- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

HR 335
Louisiana House•Passed
Summary
HR 335, which directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the prescription of actions to enforce zoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations, was introduced in the House on May 26, 2026 by Rep. Nicholas Muscarello (R). It last saw action on Jun 3, 2026: Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House.
Record
Text
HR 335 has 1 roll call.
hr335/enrolled.txtENROLLED2026 Regular SessionHOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 335BY REPRESENTATIVE MUSCARELLOA RESOLUTIONTo direct the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the prescription of actions to enforcezoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations by parishes andmunicipalities and to submit recommendations for proposed legislation to the Houseof Representatives no later than March 1, 2027.WHEREAS, parishes and municipalities regulate land use through zoning,comprehensive plans, building codes, environmental regulations, and development approvalsto ensure the orderly growth of the area included within their respective jurisdictions and topreserve the public health, safety, and welfare of their citizens; andWHEREAS, parishes and municipalities are authorized to adopt master plans for thephysical development of their respective jurisdictions, including the adoption of zoningrestrictions and subdivision regulations; andWHEREAS, zoning restrictions divide land into zones or districts, specifyingpermitted uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, or agricultural and theserestrictions further set density limits, building heights, and lot sizes; andWHEREAS, subdivision regulations govern how land is divided into smaller lots,addressing street layouts, infrastructure, and utility requirements and may require site planapprovals, design standards, and development review procedures to ensure that new projectscomply with zoning and comprehensive plan objectives; andWHEREAS, parishes and municipalities are also authorized to adopt buildingrestrictions to establish minimal standards for building design, construction, andmaintenance, which are essential for preventing accidents, injuries, and fatalities and theserestrictions also address risks from natural disasters by ensuring that structures are sound andhave properly functioning systems; andWHEREAS, parishes and municipalities are authorized to enforce compliance withzoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations and to bring civil orcriminal actions for the violations of such restrictions and regulations; andPage 1 of 4HR NO. 335 ENROLLEDWHEREAS, R.S. 9:5625 requires parishes and municipalities to bring such actionsfor violations within five years from the first act constituting the commission of theviolation; andWHEREAS, R.S. 9:5625 further provides that once prescription has accrued, theparticular property involved in the violation of the zoning restriction, building restriction,or subdivision regulation shall enjoy the same legal status as land uses and constructionfeatures of buildings or subdivisions made nonconforming by the adoption of any zoningrestriction, building restriction, or subdivision regulation; andWHEREAS, there has been disagreement as to which activity is the first act thatconstitutes the commission of a violation and thus the commencement of the prescriptiveperiod; andWHEREAS, the issue was recently litigated in the La. Supreme Court caseMcCormick v. Ford (La. 5/9/2025), 408 So.3d 932 in which property owners filed amandamus action seeking a court order requiring the Bossier Parish police jury to issue abuilding permit to allow owners to build a new residence on their property after the parishdenied the building permit in part due to the property's violation of the parish's subdivisioncode; andWHEREAS, the property owners acquired the property in question in 2014 from theprevious owner who sold them a split-out tract which included approximately one hundredand twenty eight acres; andWHEREAS, the deed for split-out to the property owners was recorded in theconveyance records of the parish in 2014 and failed to satisfy the subdivision regulationsenacted by the police jury; andWHEREAS, no action was taken by the parish to address the violation of thesubdivision regulations until more than five years later when the property owners sought abuilding permit for a new residence on the property; andWHEREAS, the property owners argued that the violation of the subdivisionregulations occurred at the time the deed for split-out to the property owners was recordedin the conveyance records of the parish and that any action to address the violation ofsubdivision regulations had prescribed; andPage 2 of 4HR NO. 335 ENROLLEDWHEREAS, the police jury questioned whether the recording of the deed was thefirst act that constituted the commencement of the prescriptive period, and a local parishofficial testified during the trial that because the local parish office is small, local officialsdo not normally receive notice