Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 2497

Washington HouseIn House Committee

Summary

HB 2497, “Addressing the rise in maltreatment-related child fatalities or near fatalities by supporting families that have received a child welfare response”, was introduced in the House on Jan 15, 2026 by Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self (D) with 7 co-sponsors. It was referred to Early Learning & Human Services, and last saw action on Jan 15, 2026: First reading, referred to Early Learning & Human Services.


Record

Text

HB 2497 has 7 co-sponsors.

hb2497/introduced.txt
H-2864.2
HOUSE BILL 2497
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session
By Representatives Ortiz-Self, Taylor, Scott, Bergquist, Ormsby,
Macri, Obras, and Reed
Read first time 01/15/26. Referred to Committee on Early Learning &
Human Services.
AN ACT Relating to addressing the rise in maltreatment-related
child fatalities or near fatalities by supporting families that have
received a child welfare response from the department of children,
youth, and families; amending RCW 2.70.020, 13.34.065, 13.34.110,
74.14B.010, and 2.30.010; adding a new section to chapter 43.06 RCW;
adding new sections to chapter 74.13 RCW; and creating new sections.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. (1) The legislature finds that critical
incidents, maltreatment-related child fatalities or near fatalities
involving families with an open child welfare case within one year of
the incident, increased by 70 percent from 2021 to 2024. In the first
quarter of 2025, there were 22 critical incidents compared to nine
critical incidents in the first quarter of 2024.
(2) The legislature intends to address the concerning rise in
critical incidents by:
(a) Increasing court oversight of child welfare cases during the
shelter care phase for children under age four;
(b) Expanding access to legal counsel and parent allies for
parents, guardians, or legal custodians who are pregnant or have a
newborn child and are at risk of child protective services
intervention and removal;
p. 1 HB 2497
(c) Convening of representatives from the health care authority,
the department of children, youth, and families, the department of
social and health services, and the department of health to align
with Washington thriving's strategic plan described in RCW
74.09.4951(6) to transform the behavioral health system and improve
access to substance use disorder treatment for families receiving
child welfare services;
(d) Improving the process connecting families with community-
based services;
(e) Providing public health nurses to support parents of children
under age four with an open child protective services investigation;
(f) Requiring that the department of children, youth, and
families develop and provide specialized training for supervisors of
child welfare workers regarding any risk and safety assessments used
by the department in child welfare cases;
(g) Respectfully requesting recommendations from the supreme
court commission on children in foster care's family well-being
community collaborative work group regarding the court process for
child welfare cases without removal; and
(h) Expanding access to the parent-child assistance program in
high-need communities to deliver additional intensive case management
and recovery support for pregnant and parenting individuals involved
in child welfare services due to substance abuse.
Sec. 2. RCW 2.70.020 and 2025 c 226 s 10 are each amended to
read as follows:
((The director shall:
(1) Administer)) The director shall administer all state-funded
services in the following program areas:
(((a))) (1) Trial court criminal indigent defense, as provided in
chapter 10.101 RCW;
(((b))) (2) Appellate indigent defense, as provided in this
chapter and RCW 10.73.150;
(((c))) (3) Representation of indigent parents qualified for
appointed counsel in dependency and termination cases, as provided in
RCW 13.34.090 and 13.34.092;
(((d))) (4) Extraordinary criminal justice cost petitions, as
provided in RCW 43.330.190;
(((e))) (5) Compilation of copies of DNA test requests by persons
convicted of felonies, as provided in RCW 10.73.170;
p. 2 HB 2497
(((f))) (6) Representation of indigent respondents qualified for
appointed counsel in sexually violent predator civil commitment
cases, as provided in chapter 71.09 RCW;
(((g))) (7) Representation of indigent persons who are acquitted
by reason of insanity and committed to state psychiatric care as
provided in chapter 10.77 RCW; and
(((h))) (8) At the request of the health care authority on behalf
of a county under chapter 71.05 RCW, representation of indigent
persons qualified for appointed counsel in involuntary commitment
cases;
(((2))) (9) Subject to availability of funds appropriated for
this specific purpose, ((provide)) providing access to counsel for
indigent persons incarcerated in a juvenile rehabilitation or adult
correctional facility to file and prosecute a first, timely personal
restraint petition under RCW 10.73.150. The office shall establish
eligibility criteria that prioritize access to counsel for youth
under age 25, youth or adults with sentences in excess of 120 months,
youth or adults with disabilities, and youth or adults with limited
English proficiency. Nothing in this subsection creates an
entitlement to counsel at state expense to file a personal restraint
petition;
(((3))) (10) Subject to the availability of funds appropriated
for this specific purpose, ((appoint)) appointing counsel to petition
the sentencing court if the legislature creates an ability to
petition the sentencing court, or appoint counsel to challenge a
conviction or sentence if a final decision of an appellate court
creates the ability to challenge a conviction or sentence. Nothing in
this subsection creates an entitlement to counsel at state expense to
petition the sentencing court;
(((4))) (11) ((Provide)) Providing access to attorneys for
juveniles contacted by a law enforcement officer for whom a legal
consultation is required under RCW 13.40.740;
(((5))) (12) ((Submit)) Submitting a biennial budget for all
costs related to the office's program areas;
(((6))) (13) ((Establish)) Establishing administrative
procedures, standards, and guidelines for the office's program areas,
including cost-efficient systems that provide for authorized recovery
of costs;
p. 3 HB 2497
