Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 6362

Washington SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

SB 6362, “Concerning judicial processes”, was introduced in the Senate on Mar 12, 2026 by Sen. Robert Hasegawa (D). It was referred to Law & Justice, and last saw action on Mar 12, 2026: First reading, referred to Law & Justice.


Record

Text

SB 6362 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

sb6362/introduced.txt
S-6052.1
SENATE BILL 6362
State of Washington 69th Legislature 2026 Regular Session
By Senator Hasegawa
AN ACT Relating to judicial processes; amending RCW 2.43.070,
7.105.200, 7.105.205, 7.105.245, 7.105.255, 7.105.310, 7.105.450, and
9.73.030; adding a new section to chapter 7.105 RCW; and creating a
new section.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1. RCW 2.43.070 and 2025 c 55 s 8 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) Subject to the availability of funds, the administrative
office of the courts shall establish and maintain a credentialing
program for spoken language interpreters and administer comprehensive
testing.
(2) The administrative office of the courts shall work
cooperatively with public or private educational institutions, and
with other public or private organizations to establish suitable
training programs and engage in recruitment efforts to ensure the
availability of credentialed interpreters. Training programs shall be
made readily available in both eastern and western Washington
locations. Training programs shall include trainings on mutually
unintelligible languages.
p. 1 SB 6362
(3) The administrative office of the courts shall establish and
adopt standards of proficiency, written and oral, and, if applicable,
tonal, in English and the language to be interpreted.
(4) The administrative office of the courts shall conduct
periodic examinations to ensure the availability of credentialed
interpreters. Periodic examinations shall be made readily available
in both eastern and western Washington locations.
(5) The administrative office of the courts shall compile,
maintain, and disseminate a current list of interpreters credentialed
by the office.
(6) The administrative office of the courts may charge reasonable
fees for testing, training, and credentialing.
(7) The administrative office of the courts may create different
credentials, including heightened credentials for interpreters
interpreting in the simultaneous mode, and provide guidance for the
selection and use of credentialed and noncredentialed interpreters to
ensure the highest standards of accuracy are maintained in all
judicial proceedings.
Sec. 2. RCW 7.105.200 and 2022 c 268 s 12 are each amended to
read as follows:
In hearings under this chapter, the following apply:
(1) Hearings under this chapter are special proceedings. The
procedures established under this chapter for protection order
hearings supersede inconsistent civil court rules. Courts should
evaluate the needs and procedures best suited to individual hearings
based on consideration of the totality of the circumstances,
including disparities that may be apparent in the parties' resources
and representation by counsel.
(2)(a) Courts shall prioritize hearings on petitions for ex parte
temporary protection orders over less emergent proceedings.
(b) For extreme risk protection order hearings where a law
enforcement agency is the petitioner, the court shall prioritize
scheduling because of the importance of immediate temporary removal
of firearms in situations of extreme risk and the goal of minimizing
the time law enforcement must otherwise wait for a particular case to
be called, which can hinder their other patrol and supervisory
duties. Courts also may allow a law enforcement petitioner to
participate remotely, or allow another representative from that law
enforcement agency or the prosecutor's office to present the
p. 2 SB 6362
information to the court if personal presence of the petitioning
officer is not required for testimonial purposes.
(3) If the respondent does not appear for the full hearing and
there is no proof of timely and proper service on the respondent, the
court shall reissue any temporary protection order previously issued
and reset the hearing date. If a temporary protection order is
reissued, the court shall reset the hearing date not later than 14
days from the reissue date. If a temporary protection order is
reissued and the court permits service by mail or by publication, the
court shall reset the hearing date not later than 30 days from the
date of the order authorizing such service. These time frames may be
extended for good cause.
(4) When considering any request to stay, continue, or delay a
hearing under this chapter because of the pendency of a parallel
criminal investigation or prosecution of the respondent, courts shall
apply a rebuttable presumption against such delay and give due
recognition to the purpose of this chapter to provide victims quick
and effective relief. Courts must consider on the record the
following factors:
(a) The extent to which a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights are
or are not implicated, given the special nature of protection order
proceedings, which burden a defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege
substantially less than do other civil proceedings;
(b) Similarities between the civil and criminal cases;
(c) Status of the criminal case;
(d) The interests of the petitioners in proceeding expeditiously
with litigation and the potential prejudice and risk to petitioners
of a delay;
(e) The burden that any particular aspect of the proceeding may
