Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8966

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8966, the Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act, was introduced in the House on May 21, 2026 by Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 21, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 8966 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb8966/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8966 IH: Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-05-21
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8966 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 21, 2026 Mr. Espaillat (for himself, Mr. Massie , Ms. Kelly of Illinois , and Mr. Burlison ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To amend section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain use of administrative subpoenas with respect to customer communications and records, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act .
2.
Reforming subpoenas
(a)
Consistent protections for phone and app-Based call and texting records
Section 2703(c)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking subparagraph (C); and
(2)
by redesignating subparagraphs (D), (E), and (F) as subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E), respectively.
(b)
Prohibiting the use of subpoenas for bulk collection of certain subscriber information
Section 2703(c)(2) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended in the matter following subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, by inserting provided that for any administrative, grand jury, or trial subpoena, the governmental entity identifies the subscriber or customer by name, address, temporarily assigned network address, or account identifier (such as a username) before the period at the end.
(c)
Prohibiting the use of subpoenas with a purpose To investigate constitutionally protected activities
Section 2703(c) of title 18, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(4)
Protections for constitutionally protected activities
(A)
In general
A governmental entity may not use a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) if a purpose of the subpoena is to—
(i)
investigate, monitor, or otherwise acquire information about activities, or any person's engagement in activities, that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States; or
(ii)
retaliate against any person for their engagement in activities that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States.
(B)
Required certification
(i)
In general
A governmental entity using a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall provide a certification under penalty of perjury attesting that the subpoena is being made for a legitimate and lawful purpose, and not with a purpose described in subparagraph (A)—
(I)
to the service provider; and
(II)
when applying for a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b), to the court in such application.
(ii)
Absence of certification
A subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall not be valid, and a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b) for such subpoena shall not issue, unless the subpoena includes the certification described in clause (i).
.
(d)
Required disclosures
Section 2703(c) of title 18, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(5)
Required disclosures to service provider
(A)
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B)—
(i)
the service provider—
(I)
may notify a customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and
(II)
may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena; and
(ii)
the government entity shall inform the service provider that it—
(I)
is not being directed to not notify any other person of the existence of the subpoena;
(II)
may notify the customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and
(III)
may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena.
(B)
Exception for nondisclosure orders
If a governmental entity described in subparagraph (A) obtains a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b)—
(i)
such order may limit the right of the service provider described in subparagraph (A)(i)(I); and
(ii)
the governmental entity shall modify the required disclosures described in subclauses (I) and (II) of subparagraph (A)(ii) to be consistent with the terms of the order.
.
(e)
Public reporting of use of administrative subpoenas
Section 2703(c) of title 18, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(6)
Reporting of Federal use of administrative subpoenas
Each Federal governmental entity that uses an administrative subpoena to require the disclosure of information under this subsection shall annually publicly publish a report containing, for the 1-year period preceding the date of the report—
(A)
the number of administrative subpoenas issued by the governmental entity, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued; and
(B)
the number of accounts for which the governmental entity received information through an administrative subpoena, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-21
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain use of administrative subpoenas with respect to customer communications and records, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D) sponsors H.R. 8966, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 8966 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 21, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8966 has taken 2 actions since May 21, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 21, 2026
House
Introduced in House
May 21, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 8966 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 8966, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 8966 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act — Display Title
  • Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain use of administrative subpoenas with respect to customer communications and records, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 2 firms and 3 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8966 in 2 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC.Non-profit advocacyDistrict of Columbia22$170K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE11$50K
SCHAERR JAFFE LLP11$120K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
GENE SCHAERR111
MATTHEW BARBLAN111
ROBERT GOODLATTE111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC.SCHAERR JAFFE LLP2026 second_quarter$120K2nd Quarter - Report
PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC.GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8966 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8966’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr8966/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8966, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 87 (Thursday, May 21, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. ESPAILLAT:H.R. 8966.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clause 1The Congress shall have Power to . . . provide for the . .. general Welfare of the United States; . . .[Page H3725]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com