(((7))) (14) ((Provide)) Providing oversight and technical
assistance to ensure the effective and efficient delivery of services
in the office's program areas;
(((8))) (15) ((Recommend)) Recommending criteria and standards
for determining and verifying indigency. In recommending criteria for
determining indigency, the director shall compile and review the
indigency standards used by other state agencies and shall
periodically submit the compilation and report to the legislature on
the appropriateness and consistency of such standards;
(((9))) (16) ((Collect)) Collecting information regarding
indigent defense services funded by the state and report annually to
the advisory committee, the legislature, and the supreme court;
(((10))) (17) ((Coordinate)) Coordinating with the supreme court
and the judges of each division of the court of appeals to determine
how appellate attorney services should be provided; and
(18)(a) Subject to the amounts provided for this specific
purpose, providing legal counsel and a parent ally as defined in RCW
2.70.060 for parents, guardians, or legal custodians who are pregnant
or have a newborn child that is:
(i) At risk of child protective services intervention and
removal; and
(ii) Exposed to alcohol or controlled substances during their
mother's pregnancy.
(b) The purpose of the support from legal counsel and a parent
ally described in this subsection is to create a safety plan for the
family and identify services and supports that will maintain the
safety of the child in the home of the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian.
Sec. 3. RCW 13.34.065 and 2024 c 328 s 103 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1)(a) When a child is removed or when the petitioner is seeking
the removal of a child from the child's parent, guardian, or legal
custodian, the court shall hold a shelter care hearing within 72
hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. The primary
purpose of the shelter care hearing is to determine whether the child
can be immediately and safely returned home while the adjudication of
the dependency is pending. The court shall hold an additional shelter
care hearing within 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and
holidays if the child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian,
p. 4 HB 2497
or legal custodian at any time after an initial shelter care hearing
under this section.
(b) Any child's attorney, parent, guardian, or legal custodian
who for good cause is unable to attend or adequately prepare for the
shelter care hearing may request that the initial shelter care
hearing be continued or that a subsequent shelter care hearing be
scheduled. The request shall be made to the clerk of the court where
the petition is filed prior to the initial shelter care hearing. Upon
the request of the child's attorney, parent, guardian, or legal
custodian, the court shall schedule the hearing within 72 hours of
the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. The clerk
shall notify all other parties of the hearing by any reasonable
means. If the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is not represented
by counsel, the clerk shall provide information to the parent,
guardian, or legal custodian regarding how to obtain counsel.
(2)(a) If it is likely that the child will remain in shelter care
longer than 72 hours, the department shall submit a recommendation to
the court as to the further need for shelter care in all cases in
which the child will remain in shelter care longer than the 72 hour
period. In all other cases, the recommendation shall be submitted by
the juvenile court probation counselor.
(b) All parties have the right to present testimony to the court
regarding the need or lack of need for shelter care.
(c) Hearsay evidence before the court regarding the need or lack
of need for shelter care must be supported by sworn testimony,
affidavit, or declaration of the person offering such evidence.
(3)(a) At the commencement of the hearing, the court shall notify
the parent, guardian, or custodian of the following:
(i) The parent, guardian, or custodian has the right to a shelter
care hearing;
(ii) The nature of the shelter care hearing, the rights of the
parents, and the proceedings that will follow; and
(iii) If the parent, guardian, or custodian is not represented by
counsel, the right to be represented. If the parent, guardian, or
custodian is indigent, the court shall appoint counsel as provided in
RCW 13.34.090; and
(b) If a parent, guardian, or legal custodian desires to waive
the shelter care hearing, the court shall determine, on the record
and with the parties present, whether such waiver is knowing and
voluntary. A parent may not waive his or her right to the shelter
p. 5 HB 2497
care hearing unless he or she appears in court, in person, or by
remote means, and the court determines that the waiver is knowing and
voluntary. Regardless of whether the court accepts the parental
waiver of the shelter care hearing, the court must provide notice to
the parents of their rights required under (a) of this subsection and
make the finding required under subsection (4) of this section.
(4) At the shelter care hearing the court shall examine the need
for shelter care and inquire into the status of the case. The
paramount consideration for the court shall be the health, welfare,
and safety of the child. At a minimum, the court shall inquire into
the following:
(a) Whether the notice required under RCW 13.34.062 was given to
all known parents, guardians, or legal custodians of the child. The
court shall make an express finding as to whether the notice required
under RCW 13.34.062 was given to the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian. If actual notice was not given to the parent, guardian, or
legal custodian and the whereabouts of such person is known or can be
ascertained, the court shall order the department to make diligent
efforts to advise the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the
status of the case, including the date and time of any subsequent
hearings, and their rights under RCW 13.34.090;
(b) Whether the child can be safely returned home while the
adjudication of the dependency is pending;
(c) What efforts have been made to place the child with a
relative. The court shall ask the parents whether the department
discussed with them the placement of the child with a relative or
