- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

A 4543
New Jersey Assembly•Passed
Summary
A 4543, which permits Paterson and Newark police who were promoted following February 2019 police sergeant exam to have those promotions deemed regular appointments, was introduced in the Assembly on Mar 10, 2026 by Asm. Al Abdelaziz (D) with 5 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jun 30, 2026: Approved P.L.2026, c.19.
Record
Text
A 4543 has 5 co-sponsors and 5 roll calls.
a4543/enrolled.txtT&EP.L.2026, CHAPTER 19, approved June 30, 2026Assembly, No. 4543An Act concerning the February 2019 civil servicepolice sergeant exam.���� Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of NewJersey:���� 1.��� The Legislature finds and declares that:���� a.���� On February 23, 2019,the New Jersey Civil Service Commission administered a promotional policesergeant exam.���� b.��� Following the exam, the commission's Division ofTest Development, Analytics and Administration analyzed the examination's rawdata results and recommended that, in accordance with a consent decree reachedwith the United States Department of Justice, as well as existing law, the last10 exam questions should not be scored because they disproportionately affectedBlack and Hispanic candidates, revealing a disparity in racial minority andnon-racial minority candidates' performance. �The commission agreed andreleased the scoring results, excluding the last 10 questions from scoring.���� c.���� Following the commission�s decision, a challengeof that decision was raised by several petitioners arguing that thecommission's action was arbitrary and capricious, adversely impacted theexaminees that followed the instructions, managed their time properly, andcompleted the exam in the allotted time and, therefore the test results shouldbe nullified.���� d.��� On August 22, 2025, an Appellate Divisiondecision was issued requiring that the 2019 test results be invalidated, and anew exam be administered.���� e.���� Following the Appellate Division decision, thecommission issued an order on November 10, 2025, which determined that thecourt�s decision will only apply to police officers in Paterson and Newark whotook the 2019 exam and therefore ordered that only those officers from thosecities who were promoted following that exam be required to retake the exam.���� f.���� The commission�s order further stated thatappointments from the police sergeant eligible lists in Newark and Paterson resultingfrom the examination, as well as any other appointments from subsequent policepromotional lists of employees who were originally promoted from these police sergeantlists were deemed conditional, pending the results of a new examination.���� g.��� As a result of these decisions, over 100 policeofficers in Newark and Paterson may face demotions.���� h.��� The potential demotion of so many police officerswould negatively impact morale, disrupt the chain of command, compromiseinternal operations, and therefore pose a risk to the public safety of two ofthe State�s largest cities.���� i.���� This potential risk to public safety poses anunnecessary and unacceptable risk to the citizens of this State.���� 2.��� Notwithstanding any law, rule, regulation, oradministrative decision or action to the contrary, anypromotions determined to be conditional as a result of the final administrativeaction of the Civil Service Commission issued on November 10, 2025, In theMatter of Gabriele Spallacci, et al., CSC Docket No. 2026-1023, shall be deemedto be regular appointments as of the date the original appointments wereinitially made, without need to take a new examination.� Such regularappointments shall be considered to be permanent appointments following theindividual�s successful completion of any applicable working test periodrequirements.� The personnel records of such appointees shall be adjusted bythe appointing authority as may be necessary to reflect the originalappointment dates.���� 3.��� This act shall take effect immediately.STATEMENT���� This bill permits Paterson and Newark police officerswho were promoted following the February 23, 2019, police sergeants exam tohave those promotions deemed as regular appointments.���� On February 23, 2019, the New Jersey Civil ServiceCommission administered a promotional police sergeant exam.� Following theexam, the commission's Division of Test Development, Analytics andAdministration analyzed the examination's raw data results and recommendedthat, in accordance with a consent decree reached with the United StatesDepartment of Justice, as well as existing law, the last 10 exam questionsshould not be scored because they disproportionately affected Black andHispanic candidates, revealing a disparity in racial minority and non-racialminority candidates' performance.� The commission agreed and released thescoring results, which excluded the last 10 questions from scoring.���� Following the commission�s decision, a challenge ofthat decision was raised by several petitioners arguing that the commission'saction was arbitrary and capricious, adversely impacted the examinees thatfollowed the instructions, managed their time properly, and completed the examin the allotted time and, therefore the test results should be nullified.���� On August 22, 2025, an Appellate Division decision wasissued requiring that the 2019 test results be invalidated, and a new exam beadministered.� Following the Appellate Division decision, the commission issuedan order on November 10, 2025, which determined that the court�s decisionapplied only to police officers in Paterson and Newark who took the 2019 examand therefore ordered that only those officers from those cities who werepromoted following that exam be required to retake the exam.� The commission�sorder further stated that appointments from the police sergeant eligible listsresulting from the examination in Newark and Paterson, as well as any otherappointments from subsequent police promotional lists of employees who wereoriginally promoted from these police sergeant lists were deemed conditional.�As a result of these decisions, over 100 police officers in Newark and Patersonmay face demotions. �The potential demotion of so many police officers wouldnegatively impact morale, disrupt the chain of command, compromise internaloperations, and therefore pose a risk to the public safety of two of theState�s largest cities.� This potential risk to public safety poses anunnecessary and unacceptable risk to the citizens of this State.���� This bill requires that any promotions determined to beconditional as a result of the final administrative action of the Civil ServiceCommission issued on November 10, 2025, In the Matter of Gabriele Spallacci, etal., CSC Docket No. 2026-1023, will be deemed to be regular appointments as ofthe date the original appointments were initially made. �Such regularappointments will be considered to be permanent appointments following theindividual�s successful completion of any applicable working test periodrequirements.� The personnel records of such appointees must be adjusted by thecommission as may be necessary to reflect the original appointment dates.���� Permits Paterson and Newark police who were promotedfollowing February 2019 police sergeant exam to have those promotions deemedregular appointments.
Permits Paterson and Newark police who were promoted following February 2019 police sergeant exam to have those promotions deemed regular appointments.
Sponsors
Asm. Al Abdelaziz (D) sponsors A 4543, and 5 members have co-sponsored it.
Committees
A 4543 went before 2 committees: Public Safety and Preparedness Committee and Law and Public Safety.

History
A 4543 has taken 8 actions since Mar 10, 2026, the latest on Jun 30, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2026 | Senate | Approved P.L.2026, c.19. | ||
May 28, 2026 | Senate | Substituted for S4007 | ||
May 28, 2026 | Senate | Passed Senate (Passed Both Houses) (36-0) | ||
May 18, 2026 | Senate | Reported from Senate Committee, 2nd Reading | ||
May 4, 2026 | Senate | Received in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee |
Votes
A 4543 went to 5 roll calls across both chambers, the latest on May 28, 2026 at 0–0.
| Chamber | Question | Yea | Nay | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 28, 2026 | Senate | Senate Floor: Substitute for S4007 (Voice Vote) | 0 | 0 | ||
May 28, 2026 | Senate | Senate Floor: Third Reading - Final Passage | 36 | 0 | ||
May 18, 2026 | Senate | Senate Law and Public Safety Committee: Reported Favorably | 4 | 0 | ||
Mar 23, 2026 | Assembly | Assembly Floor: Third Reading - Final Passage | 72 | 0 | ||
Mar 19, 2026 | Assembly | Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee Committee: Reported Favorably | 7 | 0 |
Source: njleg.state.nj.us · legiscan.com