- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S 10654
New York Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S 10654, which establishes penalties where a party is found to be engaged in controlling and abusive litigation against another where they have committed an act of domestic violence against the other party and in bad faith such person advances or continues litigation against the party who is the victim of the domestic violence, was introduced in the Senate on Jun 4, 2026 by Sen. Jessica Scarcella-Spanton (D). It was referred to Rules, and last saw action on Jun 4, 2026: REFERRED TO RULES.
Record
Text
S 10654 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.
s10654/original.txtS T A T E O F N E W Y O R K________________________________________________________________________10654I N S E N A T EJune 4, 2026___________Introduced by Sen. SCARCELLA-SPANTON -- read twice and ordered printed,and when printed to be committed to the Committee on RulesAN ACT to amend the family court act and the domestic relations law, inrelation to controlling and abusive litigationTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:Section 1. The family court act is amended by adding a new section 159to read as follows:§ 159. CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION. (A) AS USED IN THIS SECTION"LITIGATION" MEANS ANY KIND OF LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING INCLUDING, BUTNOT LIMITED TO: FILING A SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, DEMAND, OR PETITION; SERV-ING A SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, DEMAND, OR PETITION, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ITHAS BEEN FILED; FILING A MOTION, NOTICE OF COURT DATE, OR ORDER TOAPPEAR; SERVING A MOTION, NOTICE OF COURT DATE, OR ORDER TO APPEAR,REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT HAS BEEN FILED OR SCHEDULED; FILING A SUBPOENA,SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST FORPRODUCTION, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION, OR OTHER DISCOVERY REQUEST; OR SERVINGA SUBPOENA, SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTFOR PRODUCTION, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION, OR OTHER DISCOVERY REQUEST.(B) UPON A MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALLDETERMINE WHETHER A PARTY IS ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITI-GATION. THE COURT SHALL FIND THAT A PARTY IS ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION IF SAID PARTY:1. HAS COMMITTED AN ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST THE OTHERPARTY IN THE MATTER AND THAT PARTY IS DEEMED A VICTIM OR VICTIMS OFDOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS DEFINED BY SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION FOUR HUNDREDFIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR THE PROVISIONS OF A SUBSTAN-TIALLY SIMILAR STATUTE UNDER THE LAWS OF ANOTHER STATE OR THE UNITEDSTATES; AND2. IN BAD FAITH AND PRIMARILY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELAY; MALICIOUSINJURY; OR HARASSING, INTIMIDATING, OR MAINTAINING CONTACT WITH THEOTHER PARTY, INITIATES, ADVANCES, OR CONTINUES LITIGATION AGAINST THEPARTY WHO IS THE VICTIM OR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ANDEXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets[ ] is old law to be omitted.LBD16045-02-6S. 10654 23. WITH REGARD TO LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THEPARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, THECOURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT:I. CLAIMS, ALLEGATIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL CONTENTIONS IN THE LITIGATIONARE WITHOUT ANY REASONABLE BASIS IN LAW OR EQUITY AND COULD NOT BESUPPORTED BY A GOOD FAITH ARGUMENT FOR AN EXTENSION, MODIFICATION, ORREVERSAL OF EXISTING LAW, AN EXISTING ORDER, OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANEW ORDER; ORII. ALLEGATIONS AND OTHER FACTUAL CONTENTIONS IN THE LITIGATION AREMADE WITHOUT EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT; ORIII. ONE OR MORE ISSUES THAT ARE THE BASIS OF THE LITIGATION HAVEPREVIOUSLY BEEN THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION FILED IN THE SAME OR ANOTHERCOURT IN THIS STATE OR ANY OTHER COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION AND THEACTIONS HAVE BEEN LITIGATED AND DISPOSED OF UNFAVORABLY TO THE PARTYALLEGED TO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION.(C) 1. A MOTION MAY BE FILED AT ANY TIME TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PARTYIS ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION BY A PARTY WHO IS AVICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTIONFOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW, OR ON THE COURT'SOWN MOTION. IF THE COURT VERIFIES THAT BOTH PARTIES ARE FAMILY OR HOUSE-HOLD MEMBERS AS DEFINED BY SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDREDFIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW AND THE PARTY RAISING THE CLAIMOF CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE A VICTIM OFDOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE CONDUCT OF THE OTHER PARTY, OR THE COURT ISUNABLE TO VERIFY THAT ONE ELEMENT IS NOT TRUE, THE COURT SHALL SET AHEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE LITIGATION IS CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION. THE MOTION MAY BE FILED ORALLY WHILE UNDER OATH, OR IN WRIT-ING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF COURT.2. AT THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING ON THE ALLEGED CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION, THE COURT SHALL HEAR ALL RELEVANT TESTIMONY AND MAYREQUIRE ANY AFFIDAVITS, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OR OTHER RECORDS THE COURTDEEMS NECESSARY.(D) THERE SHALL BE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT A PARTY IS ENGAGINGIN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION IF:1. THE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THE PARTYALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INVOLVES THESAME OR SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR ISSUES BETWEEN THE SAME OR SUBSTANTIALLYSIMILAR PARTIES WHICH HAVE BEEN LITIGATED WITHIN THE PAST FIVE YEARS INTHE SAME COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION; OR2. THE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THE PARTYALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INVOLVES THESAME OR SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR ISSUES BETWEEN THE SAME OR SUBSTANTIALLYSIMILAR PARTIES HAVE BEEN RAISED, PLED OR ALLEGED IN THE PAST FIVE YEARSAND WERE DISMISSED ON THE MERITS OR WITH PREJUDICE;3. WITHIN THE PAST TEN YEARS, A COURT IN THIS STATE OR ANOTHER JURIS-DICTION HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLINGAND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS PREVIOUSLY ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION OR SIMILAR CONDUCT; OR4. WITHIN THE PAST TEN YEARS, THE PARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROL-LING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE INITIATED, ADVANCED,OR CONTINUED LITIGATION THAT WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN FRIVOLOUS PURSUANTTO SECTION EIGHTY-THREE HUNDRED THREE-A OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW ANDRULES OR 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1 OR A SIMILAR LAW OR RULE IN THIS STATE ORANOTHER JURISDICTION.S. 10654 3(E) UPON FINDING THAT A PARTY HAS ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RELIEF DEEMED APPROPRIATE, THECOURT SHALL ENTER AN ORDER:1. DISMISSING ANY MATTER OR DENYING ANY RELIEF REQUESTED PURSUANT TOPENDING CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, ORCONTINUED BY THE PARTY;2. AWARDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS OFRESPONDING TO THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, INCLUDING THOSEASSOCIATED WITH A MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, LOST WAGES,TRANSPORTATION COSTS AND CHILDCARE COSTS;3. IDENTIFYING THE VICTIM OF THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATIONAND PROVIDING THAT THE VICTIM SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO ANYPENDING OR FUTURE LITIGATION, UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO BY THE COURT;4. PROHIBITING THE PARTY FOUND TO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM INITIATING, ADVANCING, OR CONTINUING LITIGATIONINVOLVING THE VICTIM OF THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, EXCEPTUPON LEAVE OF COURT GRANTED UPON APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE RULES OF COURT; AND5. IMPOSING A TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED DOLLAR FINE FOR EACH FINDING OFCONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION. LEAVE SHALL NOT BE GRANTED PURSUANTTO PARAGRAPH FOUR OF THIS SUBDIVISION UNTIL SUCH FINES HAVE BEEN PAID INFULL.(F) IF THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THELITIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, THECOURT SHALL ENTER WRITTEN FINDINGS AND THE LITIGATION SHALL PROCEED.(G) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO RESTRICT A PARTY FOUNDTO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM FILING, INITI-ATING, ADVANCING, OR CONTINUING LITIGATION THAT DOES NOT VIOLATE THEPROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.