other suitable person described in RCW 13.34.130(1)(b) and shall
determine what efforts have been made toward such a placement;
(d) What services were provided to the family to prevent or
eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child's home. If
the dependency petition or other information before the court alleges
that experiencing homelessness or the lack of suitable housing was a
significant factor contributing to the removal of the child, the
court shall inquire as to whether housing assistance was provided to
the family to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child
or children;
(e) Is the placement proposed by the department the least
disruptive and most family-like setting that meets the needs of the
child;
p. 6 HB 2497
(f) Whether it is in the best interest of the child to remain
enrolled in the school, developmental program, or child care the
child was in prior to placement and what efforts have been made to
maintain the child in the school, program, or child care if it would
be in the best interest of the child to remain in the same school,
program, or child care;
(g) Appointment of a guardian ad litem or attorney;
(h) Whether the child is or may be an Indian child as defined in
RCW 13.38.040, whether the provisions of the federal Indian child
welfare act or chapter 13.38 RCW apply, and whether there is
compliance with the federal Indian child welfare act and chapter
13.38 RCW, including notice to the child's tribe;
(i) Whether, as provided in RCW 26.44.063, restraining orders, or
orders expelling an allegedly abusive household member from the home
of a nonabusive parent, guardian, or legal custodian, will allow the
child to safely remain in the home;
(j) Whether any orders for examinations, evaluations, or
immediate services are needed. ((The)) Except as provided in
subsection (5)(c) of this section, the court may not order a parent
to undergo examinations, evaluation, or services at the shelter care
hearing unless the parent agrees to the examination, evaluation, or
service;
(k) The terms and conditions for parental, sibling, and family
visitation.
(5)(a) The court shall release a child alleged to be dependent to
the care, custody, and control of the child's parent, guardian, or
legal custodian unless the court finds there is reasonable cause to
believe that:
(i) After consideration of the specific services that have been
provided, reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or eliminate
the need for removal of the child from the child's home and to make
it possible for the child to return home; and
(ii)(A) The child has no parent, guardian, or legal custodian to
provide supervision and care for such child; or
(B)(I) Removal of the child is necessary to prevent imminent
physical harm due to child abuse or neglect, including that which
results from sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, a high-potency
synthetic opioid, or a pattern of severe neglect, notwithstanding an
order entered pursuant to RCW 26.44.063. The evidence must show a
causal relationship between the particular conditions in the home and
p. 7 HB 2497
imminent physical harm to the child. The existence of community or
family poverty, isolation, single parenthood, age of the parent,
crowded or inadequate housing, substance abuse, prenatal drug or
alcohol exposure, mental illness, disability or special needs of the
parent or child, or nonconforming social behavior does not by itself
constitute imminent physical harm. The court shall give great weight
to the lethality of high-potency synthetic opioids and public health
guidance from the department of health related to high-potency
synthetic opioids when determining whether removal of the child is
necessary to prevent imminent physical harm due to child abuse or
neglect;
(II) It is contrary to the welfare of the child to be returned
home; and
(III) After considering the particular circumstances of the
child, any imminent physical harm to the child outweighs the harm the
child will experience as a result of removal; or
(C) The parent, guardian, or custodian to whom the child could be
released has been charged with violating RCW 9A.40.060 or 9A.40.070.
(b) If the court finds that the elements of (a)(ii)(B) of this
subsection require removal of the child, the court shall further
consider:
(i) Whether participation by the parents, guardians, or legal
custodians in any prevention services would prevent or eliminate the
need for removal and, if so, shall inquire of the parent whether they
are willing to participate in such services. If the parent agrees to
participate in the prevention services identified by the court that
would prevent or eliminate the need for removal, the court shall
place the child with the parent. The court shall give great weight to
the lethality of high-potency synthetic opioids and public health
guidance from the department of health related to high-potency
synthetic opioids when deciding whether to place the child with the
parent. ((The)) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, the
court shall not order a parent to participate in prevention services
over the objection of the parent, however, parents shall have the
opportunity to consult with counsel prior to deciding whether to
agree to proposed prevention services as a condition of having the
child return to or remain in the care of the parent; and
(ii) Whether the issuance of a temporary order of protection
directing the removal of a person or persons from the child's
residence would prevent the need for removal of the child.
p. 8 HB 2497
(c) If the court places a child under age four or allows a child
under age four to remain in the care of a parent, guardian, or legal
custodian following a shelter care hearing under this section, the
court may order conditions necessary to maintain the safety of the
child under age four in the home if the court finds that there is
reasonable cause to believe that these conditions are necessary to
maintain the safety of the child. If these conditions involve the
participation of the parent, guardian, or legal custodian in a
service or evaluation, the department shall provide all necessary
referrals to that service within seven days of the shelter care order
that includes the service condition and shall provide appropriate
resources for the parent to access the child care that is needed to
