H.R. 9112

119 HR 9112 IH: Creative Rights Ensuring Artists’ Technique and Originality are Reserved Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2026-06-02
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  2d Session  H. R. 9112  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   June 2, 2026   Ms. Van Duyne  (for herself,  Ms. Clarke of New York , and  Mrs. Foushee ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on the Judiciary    A BILL
To provide visuals artists the exclusive right to authorize the commercial exploitation, or public distribution in or affecting interstate commerce of a stylistic impersonation of that visual artist, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Creative Rights Ensuring Artists’ Technique and Originality are Reserved Act   or the   CREATOR Act  .
2.
Right against stylistic impersonation
(a)
Grant of right
Subject to the limitations and exclusions of this Act, each visual artist or right holder shall have the exclusive right to authorize the commercial exploitation, or public distribution in or affecting interstate commerce of a stylistic impersonation of that visual artist.
(b)
Nature of the right
The right established under this section—
(1)
is a Federal intellectual property right distinct from copyright and trademark;
(2)
does not extend to ideas, concepts, genres, artistic movements, commonly used visual styles, or artistic methods that are not publicly associated with the work of a visual artist;
(3)
applies only to deliberate stylistic impersonation as defined in this Act;
(4)
shall not be construed to prohibit general artistic influence, independent human authorship, or non-material artificial intelligence assistance; and
(5)
is licensable and assignable, in whole or in part, on an exclusive basis by written agreement.
(c)
Duration and registration
(1)
Living visual artists
For a living visual artist, the right shall subsist for the life of the visual artist.
(2)
Deceased visual artists
For a deceased visual artist, the right shall subsist for 10 years after death and may be renewed in 5-year increments, up to a maximum of 50 years after death.
(3)
Renewal
Renewal of a post-mortem right shall be effective only upon filing a notice with the Register of Copyrights identifying—
(A)
the deceased artist;
(B)
the right holder; and
(C)
such additional information as the Register of Copyrights may reasonably require.
(d)
Directory of post-Mortem rights
The Register of Copyrights shall maintain a publicly accessible online directory of registered post-mortem rights under this Act.
(e)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the ability of a visual artist or right holder to authorize conduct that would otherwise constitute stylistic impersonation under this Act.
3.
Liability
(a)
Conduct giving rise to liability
A person shall be liable under this Act only if, in or affecting interstate commerce, the person knowingly engages in one of the following acts without authorization:
(1)
Offering for sale, selling, licensing, publicly distributing, or otherwise commercially exploiting a stylistic impersonation of a visual artist.
(2)
Developing and expressly marketing for commercial distribution a product or service that is both—
(A)
intentionally configured for the purpose of generating stylistic impersonations of one or more visual artists; and
(B)
promoted as capable of generating such stylistic impersonations.
(b)
Protection for general-Purpose artificial intelligence systems
(1)
In general
The development, distribution, licensing, or provision of a general-purpose artificial intelligence system shall not give rise to liability under this Act unless the provider of the system is both—
(A)
intentionally configured the system for the purpose of generating stylistic impersonations of a specifically identified visual artist; and
(B)
expressly marketed the system as capable of generating such stylistic impersonations.
(2)
Exception for mere capability
Mere capability of a system to generate outputs resembling the distinctive visual characteristics of a visual artist, or the independent actions of a user of a general-purpose artificial intelligence system, shall not give rise to liability absent the conduct described in paragraph (1).
(c)
Knowledge or notice requirement
(1)
Persons other than online services
(A)
In general
A person other than an online service shall be liable under subsection (a) only if the person knew, or deliberately avoided confirming, that the work met the definition of stylistic impersonation of a specifically identified visual artist under this Act.
(B)
Limitation
No person shall be deemed to have such knowledge solely by reason of the general capability of a system to generate outputs resembling the works of a visual artist.
(2)
Online services
An online service shall not be liable for user-generated content unless, after receipt of a valid notice under section 5 or a court order, the service knowingly fails to act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the user-generated content identified in the notice as constituting a stylistic impersonation.
4.
Exclusions
(a)
Excluded activities
The following uses shall not constitute a violation of this Act, provided that such uses do not involve the commercial exploitation of a stylistic impersonation intended to mislead as to source, sponsorship, or approval—
(1)
commentary, criticism, scholarship, research, or teaching;
(2)
parody or satire that comments upon or critiques the identified visual artist or the distinctive visual characteristics at issue;
(3)
historical, biographical, or documentary works, including reasonable fictionalization, where the use does not falsely suggest endorsement or authorization;
(4)
news reporting or public affairs commentary in which reference to the distinctive visual characteristics is materially relevant to the subject matter; and
(5)
uses resulting in fleeting, incidental, or negligible resemblance that do not reproduce a material combination of distinctive visual characteristics.
