Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

Sign In

SB 233

Utah Senate•Passed

Summary

SB 233, “Judicial Performance Evaluation Amendments”, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 2, 2026 by Sen. Brady Brammer (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It last saw action on Mar 23, 2026: Governor Signed in Lieutenant Governor's office for filing.

Record

Text

SB 233 has 1 co-sponsor and 6 roll calls.

sb233/enrolled.txt
Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
Judicial Performance Evaluation Amendments
                                     2026 GENERAL SESSION
                                          STATE OF UTAH
                                 Chief Sponsor: Brady Brammer
                                 House Sponsor: Karianne Lisonbee
  LONG TITLE
  General Description:
      This bill makes changes related to the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.
  Highlighted Provisions:
      This bill:
      ▸ amends definitions;
      ▸ renumbers and reorganizes statutory provisions in Title 78A, Chapter 12, Judicial
  Performance Evaluation Commission;
      ▸ addresses the requirements for a meeting of the Judicial Performance Evaluation
  Commission (Commission);
      ▸ requires the Commission to perform a study regarding reversal on appeal and provide a
  report to the Judiciary Interim Committee on the study;
      ▸ requires the Commission to allow a judge to appear and speak at a commission meeting in
  certain circumstances;
      ▸ modifies the requirements for the judicial performance survey, including the contents of
  the survey;
      ▸ modifies the certification standards for judicial performance, including the certification
  standards for a justice of the Utah Supreme Court and a judge of the Utah Court of
  Appeals; and
      ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
  Money Appropriated in this Bill:
      None
  Other Special Clauses:
      None
  Utah Code Sections Affected:
S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
   AMENDS:
63G-2-305, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 17
78A-12-102, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 11
78A-12-203, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 11
78A-12-204, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2017, Chapters 81, 374
78A-12-205, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 11
   ENACTS:
78A-12-105, Utah Code Annotated 1953
78A-12-106, Utah Code Annotated 1953
   RENUMBERS AND AMENDS:
78A-12-103, (Renumbered from 78A-12-201, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025,
Chapter 57)
78A-12-104, (Renumbered from 78A-12-202, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2010,
Chapter 286)
   REPEALS:
78A-12-101, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 248
   Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 1. Section 63G-2-305 is amended to read:
63G-2-305 . Protected records.
      The following records are protected if properly classified by a governmental entity:
   (1) trade secrets as defined in Section 13-24-2 if the person submitting the trade secret has
provided the governmental entity with the information specified in Section 63G-2-309;
   (2) commercial information or nonindividual financial information obtained from a person
if:
(a) disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to result in unfair
competitive injury to the person submitting the information or would impair the
ability of the governmental entity to obtain necessary information in the future;
(b) the person submitting the information has a greater interest in prohibiting access than
the public in obtaining access; and
(c) the person submitting the information has provided the governmental entity with the
information specified in Section 63G-2-309;
   (3) commercial or financial information acquired or prepared by a governmental entity to
the extent that disclosure would lead to financial speculations in currencies, securities, or
                                                  -2-
Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      commodities that will interfere with a planned transaction by the governmental entity or
      cause substantial financial injury to the governmental entity or state economy;
  (4) records, the disclosure of which could cause commercial injury to, or confer a
      competitive advantage upon a potential or actual competitor of, a commercial project
      entity as defined in Subsection 11-13-103(4);
  (5) test questions and answers to be used in future license, certification, registration,
      employment, or academic examinations;
  (6) records, the disclosure of which would impair governmental procurement proceedings
      or give an unfair advantage to any person proposing to enter into a contract or agreement
      with a governmental entity, except, subject to Subsections (1) and (2), that this
      Subsection (6) does not restrict the right of a person to have access to, after the contract
      or grant has been awarded and signed by all parties:
      (a) a bid, proposal, application, or other information submitted to or by a governmental
entity in response to:
(i) an invitation for bids;
(ii) a request for proposals;
(iii) a request for quotes;
(iv) a grant; or
(v) other similar document; or
      (b) an unsolicited proposal, as defined in Section 63G-6a-712;
  (7) information submitted to or by a governmental entity in response to a request for
      information, except, subject to Subsections (1) and (2), that this Subsection (7) does not
      restrict the right of a person to have access to the information, after:
      (a) a contract directly relating to the subject of the request for information has been
awarded and signed by all parties; or
      (b)(i) a final determination is made not to enter into a contract that relates to the
subject of the request for information; and
(ii) at least two years have passed after the day on which the request for information
is issued;
  (8) records that would identify real property or the appraisal or estimated value of real or
      personal property, including intellectual property, under consideration for public
      acquisition before any rights to the property are acquired unless:
      (a) public interest in obtaining access to the information is greater than or equal to the
governmental entity's need to acquire the property on the best terms possible;
                                                 -3-
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
(b) the information has already been disclosed to persons not employed by or under a
duty of confidentiality to the entity;
(c) in the case of records that would identify property, potential sellers of the described
property have already learned of the governmental entity's plans to acquire the
property;
(d) in the case of records that would identify the appraisal or estimated value of
property, the potential sellers have already learned of the governmental entity's
estimated value of the property; or
(e) the property under consideration for public acquisition is a single family residence
and the governmental entity seeking to acquire the property has initiated negotiations
to acquire the property as required under Section 78B-6-505;
   (9) records prepared in contemplation of sale, exchange, lease, rental, or other compensated
transaction of real or personal property including intellectual property, which, if
disclosed prior to completion of the transaction, would reveal the appraisal or estimated
value of the subject property, unless:
(a) the public interest in access is greater than or equal to the interests in restricting
access, including the governmental entity's interest in maximizing the financial
benefit of the transaction; or
(b) when prepared by or on behalf of a governmental entity, appraisals or estimates of
the value of the subject property have already been disclosed to persons not
employed by or under a duty of confidentiality to the entity;
   (10) records created or maintained for civil, criminal, or administrative enforcement
purposes or audit purposes, or for discipline, licensing, certification, or registration
purposes, if release of the records:
(a) reasonably could be expected to interfere with investigations undertaken for
enforcement, discipline, licensing, certification, or registration purposes;
(b) reasonably could be expected to interfere with audits, disciplinary, or enforcement
proceedings;
(c) would create a danger of depriving a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial
hearing;
(d) reasonably could be expected to disclose the identity of a source who is not generally
