- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8170
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8170, the MATCH Act, was introduced in the House on Apr 2, 2026 by Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R) with 29 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
Record
Text
H.R. 8170 has 29 co-sponsors.
hb8170/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8170 IH: Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware ActU.S. House of Representatives2026-04-02text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8170 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 2, 2026 Mr. Baumgartner (for himself, Mr. Moolenaar , Mr. McCormick , Mr. Mannion , Mr. Golden of Maine , Mr. Huizenga , Mr. Shreve , Mr. Lawler , Mr. Riley of New York , Ms. Goodlander , and Mr. Subramanyam ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware Act or the MATCH Act .2.Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components represent one of the United States most effective defenses of this foundational technology;(2)advanced computing applications like artificial intelligence are transforming military affairs and the balance of power;(3)the United States and its allies have an advantage in the foundational technologies that underpin advanced computing applications, including advanced-node integrated circuits and production, and the equipment and software required to design and produce advanced-node integrated circuits;(4)robust controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components have been a bipartisan priority across multiple administrations, reflecting a shared recognition that protecting America’s semiconductor advantage is essential to national security;(5)the adversaries of the United States are exploiting gaps in the current export control regime;(6)certain entities, including ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), Hua Hong, Semiconductor Ltd. (Hua Hong), Huawei, Technologies Co. Ltd. (Huawei), Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), Yangtze Memory Technologies Corp. (YMTC), Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. China (AMEC), Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. (E-Town Semiconductor), NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. (NAURA), Piotech Semiconductor Equipment Co., Ltd. (Piotech), ACM Research, Inc. (ACM Research), PNC Process Systems Co., Ltd. (PNC Process Systems), Skyverse Technology Co. (Skyverse), Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment (Group) (SMEE), Kingsemi Co., Ltd. (Kingsemi), and Hwatsing Technology Co. Ltd. (Hwatsing) are engaged in efforts to produce advanced-node integrated circuits and especially crucial for the Military-Civil Fusion efforts of the People’s Republic of China and warrant comprehensive export controls to prevent those companies from accessing items made with United States technologies;(7)companies located in adversary countries that produce semiconductor manufacturing equipment are critical to adversaries’ efforts to develop advanced-node integrated circuit production capabilities and overcome export controls, and should not be permitted to utilize or benefit from United States or allied technology or components; and(8)the United States Government should work closely with allies and partners of the United States to align export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to prevent gaps in controls, reduce the risk of circumvention, and ensure a level global playing field.3.Report and application of controls(a)Identifying chokepointsNot later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall—(1)jointly conduct a review to identify all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment and all covered facilities; and(2)submit to the appropriate congressional committees a list of all such equipment and covered facilities.(b)Diplomatic engagement(1)In generalThe covered agency heads shall prioritize and upon enactment of this Act immediately engage diplomatically to seek for the governments of allied supplier countries to adopt—(A)countrywide controls on covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment subject to the allied supplier country’s jurisdiction, or other controls and licensing policies having the same practical effect; and(B)license requirements for the export of all applicable items to any covered facility, and the servicing of all applicable items at any covered facilities, with a licensing policy of denial.(2)Briefing on diplomatic effortsNot later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the covered agency heads shall provide a briefing to members of the appropriate congressional committees that—(A)describes the status of diplomatic efforts to secure the adoption by allied supplier countries of the controls described in paragraph (1);(B)outlines and assesses incentives to encourage adoption of these controls; and(C)identifies—(i)allied supplier countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(A);(ii)allied supplier countries that have not adopted the controls described in paragraph (1)(B); and(iii)measures that the United States has taken or plans to take to implement the controls described in paragraph (1).(c)Exhaustion of diplomatic recourse and application of controls(1)Application of controlsNot later than 150 days after the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall publish regulations that—(A)ensure all U.S. countrywide controls include all U.S.-origin covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and(B)ensure all covered facilities in countries of concern are subject to comprehensive U.S. restrictions.(2)Exhaustion of diplomatic recourseBy the date that is 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the covered agency heads shall jointly either—(A)certify to the appropriate congressional committees that all allied supplier countries have implemented—(i)countrywide controls over all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment subject to the allied supplier country’s jurisdiction, or other controls and licensing policies having the same practical effect; and(ii)license requirements for all applicable items, with a licensing policy of denial, or other controls and licensing policies having the same practical effect; or(B)provide a list to the appropriate congressional committees of any allied supplier countries that have not implemented all controls described in subparagraph (A)(i) or (ii).