HB 1119

HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
 2026 Regular Session
 HOUSE BILL NO. 1119
 BY REPRESENTATIVE PHELPS
 WORKERS COMPENSATION: Provides relative to an employee's refusal to submit to a
  medical examination or cooperate with vocational rehabilitation and provides
  relative to expedited summary proceedings for certain disputes
1AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact R.S. 23:1124, 1201.1(K)(8)(a) and (c), and 1226(B)(3)(c), relative to
3workers' compensation; to provide for the refusal to submit to a medical
4examination; to provide for the suspension of benefits for such refusal; to provide for
5the refusal to cooperate with vocational rehabilitation; to provide for expedited
6summary proceedings for certain disputes; and to provide for related matters.
7 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
8Section 1. R.S. 23:1124, 1201.1(K)(8)(a) and (c), and 1226(B)(3)(c) are hereby
9 amended and reenacted to read as follows:
10§1124. Refusal to submit to an additional medical opinion regarding an examination;
11effect on right to compensation
12If the employee refuses to submit himself to an additional medical opinion
13regarding a medical examination at the behest of the employer or an examination
14conducted pursuant to R.S. 23:1123, or in anywise any way obstructs the same
15examination, his right to compensation and to take or prosecute any further
16proceedings under pursuant to this Chapter may be suspended by the employer or
17payor until the examination takes place. Such suspension of benefits by the
18employer or payor shall be made in accordance with the provisions of R.S.
1923:1201.1(A)(4) and (5) occur only after an expedited hearing has been conducted
  Page 1 of 6
 CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
 are additions.
 HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
  HB NO. 1119
1as provided for in this Section. Any employer or payor who seeks to compel an
2employee's compliance with a medical examination shall be granted an expedited
3hearing. The hearing shall be held no less than ten and no more than thirty days after
4the employee, or his attorney, receives notice, delivered by certified or registered
5mail, of the motion seeking to compel the examination. No pre-trial conference
6mediation shall be required in connection with the hearing. The hearing shall be
7conducted as a rule to show cause. Unless the employee can show good cause for
8his refusal or obstruction of the medical examination, the court shall order the
9employee's compensation and prosecution rights suspended until the examination
10takes place. Once the examination takes place, all suspended benefits shall be paid
11to the employee within ten days of the examination. When the employee has filed a
12disputed claim, the employer or payor may move for an order to compel the
13employee to appear for an additional medical opinion regarding an examination. The
14employee shall receive at least fourteen days written notice prior to the additional
15medical opinion regarding an examination. When a right to compensation is
16suspended no compensation shall be payable in respect to the period of suspension.
17*       *  *
18§1201.1. Controversion of compensation and medical benefits
19*       *  *
20K.
21*       *  *
22(8)(a) Upon motion of either party, whether or not the employer or payor is
23entitled to a preliminary determination, the workers' compensation judge's ruling in
24a hearing shall be conducted as an expedited summary proceeding and shall be
25considered an order of the court and not requiring require a further trial on the
26merits, if it concerns any of the following matters:
27(i)   The employee has sought choice of physician pursuant to R.S.
2823:1121(B)(1), including any dispute relative to penalties and attorney fees for
29alleged failure to authorize the employee's choice of physician.
  Page 2 of 6
 CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
 are additions.
 HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
  HB NO. 1119
1(ii) The employee has filed a claim pursuant to R.S. 23:1226(B)(3)(a).
2(iii) The employer or payor seeks to compel the employee to sign the choice
3of physician form pursuant to R.S. 23:1121(B)(5).
4(iv) The employer or payor seeks to compel the employee's submission to
5a medical examination pursuant to R.S. 23:1124.
6(v) The employer seeks to require the employee to return form LWC-1025
7or LWC-1020.
8(vi) The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to
9comply with R.S. 23:1121(B)(1) lifted.
10(vii) The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to
11submit to a medical examination lifted.
12(viii) The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to
13comply with R.S. 23:1208(H) lifted.
14(ix)(viii) The employee employer seeks to have a reduction in benefits for
15failure to cooperate with vocational rehabilitation lifted.
16*       *  *
17(c) The workers' compensation judge shall order the employee to sign the
18choice of physician form, enforce the employee's submission to the medical
19examination, or provide the LWC-1020 or LWC-1025 form as applicable, unless the
20employee can show good cause for his refusal.
21*       *  *
22§1226. Rehabilitation of injured employees
23*       *  *
24B.
25*       *  *
26(3)
27*       *  *
28(c) Upon refusal by the employee to cooperate with vocational rehabilitation,
29the employer or payor may file a motion in accordance with R.S.
  Page 3 of 6
 CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
 are additions.
HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
  HB NO. 1119
123:1201.1(K)(8)(a)(viii) to reduce weekly compensation, including supplemental
2earnings benefits pursuant to R.S. 23:1221(3), by fifty percent for each week of the
3period of refusal. Reduction of benefits by the employer or payor shall be made in
4accordance with the provisions of R.S. 23:1201.1(A) through (E) ordered by the
5court upon a finding that the employee has unreasonably refused to cooperate with
6vocational rehabilitation.
