Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 278

Connecticut SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

SB 278, the An Act Concerning Military Protective Orders To Address Military Interpersonal Violence, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 19, 2026 by Veterans' and Military Affairs Committee with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 12, 2026: Favorable Change of Reference, House to Committee on Judiciary.


Record

Text

SB 278 has 1 co-sponsor and 1 roll call.

sb00278/comm-sub.txt
General Assembly Substitute Bill No. 278
February Session, 2026
AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO
ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General
Assembly convened:
Section 1. Subsection (b) of section 46b-15 of the 2026 supplement to
the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu
thereof (Effective October 1, 2026):
(b) The application form shall allow the applicant, at the applicant's
option, to indicate whether the respondent holds a permit to carry a
pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long
gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one
or more firearms or ammunition. The application shall be accompanied
by an affidavit made under oath which includes a brief statement of the
conditions from which relief is sought. Upon receipt of the application
the court shall order that a hearing on the application be held not later
than fourteen days from the date of the order except that, if the
application indicates that the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol
or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun
eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or
more firearms or ammunition, and the court orders an ex parte order,
the court shall order that a hearing be held on the application not later
than seven days from the date on which the ex parte order is issued. The
court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate
LCO 1 of 6
Substitute Bill No. 278
for the protection of the applicant and such dependent children or other
persons as the court sees fit. In making such orders ex parte, the court,
in its discretion, may consider relevant court records if the records are
available to the public from a clerk of the Superior Court or on the
Judicial Branch's Internet web site. In addition, at the time of the
hearing, the court, in its discretion, may also consider a report prepared
by the family services unit of the Judicial Branch, provided the person
who prepared such report is available to testify at the hearing and is
subject to cross examination. The report may include, as available: Any
existing or prior orders of protection obtained from the [protection
order] registry of protective orders maintained pursuant to section 51-
5c, as amended by this act, including any military protective orders
contained in such registry; information on any pending criminal case or
past criminal case in which the respondent was convicted of a violent
crime; any outstanding arrest warrant for the respondent; and the
respondent's level of risk based on a risk assessment tool utilized by the
Court Support Services Division. The report may also include
information pertaining to any pending or disposed family matters case
involving the applicant and respondent. Any report provided by the
Court Support Services Division to the court shall also be provided to
the applicant and respondent. Such orders may include temporary child
custody or visitation rights, and such relief may include, but is not
limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from (1) imposing any
restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant; (2) threatening,
harassing, assaulting, molesting, sexually assaulting or attacking the
applicant; or (3) entering the family dwelling or the dwelling of the
applicant. Such order may include provisions necessary to protect any
animal owned or kept by the applicant including, but not limited to, an
order enjoining the respondent from injuring or threatening to injure
such animal. If an applicant alleges an immediate and present physical
danger to the applicant, the court may issue an ex parte order granting
such relief as it deems appropriate. If a postponement of a hearing on
the application is requested by either party and granted, the ex parte
order shall not be continued except upon agreement of the parties or by
order of the court for good cause shown. If a hearing on the application
LCO 2 of 6
Substitute Bill No. 278
is scheduled or an ex parte order is granted and the court is closed on
the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the next day the
court is open and any such ex parte order shall remain in effect until the
date of such hearing. If the applicant is under eighteen years of age, a
parent, guardian or responsible adult who brings the application as next
friend of the applicant may not speak on the applicant's behalf at such
hearing unless there is good cause shown as to why the applicant is
unable to speak on his or her own behalf, except that nothing in this
subsection shall preclude such parent, guardian or responsible adult
from testifying as a witness at such hearing. As used in this subsection,
"violent crime" includes: (A) An incident resulting in physical harm,
bodily injury or assault; (B) an act of threatened violence that constitutes
fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury or assault, including, but
not limited to, stalking or a pattern of threatening; (C) verbal abuse or
argument if there is a present danger and likelihood that physical
violence will occur; and (D) cruelty to animals as set forth in section 53-
247, and "military protective order" means a protective order issued by
a commanding officer in the armed forces of the United States or the
Connecticut National Guard against a person under such officer's
command.
Sec. 2. Subsection (b) of section 46b-16a of the general statutes is
repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October
1, 2026):
(b) The application shall be accompanied by an affidavit made by the
applicant under oath that includes a statement of the specific facts that
form the basis for relief. If the applicant attests that disclosure of the
applicant's location information would jeopardize the health, safety or
liberty of the applicant or the applicant's children, the applicant may
request, on a form prescribed by the Chief Court Administrator, that his
or her location information not be disclosed. Upon receipt of the
application, if the allegations set forth in the affidavit meet the
requirements of subsection (a) of this section, the court shall schedule a
hearing not later than fourteen days from the date of the application. If
a postponement of a hearing on the application is requested by either
LCO 3 of 6
Substitute Bill No. 278
party, no ex parte order shall be continued except upon agreement of
the parties or by order of the court for good cause shown. If the court is
closed on the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the
next day the court is open and any ex parte order that was issued shall
remain in effect until the date of such hearing. If the applicant is under
eighteen years of age, a parent, guardian or responsible adult who
brings the application as next friend of the applicant may not speak on
the applicant's behalf at such hearing unless there is good cause shown
as to why the applicant is unable to speak on his or her own behalf,
except that nothing in this subsection shall preclude such parent,
guardian or responsible adult from testifying as a witness at such
hearing. If the court finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe
that the respondent has committed acts constituting grounds for
issuance of an order under this section and will continue to commit such
acts, or acts designed to intimidate or retaliate against the applicant, the
court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate
for the protection of the applicant. If the court finds that there are
reasonable grounds to believe that an imminent danger exists to the
applicant, the court may issue an ex parte order granting such relief as
it deems appropriate. In making such orders, the court, in its discretion,
may consider relevant court records if the records are available to the
public from a clerk of the Superior Court or on the Judicial Branch's
Internet web site, as well as any existing or prior military protective
order that is contained in the registry of protective orders maintained
pursuant to section 51-5c, as amended by this act, and that may have
been obtained from such registry. Such orders may include, but are not
limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from: (1) Imposing any
restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant; (2) threatening,
harassing, assaulting, molesting, sexually assaulting or attacking the
applicant; and (3) entering the dwelling of the applicant. As used in this
subsection, "military protective order" means a protective order issued
by a commanding officer in the armed forces of the United States or the
Connecticut National Guard against a person under such officer's
command.
LCO 4 of 6
Substitute Bill No. 278
Sec. 3. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2026) (a) As used in this section,
"military protective order" means a protective order issued by a
commanding officer in the armed forces of the United States or the
Connecticut National Guard against a person under such officer's
command.
(b) A military protective order may be registered in this state by
sending to the Superior Court in this state: (1) A letter or other document
requesting registration; (2) two copies, including one certified copy, of
the military protective order sought to be registered and a statement
under penalty of perjury that, to the best of the knowledge and belief of
the petitioner, the order has not been modified; and (3) the name and
address of the person seeking registration, except if the disclosure of
such name and address would jeopardize the safety of such person.
(c) On receipt of the documents required in subsection (b) of this
section, the registering court shall: (1) Cause the military protective
order to be filed, together with one copy of any accompanying
documents and information, regardless of their form; and (2) cause the
military protective order to be entered in the automated registry of
protective orders maintained pursuant to section 51-5c of the general
statutes, as amended by this act, together with any accompanying
information required or permitted to be contained in the registry of
protective orders pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Chief
Court Administrator under section 51-5c of the general statutes, as
amended by this act.
Sec. 4. Subsection (a) of section 51-5c of the 2026 supplement to the
general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu
thereof (Effective October 1, 2026):
(a) The Chief Court Administrator shall establish and maintain an
automated registry of protective orders that shall contain (1) protective
or restraining orders issued by courts of this state, including, but not
limited to, orders issued pursuant to sections 46b-15, as amended by this
act, 46b-16a, as amended by this act, 46b-38c, 53a-40e, 54-1k, 54-82q and
LCO 5 of 6
Substitute Bill No. 278
54-82r, [and] (2) foreign orders of protection that have been registered
in this state pursuant to section 46b-15a, and (3) military protective
orders that have been registered in this state pursuant to section 3 of this
act. The registry shall clearly indicate the date of commencement, the
termination date, if specified, and the duration of any order contained
therein. The Chief Court Administrator shall adopt policies and
procedures for the operation of the registry, which shall include policies
and procedures governing the disclosure of information in the registry
to the judges of the Superior Court and employees of the Judicial
Department.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following
sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2026 46b-15(b)
Sec. 2 October 1, 2026 46b-16a(b)
Sec. 3 October 1, 2026 New section
Sec. 4 October 1, 2026 51-5c(a)
VA Joint Favorable Subst. C/R JUD
LCO 6 of 6