(3)Extension of controlsUnless the covered agency heads provide the certification in subparagraph (A), the covered agency heads shall issue regulations that—(A)establish U.S. jurisdiction over and apply countrywide controls to all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor exported from countries identified by the covered agency heads under subsection (c)(2)(B), whether by establishing jurisdiction over such items and applying controls directly, or by restricting the end-uses of essential components of such equipment that are already subject to U.S. jurisdiction, or both;(B)require a license for all servicing of any applicable item located in any covered facility, and implement a policy of denial for such servicing; and(C)establish jurisdiction over, and apply end-user or end-use controls prohibiting, the export from countries identified by the covered agency heads under subsection (c)(2)(B) of all applicable items to any covered facility.(d)National security waiverThe covered agency heads may jointly grant a one-time waiver to extend the 150-day deadline under subsection (c) by not more than 90 days, if the covered agency heads, with concurrence from the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, jointly—(1)determine and certify to the appropriate congressional committees that—(A)the extension is in the national security interest of the United States, despite the risk that countries of concern may take advantage of the delay to further stockpile covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment; and(B)the governments of an allied supplier country or countries are taking concrete, verifiable steps, pursuant to their domestic laws and regulations and as expeditiously as possible, to adopt and implement controls that are fully aligned with, or more stringent than, the controls that would otherwise be imposed under subsection (c)(3); and(2)submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing—(A)the details justifying the national security interest determination and progress that is intended to be achieved by the extension; and(B)the concrete and verifiable interim steps the covered agency heads have taken to prevent stockpiling of covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment by countries of concern.(e)ReportNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the covered agency heads shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—(1)a list of all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment;(2)a list of all covered facilities and all entities that own or operate any covered facility;(3)the scope of the controls described in subsection (b)(1) imposed by the United States and allied supplier countries for all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment identified pursuant to paragraph (1);(4)a summary of diplomatic engagements and unilateral actions undertaken in the 12-month period prior to the submission of the report to close any gap in the controls described in subsection (b)(1) among allied supplier countries; and(5)a certification that the export of all covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment to a country of concern, and the export, reexport, or transfer, or servicing of all applicable items to any covered facility, requires a United States or allied license and applications for such licenses will be reviewed under a policy of denial.(f)Termination and reimposition of controls upon allied action(1)Termination or modificationIf the covered agency heads determine that an allied supplier country has implemented all the controls in (c)(2)(A)(i) and (ii), the covered agency heads may, upon notifying the appropriate congressional committees of such determination, terminate or modify any control imposed under subsection (c)(3) for items exported from that allied supplier country.(2)ReimpositionIf, after terminating or modifying a control under paragraph (1), the covered agency heads determine that the allied supplier country has materially weakened, suspended, or revoked the control or licensing policy of denial that justified the termination or modification under paragraph (1), the covered agency heads shall, not later than 60 days after making such determination—(A)notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination; and(B)reimpose the control under subsection (c)(2) that was terminated or modified under paragraph (1).(g)Administrative procedure act rulemaking and judicial reviewThe provisions of section 1762 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4821 ) shall apply to this Act in the same manner and to the same extent as such provisions apply to the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.(h)Sunset(1)ExpirationThis Act shall cease to have effect on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.(2)Continuation of prior obligationsThe expiration of this Act under subsection (a) shall not affect any action, proceeding, or obligation that was commenced or incurred prior to such expiration.(i)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Advanced-node integrated circuitsThe term advanced-node integrated circuits has the meaning given that term in section 772.1 of the Export Administration Regulations.(2)Allied supplier countryThe term allied supplier country means any country that—(A)is not a country of concern; and(B)is engaged in the production of covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment.(3)Applicable itemThe term applicable item means any item that is or can be made subject to the Export Administration Regulations, including—(A)a foreign-produced item that is the direct product of, or produced by plants or major components that are themselves the direct product of software or technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations;(B)a foreign-produced item with more than zero percent de minimis controlled United States-origin content; and(C)a foreign-produced item that contain United States-origin or foreign-produced integrated circuits that are presumptively designed or produced, directly or indirectly, with technology, software, or equipment that is subject to the Export Administration Regulations.(4)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.