known outside of government and, in the case of a record compiled in the course of
an investigation, disclose information furnished by a source not generally known
outside of government if disclosure would compromise the source; or
                                                     -4-
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      (e) reasonably could be expected to disclose investigative or audit techniques,
procedures, policies, or orders not generally known outside of government if
disclosure would interfere with enforcement or audit efforts;
  (11) records the disclosure of which would jeopardize the life or safety of an individual;
  (12) records the disclosure of which would jeopardize the security of governmental
      property, governmental programs, or governmental recordkeeping systems from
      damage, theft, or other appropriation or use contrary to law or public policy;
  (13) records that, if disclosed, would jeopardize the security or safety of a correctional
      facility, or records relating to incarceration, treatment, probation, or parole, that would
      interfere with the control and supervision of an offender's incarceration, treatment,
      probation, or parole;
  (14) records that, if disclosed, would reveal recommendations made to the Board of
      Pardons and Parole by an employee of or contractor for the Department of Corrections,
      the Board of Pardons and Parole, or the Department of Health and Human Services that
      are based on the employee's or contractor's supervision, diagnosis, or treatment of any
      person within the board's jurisdiction;
  (15) records and audit workpapers that identify audit, collection, and operational procedures
      and methods used by the State Tax Commission, if disclosure would interfere with
      audits or collections;
  (16) records of a governmental audit agency relating to an ongoing or planned audit until
      the final audit is released;
  (17) records that are subject to the attorney client privilege;
  (18) records prepared for or by an attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer,
      employee, or agent of a governmental entity for, or in anticipation of, litigation or a
      judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative proceeding;
  (19)(a)(i) personal files of a state legislator, including personal correspondence to or
      from a member of the Legislature; and
(ii) notwithstanding Subsection (19)(a)(i), correspondence that gives notice of
legislative action or policy may not be classified as protected under this section;
and
      (b)(i) an internal communication that is part of the deliberative process in connection
with the preparation of legislation between:
(A) members of a legislative body;
(B) a member of a legislative body and a member of the legislative body's staff; or
                                                 -5-
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
(C) members of a legislative body's staff; and
(ii) notwithstanding Subsection (19)(b)(i), a communication that gives notice of
legislative action or policy may not be classified as protected under this section;
   (20)(a) records in the custody or control of the Office of Legislative Research and
General Counsel, that, if disclosed, would reveal a particular legislator's
contemplated legislation or contemplated course of action before the legislator has
elected to support the legislation or course of action, or made the legislation or course
of action public; and
(b) notwithstanding Subsection (20)(a), the form to request legislation submitted to the
Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel is a public document unless a
legislator asks that the records requesting the legislation be maintained as protected
records until such time as the legislator elects to make the legislation or course of
action public;
   (21) a research request from a legislator to a legislative staff member and research findings
prepared in response to the request;
   (22) drafts, unless otherwise classified as public;
   (23) records concerning a governmental entity's strategy about:
(a) collective bargaining; or
(b) imminent or pending litigation;
   (24) records of investigations of loss occurrences and analyses of loss occurrences that may
be covered by the Risk Management Fund, the Employers' Reinsurance Fund, the
Uninsured Employers' Fund, or similar divisions in other governmental entities;
   (25) records, other than personnel evaluations, that contain a personal recommendation
concerning an individual if disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion
of personal privacy, or disclosure is not in the public interest;
   (26) records that reveal the location of historic, prehistoric, paleontological, or biological
resources that if known would jeopardize the security of those resources or of valuable
historic, scientific, educational, or cultural information;
   (27) records of independent state agencies if the disclosure of the records would conflict
with the fiduciary obligations of the agency;
   (28) records of an institution of higher education defined in Section 53H-1-101 regarding
tenure evaluations, appointments, applications for admissions, retention decisions, and
promotions, which could be properly discussed in a meeting closed in accordance with
Title 52, Chapter 4, Open and Public Meetings Act, provided that records of the final
                                                  -6-
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      decisions about tenure, appointments, retention, promotions, or those students admitted,
      may not be classified as protected under this section;
  (29) records of the governor's office, including budget recommendations, legislative
      proposals, and policy statements, that if disclosed would reveal the governor's
      contemplated policies or contemplated courses of action before the governor has
      implemented or rejected those policies or courses of action or made them public;
  (30) records of the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst relating to budget analysis,
      revenue estimates, and fiscal notes of proposed legislation before issuance of the final
      recommendations in these areas;
  (31) records provided by the United States or by a government entity outside the state that
      are given to the governmental entity with a requirement that they be managed as
      protected records if the providing entity certifies that the record would not be subject to
      public disclosure if retained by it;
  (32) transcripts, minutes, recordings, or reports of the closed portion of a meeting of a
      public body except as provided in Section 52-4-206;
  (33) records that would reveal the contents of settlement negotiations but not including final
      settlements or empirical data to the extent that they are not otherwise exempt from
      disclosure;
  (34) memoranda prepared by staff and used in the decision-making process by an
      administrative law judge, a member of the Board of Pardons and Parole, or a member of
      any other body charged by law with performing a quasi-judicial function;
  (35) records that would reveal negotiations regarding assistance or incentives offered by or
      requested from a governmental entity for the purpose of encouraging a person to expand
      or locate a business in Utah, but only if disclosure would result in actual economic harm
      to the person or place the governmental entity at a competitive disadvantage, but this
      section may not be used to restrict access to a record evidencing a final contract;
  (36) materials to which access must be limited for purposes of securing or maintaining the
      governmental entity's proprietary protection of intellectual property rights including
      patents, copyrights, and trade secrets;
  (37) the name of a donor or a prospective donor to a governmental entity, including an
      institution of higher education defined in Section 53H-1-101, and other information
      concerning the donation that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of the
      donor, provided that:
      (a) the donor requests anonymity in writing;
                                                -7-
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
(b) any terms, conditions, restrictions, or privileges relating to the donation may not be
classified protected by the governmental entity under this Subsection (37); and
(c) except for an institution of higher education defined in Section 53H-1-101, the
governmental unit to which the donation is made is primarily engaged in educational,
charitable, or artistic endeavors, and has no regulatory or legislative authority over