comply with any conditions ordered under (c) of this subsection.
Failure by the department to provide timely referrals or access to
service conditions may not be used as a basis for removal, continued
shelter care, or a finding of dependency. Any condition that is
ordered under (c) of this subsection must be:
(i) Culturally appropriate;
(ii) Reasonably available to the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian; and
(iii) Reasonably accessible to the parent, guardian, or legal
custodian.
(d)(i) If the court does not release the child to his or her
parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the court shall order placement
with a relative or other suitable person as described in RCW
13.34.130(1)(b), unless the petitioner establishes that there is
reasonable cause to believe that:
(A) Placement in licensed foster care is necessary to prevent
imminent physical harm to the child due to child abuse or neglect,
including that which results from sexual abuse, sexual exploitation,
a high-potency synthetic opioid, or a pattern of severe neglect,
because no relative or other suitable person is capable of ensuring
the basic safety of the child; or
(B) The efforts to reunite the parent and child will be hindered.
(ii) In making the determination in (((c))) (d)(i) of this
subsection, the court shall:
(A) Inquire of the petitioner and any other person present at the
hearing for the child whether there are any relatives or other
suitable persons who are willing to care for the child. This inquiry
must include whether any relative or other suitable person:
p. 9 HB 2497
(I) Has expressed an interest in becoming a caregiver for the
child;
(II) Is able to meet any special needs of the child;
(III) Is willing to facilitate the child's sibling and parent
visitation if such visitation is ordered by the court; and
(IV) Supports reunification of the parent and child once
reunification can safely occur; and
(B) Give great weight to the stated preference of the parent,
guardian, or legal custodian, and the child.
(iii) If a relative or other suitable person expressed an
interest in caring for the child, can meet the child's special needs,
can support parent-child reunification, and will facilitate court-
ordered sibling or parent visitation, the following must not prevent
the child's placement with such relative or other suitable person:
(A) An incomplete department or fingerprint-based background
check, if such relative or other suitable person appears otherwise
suitable and competent to provide care and treatment, but the
background checks must be completed as soon as possible after
placement;
(B) Uncertainty on the part of the relative or other suitable
person regarding potential adoption of the child;
(C) Disbelief on the part of the relative or other suitable
person that the parent, guardian, or legal custodian presents a
danger to the child, provided the caregiver will protect the safety
of the child and comply with court orders regarding contact with a
parent, guardian, or legal custodian; or
(D) The conditions of the relative or other suitable person's
home are not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of a licensed
foster home. The court may order the department to provide financial
or other support to the relative or other suitable person necessary
to ensure safe conditions in the home.
(((d))) (e) If the child was not initially placed with a relative
or other suitable person, and the court does not release the child to
his or her parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the department shall
make reasonable efforts to locate a relative or other suitable person
pursuant to RCW 13.34.060(1).
(((e))) (f) If the court does not order placement with a relative
or other suitable person, the court shall place the child in licensed
foster care and shall set forth its reasons for the order. If the
court orders placement of the child with a person not related to the
p. 10 HB 2497
child and not licensed to provide foster care, the placement is
subject to all terms and conditions of this section that apply to
relative placements.
(((f))) (g) Any placement with a relative, or other suitable
person approved by the court pursuant to this section, shall be
contingent upon cooperation with the department's or agency's case
plan and compliance with court orders related to the care and
supervision of the child including, but not limited to, court orders
regarding parent-child contacts, sibling contacts, and any other
conditions imposed by the court. Noncompliance with the case plan or
court order is grounds for removal of the child from the home of the
relative or other suitable person, subject to review by the court.
(((g))) (h) If the child is placed in a qualified residential
treatment program as defined in this chapter, the court shall, within
60 days of placement, hold a hearing to:
(i) Consider the assessment required under RCW 13.34.420 and
submitted as part of the department's social study, and any related
documentation;
(ii) Determine whether placement in foster care can meet the
child's needs or if placement in another available placement setting
best meets the child's needs in the least restrictive environment;
and
(iii) Approve or disapprove the child's placement in the
qualified residential treatment program.
(((h))) (i) Uncertainty by a parent, guardian, legal custodian,
relative, or other suitable person that the alleged abuser has in
fact abused the child shall not, alone, be the basis upon which a
child is removed from the care of a parent, guardian, or legal
custodian under (a) of this subsection, nor shall it be a basis,
alone, to preclude placement with a relative or other suitable person
under (((c))) (d) of this subsection.
(((i))) (j) If the court places with a relative or other suitable
person, and that person has indicated a desire to become a licensed
foster parent, the court shall order the department to commence an
assessment of the home of such relative or other suitable person
within 10 days and thereafter issue an initial license as provided
under RCW 74.15.120 for such relative or other suitable person, if
qualified, as a foster parent. The relative or other suitable person
shall receive a foster care maintenance payment, starting on the date
the department approves the initial license. If such home is found to
p. 11 HB 2497