impose on respondents;
(f) The convenience of the court in the management of its cases
and the efficient use of judicial resources;
(g) The interests of persons not parties to the civil litigation;
and
(h) The interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal
litigation.
(5) Hearings may be conducted upon the information provided in
the sworn petition, live testimony of the parties should they choose
to testify, and any additional sworn declarations. Live testimony of
witnesses other than the parties may be requested by a party, but
p. 3 SB 6362
shall not be permitted unless the court finds that live testimony of
witnesses other than the parties is necessary and material. If either
party requests a continuance to allow for proper notice of witnesses
or to afford a party time to seek counsel, the court may continue the
hearing. In considering the request, the court should consider the
rebuttable presumption against delay and the purpose of this chapter
to provide victims quick and effective relief.
(6) If the court continues a hearing for any reason, the court
shall reissue any temporary orders, including orders to surrender and
prohibit weapons, issued with or without notice.
(7) Prehearing discovery under the civil court rules, including,
but not limited to, depositions, requests for production, or requests
for admission, is disfavored and only permitted if specifically
authorized by the court for good cause shown upon written motion of a
party filed six judicial days prior to the hearing and served prior
to the hearing.
(8) The rules of evidence need not be applied, other than with
respect to privileges, the requirements of the rape shield statute
under RCW 9A.44.020, and evidence rules 412 and 413.
(9)(a) The prior sexual activity or the reputation of the
petitioner is inadmissible except:
(i) As evidence concerning the past sexual conduct of the
petitioner with the respondent when this evidence is offered by the
respondent upon the issue of whether the petitioner consented to the
sexual conduct alleged for the purpose of a protection order; or
(ii) When constitutionally required to be admitted.
(b) To determine admissibility, a written motion must be made six
judicial days prior to the protection order hearing. The motion must
include an offer of proof of the relevancy of the proposed evidence
and reasonably specific information as to the date, time, and place
of the past sexual conduct between the petitioner and the respondent.
If the court finds that the offer of proof is relevant to the issue
of the victim's consent, the court shall conduct a hearing in camera.
The court may not admit evidence under this subsection unless it
determines at the hearing that the evidence is relevant and the
probative value of the evidence outweighs the danger of unfair
prejudice. The evidence shall be admissible at the hearing to the
extent an order made by the court specifies the evidence that may be
admitted. If the court finds that the motion and related documents
p. 4 SB 6362
should be sealed pursuant to court rule and governing law, it may
enter an order sealing the documents.
(10) When a petitioner has alleged incapacity to consent to
sexual conduct or sexual penetration due to intoxicants, alcohol, or
other condition, the court must determine on the record whether the
petitioner had the capacity to consent.
(11) Courts shall not require parties to submit duplicate or
working copies of pleadings or other materials filed with the court,
unless the document or documents cannot be scanned or are illegible.
(12) Courts shall, if possible, have petitioners and respondents
in protection order proceedings gather in separate locations and
enter and depart the court room at staggered times. Where the option
is available, for safety purposes, the court should arrange for
petitioners to leave the court premises first and to have court
security escort petitioners to their vehicles or transportation.
(13) If a party has limited English proficiency, the court shall
ensure that such party has reasonable time to confer with an
interpreter appointed under RCW 7.105.245 during court recesses
before continuing a hearing.
Sec. 3. RCW 7.105.205 and 2022 c 268 s 13 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Hearings on protection orders, including hearings concerning
temporary protection orders, full protection orders, compliance,
reissuance, renewal, modification, or termination, may be conducted
in person or remotely in order to enhance access for all parties.
(2) In the court's discretion, parties, witnesses, and others
authorized by this chapter to participate in protection order
proceedings may attend a hearing on a petition for a protection
order, or any hearings conducted pursuant to this chapter, in person
or remotely, including by telephone, video, or other electronic means
where possible. No later than three judicial days before the hearing,
the parties may request to appear at the hearing, with witnesses,
remotely by telephone, video, or other electronic means. The court
shall grant any request for a remote appearance unless the court
finds good cause to require in-person attendance or attendance
through a specific means.
(3) Courts shall require assurances of the identity of persons
who appear by telephone, video, or other electronic means. Courts may
not charge fees for remote appearances.
p. 5 SB 6362
(4) Courts shall not post or stream proceedings or recordings of
protection order hearings online unless (a) a waiver has been
received from all parties, or (b) the hearing is being conducted