(5)Country of concernThe term country of concern means—(A)the People’s Republic of China, including the Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions;(B)the Republic of Cuba;(C)the Islamic Republic of Iran;(D)the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea;(E)the Russian Federation; and(F)any other foreign country listed in the Country Group D:5 under Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations, as published on January 1, 2026, that is designated by the Secretary of State as a country of concern for purposes of this section and for which notice of such designation has been published in the Federal Register.(6)Countrywide controlsThe term countrywide controls means licensing requirements and a policy of denial for the export, reexport, transfer or servicing of all specified items to any destination within any country of concern, excluding exports where the destination is a fabrication facility that existed as of the date of the enactment of this Act and remains owned and operated by a company headquartered, and having an ultimate parent headquartered, outside of any country of concern.(7)Covered agency headsThe term covered agency heads means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security and the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense, or their designees.(8)Covered facilityThe term covered facility means any facility—(A)which is—(i)located in a country of concern;(ii)engaged in the production of advanced-node integrated circuits; and(iii)not a fabrication facility that—(I)existed as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and(II)remains owned and operated by a company which is headquartered and has an ultimate parent headquartered outside of any country of concern; or(B)which is or ever has been owned or controlled by, under common ownership or control with, or manufacturing at the direction of—(i)any entity described in section 5949(j)(3)(A) or (B);(ii)Huawei or Hua Hong;(iii)any producer, manufacturer, or developer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is headquartered in, or has an ultimate parent headquartered in, a country of concern; or(iv)any entity that is a subsidiary, affiliate, or successor to, or has a joint venture, teaming agreement, joint development or research agreement, technology transfer or collaboration agreement, or other similar type of arrangement with an entity described in paragraph (10)(B)(i), (ii), or (iii).(9)Covered semiconductor manufacturing equipmentThe term covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment —(A)means semiconductor manufacturing equipment or a component therefor that—(i)is an applicable item; and(ii)the covered agency heads determine no country of concern produces in high volume and with capabilities comparable to those of the product sold by the global market leader, as of the date of the enactment of this Act; and(B)includes, at a minimum—(i)all semiconductor manufacturing equipment, materials, and software that at the date of passage of this Act require a license for export, re-export, or in-country transfer to any destination in a country of concern;(ii)all deep ultraviolet immersion photolithography machines, through silicon via deposition and etch tools, cryogenic etch equipment, and cobalt deposition equipment, regardless of overlay or other performance characteristics; and(iii)presumptively, all semiconductor manufacturing equipment or components specified in Export Control Classification Number 3B001, 3B002, or 3B993 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, except any items the covered agency heads determine are not covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment.(10)Export; in-country transfer; reexport; export administration regulationThe terms export , in-country transfer , reexport , and Export Administration Regulations have the meanings given such terms in section 1742 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801 ).(11)ServicingThe term servicing means any servicing of equipment or components, whether in-person or remote, including installation, calibration, repair, overhauling, refurbishing, testing, diagnosing, updating software or firmware, training, field services, application support engineering, customization, technical assistance, process adjustments, troubleshooting, and transfer of industry best practices for maintenance.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-04-02
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R) sponsors H.R. 8170, and 29 members have co-sponsored it, 10 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–WA-5 · Sponsor
Introduced Apr 2, 2026

Rep. · D–ME-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · D–NH-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–MI-4 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–NY-17 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · D–NY-22 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–GA-7 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–MI-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · D–NY-19 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–IN-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 2, 2026 · Original
Committees
H.R. 8170 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 8170 has taken 4 actions since Apr 2, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 2, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Apr 2, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8170 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8170 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- MATCH Act — Display Title
- MATCH Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
30 clients hired 31 firms and 155 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8170 in 43 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Science/Technology, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Defense, Budget/Appropriations, Education, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Computer Industry.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 30.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASML US, LLC | semiconductor equipment manufacturing | Connecticut | 2 | 3 | $70K |
| KLA CORPORATION | US tech company-semiconductor process control, inspection & metrology, LED, nanotechnology | California | 1 | 2 | $120K |
| TERADYNE, INC. | Semiconductor testing and robotics. | Massachusetts | 2 | 2 | $90K |