the donor, a member of the donor's immediate family, or any entity owned or
controlled by the donor or the donor's immediate family;
   (38) accident reports, except as provided in Sections 41-6a-404, 41-12a-202, and 73-18-13;
   (39) a notification of workers' compensation insurance coverage described in Section
34A-2-205;
   (40) subject to Subsections (40)(g) and (h), the following records of an institution of higher
education defined in Section 53H-1-101, which have been developed, discovered,
disclosed to, or received by or on behalf of faculty, staff, employees, or students of the
institution:
(a) unpublished lecture notes;
(b) unpublished notes, data, and information:
(i) relating to research; and
(ii) of:
(A) the institution of higher education defined in Section 53H-1-101; or
(B) a sponsor of sponsored research;
(c) unpublished manuscripts;
(d) creative works in process;
(e) scholarly correspondence;[ and]
(f) confidential information contained in research proposals;
(g) this Subsection (40) may not be construed to prohibit disclosure of public
information required [pursuant to] in accordance with Subsection 53H-14-202(2)(a)
or (b); and
(h) this Subsection (40) may not be construed to affect the ownership of a record;
   (41)(a) records in the custody or control of the Office of the Legislative Auditor General
that would reveal the name of a particular legislator who requests a legislative audit
prior to the date that audit is completed and made public; and
(b) notwithstanding Subsection (41)(a), a request for a legislative audit submitted to the
Office of the Legislative Auditor General is a public document unless the legislator
asks that the records in the custody or control of the Office of the Legislative Auditor
                                                  -8-
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
General that would reveal the name of a particular legislator who requests a
legislative audit be maintained as protected records until the audit is completed and
made public;
  (42) records that provide detail as to the location of an explosive, including a map or other
      document that indicates the location of:
      (a) a production facility; or
      (b) a magazine;
  (43) information contained in the statewide database of the Division of Aging and Adult
      Services created by Section 26B-6-210;
  (44) information contained in the Licensing Information System described in Title 80,
      Chapter 2, Child Welfare Services;
  (45) information regarding National Guard operations or activities in support of the
      National Guard's federal mission;
  (46) records provided by any pawn or secondhand business to a law enforcement agency or
      to the central database in compliance with Title 13, Chapter 32a, Pawnshop, Secondhand
      Merchandise, and Catalytic Converter Transaction Information Act;
  (47) information regarding food security, risk, and vulnerability assessments performed by
      the Department of Agriculture and Food;
  (48) except to the extent that the record is exempt from this chapter [pursuant to] in
      accordance with Section 63G-2-106, records related to an emergency plan or program, a
      copy of which is provided to or prepared or maintained by the Division of Emergency
      Management, and the disclosure of which would jeopardize:
      (a) the safety of the general public; or
      (b) the security of:
(i) governmental property;
(ii) governmental programs; or
(iii) the property of a private person who provides the Division of Emergency
Management information;
  (49) records of the Department of Agriculture and Food that provides for the identification,
      tracing, or control of livestock diseases, including any program established under Title
      4, Chapter 24, Utah Livestock Brand and Anti-Theft Act, or Title 4, Chapter 31, Control
      of Animal Disease;
  (50) as provided in Section 26B-2-709:
      (a) information or records held by the Department of Health and Human Services related
                                                 -9-
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
to a complaint regarding a provider, program, or facility which the department is
unable to substantiate; and
(b) information or records related to a complaint received by the Department of Health
and Human Services from an anonymous complainant regarding a provider, program,
or facility;
   (51) unless otherwise classified as public under Section 63G-2-301 and except as provided
under Section 41-1a-116, an individual's home address, home telephone number, or
personal mobile phone number, if:
(a) the individual is required to provide the information in order to comply with a law,
ordinance, rule, or order of a government entity; and
(b) the subject of the record has a reasonable expectation that this information will be
kept confidential due to:
(i) the nature of the law, ordinance, rule, or order; and
(ii) the individual complying with the law, ordinance, rule, or order;
   (52) the portion of the following documents that contains a candidate's residential or
mailing address, if the candidate provides to the filing officer another address or phone
number where the candidate may be contacted:
(a) a declaration of candidacy, a nomination petition, or a certificate of nomination,
described in Section 20A-9-201, 20A-9-202, 20A-9-203, 20A-9-404, 20A-9-405,
20A-9-408, 20A-9-408.5, 20A-9-502, or 20A-9-601;
(b) an affidavit of impecuniosity, described in Section 20A-9-201; or
(c) a notice of intent to gather signatures for candidacy, described in Section 20A-9-408;
   (53) the name, home address, work addresses, and telephone numbers of an individual that
is engaged in, or that provides goods or services for, medical or scientific research that is:
(a) conducted within the state system of higher education, as described in Section
53H-1-102; and
(b) conducted using animals;
   (54) in accordance with Section 78A-12-203, any record of the Judicial Performance
Evaluation Commission concerning an individual commissioner's vote, in relation to
whether a judge meets or exceeds minimum performance standards under Subsection
78A-12-203(4), and information disclosed under Subsection 78A-12-203(5)(e);
   (55) information collected and a report prepared by the Judicial Performance Evaluation
Commission concerning a judge, unless Section 20A-7-702 or Title 78A, Chapter 12,
Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission[ Act], requires disclosure of, or makes
                                                  - 10 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      public, the information or report;
  (56) records provided or received by the Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office in
      furtherance of any contract or other agreement made in accordance with Section
      63L-11-202;
  (57) information requested by and provided to the 911 Division under Section 63H-7a-302;
  (58) in accordance with Section 73-10-33:
      (a) a management plan for a water conveyance facility in the possession of the Division
of Water Resources or the Board of Water Resources; or
      (b) an outline of an emergency response plan in possession of the state or a county or
municipality;
  (59) the following records in the custody or control of the Office of Inspector General of
      Medicaid Services, created in Section 63A-13-201:
      (a) records that would disclose information relating to allegations of personal
misconduct, gross mismanagement, or illegal activity of a person if the information
or allegation cannot be corroborated by the Office of Inspector General of Medicaid
Services through other documents or evidence, and the records relating to the
allegation are not relied upon by the Office of Inspector General of Medicaid
Services in preparing a final investigation report or final audit report;
      (b) records and audit workpapers to the extent they would disclose the identity of a
person who, during the course of an investigation or audit, communicated the
existence of any Medicaid fraud, waste, or abuse, or a violation or suspected
violation of a law, rule, or regulation adopted under the laws of this state, a political
subdivision of the state, or any recognized entity of the United States, if the
information was disclosed on the condition that the identity of the person be
protected;
      (c) before the time that an investigation or audit is completed and the final investigation
or final audit report is released, records or drafts circulated to a person who is not an
employee or head of a governmental entity for the person's response or information;
      (d) records that would disclose an outline or part of any investigation, audit survey plan,