be unqualified for licensure, the department shall report such fact
to the court within one week of that determination. The department
shall report on the status of the licensure process during the entry
of any dispositional orders in the case.
(((j))) (k) If the court places the child in licensed foster
care:
(i) The petitioner shall report to the court, at the shelter care
hearing, the location of the licensed foster placement the petitioner
has identified for the child and the court shall inquire as to
whether:
(A) The identified placement is the least restrictive placement
necessary to meet the needs of the child;
(B) The child will be able to remain in the same school and
whether any orders of the court are necessary to ensure educational
stability for the child;
(C) The child will be placed with a sibling or siblings, and
whether court-ordered sibling contact would promote the well-being of
the child;
(D) The licensed foster placement is able to meet the special
needs of the child;
(E) The location of the proposed foster placement will impede
visitation with the child's parent or parents;
(ii) The court may order the department to:
(A) Place the child in a less restrictive placement;
(B) Place the child in a location in closer proximity to the
child's parent, home, or school;
(C) Place the child with the child's sibling or siblings;
(D) Take any other necessary steps to ensure the child's health,
safety, and well-being;
(iii) The court shall advise the petitioner that:
(A) Failure to comply with court orders while a child is in
shelter care will be considered when determining whether reasonable
efforts have been made by the department during a hearing under RCW
13.34.110; and
(B) Placement moves while a child is in shelter care will be
considered when determining whether reasonable efforts have been made
by the department during a hearing under RCW 13.34.110.
(6)(a) A shelter care order issued pursuant to this section shall
include the requirement for a case conference as provided in RCW
13.34.067. However, if the parent is not present at the shelter care
p. 12 HB 2497
hearing, or does not agree to the case conference, the court shall
not include the requirement for the case conference in the shelter
care order.
(b) If the court orders a case conference, the shelter care order
shall include notice to all parties and establish the date, time, and
location of the case conference which shall be no later than 30 days
before the fact-finding hearing.
(c) The court may order another conference, case staffing, or
hearing as an alternative to the case conference required under RCW
13.34.067 so long as the conference, case staffing, or hearing
ordered by the court meets all requirements under RCW 13.34.067,
including the requirement of a written agreement specifying the
services to be provided to the parent.
(7)(a)(i) A shelter care order issued pursuant to this section
may be amended at any time with notice and hearing thereon. The
shelter care decision of placement shall be modified only upon a
showing of change in circumstances. No child may be placed in shelter
care for longer than thirty days without an order, signed by the
judge, authorizing continued shelter care.
(ii) If the court previously ordered that visitation between a
parent and child be supervised or monitored, there shall be a
presumption that such supervision or monitoring will no longer be
necessary following a continued shelter care order under (a)(i) of
this subsection. To overcome this presumption, a party must provide a
report to the court including evidence establishing that removing
visit supervision or monitoring would create a risk to the child's
safety, and the court shall make a determination as to whether visit
supervision or monitoring must continue.
(b)(i) An order releasing the child on any conditions specified
in this section may at any time be amended, with notice and hearing
thereon, so as to return the child to shelter care for failure of the
parties to conform to the conditions originally imposed.
(ii) The court shall consider whether nonconformance with any
conditions resulted from circumstances beyond the control of the
parent, guardian, or legal custodian and give weight to that fact
before ordering return of the child to shelter care.
(8) The department and its employees shall not be held liable in
any civil action for complying with an order issued under this
section for placement: With a parent who has agreed to accept
services, a relative, or a suitable person.
p. 13 HB 2497
(9)(a) If a child is placed out of the home of a parent,
guardian, or legal custodian following a shelter care hearing, the
court shall order the petitioner to provide regular visitation with
the parent, guardian, or legal custodian, and siblings. Early,
consistent, and frequent visitation is crucial for maintaining
parent-child relationships and allowing family reunification. The
court shall order a visitation plan individualized to the needs of
the family with a goal of providing the maximum parent, child, and
sibling contact possible.
(b) Visitation under this subsection shall not be limited as a
sanction for a parent's failure to comply with recommended services
during shelter care.
(c) Visitation under this subsection may only be limited where
necessary to ensure the health, safety, or welfare of the child.
(d) The first visit must take place within 72 hours of the child
being delivered into the custody of the department, unless the court
finds that extraordinary circumstances require delay.
(e) If the first visit under (d) of this subsection occurs in an
in-person format, this first visit must be supervised unless the
department determines that visit supervision is not necessary.
Sec. 4. RCW 13.34.110 and 2020 c 312 s 116 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) The court shall hold a fact-finding hearing on the petition
and, unless the court dismisses the petition, shall make written
findings of fact, stating the reasons therefor. The rules of evidence
shall apply at the fact-finding hearing and the parent, guardian, or
legal custodian of the child shall have all of the rights provided in
RCW 13.34.090(1). The petitioner shall have the burden of
establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the child is
dependent within the meaning of RCW 13.34.030.
(2)(a) The court in a fact-finding hearing may consider the
