partners suitable for an Accountable Communities for HealthMedicaid delivery model pilot project, including specific assessment of the Lincoln Trail Area Development District,Barren River Area Development District, and Green River Area Development District as an appropriate geographicregion for the pilot project;(4) Existing health information exchange, data-sharing capacity, and interoperability of various datasystems, including eligibility data, across Medicaid, providers, and social service systems to identify any necessaryinfrastructure developments for a successful Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilotproject;(5) Options for financing an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project,including anticipated costs, potential cost savings, sustainability, and funding sources with specific emphasis onidentifying options for diverting current per member, per month capitation payments made to managed careorganizations to the pilot project;(6) Creation of a nonprofit mutual insurance company as an alternative to for-profit insurance companiesand Medicaid managed care organizations for administering an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaiddelivery model pilot project, including claims processing and provider payments;(7) Potential pilot models, policy changes, and implementation pathways, including necessary next steps todesign and implement an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project;(8) Strategies and metrics for evaluating the success of a future Accountable Communities for HealthMedicaid delivery model pilot project, including key metrics and outcomes to be reported, monitored, and evaluated;and(9) Any other issues or aspects of a feasibility study or an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaiddelivery model pilot project determined to be necessary or appropriate by the Legislative Research Commission.Section 2. The results of the feasibility study required under Section 1 of this Resolution shall be submittedto the Legislative Research Commission by November 1, 2026, for referral to the Interim Joint Committee on HealthServices, the Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue, and the Medicaid Oversight and AdvisoryBoard.Section 3. A pilot project resulting from the feasibility study required under Section 1 of this Resolutionshall be known as the 20 by 30 Accountable Care Pilot Project.Section 4. Provisions of this Resolution to the contrary notwithstanding, the Legislative ResearchCommission shall have the authority to alternatively assign the issues identified herein to an interim join committeeor subcommittee thereof, and to designate a study completion date.Signed by Governor April 13, 2026.Legislative Research Commission PDF Version
Direct the Legislative Research Commission to procure a vendor to conduct a feasibility study for an Accountable Communities for Health Medicaid delivery model pilot project; require the results of the study to be submitted to the Legislative Research Commission by November 1, 2026; strongly encourage the Legislative Research Commission to begin the procurement process immediately upon the adoption of this Resolution; establish that a pilot project resulting from the feasibility study shall be known as the 20 by 30 Accountable Care Pilot Project.
Sponsors
Sen. Stephen Meredith (R) sponsors SCR 9 alone.
Committees
SCR 9 went before 4 committees: Committee on Committees, Health Services, Rules and Committee On Committees.
History
SCR 9 has taken 28 actions since Jan 6, 2026, the latest on Apr 13, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2026 | Senate | signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 139) | ||
Apr 2, 2026 | Senate | delivered to Governor | ||
Apr 1, 2026 | House | floor amendment (2) adopted | ||
Apr 1, 2026 | House | 3rd reading, adopted 88-0 with Floor Amendment (2) and Floor Amendment (3-title) | ||
Apr 1, 2026 | Senate | received in Senate |
Votes
SCR 9 went to 3 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Apr 1, 2026 at 88–0.
| Chamber | Question | Yea | Nay | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 1, 2026 | House | House: Adopt RCS# 449 | 88 | 0 | ||
Apr 1, 2026 | Senate | Senate: Third Reading RSN# 4143 | 36 | 0 | ||
Jan 21, 2026 | Senate | Senate: Adopt RSN# 3769 | 37 | 0 |
Source: apps.legislature.ky.gov · legiscan.com