or audit program; or
      (e) requests for an investigation or audit, if disclosure would risk circumvention of an
investigation or audit;
  (60) records that reveal methods used by the Office of Inspector General of Medicaid
      Services, the fraud unit, or the Department of Health and Human Services, to discover
                                                - 11 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
Medicaid fraud, waste, or abuse;
   (61) information provided to the Department of Health and Human Services or the Division
of Professional Licensing under Subsections 58-67-304(3) and (4) and Subsections
58-68-304(3) and (4);
   (62) a record described in Section 63G-12-210;
   (63) captured plate data that is obtained through an automatic license plate reader system
used by a governmental entity as authorized in Section 41-6a-2003;
   (64) an audio or video recording created by a body-worn camera, as that term is defined in
Section 77-7a-103, that records sound or images inside a hospital or health care facility
as those terms are defined in Section 78B-3-403, inside a clinic of a health care provider,
as that term is defined in Section 78B-3-403, or inside a human service program as that
term is defined in Section 26B-2-101, except for recordings that:
(a) depict the commission of an alleged crime;
(b) record any encounter between a law enforcement officer and a person that results in
death or bodily injury, or includes an instance when an officer fires a weapon;
(c) record any encounter that is the subject of a complaint or a legal proceeding against a
law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency;
(d) contain an officer involved critical incident as defined in Subsection 76-2-408(1)(f);
or
(e) have been requested for reclassification as a public record by a subject or authorized
agent of a subject featured in the recording;
   (65) a record pertaining to the search process for a president of an institution of higher
education described in Section 53H-3-302;
   (66) an audio recording that is:
(a) produced by an audio recording device that is used in conjunction with a device or
piece of equipment designed or intended for resuscitating an individual or for treating
an individual with a life-threatening condition;
(b) produced during an emergency event when an individual employed to provide law
enforcement, fire protection, paramedic, emergency medical, or other first responder
service:
(i) is responding to an individual needing resuscitation or with a life-threatening
condition; and
(ii) uses a device or piece of equipment designed or intended for resuscitating an
individual or for treating an individual with a life-threatening condition; and
                                                  - 12 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      (c) intended and used for purposes of training emergency responders how to improve
their response to an emergency situation;
  (67) records submitted by or prepared in relation to an applicant seeking a recommendation
      by the Research and General Counsel Subcommittee, the Budget Subcommittee, or the
      Legislative Audit Subcommittee, established under Section 36-12-8, for an employment
      position with the Legislature;
  (68) work papers as defined in Section 31A-2-204;
  (69) a record made available to Adult Protective Services or a law enforcement agency
      under Section 61-1-206;
  (70) a record submitted to the Insurance Department in accordance with Section
      31A-37-201;
  (71) a record described in Section 31A-37-503;
  (72) any record created by the Division of Professional Licensing as a result of Subsection
      58-37f-304(5) or 58-37f-702(2)(a)(ii);
  (73) a record described in Section 72-16-306 that relates to the reporting of an injury
      involving an amusement ride;
  (74) except as provided in Subsection 63G-2-305.5(1), the signature of an individual on a
      political petition, or on a request to withdraw a signature from a political petition,
      including a petition or request described in the following titles:
      (a) Title 10, Utah Municipal Code;
      (b) Title 17, Counties;
      (c) Title 17B, Limited Purpose Local Government Entities - Special Districts;
      (d) Title 17D, Limited Purpose Local Government Entities - Other Entities; and
      (e) Title 20A, Election Code;
  (75) except as provided in Subsection 63G-2-305.5(2), the signature of an individual in a
      voter registration record;
  (76) except as provided in Subsection 63G-2-305.5(3), any signature, other than a signature
      described in Subsection (74) or (75), in the custody of the lieutenant governor or a local
      political subdivision collected or held under, or in relation to, Title 20A, Election Code;
  (77) a Form I-918 Supplement B certification as described in Title 77, Chapter 38, Part 5,
      Victims Guidelines for Prosecutors Act;
  (78) a record submitted to the Insurance Department under Section 31A-48-103;
  (79) personal information, as defined in Section 63G-26-102, to the extent disclosure is
      prohibited under Section 63G-26-103;
                                                - 13 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
   (80) an image taken of an individual during the process of booking the individual into jail,
unless:
(a) the individual is convicted of a criminal offense based upon the conduct for which
the individual was incarcerated at the time the image was taken;
(b) a law enforcement agency releases or disseminates the image:
(i) after determining that the individual is a fugitive or an imminent threat to an
individual or to public safety and releasing or disseminating the image will assist
in apprehending the individual or reducing or eliminating the threat; or
(ii) to a potential witness or other individual with direct knowledge of events relevant
to a criminal investigation or criminal proceeding for the purpose of identifying or
locating an individual in connection with the criminal investigation or criminal
proceeding;
(c) a judge orders the release or dissemination of the image based on a finding that the
release or dissemination is in furtherance of a legitimate law enforcement interest; or
(d) the image is displayed to a person who is permitted to view the image under Section
17-72-802;
   (81) a record:
(a) concerning an interstate claim to the use of waters in the Colorado River system;
(b) relating to a judicial proceeding, administrative proceeding, or negotiation with a
representative from another state or the federal government as provided in Section
63M-14-205; and
(c) the disclosure of which would:
(i) reveal a legal strategy relating to the state's claim to the use of the water in the
Colorado River system;
(ii) harm the ability of the Colorado River Authority of Utah or river commissioner to
negotiate the best terms and conditions regarding the use of water in the Colorado
River system; or
(iii) give an advantage to another state or to the federal government in negotiations
regarding the use of water in the Colorado River system;
   (82) any part of an application described in Section 63N-16-201 that the Governor's Office
of Economic Opportunity determines is nonpublic, confidential information that if
disclosed would result in actual economic harm to the applicant, but this Subsection (82)
may not be used to restrict access to a record evidencing a final contract or approval
decision;
                                                   - 14 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
  (83) the following records of a drinking water or wastewater facility:
      (a) an engineering or architectural drawing of the drinking water or wastewater facility;
and
      (b) except as provided in Section 63G-2-106, a record detailing tools or processes the
drinking water or wastewater facility uses to secure, or prohibit access to, the records
described in Subsection (83)(a);
  (84) a statement that an employee of a governmental entity provides to the governmental
      entity as part of the governmental entity's personnel or administrative investigation into
      potential misconduct involving the employee if the governmental entity:
      (a) requires the statement under threat of employment disciplinary action, including
possible termination of employment, for the employee's refusal to provide the
statement; and
      (b) provides the employee assurance that the statement cannot be used against the
employee in any criminal proceeding;
  (85) any part of an application for a Utah Fits All Scholarship account described in Section
      53F-6-402 or other information identifying a scholarship student as defined in Section