7*       *  *
  DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 1119 Original  2026 Regular Session  Phelps
Abstract: Provides relative to an employee's refusal to submit to a medical examination or
  to cooperate with vocational rehabilitation and provides for expedited summary
  proceedings for certain disputes.
Present law provides that, if an employee refuses to submit to or obstruct the occurrence of
an additional medical opinion regarding a medical examination at the employer's request or
an examination conducted pursuant to present law (R.S. 23:1123), his right to compensation
and to take or prosecute any further proceedings may be suspended by the employer or
payor, until the examination takes place.
Present law provides that a suspension of benefits by the employer or payor shall be made
in accordance with present law (R.S. 23:1201.1(A)(4) and (5)).
Proposed law instead provides that the suspension shall occur only after an expedited
hearing has been conducted. Proposed law also provides that any employer or payor who
seeks to compel an employee's compliance with a medical examination shall be granted an
expedited hearing.
Proposed law requires the expedited hearing to be held not less than 10 days and no more
than 30 days after the employee, or his attorney, receives notice via certified or registered
mail, of the motion seeking to compel the examination.
Proposed law prohibits a pre-trial conference mediation from being required in connection
with the hearing.
Proposed law requires the hearing to be conducted as a rule to show cause and further
requires the court to order the employee's compensation and prosecution rights suspended
until the examination takes place, unless the employee can show good cause for his refusal
to or obstruction of the medical examination.
Present law allows the employer or payor to move for an order to compel the employee to
appear for an additional medical opinion regarding an examination when an employee has
filed a disputed claim. Present law also requires a 14-day written notice to be sent to the
employee prior to the examination.
  Page 4 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
  HB NO. 1119
Present law prohibits compensation from being paid during a period of suspension when a
right to compensation is suspended.
Proposed law repeals present law.
Present law provides that, upon motion of either party, regardless of whether the employer
or payor is entitled to a preliminary determination, the workers' compensation judge's ruling
in a hearing shall be conducted as an expedited summary proceeding and shall be considered
an order of the court and not require a further trial on the merits, if it concerns any of the
following matters:
(1)    The employee has sought a choice of physician pursuant to present law (R.S.
   23:1121(B)(1)).
(2)    The employee has filed a claim pursuant to present law (R.S. 23:1226(B)(3)(a)).
(3)    The employer or payor seeks to compel the employee to sign the choice of physician
   form pursuant to present law (R.S. 23:1121(B)(5)).
(4)    The employer or payor seeks to compel the employee's submission to a medical
   examination pursuant to present law (R.S. 23:1124).
(5)    The employer seeks to require the employee to return either of the forms required by
   present law.
(6)    The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to comply with
   present law (R.S. 23:1121(B)(1)) lifted.
(7)    The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to submit to a
   medical examination lifted.
(8)    The employee seeks to have a suspension of benefits for failure to comply with
   present law (R.S. 23:1208(H)) lifted.
(9)    The employee seeks to have a reduction in benefits for failure to cooperate with
   vocational rehabilitation lifted.
Proposed law revises two of the aforementioned concerns to instead say the following:
(1)    The employee has sought a choice of physician pursuant to present law (R.S.
   23:1121(B)(1)), including any dispute relative to penalties and attorney fees for
   alleged failure to authorize the employee's choice of physician.
(2)    The employer seeks a reduction in benefits for failure to cooperate with vocational
   rehabilitation.
Proposed law repeals the aforementioned concern regarding the employee seeking to have
a suspension of benefits for failure to submit a medical examination lifted.
Present law requires the workers' compensation judge to order the employee to sign the
choice of physician form, enforce the employee's submission to the medical examination,
or provide either of the requisite forms provided for in present law, unless the employee can
show good cause for his refusal to submit to the examination.
Proposed law removes the provision that requires the judge to enforce the employee's
submission to the medical examination. Proposed law otherwise retains present law.
  Page 5 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-2598  ORIGINAL
  HB NO. 1119
Present law allows the employer or payor to reduce weekly compensation, including
supplemental earnings benefits, if the employee refuses to submit to an examination. Present
law also allows the employer or payor to reduce compensation by 50% for each week during
the period of refusal.
Proposed law instead provides that an employer or payor may file a motion in accordance
with proposed law (R.S. 23:1201.1(K)(8)(a)(viii)) to reduce weekly compensation.
Present law provides that reduction of benefits by the employer or payor shall be made in
accordance with provisions of present law (R.S. 23:1201.1(A) - (E)).
Proposed law instead provides that a reduction of benefits by the employer or payor shall be
ordered by the court upon a finding that the employee has unreasonably refused to cooperate
with vocational rehabilitation.
(Amends R.S. 23:1124, 1201.1(K)(8)(a) and (c), and 1226(B)(3)(c))
  Page 6 of 6
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.