Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 1056

California SenateEnrolled

Summary

SB 1056, “Criminal procedure”, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 12, 2026 by Sen. Tim Grayson (D) with 8 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Aug 28, 2026: Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.


Record

Text

SB 1056 has 8 co-sponsors and 8 roll calls.

sb1056/enrolled.txt
Bill Text - SB-1056 Criminal procedure.
/* Hide page by default*/
html { display : none; }
// = 0)) {
window.top.location.replace(window.location);
top.location = self.location;
}
}
}
// ]]>
/* Hide page by default*/
html { display : inline; }
//
function changePlaceHolder() {
var x = document.getElementById("billheaderinit_form:quick_search_select_id");
var input = document.getElementById("billheaderinit_form:searchall");
if (x !== null) {
if (x.options[0].selected) {
input.placeholder = "AB1 or ab 1 or ABX1-1";
} else {
input.placeholder = "Search phrase";
}
}
}
skip to content
home
accessibility
FAQ
feedback
sitemap
login
x
Quick Search:
Bill Number
Bill Keyword
Home
Bill Information
California Law
Publications
Other Resources
My Subscriptions
My Favorites
Bill Information
>>
Bill Search
>>
Text
Bill Text
function asAmendsPopup() {
window.open("asAmendsInfo.xhtml", "Information", "width=330, height=220, toolbar=no, location=no, directories=no, menubar=no, scrollbars=no, top=270, left=150")
}
function selectVersion() {
var versionObj = document.getElementById("version");
var selectedVersionId = '20250SB105695ENR';
var len = versionObj.options.length;
//alert('selectedVersionId='+selectedVersionId);
for (i = 0; i
PDF2
Bill PDF
| Add To My Favorites | Track Bill | Version: 08/25/26 - Enrolled
08/13/26 - Amended Assembly
06/24/26 - Amended Assembly
03/26/26 - Amended Senate
02/12/26 - Introduced
SB-1056 Criminal procedure. (2025-2026)
Text
>>
Votes
>>
History
>>
Bill Analysis
>>
Today's Law As Amended
>>
Compare Versions
>>
Status
>>
Comments To Author
>>
Track Bill
>>
Add To My Favorites
>>
selectVersion();
SHARE THIS:
Date Published: 08/25/2026 09:00 PM
SB1056:v95#DOCUMENT
Bill Start
Enrolled
August 25, 2026
Passed
IN
Senate
August 24, 2026
Passed
IN
Assembly
August 19, 2026
Amended
IN
Assembly
August 13, 2026
Amended
IN
Assembly
June 24, 2026
Amended
IN
Senate
March 26, 2026
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—
2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill
No. 1056 Introduced by Senators Grayson and Wahab (Coauthors: Senators Cabaldon, Ochoa Bogh, Richardson, Rubio, and Seyarto) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis and Schultz) February 12, 2026 An act to add Section 1054.11 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal procedure. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1056, Grayson.
Criminal procedure. Existing law requires a prosecuting attorney to disclose to the defendant or their attorney all relevant real evidence seized or obtained as a part of the investigation of the offenses charged that is in the possession of the prosecuting attorney or known to be in the possession of the investigating agencies. Existing law requires the disclosures to be made at least 30 days prior to the trial, unless good cause is shown why a disclosure should be denied, restricted, or deferred. Existing law prohibits an attorney from disclosing or permitting to be disclosed to a defendant, members of the defendant’s family, or anyone else copies of child pornography evidence, unless specifically permitted to do so by the court after a hearing and a showing of good cause. Existing law authorizes an attorney to disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of child
pornography evidence to persons employed by the attorney or to persons appointed by the court to assist in the preparation of a defendant’s case if that disclosure is required for that preparation. This bill would require the court, in specified criminal cases involving sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, to issue a protective order governing the disclosure of that material, with conditions sufficient to safeguard the victim’s privacy, prevent unnecessary copying, transmission, or dissemination of the material, and ensure the defendant’s right to a fair trial and a meaningful opportunity to participate in their own defense. This bill would, if the court issues that protective order, prohibit the parties from disclosing to any person copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, unless specifically permitted to do so by the protective order. The bill would authorize an attorney for any
party to disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim subject to the protective order, to a person necessary for the preparation of the case, including the defendant. The bill would, if a party receives any other sexually explicit material of the adult victim, require the party to notify the court for inclusion of the material in any existing protective order, or inclusion in a new or separate protective order. By increasing duties on local prosecutors, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would clarify that these provisions do not relieve the prosecution from the duty to disclose the existence of any relevant or exculpatory evidence nor affect the admissibility of any relevant evidence in court. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Digest Key
Vote:
MAJORITY
Appropriation:
NO
Fiscal Committee:
YES
Local Program:
YES Bill Text The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 1054.11 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 1054.10, to read: 1054.11. (a) (1) In a criminal case in which a defendant is being prosecuted for a violation of any offense listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 that is also required to register pursuant to Section 290, or a violation of subdivision (j) of Section 647, involving sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, the court shall issue, upon a noticed motion of either the prosecutor or the defense attorney, or on its own motion with notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard by both parties, a protective order governing the disclosure of that material, by any party, with conditions sufficient to do all of the following: (A) Safeguard the adult victim’s privacy. (B) Prevent unnecessary copying, transmission, or dissemination of the material. (C) Ensure the defendant’s right to a fair trial and a meaningful opportunity to participate in their own defense. (2) If a defendant is representing themselves, the court shall consider whether the protective order shall include a requirement that the material be viewed in a secured location. In any such case, the defendant shall not retain a copy of the material after the case has ended. (3) Except as provided in this
subdivision, if the court issues a protective order, the parties shall be prohibited from disclosing to any person copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, unless specifically permitted to do so by the terms of the protective order. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), an attorney for any party may disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim subject to the protective order, to a person necessary for the preparation of the case, including the defendant. (c) If a party receives any other sexually explicit material of the adult victim, the party shall notify the court for inclusion of the material in any existing protective order, or inclusion in a new or separate protective order. (d) (1) This section does not relieve the prosecution from the duty to disclose the existence of any relevant or exculpatory evidence. (2) This section is not intended to affect the admissibility of any relevant evidence in any court proceeding. SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

An act to add Section 1054.11 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal procedure.

Sponsors

Sen. Tim Grayson (D) sponsors SB 1056, and 8 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 1056 went before 3 committees: Rules, Public Safety and Appropriations.

Rules
Rules
Referred to · Feb 12, 2026
Public Safety
Public Safety
Referred to · Feb 26, 2026
Appropriations
Appropriations
Referred to · Mar 25, 2026

History

SB 1056 has taken 27 actions since Feb 12, 2026, the latest on Aug 28, 2026.

ChamberAction
Aug 28, 2026
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
Aug 24, 2026
Senate
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Aug 19, 2026
Assembly
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
Aug 19, 2026
Senate
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
Aug 17, 2026
Assembly
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Votes

SB 1056 went to 8 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on Aug 24, 2026 at 400.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Aug 24, 2026
Senate
Unfinished Business SB1056 Grayson et al. Concurrence
40
0
Aug 19, 2026
Assembly
SB 1056 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Schultz
78
0
Aug 13, 2026
Assembly
Do pass as amended
11
0
Jun 30, 2026
Assembly
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
9
0
May 19, 2026
Senate
Senate 3rd Reading SB1056 Grayson
39
0

Source: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · legiscan.com