online and members of the public do not have in-person access to
observe or listen to the hearing. Unless the court orders a hearing
to be closed to the public consistent with the requirements of
Washington law, courts should provide access to members of the public
who wish to observe or listen to a hearing conducted by telephone,
video, or other electronic means.
(5) If a hearing is held with any parties or witnesses appearing
remotely, the following apply:
(a) Courts should include directions to access a hearing remotely
in the order setting the hearing and in any order granting a party's
request for a remote appearance. Such orders shall also include
directions to request an interpreter and accommodations for
disabilities;
(b) Courts should endeavor to give a party or witness appearing
by telephone no more than a one-hour waiting time by the court for
the hearing to begin. For remote hearings, if the court anticipates
the parties or witnesses will need to wait longer than one hour to be
called or connected, the court should endeavor to inform them of the
estimated start time of the hearing;
(c) Courts should inform the parties before the hearing begins
that the hearing is being recorded by the court, in what manner the
public is able to view the hearing, how a party may obtain a copy of
the recording of the hearing, and that recording or broadcasting any
portion of the hearing by any means other than the court record is
strictly prohibited without prior court approval;
(d) To minimize trauma, while allowing remote hearings to be
observed by the public, courts should take appropriate measures to
prevent members of the public or the parties from harassing or
intimidating any party or witness to a case. Such practices may
include, but are not limited to, disallowing members of the public
from communicating with the parties or with the court during the
hearing, ensuring court controls over microphone and viewing
settings, and announcing limitations on allowing others to record the
hearing;
(e) Courts shall use technology that accommodates American sign
language and other languages;
p. 6 SB 6362
(f) To help ensure that remote access does not undermine personal
safety or privacy, or introduce other risks, courts should protect
the privacy of telephone numbers, emails, and other contact
information for parties, witnesses, and others authorized by this
chapter to participate in protection order proceedings, and inform
them of these safety considerations. Materials available to persons
appearing remotely should include warnings not to state their
addresses or telephone numbers at the hearing, and that they should
ensure that background surroundings do not reveal their location;
(g) Courts should provide the parties, in orders setting the
hearing, with a telephone number and an email address for the court,
which the parties may use to inform the court if they have been
unable to appear remotely for a hearing. Before dismissing or
granting a petition due to the petitioner or respondent not appearing
for a remote hearing, or the court not being able to reach the party
via telephone or video, the court shall check for any notifications
to the court regarding issues with remote access or other
technological difficulties. If any party has provided such
notification to the court, the court shall not dismiss or grant the
petition, but shall reset the hearing by continuing it and reissuing
any temporary order in place. If a party was unable to provide the
notification regarding issues with remote access or other
technological difficulties on the day of the hearing prior to the
court's ruling, that party may seek relief via a motion for
reconsideration; and
(h) A party attending a hearing remotely who is unable to
participate in the hearing outside the presence of others who reside
with the party, but who are not part of the proceeding including, but
not limited to, children, and who asserts that the presence of those
individuals may hinder the party's testimony or the party's ability
to fully and meaningfully participate in the hearing, may request a
continuance on that basis. Such requests may be granted in the
court's discretion. In considering the request, the court may
consider the rebuttable presumption against delay and the purpose of
this chapter to provide victims quick and effective relief.
(6) If an interpreter is appointed pursuant to RCW 7.105.245(2)
for any remote hearing conducted pursuant to this chapter, and if the
interpreter is appearing remotely and interpreting in the
simultaneous mode, then such interpretation must be recorded.
p. 7 SB 6362
Sec. 4. RCW 7.105.245 and 2025 c 55 s 12 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Pursuant to chapter 2.42 RCW, in order to ensure that parties
have meaningful access to the court, an interpreter shall be
appointed for any party who is deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind, or
has a speech impairment and cannot readily understand or communicate
in spoken language. Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 2.42
RCW, the court shall not:
(a) Appoint an interpreter who is not credentialed or duly
qualified by the court to provide interpretation services; or
(b) Appoint a person to provide interpretation services if that
person is serving as an advocate for the party.
(2) Pursuant to chapter 2.43 RCW, in order to ensure that parties
have meaningful access to the court, an interpreter shall be
appointed for any party who has limited English proficiency.
Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 2.43 RCW, the court shall
not:
(a) Appoint an interpreter who is not credentialed or duly