history of past involvement of child protective services or law
enforcement agencies with the family for the purpose of establishing
a pattern of conduct, behavior, or inaction with regard to the
health, safety, or welfare of the child on the part of the child's
parent, guardian, or legal custodian, or for the purpose of
establishing that reasonable efforts have been made by the department
to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the
child's home. No report of child abuse or neglect that has been
p. 14 HB 2497
destroyed or expunged under RCW 26.44.031 may be used for such
purposes.
(b) The fact that the parent participated in prevention services,
safety planning, or conditions necessary to maintain the safety of
the child under RCW 13.34.065(5)(c) may not be construed as an
admission of abuse or neglect.
(3)(a) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the child may
waive his or her right to a fact-finding hearing by stipulating or
agreeing to the entry of an order of dependency establishing that the
child is dependent within the meaning of RCW 13.34.030. The parent,
guardian, or legal custodian may also stipulate or agree to an order
of disposition pursuant to RCW 13.34.130 at the same time. Any
stipulated or agreed order of dependency or disposition must be
signed by the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and his or her
attorney, unless the parent, guardian, or legal custodian has waived
his or her right to an attorney in open court, and by the petitioner
and the attorney, guardian ad litem, or court-appointed special
advocate for the child, if any. If the department is not the
petitioner and is required by the order to supervise the placement of
the child or provide services to any party, the department must also
agree to and sign the order.
(b) Entry of any stipulated or agreed order of dependency or
disposition is subject to approval by the court. The court shall
receive and review a social study before entering a stipulated or
agreed order and shall consider whether the order is consistent with
the allegations of the dependency petition and the problems that
necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care. No social
file or social study may be considered by the court in connection
with the fact-finding hearing or prior to factual determination,
except as otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence.
(c) Prior to the entry of any stipulated or agreed order of
dependency, the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the child and
his or her attorney must appear before the court and the court within
available resources must inquire and establish on the record that:
(i) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian understands the
terms of the order or orders he or she has signed, including his or
her responsibility to participate in remedial services as provided in
any disposition order;
(ii) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian understands that
entry of the order starts a process that could result in the filing
p. 15 HB 2497
of a petition to terminate his or her relationship with the child
within the time frames required by state and federal law if he or she
fails to comply with the terms of the dependency or disposition
orders or fails to substantially remedy the problems that
necessitated the child's placement in out-of-home care;
(iii) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian understands that
the entry of the stipulated or agreed order of dependency is an
admission that the child is dependent within the meaning of RCW
13.34.030 and shall have the same legal effect as a finding by the
court that the child is dependent by at least a preponderance of the
evidence, and that the parent, guardian, or legal custodian shall not
have the right in any subsequent proceeding for termination of
parental rights pursuant to this chapter or guardianship pursuant to
chapters [chapter] 13.36 or 11.130 RCW to challenge or dispute the
fact that the child was found to be dependent; and
(iv) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian knowingly and
willingly stipulated and agreed to and signed the order or orders,
without duress, and without misrepresentation or fraud by any other
party.
If a parent, guardian, or legal custodian fails to appear before
the court after stipulating or agreeing to entry of an order of
dependency, the court may enter the order upon a finding that the
parent, guardian, or legal custodian had actual notice of the right
to appear before the court and chose not to do so. The court may
require other parties to the order, including the attorney for the
parent, guardian, or legal custodian, to appear and advise the court
of the parent's, guardian's, or legal custodian's notice of the right
to appear and understanding of the factors specified in this
subsection. A parent, guardian, or legal custodian may choose to
waive his or her presence at the in-court hearing for entry of the
stipulated or agreed order of dependency by submitting to the court
through counsel a completed stipulated or agreed dependency fact-
finding/disposition statement in a form determined by the Washington
state supreme court pursuant to General Rule GR 9.
(4) Immediately after the entry of the findings of fact, the
court shall hold a disposition hearing, unless there is good cause
for continuing the matter for up to fourteen days. If good cause is
shown, the case may be continued for longer than fourteen days.
Notice of the time and place of the continued hearing may be given in
open court. If notice in open court is not given to a party, that
p. 16 HB 2497
party shall be notified by certified mail of the time and place of
any continued hearing. Unless there is reasonable cause to believe
the health, safety, or welfare of the child would be jeopardized or
efforts to reunite the parent and child would be hindered, the court
shall direct the department to notify those adult persons who: (a)
Are related by blood or marriage to the child in the following
degrees: Parent, grandparent, brother, sister, stepparent,
stepbrother, stepsister, uncle, or aunt; (b) are known to the
department as having been in contact with the family or child within
the past twelve months; and (c) would be an appropriate placement for
the child. Reasonable cause to dispense with notification to a parent
