Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8500

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8500, the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Apr 27, 2026 by Rep. Neal Dunn (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Ways And Means, and last saw action on Apr 27, 2026: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 8500 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb8500/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8500 IH: Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-04-27
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8500 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 27, 2026 Mr. Dunn of Florida (for himself, Ms. Barragán , and Ms. Tenney ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure timely review of local coverage determination requests under the Medicare program.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act of 2026 .
2.
Ensuring timely review of local coverage determination requests under the Medicare program
(a)
In general
Section 1862(l)(5) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395y(l)(5) ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(E)
Timeframe for decisions on requests for local coverage determinations
(i)
In general
The Secretary shall require each Medicare administrative contractor that receives a formal LCD request on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this subparagraph to determine whether such request is a complete request or an incomplete request not later than 60 days after such contractor receives such request.
(ii)
Notification with respect to incomplete requests
In the case that a Medicare administrative contractor makes a determination described in clause (i) with respect to a formal LCD request that such request is incomplete, such contractor shall, not later than 60 days after the date on which such contractor received such request, transmit to the entity that submitted such request a written notification of such determination that includes a specification of each item of additional information needed to make such request complete.
(iii)
Decision timeline for complete requests
In the case that a Medicare administrative contractor makes a determination described in clause (i) with respect to a formal LCD request that such request is complete, such contractor shall, not later than 1 year after the date on which such contractor received such request, take the actions described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (D).
(iv)
Formal LCD request defined
In this subparagraph, the term formal LCD request means a document that identifies itself as a formal request for a local coverage determination.
.
(b)
Reconsideration requests
Section 1862(l)(5) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395y(l)(5) ), as amended by subsection (a) , is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
(F)
Timeframe for decisions on reconsideration requests for local coverage determinations
(i)
In general
The Secretary shall require each Medicare administrative contractor that receives a formal reconsideration request on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this subparagraph to determine whether such request is a complete request or an incomplete request not later than 60 days after such contractor receives such request.
(ii)
Notification with respect to incomplete requests
In the case that a Medicare administrative contractor makes a determination described in clause (i) with respect to a formal reconsideration request that such request is incomplete, such contractor shall, not later than 60 days after the date on which such contractor received such request, transmit to the entity that submitted such request a written notification of such determination that includes a specification of each item of additional information needed to make such request complete.
(iii)
Decision timeline for complete requests
In the case that a Medicare administrative contractor makes a determination described in clause (i) with respect to a formal reconsideration request that such request is complete, such contractor shall, not later than 1 year after the date on which such contractor received such request, take the actions described in clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (D).
(iv)
Definitions
In this subparagraph:
(I)
Formal reconsideration request
The term formal reconsideration request means, with respect to a Medicare administrative contractor, a document that—
(aa)
identifies itself as a formal request for reconsideration of part or all of a finalized local coverage determination made by such contractor with respect to a geographic area; and
(bb)
is submitted by an interested party.
(II)
Interested party
The term interested party means, with respect to a local coverage determination made by a Medicare administrative contractor with respect to a geographic area—
(aa)
an individual entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B who resides in, or receives items or services in, such area;
(bb)
a provider of services or supplier that, in such area, furnishes, provides, or supplies items or services that are subject to such determination; or
(cc)
any entity that the Secretary determines to be an interested party in such area.
(G)
Agency review of reconsideration decision
Upon the request of an interested party (as defined in subparagraph (F)(iv)), the Secretary shall review the final determination (as defined in subparagraph (D)(ii)) made by a Medicare administrative contractor following a complete formal reconsideration request made under subparagraph (F). Such review shall include an analysis of whether—
(i)
the determination did not apply, or inaccurately interpreted, qualifying evidence (as defined in subparagraph (D)(iv)) relevant to such determination;
(ii)
the determination used language that exceeded the scope of the intended purpose of the determination;
(iii)
the determination was incorrect in its determination of whether such item or service is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury under section 1862(a)(1)(A);
(iv)
the determination failed to describe, with respect to such an item or service, the clinical conditions to be used for purposes of determining whether such item or service is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury under section 1862(a)(1)(A);
(v)
the determination does not apply with respect to items or services to which it was intended to apply; or
(vi)
the determination conflicts with any other law, rule, regulation, or national coverage determination, as determined by the Secretary.
.
(c)
Development process for specified LCDs
Section 1862(l)(5)(D) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395y(l)(5)(D) ) is amended to read as follows:
(D)
Process for issuing specified local coverage determinations
(i)
In general
In the case of a specified local coverage determination (as defined in clause (iii)) within an area by a Medicare administrative contractor, such contractor must take the following actions with respect to such determination before such determination may take effect:
(I)
Publish on the public internet website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services commonly referred to as the Medicare Coverage Database (or a successor website) and on the public internet website of the Medicare administrative contractor a proposed version of the specified local coverage determination (in this subparagraph referred to as a draft determination ), any related coding or billing information, a written rationale for the draft determination, and a description of all evidence relied upon and considered by the contractor in the development of the draft determination.
(II)
Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Medicare administrative contractor publishes the draft determination in accordance with subclause (I)—
(aa)
convene one or more open, public meetings to review the draft determination, and, with respect to each such meeting, make available means for the public to attend such meeting remotely, and make the planned agenda for such meeting publicly accessible at least 14 days in advance;
(bb)
receive comments with respect to the draft determination; and
(cc)
secure the advice of an expert panel, which shall include—
(AA)
1 or more physicians;
(BB)
1 or more members of the Contractor Advisory Committee (as described in chapter 13 of the Medicare Program Integrity Manual, as in effect on February 12, 2019); and
(CC)
1 or more entities advocating on behalf of one or more individuals entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B.
(III)
With respect to each meeting convened pursuant to subclause (II)(aa), post on the public internet website of the contractor, not later than 14 days after such meeting is convened, a record of such meeting, which may include a video or audio recording of the meeting.
(IV)
Provide a period for submission of written public comment on such draft determination that begins on the date on which all records required to be posted with respect to such draft determination under subclause (III) are so posted and that is not fewer than 30 days in duration.
(ii)
Finalizing a specified local coverage determination
(I)
In general
Subject to subclause (II) , a Medicare administrative contractor that has entered into a contract with the Secretary under section 1874A shall, before a specified local coverage determination (in this subparagraph referred to as the final determination ) takes effect, post on the Medicare Coverage Database and the public internet website of the contractor the following information:
(aa)
A response to public comments received and the relevant issues raised at meetings convened pursuant to clause (i)(II)(aa) with respect to the draft determination.
(bb)
The full text of all such public comments received.
(cc)
The rationale for the final determination.
(dd)
In the case that the Medicare administrative contractor considered qualifying evidence (as defined in clause (v)) in the development of the determination that was not described in the written notice provided pursuant to clause (i)(I), a description of such qualifying evidence.
(ee)
An effective date for the final determination that is not less than 45 days after the date on which such determination is so posted.
(II)
Logical outgrowth requirement
Notwithstanding subclause (I) , a final determination may not take effect unless such determination is a logical outgrowth of the draft determination published under clause (i) .
(iii)
Specified local coverage determination defined
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term specified local coverage determination means, with respect to the relevant geographic area—
(I)
a new local coverage determination;
(II)
a revised local coverage determination that makes a substantive revision to one or more existing local coverage determinations (such as by imposing new requirements with respect to coverage of the relevant item or service or by changing any coding or billing information related to such determination); or
(III)
any other local coverage determination specified by the Secretary pursuant to regulations.
(iv)
Qualifying evidence defined
For purposes of this subparagraph, the term qualifying evidence means publicly available evidence of general acceptance by the medical community, such as published original research in peer-reviewed medical journals, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, evidence-based consensus statements, and clinical guidelines.
.
(d)
Effective date
This section, and the amendments made by this section, shall apply beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-04-27
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure timely review of local coverage determination requests under the Medicare program.