qualified by the court to provide interpretation services; ((or))
(b) Appoint a person to provide interpretation services if that
person is serving as an advocate for the party; or
(c) Require interpretation in the simultaneous mode, unless
requested by the party who needs interpreter services.
(3) Once an interpreter has been appointed for a party, the party
shall no longer be required to make further requests for the
appointment of an interpreter for subsequent hearings or proceedings.
The clerk shall identify the party as a person who needs interpreter
services and the clerk or the court administrator shall be
responsible for ensuring that an interpreter is available for every
subsequent hearing.
(4) The interpreter shall interpret for the party meeting with
either counsel or court staff, or both, for the purpose of preparing
forms and participating in the hearing and court-ordered assessments,
and the interpreter shall sight translate any orders.
(5) The same interpreter shall not serve parties on both sides of
the proceeding when not on the record, nor shall the interpreter
appointed by the court for the proceeding be the same interpreter
appointed for any court-ordered assessments, unless the court finds
good cause on the record to do so because it is not possible to
obtain more than one interpreter for the proceeding, or the safety of
p. 8 SB 6362
the litigants is not compromised, or any other reasons identified by
the court.
(6) Courts shall make a private space available for parties,
counsel, and/or court staff and interpreters to sight translate any
written documents or to meet and confer.
(7) When a hearing is conducted through telephone, video, or
other electronic means, the court must make appropriate arrangements
to permit interpreters to serve the parties and the court as needed.
(8) Courts shall ensure that interpretations in the simultaneous
mode occur in maximum intervals of 30 minutes.
(9) The court shall ensure that a party participating in a
hearing in person has meaningful access to the court by providing
necessary technology and software to such party if the party is
appointed an interpreter under subsection (2) of this section and the
interpretation is conducted in the simultaneous mode.
Sec. 5. RCW 7.105.255 and 2023 c 462 s 202 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) To help ensure familiarity with the unique nature of
protection order proceedings, and an understanding of trauma-informed
practices and best practices in the use of new technologies for
remote hearings, judicial officers, including persons who serve as
judicial officers pro tempore, ((should)) shall receive evidence-
based training on procedural justice, trauma-informed and trauma-
responsive practices, gender-based violence dynamics, coercive
control, elder abuse, juvenile sex offending, teen dating violence,
domestic violence homicide prevention, antibias, antioppression, and
requirements and best practices for the surrender of weapons before
presiding over protection order hearings. Trainings should be
provided on an ongoing basis as best practices, research on trauma,
and legislation continue to evolve. As a method of continuous
training, court commissioners, including pro tempore commissioners,
shall be notified by the presiding judge or court administrator upon
revision of any decision made under this chapter.
(2) Subject to funds appropriated for this specific purpose, the
administrative office of the courts shall ((develop)):
(a) Develop training for judicial officers on the topics listed
in subsection (1) of this section, which must be provided free of
charge to judicial officers; and
p. 9 SB 6362
(b) Develop special certification for judicial officers who have
completed trauma-informed practices training.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 7.105
RCW to read as follows:
Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this
specific purpose, the administrative office of the courts shall
conduct a review of judicial officers' rulings under RCW 7.105.225
from the beginning of the year 2017 through the end of the year 2027.
Sec. 7. RCW 7.105.310 and 2025 c 122 s 2 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) In issuing any type of protection order, other than an ex
parte temporary antiharassment protection order as limited by
subsection (2) of this section, and other than an extreme risk
protection order, the court shall have broad discretion to grant such
relief as the court deems proper, including an order that provides
relief as follows:
(a) Restrain the respondent from committing any of the following
acts against the petitioner and other persons protected by the order:
Domestic violence; nonconsensual sexual conduct or nonconsensual
sexual penetration; sexual abuse; stalking; acts of abandonment,
abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation against a vulnerable adult;
and unlawful harassment;
(b) Restrain the respondent from making any attempts to have
contact, including nonphysical contact, with the petitioner or the
petitioner's family or household members who are minors or other
members of the petitioner's household, either directly, indirectly,
or through third parties regardless of whether those third parties
know of the order;
(c) Exclude the respondent from the residence that the parties
share;
(d) Exclude the respondent from the residence, workplace, or
school of the petitioner; or from the day care or school of a minor
child;
(e) Restrain the respondent from knowingly coming within, or
knowingly remaining within, a specified distance from a specified