under this section must be proved by clear, cogent, and convincing
evidence.
The parties need not appear at the fact-finding or dispositional
hearing if the parties, their attorneys, the guardian ad litem, and
court-appointed special advocates, if any, are all in agreement.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 43.06
RCW to read as follows:
(1) The governor or the governor's staff designee shall convene
the convening of representatives from:
(a) The health care authority;
(b) The department of children, youth, and families;
(c) The department of social and health services; and
(d) The department of health.
(2) The purpose of the convening of agencies described in
subsection (1) of this section is to:
(a) Coordinate to identify all available substance use disorder
treatment options for families receiving child welfare services as
defined in RCW 74.13.020 and child protective services as defined in
RCW 26.44.020;
(b) Establish a process to make substance use disorder treatment
options for families receiving child welfare services as defined in
RCW 74.13.020 and child protective services as defined in RCW
26.44.020 readily available to child welfare workers as defined in
RCW 74.14B.010;
(c) Establish a process for child welfare workers as defined in
RCW 74.14B.010 to identity the unmet treatment needs of families they
are working with;
p. 17 HB 2497
(d) Identify resources that would allow families receiving child
welfare services and child protection services to obtain readily
available access to:
(i) Medication-assisted treatment;
(ii) Medications for opioid use disorder; and
(iii) Family-centered residential and intensive outpatient
treatment; and
(e) Identify policy or statutory barriers to substance use
disorder treatment options for families receiving child welfare
services as defined in RCW 74.13.020 and child protective services as
defined in RCW 26.44.020 and provide publicly available information
regarding these barriers and possible solutions to overcome these
barriers.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 74.13
RCW to read as follows:
(1) By August 1, 2026, the department shall implement a process
to strengthen referrals and connections between eligible families and
community-based services in high-need communities identified by the
department. The process described in this section must:
(a) Facilitate a transition that connects eligible families with
a community-based service provider;
(b) Aim to keep children safe, support families, and increase
participation in services by eligible families;
(c) Incorporate a referral process to the following services when
appropriate:
(i) The plan of safe care community pathway;
(ii) Peer navigators;
(iii) Behavioral health navigators;
(iv) Parent allies;
(v) Community-based organizations;
(vi) Family resource centers; and
(vii) Community care hubs;
(d) Develop the referral process described in this subsection (1)
in partnership with community-based service providers and support
organizations including, but not limited to, those listed in (c) of
this subsection; and
(e) Incorporate a process for obtaining consent from a parent,
guardian, or legal custodian to share their personal information with
potential service providers.
p. 18 HB 2497
(2) By November 1, 2027, and in compliance with RCW 43.01.036,
the department shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of
the legislature describing:
(a) The processes developed under subsection (1) of this section;
(b) Any available and relevant data demonstrating the impact of
the processes developed under subsection (1) of this section; and
(c) Recommendations regarding statewide implementation of the
process described under subsection (1) of this section.
(3) For purposes of this section, "eligible families" means
families:
(a) Receiving child protective services as defined in RCW
26.44.020; and
(b) Families with an active dependency court case under chapter
13.34 RCW where the child or children reside with a parent, guardian,
or legal custodian and the caseworker is planning for case closure.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 74.13
RCW to read as follows:
Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this
specific purpose, the department shall contract with public health
nurses to support parents of children under age four with an open
child protective services investigation, family assessment response,
or family voluntary services case. The contracts described in this
section must:
(1) Include contracts in communities impacted by substance use
for public health nurses to support child protective services workers
in safety planning;
(2) Provide for holistic assessments and intervention on issues
such as risk reduction and protective strategies, safe sleep, parent-
child attachment and interaction, maternal and child health, child
development, and medical home identification.
Sec. 8. RCW 74.14B.010 and 2019 c 470 s 27 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Child welfare workers shall meet minimum standards
established by the department. Comprehensive training for child
welfare workers shall be completed before such child welfare workers
are assigned to case-carrying responsibilities as the sole worker
assigned to a particular case. Intermittent, part-time, and standby
p. 19 HB 2497
child welfare workers shall be subject to the same minimum standards
and training.
(2) Ongoing specialized training shall be provided for child
welfare workers responsible for investigating child sexual abuse.
Training participants shall have the opportunity to practice
interview skills and receive feedback from instructors.
(3) The department, the criminal justice training commission, the
Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, and the
Washington association of prosecuting attorneys shall design and
implement statewide training that contains consistent elements for
persons engaged in the interviewing of children, including law
enforcement, prosecution, and child protective services.
(4) The training required by this section shall: (a) Be based on
research-based practices and standards; (b) minimize the trauma of
all persons who are interviewed during abuse investigations; (c)
provide methods of reducing the number of investigative interviews
necessary whenever possible; (d) assure, to the extent possible, that
investigative interviews are thorough, objective, and complete; (e)