Sponsors

Rep. Neal Dunn (R) sponsors H.R. 8500, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 2 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 8500 went before 2 committees: Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Apr 27, 2026 · 1,636 Bills
Ways and Means
Ways and Means
Referred To · Apr 27, 2026 · 1,160 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8500 has taken 2 actions since Apr 27, 2026.

ChamberAction
Apr 27, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Apr 27, 2026
House
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Ways and Means Committee

Votes

H.R. 8500 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8500 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure timely review of local coverage determination requests under the Medicare program. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Timely Access to Coverage Decisions Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 35 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8500 in 5 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Veterans, Immigration, Pharmacy, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Welfare.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia12
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTSDistrict of Columbia11
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGSNorth Carolina11
THE ALS ASSOCIATIONVirginia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 35.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$5.1M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$513K2nd Quarter - Report
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGSLABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS2026 second_quarter$270K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTSAMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS2026 second_quarter$96K2nd Quarter - Report
THE ALS ASSOCIATIONTHE ALS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8500 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8500’s is Health.

hr8500/policy-areas.txt
HealthAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8500, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 73 (Monday, April 27, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. DUNN of Florida:H.R. 8500.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:The constitutional authority on which this bill rests isthe power of Congress to lay and collect taxes for thegeneral welfare, as enumerated in Article I, Section 8,Clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States.[Page H3124]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com