§ 2. The domestic relations law is amended by adding a new section 256to read as follows:§ 256. CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION. 1. AS USED IN THIS SECTION"LITIGATION" MEANS ANY KIND OF LEGAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING INCLUDING, BUTNOT LIMITED TO: FILING A SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, DEMAND, OR PETITION; SERV-ING A SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, DEMAND, OR PETITION, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER ITHAS BEEN FILED; FILING A MOTION, NOTICE OF COURT DATE, OR ORDER TOAPPEAR; SERVING A MOTION, NOTICE OF COURT DATE, OR ORDER TO APPEAR,REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT HAS BEEN FILED OR SCHEDULED; FILING A SUBPOENA,SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST FORPRODUCTION, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION, OR OTHER DISCOVERY REQUEST; OR SERVINGA SUBPOENA, SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM, REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTFOR PRODUCTION, NOTICE OF DEPOSITION, OR OTHER DISCOVERY REQUEST.2. UPON A MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALLDETERMINE WHETHER A PARTY IS ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITI-GATION. THE COURT SHALL FIND THAT A PARTY IS ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION IF SAID PARTY:(A) HAS COMMITTED AN ACT OR ACTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST THEOTHER PARTY IN THE MATTER AND THAT PARTY IS DEEMED A VICTIM OR VICTIMSOF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS DEFINED BY SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION FOURHUNDRED FIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW OR THE PROVISIONS OF ASUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR STATUTE UNDER THE LAWS OF ANOTHER STATE OR THEUNITED STATES; AND(B) IN BAD FAITH AND PRIMARILY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELAY; MALICIOUSINJURY; OR HARASSING, INTIMIDATING, OR MAINTAINING CONTACT WITH THEOTHER PARTY, INITIATES, ADVANCES, OR CONTINUES LITIGATION AGAINST THEPARTY WHO IS THE VICTIM OR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ANDS. 10654 4(C) WITH REGARD TO LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THEPARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, THECOURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT:I. CLAIMS, ALLEGATIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL CONTENTIONS IN THE LITIGATIONARE WITHOUT ANY REASONABLE BASIS IN LAW OR EQUITY AND COULD NOT BESUPPORTED BY A GOOD FAITH ARGUMENT FOR AN EXTENSION, MODIFICATION, ORREVERSAL OF EXISTING LAW, AN EXISTING ORDER, OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ANEW ORDER; ORII. ALLEGATIONS AND OTHER FACTUAL CONTENTIONS IN THE LITIGATION AREMADE WITHOUT EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT; ORIII. ONE OR MORE ISSUES THAT ARE THE BASIS OF THE LITIGATION HAVEPREVIOUSLY BEEN THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION FILED IN THE SAME OR ANOTHERCOURT IN THIS STATE OR ANY OTHER COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION AND THEACTIONS HAVE BEEN LITIGATED AND DISPOSED OF UNFAVORABLY TO THE PARTYALLEGED TO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION.3. (A) A MOTION MAY BE FILED AT ANY TIME TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PARTYIS ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION BY A PARTY WHO IS AVICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTIONFOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW, OR ON THE COURT'SOWN MOTION. IF THE COURT VERIFIES THAT BOTH PARTIES ARE FAMILY OR HOUSE-HOLD MEMBERS AS DEFINED BY SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDREDFIFTY-NINE-A OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW AND THE PARTY RAISING THE CLAIMOF CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE A VICTIM OFDOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE CONDUCT OF THE OTHER PARTY, OR THE COURT ISUNABLE TO VERIFY THAT ONE ELEMENT IS NOT TRUE, THE COURT SHALL SET AHEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE LITIGATION IS CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION. THE MOTION MAY BE FILED ORALLY WHILE UNDER OATH, OR IN WRIT-ING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF COURT.