Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 93

South Dakota SenateEngrossed

Summary

SB 93, “Prohibit certain state officers or employees from being employed by an organization that was the recipient of a contract awarded on behalf of a state agency for a period of time”, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 15, 2026 by Sen. Tim Reed (R) with 28 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Mar 2, 2026: House of Representatives Tabled, Passed, YEAS 37, NAYS 28. H.J. 473.


Record

Text

SB 93 has 28 co-sponsors and 5 roll calls.

sb93/comm-sub.txt
26.581.11 101st Legislative Session 93
2026 South Dakota Legislature
Senate Bill 93
HOUSE STATE AFFAIRS ENGROSSED
Introduced by: Senator Reed
An Act to prohibit certain state officers or employees from being employed by an
organization that was the recipient of a contract awarded on behalf of a state
agency for a period of time.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
Section 1. That § 5-18A-17 be AMENDED:
5-18A-17. No state officer or employee who approves, awards, or administers a
contract on behalf of a state agency, may have an interest in a contract or derive a direct
benefit from a contract that is within the scope of the officer's or employee's official duties,
nor for a one-year period following the end of their employment or position as a state
officer may the officer or employee derive a direct benefit as a result of such contract
except as provided in § 5-18A-17.2. In addition, no such officer or employee may enter
into any contract, other than a contract of employment, with any state agency for a period
of one year following their leaving office or employment except as provided in § 5-18A-
17.3.This prohibition includes any state officer or employee who, in his or her official
capacity, recommends the approval or award of the contract or who supervises a person
who approves, awards, or administers the contract. This prohibition does not include any
state officer who serves without compensation or who may be paid per diem pursuant to
§ 4-7-10.4. If an officer or employee of this state has responsibility, on behalf of a state
agency, for approving, awarding, or administering a contract, that officer or employee
may not:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in § 5-18A-17.2:
(a) Have an interest in a contract or derive a direct benefit from a contract that
is within the scope of the officer's or employee's official duties; or
(b) Derive a direct benefit from any contract that the officer or employee
approved, awarded, or administered on behalf of a state agency for at least
Underscores indicate new language.
Overstrikes indicate deleted language.
26.581.11 2 93
one year following the end of the individual's term of office or employment
with the state;
(2) Except as otherwise provided in § 5-18A-17.3, enter into any contract with a state
agency, other than an employment contract, for at least one year following the end
of the individual's term of office or employment with the state; or
(3) Be employed by any organization that was the beneficiary of a contract approved,
awarded, or administered by the officer or employee, for a period of:
(a) One year, if the value of the contract was not more than one million dollars;
or
(b) Two years, if the value of the contract was more than one million dollars.
Nothing in this section may be construed to apply to an officer or employee who
serves without compensation or who is only compensated per diem pursuant to § 4-7-
10.4.
For purposes of this section, the responsibility for approving, awarding, or
administering a contract on behalf of a state agency includes supervising the approval,
award, or administration of a contract or recommending the approval or award of a
contract.
Section 2. That § 5-18A-17.2 be AMENDED:
5-18A-17.2. A governing body may authorize an officer or employee whose
responsibilities include approving, awarding, or administering a contract on behalf of a
state agency or; supervising any employee who has these responsibilities approves,
awards, or administers a contract on behalf of a state agency; or recommending to any
employee the approval or award of a contract on behalf of a state agency, to be a party
to or derive a direct benefit from a contract if:
(1) The officer or employee has provided full written disclosure to the governing body;
(2) The governing body has reviewed the:
(a) The essential terms of the transaction or contract and the state officer's or
employee's; and
(b) The role of the officer or employee in the contract or transaction; and
(3) The transaction and the terms of the contract are fair, reasonable, and not contrary
to the public interest.
The authorization shall be in writing. If a governing body authorizes an officer or
employee to be a party to or derive a direct benefit from a contract, the governing body
must provide the authorization in writing. Any authorization given pursuant to this section
Underscores indicate new language.
Overstrikes indicate deleted language.
26.581.11 3 93
is a public record. Each authorization shall must be filed with the commissioner of human
resources and administration, who. The commissioner shall annually compile the
authorizations and present them annually for review by to the Government Operations
and Audit Committee for review.
Underscores indicate new language.
Overstrikes indicate deleted language.

Prohibit certain state officers or employees from being employed by an organization that was the recipient of a contract awarded on behalf of a state agency for a period of time.

Sponsors

Sen. Tim Reed (R) sponsors SB 93, and 28 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 93 went before 1 committee: State Affairs.

State Affairs
State Affairs
Referred to · Jan 15, 2026

History

SB 93 has taken 16 actions since Jan 15, 2026, the latest on Mar 2, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 2, 2026
House
House of Representatives Tabled, Passed, YEAS 37, NAYS 28. H.J. 473
Feb 25, 2026
House
Scheduled for hearing
Feb 25, 2026
House
State Affairs Motion to amend, Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 4. Amendment 93B
Feb 25, 2026
House
State Affairs Do Pass Amended, Passed, YEAS 11, NAYS 1.
Feb 2, 2026
House
Referred to House State Affairs H.J. 194

Votes

SB 93 went to 5 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Mar 2, 2026 at 3728.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Mar 2, 2026
House
Tabled
37
28
Feb 25, 2026
House
Motion to amend
8
4
Feb 25, 2026
House
Do Pass Amended
11
1
Jan 28, 2026
Senate
Do Pass Amended
34
0
Jan 21, 2026
Senate
Do Pass
8
0

Source: sdlegislature.gov · legiscan.com