      53F-6-401;
  (86) a record:
      (a) concerning a claim to the use of waters in the Great Salt Lake;
      (b) relating to a judicial proceeding, administrative proceeding, or negotiation with a
person concerning the claim, including a representative from another state or the
federal government; and
      (c) the disclosure of which would:
(i) reveal a legal strategy relating to the state's claim to the use of the water in the
Great Salt Lake;
(ii) harm the ability of the Great Salt Lake commissioner to negotiate the best terms
and conditions regarding the use of water in the Great Salt Lake; or
(iii) give an advantage to another person including another state or to the federal
government in negotiations regarding the use of water in the Great Salt Lake;
  (87) a consumer complaint described in Section 13-2-11, unless the consumer complaint is
      reclassified as public as described in Subsection 13-2-11(4);
  (88) a record of the Utah water agent, appointed under Section 73-10g-702:
      (a) concerning a claim to the use of waters;
      (b) relating to a judicial proceeding, administrative proceeding, or negotiation with a
                                                 - 15 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
representative from another state, a tribe, the federal government, or other
government entity as provided in Title 73, Chapter 10g, Part 7, Utah Water Agent;
and
(c) the disclosure of which would:
(i) reveal a legal strategy relating to the state's claim to the use of the water;
(ii) harm the ability of the Utah water agent to negotiate the best terms and conditions
regarding the use of water; or
(iii) give an advantage to another state, a tribe, the federal government, or other
government entity in negotiations regarding the use of water; and
   (89) a record created or maintained for an investigation of the Prosecutor Conduct
Commission, created in Section 63M-7-1102, that contains any personal identifying
information of a prosecuting attorney, including:
(a) a complaint, or a document that is submitted or created for a complaint, received by
the Prosecutor Conduct Commission; or
(b) a finding by the Prosecutor Conduct Commission.
Section 2. Section 78A-12-102 is amended to read:
CHAPTER 12. Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission
Part 1. General Provisions
78A-12-102 . Definitions for chapter.
      As used in this chapter:
   (1) "Commission" means the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission established [by
this chapter] in Section 78A-12-103.
   (2) "Does not meet or exceed minimum performance standards" means that:
(a)(i) a judge does not meet the certification standards under Section 78A-12-205; and
(ii) the presumption, described in Subsection 78A-12-203(4)(b)(ii), that the judge
does not meet or exceed minimum performance standards is not overcome by
substantial countervailing evidence; or
(b) a judge meets the certification standards under Section 78A-12-205, but the
presumption, described in Subsection 78A-12-203(4)(b)(i), that the judge meets or
exceeds minimum performance standards is overcome by substantial countervailing
evidence.
   (3) [Except as provided in Section 78A-12-207, "judge" means] "Judge" means, except as
provided in Section 78A-12-207, a state court judge or a state court justice who is
                                                    - 16 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
      subject to a retention election.
  (4) "Justice" means a judge who is a member of the Supreme Court.
  (5) "Justice court judge" means a judge appointed pursuant to Title 78A, Chapter 7, Justice
      Court.
  (6) "Meets or exceeds minimum performance standards" means that:
      (a)(i) a judge meets the certification standards under Section 78A-12-205; and
(ii) the presumption that the judge meets or exceeds minimum performance
standards, described in Subsection 78A-12-203(4)(b)(i), is not overcome by
substantial countervailing evidence; or
      (b) a judge does not meet the certification standards under Section 78A-12-205, but the
presumption described in Subsection 78A-12-203(4)(b)(ii), that the judge does not
meet or exceed minimum performance standards, is overcome by substantial
countervailing evidence.
Section 3. Section 78A-12-103, which is renumbered from Section 78A-12-201 is renumbered
  and amended to read:
[78A-12-201] 78A-12-103 . Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission --
  Creation -- Membership.
  (1) There is created an independent commission called the Judicial Performance Evaluation
      Commission consisting of 13 members, as follows:
      (a) two members appointed by the president of the Senate, only one of whom may be a
member of the Utah State Bar;
      (b) two members appointed by the speaker of the House of Representatives, only one of
whom may be a member of the Utah State Bar;
      (c) four members appointed by the members of the Supreme Court, at least one of
whom, but not more than two of whom, may be a member of the Utah State Bar;
      (d) four members appointed by the governor, at least one of whom, but not more than
two of whom, may be a member of the Utah State Bar; and
      (e) the executive director of the State Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice.
  (2)(a) The president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives shall
      confer when appointing members under Subsections (1)(a) and (b) to ensure that
      there is at least one member from among their four appointees who is a member of
      the Utah State Bar.
      (b) A sitting legislator or a sitting judge may not serve as a commission member.
  (3)(a) A member appointed under Subsection (1) shall be appointed for a four-year term.
                                               - 17 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
(b) A member may serve no more than three consecutive terms.
   (4) At the time of appointment, the terms of commission members shall be staggered so that
approximately half of commission members' terms expire every two years.
   (5) When a vacancy occurs in the membership for any reason, the replacement shall be
appointed for the unexpired term by the same appointing authority that appointed the
member creating the vacancy.
   [(6)(a) Eight members of the commission constitute a quorum.]
[(b) The action of a majority of the quorum constitutes the action of the commission,
except that the commission may not make a determination that a judge meets or
exceeds minimum performance standards, or that a judge does not meet or exceed
minimum performance standards, by a vote of less than six members.]
[(c) If, because of absences, the commission is unable to make a determination described
in Subsection (6)(b) by at least six votes, the commission may meet a second time to
make a determination.]
[(d) If a vote on the question of whether a judge meets or exceeds minimum
performance standards or does not meet or exceed minimum performance standards
ends in a tie or does not pass by at least six votes, the record shall reflect that the
commission made no determination in relation to that judge.]
Section 4. Section 78A-12-104, which is renumbered from Section 78A-12-202 is renumbered
   and amended to read:
[78A-12-202] 78A-12-104 . Salary and expenses -- Staff.
   (1) A member may not receive compensation or benefits for the member's service, but may
receive per diem and travel expenses in accordance with:
(a) Section 63A-3-106;
(b) Section 63A-3-107; and
(c) rules made by the Division of Finance pursuant to Sections 63A-3-106 and
63A-3-107.
   (2) The commission shall elect a chair from among [its] the commission's members.
   (3) The commission shall employ an executive director and may employ additional staff as
necessary within budgetary constraints.
   (4) The commission shall be located in the State Commission on Criminal and Juvenile
Justice.
Section 5. Section 78A-12-105 is enacted to read:
78A-12-105 . Quorum -- Voting requirements -- Meetings.
                                                     - 18 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
  (1)(a) Eight members of the commission constitute a quorum.
      (b) The action of a majority of the quorum constitutes the action of the commission,
except that the commission may not make a determination that a judge meets or
exceeds minimum performance standards, or that a judge does not meet or exceed
minimum performance standards, by a vote of less than six members.
      (c) If, because of absences, the commission is unable to make a determination described
in Subsection (1)(b) by at least six votes, the commission may meet a second time to
make a determination.