(b)
Obscenity
Nothing in this section shall be construed to exempt from liability the use of a stylistic impersonation in material that is obscene under applicable law.
5.
Online service safe harbors
(a)
Limitation on liability for online services
An online service shall not be liable for a violation under section 3 arising from user-generated content if the service—
(1)
has designated an agent to receive notifications of claimed violations under this Act;
(2)
upon receipt of a valid notice under subsection (b), acts expeditiously to remove or disable access to the identified material; and
(3)
adopts and reasonably implements a policy providing for the termination, in appropriate circumstances, of repeat violators.
(b)
No requirement To monitor
No online service shall be required to monitor user content proactively or to affirmatively seek facts indicating potential violations of this Act.
(c)
Notification requirements
A notification of claimed violation under this Act shall include—
(1)
identification of the visual artist whose work is allegedly impersonated;
(2)
identification of the material claimed to constitute a stylistic impersonation;
(3)
a statement that the notifying party has a good-faith belief that the use is not authorized; and
(4)
information reasonably sufficient to permit the online service to contact the notifying party.
(d)
Counter-Notification and restoration
(1)
Submission
A user whose material has been removed or disabled pursuant to a notification under this section may submit a counter-notification stating, under penalty of perjury, that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification.
(2)
Notification
Upon receipt of a valid counter-notification, the online service shall promptly notify the original notifying party.
(3)
Restoration
The online service may restore the removed material not less than 10 business days and not more than 14 business days after receipt of the counter-notification unless the notifying party provides notice that a civil action has been filed seeking a court order restraining the user from engaging in the allegedly unlawful activity.
(e)
Misrepresentation and abuse of process
(1)
Liability
Any person who knowingly and materially misrepresents that material constitutes a stylistic impersonation shall be liable for—
(A)
actual damages suffered by the alleged violator;
(B)
costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees; and
(C)
statutory damages of not less than $5,000 per material misrepresentation.
(2)
Failure to conduct evaluation
A failure to conduct a reasonable and good-faith evaluation of whether the material meets the definition of stylistic impersonation may constitute a knowing material misrepresentation.
(3)
Repeated bad-faith notifications
Repeated bad-faith notifications may result in suspension of notice privileges under this Act.
6.
Civil actions and remedies
(a)
Civil action
(1)
In general
A civil action under this Act may be brought by a right holder against a person who violates section 3.
(2)
Safe harbors
A person whose conduct falls within the limitations or safe harbors provided in sections 3 or 5 shall not be liable under this Act.
(b)
Remedies
In a civil action under this Act, the court may award the following:
(1)
Injunctive relief
Temporary or permanent injunctive relief that is narrowly tailored to prevent ongoing or future violations of this Act.
(2)
Other relief
At the election of the prevailing plaintiff, either—
(A)
actual damages suffered by the right holder and any profits of the violator attributable to the violation; or
(B)
statutory damages as provided in paragraph (3).
(3)
Statutory Damages
Statutory damages may be awarded, in lieu of actual damages and profits, as follows:
(A)
For a commercial actor that intentionally engaged in stylistic impersonation: not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 per stylistic impersonation work commercially exploited.
(B)
For willful violations involving intentional targeting and commercial exploitation: not less than $50,000 and not more than $150,000 per work.
(4)
Considerations for statutory damages
In determining statutory damages, the court or jury, as applicable, shall consider—
(A)
the willfulness of the conduct;
(B)
the scale and duration of dissemination;
(C)
the commercial impact on the right holder;
(D)
the defendant’s efforts to comply with this Act; and
(E)
whether the defendant qualifies for any limitation on liability under this Act.
(c)
No award of statutory damages
Statutory damages shall not be awarded where the defendant establishes that the conduct falls within a limitation, exclusion, or safe harbor under this Act.
7.
Rules of construction
(a)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this Act shall be construed—
(1)
to limit, expand, or replace copyright protection under title 17, United States Code;
(2)
to grant exclusive rights over ideas, concepts, genres, artistic movements, or commonly used visual styles methods;
(3)
to impose a duty on any online service or provider of a general-purpose artificial intelligence system to monitor content proactively or to affirmatively seek facts indicating potential violations of this Act;
(4)
to prohibit lawful artistic influence, stylistic evolution, independent human authorship, or non-material use of artificial intelligence;
(5)
to create liability for the mere development, availability, or licensing of an artificial intelligence system absent intentional targeting as defined in this Act; or
(6)
to restrict speech protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
(b)
No training data inference
The mere capacity of an artificial intelligence system to generate outputs that resemble or incorporate distinctive visual characteristics publicly associated with a visual artist shall not give rise to any presumption, inference, or evidentiary showing that—
(1)
the system was trained on any specific work of that visual artist; or
(2)
any particular dataset containing works associated with that visual artist was used in the training, fine-tuning, or operation of the system.