location including, but not limited to, a residence, school, day
care, workplace, the protected party's person, and the protected
party's vehicle. The specified distance shall presumptively be at
p. 10 SB 6362
least 1,000 feet, unless the court for good cause finds that a
shorter specified distance is appropriate;
(f) If the parties have children in common, make residential
provisions with regard to their minor children on the same basis as
is provided in chapter 26.09 RCW. However, parenting plans as
specified in chapter 26.09 RCW must not be required under this
chapter. The court may not delay or defer relief under this chapter
on the grounds that the parties could seek a parenting plan or
modification to a parenting plan in a different action. A protection
order must not be denied on the grounds that the parties have an
existing parenting plan in effect. A protection order may suspend the
respondent's contact with the parties' children under an existing
parenting plan, subject to further orders in a family law proceeding;
(g) Order the respondent to participate in a state-certified
domestic violence perpetrator treatment program approved under RCW
43.20A.735 or a state-certified sex offender treatment program
approved under RCW 18.155.070;
(h) Order the respondent to obtain a mental health or chemical
dependency evaluation. If the court determines that a mental health
evaluation is necessary, the court shall clearly document the reason
for this determination and provide a specific question or questions
to be answered by the mental health professional. The court shall
consider the ability of the respondent to pay for an evaluation.
Minors are presumed to be unable to pay. The parent or legal guardian
is responsible for costs unless the parent or legal guardian
demonstrates inability to pay;
(i) In cases where the petitioner and the respondent are students
who attend the same public or private elementary, middle, or high
school, the court, when issuing a protection order and providing
relief, shall consider, among the other facts of the case, the
severity of the act, any continuing physical danger, emotional
distress, or educational disruption to the petitioner, and the
financial difficulty and educational disruption that would be caused
by a transfer of the respondent to another school. The court may
order that the respondent not attend the public or private
elementary, middle, or high school attended by the petitioner. If a
minor respondent is prohibited attendance at the minor's assigned
public school, the school district must provide the student
comparable educational services in another setting. In such a case,
the district shall provide transportation at no cost to the
p. 11 SB 6362
respondent if the respondent's parent or legal guardian is unable to
pay for transportation. The district shall put in place any needed
supports to ensure successful transition to the new school
environment. The court shall send notice of the restriction on
attending the same school as the petitioner to the public or private
school the respondent will attend and to the school the petitioner
attends;
(j) Require the respondent to pay the administrative court costs
and service fees, as established by the county or municipality
incurring the expense, and to reimburse the petitioner for costs
incurred in bringing the action, including reasonable attorneys' fees
or limited license legal technician fees when such fees are incurred
by a person licensed and practicing in accordance with state supreme
court admission and practice rule 28, the limited practice rule for
limited license legal technicians. Minors are presumed to be unable
to pay. The parent or legal guardian is responsible for costs unless
the parent or legal guardian demonstrates inability to pay;
(k) Restrain the respondent from harassing, following,
monitoring, keeping under physical or electronic surveillance, cyber
harassment as defined in RCW 9A.90.120, and using telephonic,
audiovisual, or other electronic means to monitor the actions,
location, or communication of the petitioner or the petitioner's
family or household members who are minors or other members of the
petitioner's household. For the purposes of this subsection,
"communication" includes both "wire communication" and "electronic
communication" as defined in RCW 9.73.260;
(l) Other than for respondents who are minors, require the
respondent to submit to electronic monitoring. The order must specify
who shall provide the electronic monitoring services and the terms
under which the monitoring must be performed. The order also may
include a requirement that the respondent pay the costs of the
monitoring. The court shall consider the ability of the respondent to
pay for electronic monitoring;
(m) Consider the provisions of RCW 9.41.800, and order the
respondent to surrender, and prohibit the respondent from accessing,
having in his or her custody or control, possessing, purchasing,
attempting to purchase or receive, or receiving, all firearms,
dangerous weapons, and any concealed pistol license, as required in
RCW 9.41.800;
p. 12 SB 6362
(n) Order possession and use of essential personal effects. The
court shall list the essential personal effects with sufficient
specificity to make it clear which property is included. Personal
effects may include pets. The court may order that a petitioner be
granted the exclusive custody or control of any pet owned, possessed,
leased, kept, or held by the petitioner, respondent, or minor child
residing with either the petitioner or respondent, and may prohibit