| ANTHROPIC | Artificial Intelligence | California | 2 | 2 | $80K |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | Nonprofit advocating for artificial intelligence safety and biosecurity | Virginia | 1 | 2 | $60K |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | Advocacy and policy on behalf of innovation and technology companies | District of Columbia | 2 | 2 | $50K |
| ENTEGRIS | Manufacturer and supplier | Massachusetts | 1 | 2 | — |
| INTEL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | Consumer electronics manufacturer | North Carolina | 1 | 2 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP) | California | 1 | 2 | — |
| THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION | Nonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced AI | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| ACM RESEARCH, INC. | Cleaning as part of the semiconductor manufacturing process. | California | 1 | 1 | $100K |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Provides technology solutions, services and support. | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | Develops, markets, distributes, and licenses computer software and hardware | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| ASM AMERICA, INC. | ASM is a wafer processing equipment supplier that supports semiconductor manufacturers. | Arizona | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER ACTION, INC. | Advocates for Bipartisan Policy Solutions | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $40K |
| BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE | Association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | Technology manufacturer | Idaho | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| CARL ZEISS, INC. | manufacturing | New York | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| PENN HILL GROUP | 3 | 3 | $150K |
| ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 1 | 2 | $60K |
| ASML US, LLC | 1 | 2 | — |
| ENTEGRIS | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRANKLIN SQUARE GROUP, LLC | 1 | 2 | $120K |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 1 | 2 | — |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 1 | 2 | — |
| SIGHTLINE ADVOCACY, LLC | 2 | 2 | $80K |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION | 1 | 2 | — |
| ANTHROPIC | 1 | 1 | — |
| CARL ZEISS, INC. | 1 | 1 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
| FDD ACTION | 1 | 1 | — |
| FIERCE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA | 1 | 1 | — |
| HILL EAST GROUP, LLC | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 155.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| D'ARCY PHILPS | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| ALLEN THOMPSON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ANDREW GINSBURG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ANDREW ROLLO | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BRENDAN STEINHAUSER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BRIAN EAGLE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CALEB KNAPP | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DAVID ISAACS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DUSTIN TODD | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| EMINENCE GRIFFIN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ERIN ADRIAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| HEATHER SMITH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JAMES REDSTONE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JONATHAN HOGANSON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JON BEAMER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JORDAN HAAS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JOSEPH DONOGHUE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JOSHUA ACKIL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KEVIN CUMMINS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| LESLEY HILL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES | RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES | 2026 second_quarter | $3.9M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ANTHROPIC | ANTHROPIC | 2026 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2026 second_quarter | $720K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INTEL CORPORATION | INTEL CORPORATION | 2026 second_quarter | $700K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INTEL CORPORATION | INTEL CORPORATION | 2026 first_quarter | $680K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ASML US, LLC | ASML US, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $600K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ASML US, LLC | ASML US, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $600K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $570K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $570K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SEMI | SEMI | 2026 second_quarter | $470K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $460K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $450K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | SYNOPSYS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $370K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | SYNOPSYS, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $310K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED | 2026 second_quarter | $300K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| TERADYNE INC. | TERADYNE INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $270K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FDD ACTION | FDD ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $240K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ENTEGRIS | ENTEGRIS | 2026 first_quarter | $220K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| THE AI POLICY NETWORK INC. | THE AI POLICY NETWORK INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $188.9K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8170 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8170’s is International Affairs.
hr8170/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8170, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 61 (Thursday, April 2, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BAUMGARTNER:H.R. 8170.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H2821]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com