      (d) If a vote on the question of whether a judge meets or exceeds minimum performance
standards or does not meet or exceed minimum performance standards ends in a tie
or does not pass by at least six votes, the record shall reflect that the commission
made no determination in relation to that judge.
  (2)(a) A member of the commission, including a member of the Utah State Bar, may not
      be disqualified from voting on whether a judge meets or exceeds minimum
      performance standards solely because the member appears before the judge as an
      attorney, a fact witness, or an expert, unless the member is a litigant in a case pending
      before the judge.
      (b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a), a member of the commission shall disclose any
conflicts of interest with a judge being reviewed to the other members of the
commission before the deliberation and vote on whether the judge meets or exceeds
minimum performance standards.
      (c) Information disclosed under this Subsection (2) is a protected record under Title
63G, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act.
  (3)(a) Any meeting of the commission shall comply with Title 52, Chapter 4, Open and
      Public Meetings Act, including any electronic meeting.
      (b) The commission may meet in a closed meeting to discuss a judge's judicial
performance evaluation by complying with Title 52, Chapter 4, Open and Public
Meetings Act.
      (c) Notwithstanding Subsection (3)(b), any vote of the commission on whether a judge
meets or exceeds minimum performance standards shall occur in a meeting open to
the public.
      (d) The commission may only disclose the final commission vote under Subsection (3)(c).
  (4) Any record of an individual commissioner's vote on whether a judge meets or exceeds
      minimum performance standards is a protected record under Title 63G, Chapter 2,
                                                - 19 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
Government Records Access and Management Act.
Section 6. Section 78A-12-106 is enacted to read:
78A-12-106 . Report to Judiciary Interim Committee.
   (1) Before October 1, 2026, the commission shall study whether the number of times that a
judge is overturned on appeal for an abuse of discretion should be included in a judicial
performance evaluation.
   (2) No later than November 1, 2026, the commission shall provide a written report to the
Judiciary Interim Committee regarding the outcome of the study described in Subsection
(1).
Section 7. Section 78A-12-203 is amended to read:
Part 2. Judicial Performance Evaluation
78A-12-203 . Judicial performance evaluation.
   (1) [Beginning with the 2012 judicial retention elections, the] The commission shall prepare
a judicial performance evaluation for:
(a) each judge in the third and fifth year of the judge's term if the judge is not a justice of
the Supreme Court; and
(b) each justice of the Utah Supreme Court in the third, seventh, and ninth year of the
justice's term.
   (2)(a) [Except as provided in Subsection (3), the] Subject to Subsection (2)(b), the
judicial performance evaluation for a judge under Subsection (1) shall consider only
the following information[ but shall give primary emphasis to the information that is
gathered and relates to the performance of the judge during the period subsequent to
the last judicial retention election of that judge or if the judge has not had a judicial
retention election, during the period applicable to the first judicial retention election]:
[(a)] (i) the results of the judge's most recent judicial performance survey that is
conducted by a third party [in accordance with] as described in Section 78A-12-204;
[(b)] (ii) information concerning the judge's compliance with certification standards [
established in accordance with] described in Section 78A-12-205;
[(c)] (iii) courtroom observation;
[(d)] (iv) the judge's judicial disciplinary record, if any;
[(e)] (v) public comment solicited by the commission;
[(f)] (vi) information from an earlier judicial performance evaluation concerning the
judge[ except that the commission shall give primary emphasis to information
gathered subsequent to the last judicial retention election]; and
                                                     - 20 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
[(g)] (vii) any other factor that the commission:
[(i)] (A) considers relevant to evaluating the judge's performance for the purpose
of a retention election; and
[(ii)] (B) establishes by rule made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah
Administrative Rulemaking Act.
      (b) The judicial performance evaluation for a judge under Subsection (1) shall give
primary emphasis to the information that is gathered and relates to the performance
of the judge during:
(i) the period subsequent to the last judicial retention election of that judge; or
(ii) the period applicable to the first judicial retention election if the judge has not had
a judicial retention election.
  (3) The commission shall, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative
      Rulemaking Act, make rules concerning the conduct of courtroom observation under
      Subsection (2), [which shall include the following] including:
      (a) an indication of who may perform the courtroom observation;
      (b) a determination of whether the courtroom observation shall be made in person or
may be made by electronic means; and
      (c) a list of principles and standards used to evaluate the behavior observed.
  (4)(a) As part of [the evaluation] a judicial performance evaluation conducted under this
      section, the commission shall[ do one of the following]:
(i) determine, by a vote of at least six members, that the judge meets or exceeds
minimum performance standards;
(ii) determine, by a vote of at least six members, that the judge does not meet or
exceed minimum performance standards;
(iii) determine, by a majority vote, that the information concerning the judge is
insufficient to make a determination described in Subsection (4)(a)(i) or (ii); or
(iv) fail to make a determination described in Subsection (4)(a)(i), (ii), or (iii) by the
number of votes required for one of those determinations.
      (b)(i) If a judge meets the certification standards established in accordance with
Section 78A-12-205, there is a rebuttable presumption that the judge meets or
exceeds minimum performance standards.
(ii) If a judge fails to meet the certification standards established in accordance with
Section 78A-12-205, there is a rebuttable presumption that the judge does not
meet or exceed minimum performance standards.
                                                 - 21 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
(c) If the commission deviates from a presumption described in Subsection (4)(b), the
commission shall provide a detailed explanation of the reason for that deviation in the
commission's report under Section 78A-12-206.
(d) If the commission makes the determination described in Subsection (4)(a)(iii) or fails
to make a determination described in Subsection (4)(a)(i), (ii), or (iii) by the number
of votes required for those determinations, the commission shall note that fact in the
commission's report.
   (5)[(a) The commission shall allow a judge who is the subject of a judicial performance
retention evaluation, and who has not passed one or more of the certification
standards on the retention evaluation, to appear and speak at any commission meeting
during which the judge's judicial performance evaluation is considered.]
(a) If a judge is the subject of a performance evaluation and has not passed one or more
of the certification standards for that performance evaluation, the commission shall
grant the judge time to appear and speak at a commission meeting during which the
judge's performance evaluation will be considered.
(b) The commission may invite any judge to appear before the commission to discuss
concerns about the judge's judicial performance.
[(c)(i) The commission may meet in a closed meeting to discuss a judge's judicial
performance evaluation by complying with Title 52, Chapter 4, Open and Public
Meetings Act.]
[(ii) The commission may meet in an electronic meeting by complying with Title 52,
Chapter 4, Open and Public Meetings Act.]
[(d) Any record of an individual commissioner's vote under Subsection (4) is a protected
record under Title 63G, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act.]
[(e)(i) A member of the commission, including a member of the Utah State Bar, may
not be disqualified from voting under Subsection (4) solely because the member
appears before the judge as an attorney, a fact witness, or an expert, unless the