the respondent from interfering with the petitioner's efforts to
obtain the pet. The court may also prohibit the respondent from
knowingly coming within, or knowingly remaining within, a specified
distance of specified locations where the pet is regularly found;
(o) Order use of a vehicle;
(p) Enter an order restricting the respondent from engaging in
abusive litigation as set forth in chapter 26.51 RCW or in frivolous
filings against the petitioner, making harassing or libelous
communications about the petitioner to third parties, ((or)) making
false reports to investigative agencies, or engaging in abusive use
of process. A petitioner may request this relief in the petition or
by separate motion. A petitioner may request this relief by separate
motion at any time within five years of the date the protection order
is entered even if the order has since expired. A stand-alone motion
for an order restricting abusive litigation may be brought by a party
who meets the requirements of chapter 26.51 RCW regardless of whether
the party has previously sought a protection order under this
chapter, provided the motion is made within five years of the date
the order that made a finding of domestic violence was entered. In
cases where a finding of domestic violence was entered pursuant to an
order under chapter 26.09, 26.26, or 26.26A RCW, a motion for an
order restricting abusive litigation may be brought under the family
law case or as a stand-alone action filed under this chapter, when it
is not reasonable or practical to file under the family law case;
(q) Restrain the respondent from committing acts of abandonment,
abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation against a vulnerable adult;
(r) Require an accounting by the respondent of the disposition of
the vulnerable adult's income or other resources;
(s) Restrain the transfer of either the respondent's or
vulnerable adult's property, or both, for a specified period not
exceeding 90 days;
(t) Order financial relief and restrain the transfer of jointly
owned assets;
p. 13 SB 6362
(u) Restrain the respondent from possessing or distributing
intimate images, as defined in RCW 9A.86.010, depicting the
petitioner including, but not limited to, requiring the respondent
to: Take down and delete all intimate images and recordings of the
petitioner in the respondent's possession or control; and cease any
and all disclosure of those intimate images. The court may also
inform the respondent that it would be appropriate to ask third
parties in possession or control of the intimate images of this
protection order to take down and delete the intimate images so that
the order may not inadvertently be violated; or
(v) Order other relief as it deems necessary for the protection
of the petitioner and other family or household members who are
minors or vulnerable adults for whom the petitioner has sought
protection, including orders or directives to a law enforcement
officer, as allowed under this chapter.
(2) In an antiharassment protection order proceeding, the court
may grant the relief specified in subsection (1)(c), (f), and (t) of
this section only as part of a full antiharassment protection order.
(3) The court in granting a temporary antiharassment protection
order or a civil antiharassment protection order shall not prohibit
the respondent from exercising constitutionally protected free
speech. Nothing in this section prohibits the petitioner from
utilizing other civil or criminal remedies to restrain conduct or
communications not otherwise constitutionally protected.
(4) The court shall not take any of the following actions in
issuing a protection order.
(a) The court may not order the petitioner to obtain services
including, but not limited to, drug testing, victim support services,
a mental health assessment, or a psychological evaluation.
(b) The court shall not issue a full protection order to any
party except upon notice to the respondent and the opportunity for a
hearing pursuant to a petition or counter-petition filed and served
by the party seeking relief in accordance with this chapter. Except
as provided in RCW 7.105.210, the court shall not issue a temporary
protection order to any party unless the party has filed a petition
or counter-petition for a protection order seeking relief in
accordance with this chapter.
(c) Under no circumstances shall the court deny the petitioner
the type of protection order sought in the petition on the grounds
p. 14 SB 6362
that the court finds that a different type of protection order would
have a less severe impact on the respondent.
(5) The order shall specify the date the order expires, if any.
For permanent orders, the court shall set the date to expire 99 years
from the issuance date. The order shall also state whether the court
issued the protection order following personal service, service by
electronic means, service by mail, or service by publication, and
whether the court has approved service by mail or publication of an
order issued under this section.
(6) Issuing mutual full protection orders of any type is
disfavored.
Sec. 8. RCW 7.105.450 and 2024 c 137 s 2 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1)(a) Whenever a domestic violence protection order, a sexual
assault protection order, a stalking protection order, or a
vulnerable adult protection order is granted under this chapter, or
an order is granted under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A,
10.77, 10.99, 26.09, 26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or there is a valid
foreign protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, or there is a