recognize needs of special populations, such as persons with
developmental disabilities; (f) recognize the nature and consequences
of victimization; (g) require investigative interviews to be
conducted in a manner most likely to permit the interviewed persons
the maximum emotional comfort under the circumstances; (h) address
record retention and retrieval; (i) address documentation of
investigative interviews; and (j) include self-care for child welfare
workers.
(5) The identification of domestic violence is critical in
ensuring the safety of children in the child welfare system. It is
also critical for child welfare workers to support victims of
domestic violence while victims continue to care for their children,
when possible, as domestic violence perpetrated against someone other
than the child does not constitute negligent treatment or
maltreatment in and of itself as provided in RCW 26.44.020. For these
reasons, ongoing domestic violence training and consultation shall be
provided to child welfare workers, including how to use the
department's practice guide to domestic violence.
(6) ((By January 1, 2021, the)) The department shall:
(a) Develop and implement an evidence-informed curriculum for
supervisors providing support to child welfare workers to better
p. 20 HB 2497
prepare candidates for effective supervisory and leadership roles
within the department;
(b) Develop specialized training for child welfare workers that
includes simulation and coaching designed to improve clinical and
analytical skills;
(c) Based on the report required under RCW 43.216.7501(3),
develop and implement training for child welfare workers that
incorporates trauma-informed care and reflective supervision
principles; and
(d) By September 1, 2026, develop and provide specialized
training for supervisors of child welfare workers regarding any risk
and safety assessment tools used by the department in child welfare
cases.
(7) For purposes of this section, "child welfare worker" means an
employee of the department whose job includes supporting or providing
child welfare services as defined in RCW 74.13.020 or child
protective services as defined in RCW 26.44.020.
Sec. 9. RCW 2.30.010 and 2015 c 291 s 1 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The legislature finds that judges in the trial courts
throughout the state effectively utilize what are known as
therapeutic courts to remove a defendant's or respondent's case from
the criminal and civil court traditional trial track and allow those
defendants or respondents the opportunity to obtain treatment
services to address particular issues that may have contributed to
the conduct that led to their arrest or other issues before the
court. Trial courts have proved adept at creative approaches in
fashioning a wide variety of therapeutic courts addressing the
spectrum of social issues that can contribute to criminal activity
and engagement with the child welfare system.
(2) The legislature further finds that by focusing on the
specific individual's needs, providing treatment for the issues
presented, and ensuring rapid and appropriate accountability for
program violations, therapeutic courts may decrease recidivism,
improve the safety of the community, and improve the life of the
program participant and the lives of the participant's family members
by decreasing the severity and frequency of the specific behavior
addressed by the therapeutic court.
p. 21 HB 2497
(3) The legislature recognizes the inherent authority of the
judiciary under Article IV, section 1 of the state Constitution to
establish therapeutic courts, and the outstanding contribution to the
state and local communities made by the establishment of therapeutic
courts and desires to provide a general provision in statute
acknowledging and encouraging the judiciary to provide for
therapeutic court programs to address the particular needs within a
given judicial jurisdiction.
(4) Therapeutic court programs may include, but are not limited
to:
(a) Adult drug court;
(b) Juvenile drug court;
(c) Family dependency treatment court or family drug court that
may include participants following the filing of a dependency
petition but before a dependency is established under RCW 13.34.110;
(d) Mental health court, which may include participants with
developmental disabilities;
(e) DUI court;
(f) Veterans treatment court;
(g) Truancy court;
(h) Domestic violence court;
(i) Gambling court;
(j) Community court;
(k) Homeless court;
(l) Treatment, responsibility, and accountability on campus (Back
on TRAC) court.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. The legislature respectfully requests
that by November 1, 2026, the supreme court commission on children in
foster care's family well-being community collaborative work group
regarding the court process for child welfare cases without removal
provide a report to the appropriate committees of the legislature
describing the work group's recommendations.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 11. Subject to the availability of amounts
provided for this specific purpose, the department of children,
youth, and families shall contract with two existing parent-child
assistance program providers in high-need communities as defined by
the department of children, youth, and families to deliver additional
intensive case management and recovery support for pregnant and
p. 22 HB 2497
parenting individuals involved in child welfare due to substance
abuse. The support provided in this section shall support at least 16
additional individuals in each high-need community for a total of at
least 32 additional individuals served.
--- END ---
p. 23 HB 2497

Addressing the rise in maltreatment-related child fatalities or near fatalities by supporting families that have received a child welfare response.

Sponsors

Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self (D) sponsors HB 2497, and 7 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

HB 2497 went before 1 committee: Early Learning & Human Services.

Early Learning & Human Services
Early Learning & Human Services
Referred to · Jan 15, 2026 · 48 Bills

History

HB 2497 has taken 1 action since Jan 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jan 15, 2026
House
First reading, referred to Early Learning & Human Services.

Votes

HB 2497 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com