that a subdivision has been illegally split-out until theproperty owner seeks a building permit; andWHEREAS, the police jury argued that the court of appeal incorrectly applied thepublic records doctrine and the theory of constructive knowledge to hold that the five-yearprescriptive period commenced on the date that the deed was recorded in the conveyancerecords; andWHEREAS, the police jury also argued that it was entitled to rely on the propertyowners, the notary public who notarized the property owner's deed, and the parish clerk ofcourt to comply with R.S. 33:5051 and 5052 as R.S. 33:5052 expressly charges clerks ofcourt and notaries public with the legal obligation not to record deeds that fail to complywith R.S. 33:5051; andWHEREAS, the La. Supreme Court sided with the property owners and held that theviolation of the subdivision regulations occurred when the property owners filed the deedin the conveyance records of the parish and that any action to enforce the subdivisionregulations had prescribed and as such the property enjoyed a non-conforming status byoperation of R.S. 9:5625; andWHEREAS, the issue of prescription was also litigated in the La. Second CircuitCourt of Appeal case Bossier Parish Policy Jury v. Hicks, (La. App. 2 Cir., 11/19/2025), 425So.3d 252 in which the Bossier Parish police jury filed a petition for injunctive relief in 2021alleging that a property owner constructed a concrete driveway on parish property withoutthe knowledge or consent of the parish, in violation of a parish ordinance that required theproperty owner to request a driveway permit; andWHEREAS, counsel for the property owner stated that the affidavits of the previousowners of the property showed a historical use of the driveway, that a prior ownerconstructed it pursuant to a 1979 servitude, and that the current property owner resurfacedit in March 2021; andPage 3 of 4HR NO. 335 ENROLLEDWHEREAS, the property owner argued that the district court failed to apply thefive-year prescriptive period provided in R.S. 9:5625, and that the accrual of prescription hadextinguished any enforcement action brought after 1984, when the driveway had alreadyexisted for five years without challenge and thus the driveway became a statutorily lawful,vested nonconforming improvement; andWHEREAS, the police jury argued that the five-year prescriptive period did notapply because the particular ordinance at issue was not a zoning restriction, buildingrestriction, or subdivision regulation but, rather, a condition on the use of public propertyand that applying R.S. 9:5625 would undermine fundamental principles of public ownership;andWHEREAS, the court held that the prescriptive period set forth in R.S. 9:5625 wasapplicable to the case as the ordinance at issue was a building restriction and that the firstact constituting the commission of the violation was the original construction of thedriveway in 1979 without a permit and thus the driveway enjoyed nonconforming status; andWHEREAS, local government officials possess a substantial and legitimate stake inthe outcome of cases involving the prescriptive period for the enforcement of zoningrestrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations; andWHEREAS, there is a need for updated legislation regarding the prescription ofactions to enforce zoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations thatbalances the public purpose of regulating land use and the right of property owners not tobe deprived of property without due process of law and just compensation.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the House of Representatives of theLegislature of Louisiana does hereby direct the Louisiana State Law Institute to study theprescription of actions to enforce zoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivisionregulations by parishes and municipalities and to submit recommendations for proposedlegislation to the House of Representatives no later than March 1, 2027.SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESPage 4 of 4
Directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to study the prescription of actions to enforce zoning restrictions, building restrictions, and subdivision regulations
Sponsors
Rep. Nicholas Muscarello (R) sponsors HR 335 alone.
History
HR 335 has taken 6 actions since May 26, 2026, the latest on Jun 3, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 3, 2026 | House | Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House. | ||
Jun 1, 2026 | House | Read by title, roll called, yeas 91, nays 1. The resolution was adopted. | ||
Jun 1, 2026 | House | Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House. | ||
May 27, 2026 | House | Read by title, passed to 3rd reading. | ||
May 27, 2026 | House | Scheduled for floor debate on 06/01/2026. |
Votes
HR 335 went to 1 roll call in the House, the latest on Jun 1, 2026 at 91–1.
| Chamber | Question | Yea | Nay | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 1, 2026 | House | House Vote on HR 335 FINAL CONSIDERATION (#1876) | 91 | 1 |
Source: legis.la.gov · legiscan.com