Canadian domestic violence protection order as defined in RCW
26.55.010, and the respondent or person to be restrained knows of the
order, a violation of any of the following provisions of the order is
a gross misdemeanor, except as provided in subsections (4) and (5) of
this section:
(i) The restraint provisions prohibiting acts or threats of
violence against, or stalking of, a protected party, or the restraint
provisions prohibiting contact with a protected party;
(ii) A provision excluding the person from a residence,
workplace, school, or day care;
(iii) A provision prohibiting the person from knowingly coming
within, or knowingly remaining within, a specified distance of a
location, a protected party's person, or a protected party's vehicle;
(iv) A provision prohibiting interfering with the protected
party's efforts to remove a pet owned, possessed, leased, kept, or
held by the petitioner, the respondent, or a minor child residing
with either the petitioner or the respondent; or
(v) A provision of a foreign protection order or a Canadian
domestic violence protection order specifically indicating that a
violation will be a crime.
p. 15 SB 6362
(b) Upon conviction, and in addition to any other penalties
provided by law, the court:
(i) May require that the respondent submit to electronic
monitoring. The court shall specify who must provide the electronic
monitoring services and the terms under which the monitoring must be
performed. The order also may include a requirement that the
respondent pay the costs of the monitoring. The court shall consider
the ability of the convicted person to pay for electronic monitoring;
and
(ii) Shall impose a fine of $15, in addition to any penalty or
fine imposed, for a violation of a domestic violence protection order
issued under this chapter. Revenue from the $15 fine must be remitted
monthly to the state treasury for deposit in the domestic violence
prevention account.
(2) A law enforcement officer shall arrest without a warrant and
take into custody a person whom the law enforcement officer has
probable cause to believe has violated a domestic violence protection
order, a sexual assault protection order, a stalking protection
order, or a vulnerable adult protection order, or an order issued
under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A, 10.77, 10.99, 26.09,
26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign protection order as defined
in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic violence protection order as
defined in RCW 26.55.010, that restrains the person or excludes the
person from a residence, workplace, school, or day care, or prohibits
the person from knowingly coming within, or knowingly remaining
within, a specified distance of a location, a protected party's
person, or a protected party's vehicle, if the person restrained
knows of the order. Presence of the order in the law enforcement
computer-based criminal intelligence information system is not the
only means of establishing knowledge of the order.
(3)(a) A violation of a domestic violence protection order, a
sexual assault protection order, a stalking protection order, or a
vulnerable adult protection order, or an order issued under chapter
9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A, 10.77, 10.99, 26.09, 26.26A, or
26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign protection order as defined in RCW
26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic violence protection order as
defined in RCW 26.55.010, shall also constitute contempt of court,
and is subject to the penalties prescribed by law.
(b) A court, pursuant to its authority under chapter 7.21 RCW,
shall initiate a contempt proceeding on its own motion when there is
p. 16 SB 6362
probable cause to believe that the respondent violated an order
listed in this subsection.
(4) Any assault that is a violation of a domestic violence
protection order, a sexual assault protection order, a stalking
protection order, or a vulnerable adult protection order, or an order
issued under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A, 10.77, 10.99,
26.09, 26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign protection order as
defined in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic violence protection
order as defined in RCW 26.55.010, and that does not amount to
assault in the first or second degree under RCW 9A.36.011 or
9A.36.021 is a class C felony, and any conduct in violation of such
an order that is reckless and creates a substantial risk of death or
serious physical injury to another person is a class C felony.
(5) A violation of a domestic violence protection order, a sexual
assault protection order, a stalking protection order, or a
vulnerable adult protection order, or a court order issued under
chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A, 10.77, 10.99, 26.09,
26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign protection order as defined
in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic violence protection order as
defined in RCW 26.55.010, is a class C felony if the offender has at
least two previous convictions for violating the provisions of a
domestic violence protection order, a sexual assault protection
order, a stalking protection order, or a vulnerable adult protection
order, or an order issued under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88,
9.94A, 10.77, 10.99, 26.09, 26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign
protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic
violence protection order as defined in RCW 26.55.010. The previous