(B) AT THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING ON THE ALLEGED CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION, THE COURT SHALL HEAR ALL RELEVANT TESTIMONY AND MAYREQUIRE ANY AFFIDAVITS, DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE OR OTHER RECORDS THE COURTDEEMS NECESSARY.4. THERE SHALL BE A REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION THAT A PARTY IS ENGAGING INCONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION IF:(A) THE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THE PARTYALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INVOLVES THESAME OR SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR ISSUES BETWEEN THE SAME OR SUBSTANTIALLYSIMILAR PARTIES WHICH HAVE BEEN LITIGATED WITHIN THE PAST FIVE YEARS INTHE SAME COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION; OR(B) THE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED BY THE PARTYALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INVOLVES THESAME OR SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR ISSUES BETWEEN THE SAME OR SUBSTANTIALLYSIMILAR PARTIES HAVE BEEN RAISED, PLED OR ALLEGED IN THE PAST FIVE YEARSAND WERE DISMISSED ON THE MERITS OR WITH PREJUDICE;(C) WITHIN THE PAST TEN YEARS, A COURT IN THIS STATE OR ANOTHER JURIS-DICTION HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN CONTROLLINGAND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS PREVIOUSLY ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION OR SIMILAR CONDUCT; OR(D) WITHIN THE PAST TEN YEARS, THE PARTY ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING INCONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION HAS BEEN FOUND TO HAVE INITIATED,ADVANCED, OR CONTINUED LITIGATION THAT WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN FRIVOLOUSPURSUANT TO SECTION EIGHTY-THREE HUNDRED THREE-A OF THE CIVIL PRACTICELAW AND RULES OR 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1 OR A SIMILAR LAW OR RULE IN THISSTATE OR ANOTHER JURISDICTION.S. 10654 55. UPON FINDING THAT A PARTY HAS ENGAGED IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVELITIGATION, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RELIEF DEEMED APPROPRIATE, THECOURT SHALL ENTER AN ORDER:(A) DISMISSING ANY MATTER OR DENYING ANY RELIEF REQUESTED PURSUANT TOPENDING CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION INITIATED, ADVANCED, ORCONTINUED BY THE PARTY;(B) AWARDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS OFRESPONDING TO THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, INCLUDING THOSEASSOCIATED WITH A MOTION FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, LOST WAGES,TRANSPORTATION COSTS AND CHILDCARE COSTS;(C) IDENTIFYING THE VICTIM OF THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATIONAND PROVIDING THAT THE VICTIM SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO RESPOND TO ANYPENDING OR FUTURE LITIGATION, UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO BY THE COURT;(D) PROHIBITING THE PARTY FOUND TO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING ANDABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM INITIATING, ADVANCING, OR CONTINUING LITIGATIONINVOLVING THE VICTIM OF THE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, EXCEPTUPON LEAVE OF COURT GRANTED UPON APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE RULES OF COURT; AND(E) IMPOSING A TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED DOLLAR FINE FOR EACH FINDING OFCONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION. LEAVE SHALL NOT BE GRANTED PURSUANTTO PARAGRAPH (D) OF THIS SUBDIVISION UNTIL SUCH FINES HAVE BEEN PAID INFULL.6. IF THE COURT FINDS BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THELITIGATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION, THECOURT SHALL ENTER WRITTEN FINDINGS AND THE LITIGATION SHALL PROCEED.7. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO RESTRICT A PARTY FOUNDTO BE ENGAGING IN CONTROLLING AND ABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM FILING, INITI-ATING, ADVANCING, OR CONTINUING LITIGATION THAT DOES NOT VIOLATE THEPROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.§ 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shallhave become a law. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment and/orrepeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation ofthis act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completedon or before such effective date.
Establishes penalties where a party is found to be engaged in controlling and abusive litigation against another where they have committed an act of domestic violence against the other party and in bad faith such person advances or continues litigation against the party who is the victim of the domestic violence.
Sponsors
Sen. Jessica Scarcella-Spanton (D) sponsors S 10654 alone.
Committees
S 10654 went before 1 committee: Rules.
History
S 10654 has taken 1 action since Jun 4, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 4, 2026 | Senate | REFERRED TO RULES |
Votes
S 10654 has not gone to a roll call.
Source: nysenate.gov · legiscan.com