To (1) provide that courts may consider prior or existing military protective orders that are contained in the state's automated registry of protective orders when issuing a civil protective order for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, sexual violence or stalking, and (2) specify that such registry contains military protective orders that have been entered into the National Crime Information Center computerized index.

Sponsors

Veterans' and Military Affairs Committee sponsors SB 278, and 1 member has co-sponsored it.

Committees

SB 278 went before 2 committees: Veterans' and Military Affairs and Judiciary.

Veterans' and Military Affairs
Veterans' and Military Affairs
Referred to · Feb 19, 2026
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred to · Mar 10, 2026

History

SB 278 has taken 7 actions since Feb 19, 2026, the latest on Mar 12, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 12, 2026
Senate
Favorable Change of Reference, Senate to Committee on Judiciary
Mar 12, 2026
Senate
Favorable Change of Reference, House to Committee on Judiciary
Mar 11, 2026
Senate
Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Mar 11, 2026
Senate
Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
Mar 10, 2026
Senate
Joint Favorable Substitute Change of Reference Judiciary

Votes

SB 278 went to 1 roll call in the J, the latest on Mar 10, 2026 at 220.

ChamberQuestion
Yea
Nay
Mar 10, 2026
J
VA Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable Substitute Change of Reference)
22
0

Source: cga.ct.gov · legiscan.com