convictions may involve the same victim or other victims specifically
protected by the orders the offender violated.
(6)(a) A defendant arrested for violating a domestic violence
protection order, sexual assault protection order, stalking
protection order, or vulnerable adult protection order, or an order
granted under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88, 9.94A, 10.77,
10.99, 26.09, 26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign protection
order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic violence
protection order as defined in RCW 26.55.010, is required to appear
in person before a magistrate within one judicial day after the
arrest. At the time of the appearance, the court shall determine the
necessity of imposing a no-contact order or other conditions of
pretrial release.
p. 17 SB 6362
(b) A defendant who is charged by citation, complaint, or
information with violating any protection order identified in (a) of
this subsection and not arrested shall appear in court for
arraignment in person as soon as practicable, but in no event later
than 14 days after the next day on which court is in session
following the issuance of the citation or the filing of the complaint
or information.
(7) Upon the filing of an affidavit by the petitioner or any law
enforcement officer alleging that the respondent has violated a
domestic violence protection order, a sexual assault protection
order, a stalking protection order, or a vulnerable adult protection
order, or an order granted under chapter 9A.40, 9A.44, 9A.46, 9A.88,
9.94A, 10.77, 10.99, 26.09, 26.26A, or 26.26B RCW, or a valid foreign
protection order as defined in RCW 26.52.020, or a Canadian domestic
violence protection order as defined in RCW 26.55.010, the court may
issue an order to the respondent, requiring the respondent to appear
and show cause within 14 days as to why the respondent should not be
found in contempt of court and punished accordingly. The hearing may
be held in the court of any county or municipality in which the
petitioner or respondent temporarily or permanently resides at the
time of the alleged violation.
(8) Appearances required under this section are mandatory and
cannot be waived.
Sec. 9. RCW 9.73.030 and 2021 c 329 s 21 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it shall be
unlawful for any individual, partnership, corporation, association,
or the state of Washington, its agencies, and political subdivisions
to intercept, or record any:
(a) Private communication transmitted by telephone, telegraph,
radio, or other device between two or more individuals between points
within or without the state by any device electronic or otherwise
designed to record and/or transmit said communication regardless how
such device is powered or actuated, without first obtaining the
consent of ((all)) one of the participants in the communication;
(b) Private conversation, by any device electronic or otherwise
designed to record or transmit such conversation regardless how the
device is powered or actuated without first obtaining the consent of
((all)) one of the persons engaged in the conversation.
p. 18 SB 6362
(2) ((Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, wire)) Wire
communications or conversations (a) of an emergency nature, such as
the reporting of a fire, medical emergency, crime, or disaster, or
(b) which convey threats of extortion, blackmail, bodily harm, or
other unlawful requests or demands, or (c) which occur anonymously or
repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient hour, or (d) which relate
to communications by a hostage holder or barricaded person as defined
in RCW 70.85.100, whether or not conversation ensues, may be recorded
with the consent of one party to the conversation.
(3) Where consent by all parties is needed pursuant to this
chapter, consent shall be considered obtained whenever one party has
announced to all other parties engaged in the communication or
conversation, in any reasonably effective manner, that such
communication or conversation is about to be recorded or transmitted:
PROVIDED, That if the conversation is to be recorded that said
announcement shall also be recorded.
(4) An employee of any regularly published newspaper, magazine,
wire service, radio station, or television station acting in the
course of bona fide news gathering duties on a full-time or
contractual or part-time basis, shall be deemed to have consent to
record and divulge communications or conversations otherwise
prohibited by this chapter if the consent is expressly given or if
the recording or transmitting device is readily apparent or obvious
to the speakers. Withdrawal of the consent after the communication
has been made shall not prohibit any such employee of a newspaper,
magazine, wire service, or radio or television station from divulging
the communication or conversation.
(5) This section does not apply to the recording of custodial
interrogations pursuant to RCW 10.122.040.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. This act may be known and cited as Zhen's
law.
--- END ---
p. 19 SB 6362

Concerning judicial processes.

Sponsors

Sen. Robert Hasegawa (D) sponsors SB 6362 alone.

Committees

SB 6362 went before 1 committee: Law & Justice.

Law & Justice
Law & Justice
Referred to · Mar 12, 2026 · 82 Bills

History

SB 6362 has taken 1 action since Mar 12, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 12, 2026
Senate
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Votes

SB 6362 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: app.leg.wa.gov · legiscan.com