(c)
Limitation on civil action
No civil action under this Act may be predicated solely on claims regarding the training data, training process, or internal parameters of an artificial intelligence system, except to the extent such claims are independently actionable under other applicable law.
8.
Preemption
(a)
Limited preemption
This Act shall preempt State law causes of action only to the extent that such causes of action impose liability for conduct that constitutes stylistic impersonation as defined in this Act.
(b)
Preservation of other law
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt or limit—
(1)
State or Federal copyright law;
(2)
State or Federal trademark or false endorsement law;
(3)
State right-of-publicity or misappropriation claims based on name, likeness, voice, or other protected personal attributes; or
(4)
State unfair competition or consumer protection laws that regulate deceptive or misleading commercial conduct independent of stylistic impersonation as defined in this Act.
9.
Severability
If any provision of this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act and the application of its remaining provisions shall not be affected.
10.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Artificial intelligence system
The term  artificial intelligence system  means a machine-based system that infers from input data how to generate visual expressive content in fixed or static form and that operates with a degree of autonomy beyond purely deterministic rule-based automation.
(2)
Artist
The term  artist  means a human individual who has created and publicly distributed or exhibited original visual works of authorship.
(3)
Authorization
The term  authorization  means express written permission granted by the applicable right holder for the commercial exploitation or public distribution of a stylistic impersonation.
(4)
Distinctive visual characteristics
The term  distinctive visual characteristics  means identifiable visual elements, taken together, that are consistently present in a visual artist’s publicly distributed works and that are publicly associated with that artist.
(5)
General-purpose artificial intelligence system
The term  general-purpose artificial intelligence system  means an artificial intelligence system designed for a broad range of lawful uses and not primarily configured to generate works emulating the distinctive visual characteristics of a specifically identified visual artist.
(6)
Material
The term  material  means significant in relation to the work as a whole and not merely incidental or de minimis.
(7)
Online service
The term  online service  means a provider of an interactive computer service, as defined in section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 230(f) ), that hosts, transmits, indexes, or provides access to user-generated content.
(8)
Public distribution
The term  public distribution  means making a work available to the public, whether for sale or otherwise, by offering it for sale, display, transmission, posting, publication on a website or online service, or other means of public dissemination.
(9)
Right holder
The term  right holder  means—
(A)
the visual artist; or
(B)
a person or entity that has lawfully acquired, by written assignment, inheritance, or operation of law, one or more of the exclusive right granted under this Act.
(10)
Specifically identified visual artist
The term  specifically identified visual artist  means a visual artist whose name or one or more distinctive visual characteristics is expressly referenced in the prompting, configuration, marketing, or operation of an artificial intelligence system, or in the promotion of the resulting output.
(11)
Stylistic impersonation
(A)
In general
The term  stylistic impersonation  means a visual work generated in whole or in material part through the use of an artificial intelligence system that—
(i)
was intentionally configured, prompted, marketed, or otherwise designed to emulate the distinctive visual characteristics publicly associated with a visual artist; and
(ii)
reproduces a combination of those distinctive visual characteristics in a manner likely to mislead a reasonable viewer as to the source, sponsorship, or approval of the work or to affect the commercial market for the visual artist’s work.
(B)
Intentional design
For purposes of subparagraph (A), intentional design may be established by evidence that the artificial intelligence system or its operator—
(i)
expressly referenced the visual artist or their work in prompts, configuration settings, or user-facing interfaces;
(ii)
marketed or promoted the system or the resulting output as capable of imitating the visual artist’s work; or
(iii)
configured the system for the purpose to produce outputs substantially reflecting the visual artist’s distinctive visual characteristics.
(C)
Limitation
The term  stylistic impersonation  does not include—
(i)
works reflecting general artistic influence, genre conventions, or historical movements;
(ii)
works created through independent human authorship without deliberate targeting of a specifically identified visual artist’s work;
(iii)
parody, satire, commentary, scholarship, or other expressive uses protected under section 4; or
(iv)
works generated by a general-purpose artificial intelligence system absent evidence of intentional targeting of a specifically identified visual artist’s work.
(12)
Visual work
The term  visual work  means a work consisting of a fixed or static visual image, including illustrations, photographs, graphic designs, paintings, drawings, or similar visual media, but does not include motion pictures, audiovisual works, or sound recordings.
11.
Effective date
(a)
Effective date
This Act shall take effect 180 days after the enactment of the enactment of this Act.
(b)
Prospective application
This Act shall apply only to conduct occurring on or after the effective date.