member is a litigant in a case pending before the judge.]
[(ii) Notwithstanding Subsection (5)(e)(i), a member of the commission shall disclose
any conflicts of interest with the judge being reviewed to the other members of the
commission before the deliberation and vote under Subsection (4).]
[(iii) Information disclosed under this Subsection (5)(e) is a protected record under
Title 63G, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act.]
[(f) The commission may only disclose the final commission vote described in
                                                 - 22 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
Subsection (4).]
  (6)(a) If the Utah Supreme Court issues a public sanction of a judge after the
      commission makes or fails to make a determination described in Subsection (4), but
      before the publication of the voter information pamphlet in accordance with Section
      20A-7-702, the commission may elect to reconsider the commission's action.
      (b) The commission shall invite the judge described in Subsection (6)(a) to appear
before the commission during a closed meeting for the purpose of reconsidering the
commission's action.
      (c) The judge described in Subsection (6)(a) may provide a written statement, not to
exceed 100 words, that shall be included in the judge's judicial performance
evaluation report.
      (d) The commission shall include in the judge's judicial performance evaluation report:
(i) the date of the reconsideration;
(ii) any change in the action of the commission; and
(iii) a brief statement explaining the reconsideration.
      (e) The commission shall:
(i) submit revisions to the judge's judicial performance evaluation report to the
lieutenant governor by no later than August 31 of a regular general election year
for publication in the voter information pamphlet[, and] ; and
(ii) publish the revisions on the commission's website, and through any other means
the commission considers appropriate and within budgetary constraints.
  (7)(a) The commission shall compile a midterm report of the commission's judicial
      performance evaluation of a judge.
      (b) The midterm report of a judicial performance evaluation shall include information
that the commission considers appropriate for purposes of judicial self-improvement.
      (c)(i) The report shall be provided to the evaluated judge, the presiding judge of the
district in which the evaluated judge serves, and the Judicial Council.
(ii) If the evaluated judge is the presiding judge, the midterm report shall be provided
to the chair of the board of judges for the court level on which the evaluated judge
serves.
      (d)(i) The commission may provide a partial midterm evaluation to a judge whose
appointment date precludes the collection of complete midterm evaluation data.
(ii) For a newly appointed judge, a midterm evaluation is considered partial when the
midterm evaluation is missing a respondent group, including attorneys, court staff,
                                                 - 23 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
court room observers, or intercept survey respondents.
(iii) A judge who receives partial midterm evaluation data may receive a statement in
acknowledgment of that fact on the judge's voter information pamphlet page.
(iv) On or before the beginning of the retention evaluation cycle, the commission
shall inform the Judicial Council of the name of any judge who receives a partial
midterm evaluation.
   (8) The commission shall identify a judge whose midterm evaluation:
(a) fails to meet certification standards in accordance with Section 78A-12-205 or as
established by rule; or
(b) otherwise demonstrates to the commission that the judge's performance would be of
such concern if the performance occurred in a retention evaluation that the judge
would be invited to appear before the commission in accordance with Subsection
(5)(b).
   (9) The commission may make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah
Administrative Rulemaking Act, as necessary to administer the evaluation required by
this section.
Section 8. Section 78A-12-204 is amended to read:
78A-12-204 . Judicial performance survey.
   (1) A third party under contract to the commission shall conduct, on an ongoing basis
during the judge's term in office, the judicial performance survey required by Section
78A-12-203 concerning a judge who is subject to a retention election.
   (2)(a) The judicial performance survey shall include as respondents a sample of each of
the following groups as applicable:
(i) attorneys who have appeared before the judge as counsel;
(ii) jurors who have served in a case before the judge;[ and]
(iii) court staff who have worked with the judge[.] ; and
(iv) to the extent practical, individuals who have appeared before the judge as a party
in a case.
(b) Only a respondent under Subsection (2)(a)(i) who is admitted to practice law in the
state and in good standing with the Utah State Bar may evaluate a judge's legal [
ability] competence under Subsection (7)(a).
   (3) The commission may include an additional classification of respondents if the
commission:
(a) considers a judicial performance survey of that classification of respondents helpful
                                                 - 24 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
to voters in determining whether to vote to retain a judge; and
      (b) establishes the additional classification of respondents by rule.
  (4) All survey responses for a judicial performance survey are confidential, including
      comments included with a survey response.
  (5) If the commission provides information to a judge or the Judicial Council, the
      commission shall provide the information in such a way as to protect the anonymity of a
      survey respondent.
  [(6) A survey shall be provided to a potential survey respondent within 30 days of the day
      on which the case in which the person appears in the judge's court is closed, exclusive of
      any appeal, except for court staff and attorneys, who may be surveyed at any time during
      the survey period.]
  (6) A judicial performance survey shall be provided to a potential survey respondent:
      (a) if the potential survey respondent is court staff or an attorney, at any time during the
survey period;
      (b) if the potential survey respondent is a juror, within 30 days after the verdict is
reached; and
      (c) if the potential survey respondent is an individual who appeared before the judge as a
party and to the extent practical, within 90 days after the day on which the case is
closed excluding any time for an appeal.
  (7) [Survey categories shall include questions concerning a judge's] A judicial performance
      survey shall provide a survey respondent with the ability to evaluate:
      (a) [legal ability, including the following] a judge's legal competence, including:
(i) [demonstration of] demonstrated understanding of the substantive law and any
relevant rules of procedure and evidence;
(ii) attentiveness to factual and legal issues before the court;
(iii) adherence to precedent and ability to clearly explain departures from precedent;
and
(iv) [grasp] awareness of the practical impact on the parties of the judge's rulings,
including the effect of delay and increased litigation expense;
[(v) ability to write clear judicial opinions; and]
[(vi) ability to clearly explain the legal basis for judicial opinions;]
      (b) a judge's impartiality, including:
(i) absence of bias or prejudice based on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability,
age, sexual orientation, political affiliation, socioeconomic status, legal
                                                 - 25 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
representation, or mental health or competency;
(ii) demonstrated fairness and neutrality towards all parties;
(iii) consideration given to all arguments and viewpoints before rendering a final
decision; and
(iv) respect and dignified treatment, given equally and without favoritism, towards
attorneys, court staff, and all other individuals appearing before the judge;
(c) a judge's ability to communicate clearly, including:
(i) ability to write clear judicial opinions or decisions, findings of fact, conclusions of
law, and other orders;
(ii) ability to write a clear factual and legal basis for judicial opinions and decisions;
and
(iii) demonstrated ability to adapt the judge's communication style, including the use
of plain language, when needed to communicate with specific individuals, parties,
or audiences;
[(b)] (d) the judge's judicial temperament[ and integrity, including the following] ,
including:
(i) [demonstration of ] demonstrated courtesy toward attorneys, court staff, and others
in the judge's court;
[(ii) maintenance of decorum in the courtroom;]
[(iii)] (ii) [demonstration of ] the ability to maintain judicial demeanor and personal
attributes that promote public trust and confidence in the judicial system;
[(iv) preparedness for oral argument;]
(iii) ability to maintain courtroom decorum;
[(v)] (iv) avoidance of impropriety or the appearance of impropriety; and
(v) attentiveness towards the proceedings and all parties; and
[(vi) display of fairness and impartiality toward all parties; and]
[(vii) ability to clearly communicate, including the ability to explain the basis for
written rulings, court procedures, and decisions; and]
[(c)] (e) administrative [performance, including the following] capacity, including:
[(i) management of workload;]
[(ii) sharing proportionally the workload within the court or district; and]
[(iii) issuance of opinions and orders without unnecessary delay.]
(i) effective management of workload and the competent use of technology necessary
to manage cases, court filings, and otherwise discharge judicial duties;
                                                  - 26 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
(ii) timely issuance of opinions, orders, and other judicial rulings without
unnecessary delay; and
(iii) ability to set clear expectations and timelines and to regularly monitor cases and
streamline procedures.
  (8) If the commission determines that a certain survey question or category of questions is
      not appropriate for a respondent group, the commission may omit that question or
      category of questions from the judicial performance survey provided to that respondent
      group.
  [(9)(a) The survey shall allow respondents to indicate responses in a manner determined
      by the commission, which shall be:]
[(i) on a numerical scale from one to five; or]
[(ii) in the affirmative or negative, with an option to indicate the respondent's
inability to respond in the affirmative or negative.]
      [(b)(i) To supplement the responses to questions on either a numerical scale or in the
affirmative or negative, the commission may allow respondents to provide written
comments.]
[(ii) The executive director may not provide the commission a comment that would
be prohibited in relation to taking an employment action under federal or state law.]
  (9) The commission may formulate questions that allow survey respondents to provide
      responses through various means, including the ability to:
      (a) rank individuals and activities on a numerical scale;
      (b) evaluate judicial performance using affirmative or negative responses, including the
option to indicate the respondent's inability to respond in the affirmative or negative;
      (c) answer nonrestrictive questions that explain or expand upon the survey categories
described in Subsection (7) by providing additional written comments; and
      (d) supplement answers that rank individuals or activities based on a numerical scale or
that call for an affirmative or negative answer by allowing a survey respondent to
comment in writing.
  (10) The executive director may not provide the commission with any response that would
      be prohibited in relation to taking an employment action under federal or state law.
  [(10)] (11) The commission shall compile and make available to each judge that judge's
      judicial performance survey results with each of the judge's judicial performance
      evaluations.
  [(11)] (12) The commission may make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah
                                                - 27 -
 S.B. 233  Enrolled Copy
Administrative Rulemaking Act, as necessary to administer the judicial performance
survey.
Section 9. Section 78A-12-205 is amended to read:
78A-12-205 . Certification standards.
   (1) As used in this section:
(a) "Opinions" means the decisions authored by a judge for the calendar year.
(b) "Submission" means the later of the day on which:
(i) staff placed a matter in the case needing a decision from the court in the judge's
personal electronic queue or inbox, personal possession, or any other equivalent;
(ii) if a hearing or oral argument is set for a matter in the case, the hearing or oral
argument concluded; or
(iii) if further briefing is required in the case after a hearing or oral argument, all
briefing is completed, a request to submit is filed, or the matter is placed in the
judge's personal electronic queue or inbox, personal possession, or any other
equivalent.
   [(1)] (2) The commission shall establish certification standards requiring that:
(a) the judge have no more than one public sanction issued by the [Utah ]Supreme Court
during the judge's current term; and
(b) the judge receive a minimum score on the judicial performance survey as follows:
(i) an average score of no less than 65% on each survey category as provided in
Subsection 78A-12-204(7); and
(ii) if the commission includes a question on the survey that does not use the
numerical scale, [the commission shall establish the certification standard for all
questions that do not use the numerical scale to be substantially equivalent] a
substantial equivalent to the standard required under Subsection [(1)(b)(i)] (2)(b)(i).
   (3)(a) In addition to Subsection (2), the commission shall establish certification
standards for a judge of the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals that address timely
management of the judge's caseload, including:
(i) for a justice of the Supreme Court, a certification standard that requires the justice
to have distributed to other members of the Supreme Court:
(A) no more than 25% of opinions more than 150 days after submission;
(B) no more than 10% of opinions more than 210 days after submission; and
(C) 100% of all opinions within one year after submission; and
(ii) for a judge of the Court of Appeals, a certification standard that requires the judge
                                                    - 28 -
 Enrolled Copy  S.B. 233
to have distributed to other members of a Court of Appeals' panel:
(A) no more than 25% of opinions more than 120 days after submission;
(B) no more than 10% of opinions more than 180 days after submission; and
(C) 100% of all opinions within 270 days after submission.
      (b) This Subsection (3) only applies to a submission on or after May 6, 2026.
  [(2)] (4) The commission may establish an additional certification standard if the
      commission by at least two-thirds vote:
      (a) determines that satisfaction of the standard is necessary to the satisfactory
performance of the judge; and
      (b) adopts the standard.
  [(3)] (5) The commission may make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah
      Administrative Rulemaking Act, to establish a certification standard.
Section 10. Repealer.
This bill repeals:
Section 78A-12-101, Title.
Section 11. Effective Date.
  This bill takes effect on May 6, 2026.
                                                - 29 -

Judicial Performance Evaluation Amendments

Sponsors

Sen. Brady Brammer (R) sponsors SB 233, and 1 member has co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 233 went before 3 committees: Rules, Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice and Judiciary.

Rules
Rules
Referred to · Feb 3, 2026
Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice
Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice
Referred to · Feb 3, 2026
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred to · Feb 25, 2026

History

SB 233 has taken 46 actions since Feb 2, 2026, the latest on Mar 23, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 23, 2026
—
Governor Signed in Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
Mar 13, 2026
Senate
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing in Senate Secretary
Mar 13, 2026
—
Senate/ to Governor in Executive Branch - Governor
Mar 11, 2026
Senate
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate in Senate Secretary
Mar 11, 2026
Senate
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing in Senate Secretary

Votes

SB 233 went to 6 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Mar 4, 2026 at 51–18.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Mar 4, 2026
House
House/ passed 3rd reading
51
18
Feb 26, 2026
House
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
8
2
Feb 24, 2026
Senate
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
18
7
Feb 23, 2026
Senate
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
20
5
Feb 9, 2026
Senate
Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
6
0

Source: le.utah.gov · legiscan.com